- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review B

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Non-Hermitian Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model with the energy levels of free parafermions

Edward McCann*

  • *Contact author: ed.mccann@lancaster.ac.uk
PDF

Phys. Rev. B 113, 045403 – Published 2 January, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/hdzd-94qm

Abstract

Using a parent Hermitian tight-binding model on a bipartite lattice with chiral symmetry, we theoretically generate non-Hermitian models for free fermions with p orbitals per unit cell satisfying a complex generalization of chiral symmetry. The p complex energy bands in k space are given by a common k-dependent real factor, determined by the bands of the parent model, multiplied by the pth roots of unity. When the parent model is the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (SSH) model, the single-particle energy levels are the same as those of free parafermion solutions to Baxter's non-Hermitian clock model. This construction relies on fully unidirectional hopping to create Bloch Hamiltonians with the form of generalized permutation matrices, but we also describe the effect of partial unidirectional hopping. For fully bidirectional hopping, the Bloch Hamiltonians are Hermitian and may be separated into even and odd parity blocks with respect to inversion of the orbitals within the unit cell. Partially unidirectional hopping breaks the inversion symmetry and mixes the even and odd blocks, and the real energy spectrum evolves into a complex one as the degree of unidirectionality increases, with details determined by the topology of the parent model and the number of orbitals per unit cell, p. We describe this process in detail for p=3 and 4 with the SSH model. We also apply our approach to graphene, and we show that AA-stacked bilayer graphene evolves into a square-root Hamiltonian of monolayer graphene with the introduction of unidirectional hopping. We show that higher-order exceptional points occur at edge states and solitons in the non-Hermitian SSH model, and at the Dirac point of non-Hermitian graphene.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (120)

  1. W. P. Su, J. R. Schrieffer, and A. J. Heeger, Solitons in polyacetylene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1698 (1979).
  2. W. P. Su, J. R. Schrieffer, and A. J. Heeger, Soliton excitations in polyacetylene, Phys. Rev. B 22, 2099 (1980).
  3. J. K. Asbóth, L. Oroszlány, and A. Pályi, A Short Course on Topological Insulators (Springer, Switzerland, 2016).
  4. A. P. Schnyder, S. Ryu, A. Furusaki, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Classification of topological insulators and superconductors in three spatial dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 78, 195125 (2008).
  5. A. Kitaev, Periodic table for topological insulators and superconductors, AIP Conf. Proc. 1134, 22 (2009).
  6. S. Ryu, A. P. Schnyder, A. Furusaki, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Topological insulators and superconductors: Tenfold way and dimensional hierarchy, New J. Phys. 12, 065010 (2010).
  7. C.-K. Chiu, J. C. Y. Teo, A. P. Schnyder, and S. Ryu, Classification of topological quantum matter with symmetries, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 035005 (2016).
  8. C. M. Bender and S. Boettcher, Real spectra in non-Hermitian Hamiltonians having PT symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5243 (1998).
  9. Y. C. Hu and T. L. Hughes, Absence of topological insulator phases in non-Hermitian PT-symmetric Hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. B 84, 153101 (2011).
  10. S.-D. Liang and G.-Y. Huang, Topological invariance and global Berry phase in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. A 87, 012118 (2013).
  11. H. Schomerus, Topologically protected midgap states in complex photonic lattices, Opt. Lett. 38, 1912 (2013).
  12. B. Zhu, R. Lu, and S. Chen, PT symmetry in the non-Hermitian Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model with complex boundary potentials, Phys. Rev. A 89, 062102 (2014).
  13. S. Weimann, M. Kremer, Y. Plotnik, Y. Lumer, S. Nolte, K. G. Makris, M. Segev, M. C. Rechtsman, and A. Szameit, Topologically protected bound states in photonic parity–time-symmetric crystals, Nat. Mater. 16, 433 (2017).
  14. M. Klett, H. Cartarius, D. Dast, J. Main, and G. Wunner, Relation between PT-symmetry breaking and topologically nontrivial phases in the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger and Kitaev models, Phys. Rev. A 95, 053626 (2017).
  15. S. Lieu, Topological phases in the non-Hermitian Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model, Phys. Rev. B 97, 045106 (2018).
  16. D. Halder, S. Ganguly, and S. Basu, Properties of the non-Hermitian SSH model: Role of PT symmetry, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 35, 105901 (2023).
  17. C. C. Ye, W. L. Vleeshouwers, S. Heatley, V. Gritsev, and C. Morais Smith, Quantum metric of non-Hermitian Su-Schrieffer-Heeger systems, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 023202 (2024).
  18. E. Slootman, W. Cherifi, L. Eek, R. Arouca, E. J. Bergholtz, M. Bourennane, and C. Morais Smith, Breaking and resurgence of symmetry in the non-Hermitian Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model in photonic waveguides, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 023140 (2024).
  19. N. Hatano and D. R. Nelson, Localization transitions in non-Hermitian quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 570 (1996).
  20. N. Hatano and D. R. Nelson, Vortex pinning and non-Hermitian quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. B 56, 8651 (1997).
  21. N. Hatano and D. R. Nelson, Non-Hermitian delocalization and eigenfunctions, Phys. Rev. B 58, 8384 (1998).
  22. S. Longhi, D. Gatti, and G. D. Valle, Non-Hermitian transparency and one-way transport in low-dimensional lattices by an imaginary gauge field, Phys. Rev. B 92, 094204 (2015).
  23. S. Yao and Z. Wang, Edge states and topological invariants of non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 086803 (2018).
  24. F. Song, S. Yao, and Z. Wang, Non-Hermitian topological invariants in real space, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 246801 (2019)
  25. J. S. Liu, Y. Z. Han, and C. S. Liu, Topological phases of a non-Hermitian coupled SSH ladder, Chin. Phys. B 28, 100304 (2019).
  26. Y. Z. Han, J. S. Liu, and C. S. Liu, The topological counterparts of non-Hermitian SSH models, New J. Phys. 23, 123029 (2021).
  27. E. J. Bergholtz, J. C. Budich, and F. K. Kunst, Exceptional topology of non-Hermitian systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 015005 (2021).
  28. J.-W. Ryu, J.-H. Han, C.-H. Yi, M. J. Park, and H. C. Park, Exceptional classifications of non-Hermitian systems, Commun. Phys. 7, 109 (2024).
  29. T. Kato, Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators (Springer, New York, 1966).
  30. W. D. Heiss, Exceptional points of non-Hermitian operators, J. Phys. A 37, 2455 (2004).
  31. M. V. Berry, Physics of non-Hermitian degeneracies, Czech. J. Phys. 54, 1039 (2004).
  32. S. Klaiman, U. Günther, and N. Moiseyev, Visualization of branch points in PT-symmetric waveguides, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 080402 (2008).
  33. W. D. Heiss, The physics of exceptional points, J. Phys. A 45, 444016 (2012).
  34. T. E. Lee, Anomalous edge state in a non-Hermitian lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 133903 (2016).
  35. K. Kawabata, T. Bessho, and M. Sato, Classification of exceptional points and non-Hermitian topological semimetals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 066405 (2019).
  36. M.-A. Miri and A. Alu, Exceptional points in optics and photonics, Science 363, eaar7709 (2019).
  37. J. Wiersig, Response strengths of open systems at exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 023121 (2022).
  38. J. Wiersig, Distance between exceptional points and diabolic points and its implication for the response strength of non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 033179 (2022).
  39. S. Manna and B. Roy, Inner skin effects on non-Hermitian topological fractals, Commun. Phys. 6, 10 (2023).
  40. J. Wiersig, Petermann factors and phase rigidities near exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 033042 (2023).
  41. S. Sayyad, M. Stålhammar, L. Rødland, and F. K. Kunst, Symmetry-protected exceptional and nodal points in non-Hermitian systems, SciPost Phys. 15, 200 (2023).
  42. H. Schomerus, Eigenvalue sensitivity from eigenstate geometry near and beyond arbitrary-order exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 013044 (2024).
  43. S. Bid and H. Schomerus, Uniform response theory of non-Hermitian systems: Non-Hermitian physics beyond the exceptional point, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 023062 (2025).
  44. B. Hetényi and B. Dóra, Localized states and skin effect around non-Hermitian impurities in tight-binding models, Phys. Rev. B 112, 075123 (2025).
  45. J. Kullig, J. Wiersig, and H. Schomerus, Generalized petermann factor of non-Hermitian systems at exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 043246 (2025).
  46. S. Bid and H. Schomerus, Fragmented exceptional points and their bulk and edge realizations in lattice models, Phys. Rev. B 112, 195433 (2025).
  47. S. Bid and H. Schomerus, Exceptionally deficient topological square-root insulators, arXiv:2508.11490.
  48. J. T. Gohsrich, J. Fauman, and F. K. Kunst, Exceptional points of any order in a generalized Hatano-Nelson model, arXiv:2403.12018.
  49. P. Fendley, Free parafermions, J. Phys. A 47, 075001 (2014).
  50. A. M. Marques and R. G. Dias, Generalized Lieb's theorem for noninteracting non-Hermitian n-partite tight-binding lattices, Phys. Rev. B 106, 205146 (2022).
  51. D. Viedma, A. M. Marques, R. G. Dias, and V. Ahufinger, Topological n-root Su–Schrieffer–Heeger model in a non-Hermitian photonic ring system, Nanophotonics 13, 51 (2024).
  52. S. Longhi, D. Gatti, and G. D. Valle, Robust light transport in non-Hermitian photonic lattices, Sci. Rep. 5, 13376 (2015).
  53. S. Weidemann, M. Kremer, T. Helbig, T. Hofmann, A. Stegmaier, M. Greiter, R. Thomale, and A. Szameit, Topological funneling of light, Science 368, 311 (2020).
  54. C. Qin, B. Wang, Z. J. Wong, S. Longhi, and P. Lu, Discrete diffraction and Bloch oscillations in non-Hermitian frequency lattices induced by complex photonic gauge fields, Phys. Rev. B 101, 064303 (2020).
  55. Z. Lin, S. Ke, X. Zhu, and X. Li, Square-root non-Bloch topological insulators in non-Hermitian ring resonators, Opt. Express 29, 8462 (2021).
  56. S. Weidemann, M. Kremer, S. Longhi, and A. Szameit, Topological triple phase transition in non-Hermitian Floquet quasicrystals, Nature (London) 601, 354 (2022).
  57. Y. G. N. Liu, Y. Wei, O. Hemmatyar, G. G. Pyrialakos, P. S. Jung, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan, Complex skin modes in non-Hermitian coupled laser arrays, Light Sci. Appl. 11, 336 (2022).
  58. Z. Gao, X. Qiao, M. Pan, S. Wu, J. Yim, K. Chen, B. Midya, L. Ge, and L. Feng, Two-Dimensional reconfigurable non-Hermitian gauged laser array, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 263801 (2023).
  59. S. Ke, W. Wen, D. Zhao, and Y. Wang, Floquet engineering of the non-Hermitian skin effect in photonic waveguide arrays, Phys. Rev. A 107, 053508 (2023).
  60. X. Zhang, Y. Tian, J.-H. Jiang, M.-H. Lu, and Y.-F. Chen, Observation of higher-order non-Hermitian skin effect, Nat. Commun. 12, 5377 (2021).
  61. H. Gao, H. Xue, Z. Gu, L. Li, W. Zhu, Z. Su, J. Zhu, B. Zhang, and Y. D. Chong, Anomalous Floquet non-Hermitian skin effect in a ring resonator lattice, Phys. Rev. B 106, 134112 (2022).
  62. Z. Gu, H. Gao, H. Xue, J. Li, Z. Su, and J. Zhu, Transient non-Hermitian skin effect, Nat. Commun. 13, 7668 (2022).
  63. J.-H. Wu, M. Artoni, and G. C. La Rocca, Non-Hermitian degeneracies and unidirectional reflectionless atomic lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 123004 (2014).
  64. J. Li, A. K. Harter, J. Liu, L. de Melo, Y. N. Joglekar, and L. Luo, Observation of parity-time symmetry breaking transitions in a dissipative Floquet system of ultracold atoms, Nat. Commun. 10, 855 (2019).
  65. T. Liu, Y.-R. Zhang, Q. Ai, Z. Gong, K. Kawabata, M. Ueda, and F. Nori, Second-Order topological phases in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 076801 (2019).
  66. T. Hofmann, T. Helbig, C. H. Lee, M. Greiter, and R. Thomale, Chiral voltage propagation and calibration in a topolectrical chern circuit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 247702 (2019).
  67. T. Helbig, T. Hofmann, S. Imhof, M. Abdelghany, T. Kiessling, L. W. Molenkamp, C. H. Lee, A. Szameit, M. Greiter, and R. Thomale, Generalized bulk–boundary correspondence in non-Hermitian topolectrical circuits, Nat. Phys. 16, 747 (2020).
  68. S. Liu, R. Shao, S. Ma, L. Zhang, O. You, H. Wu, Y. J. Xiang, T. J. Cui, and S. Zhang, Non-Hermitian skin effect in a Non-Hermitian electrical circuit, Research 2021, 5608038 (2021).
  69. S. M. Rafi-Ul-Islam, Z. B. Siu, and M. B. A. Jalil, Topological phases with higher winding numbers in nonreciprocal one-dimensional topolectrical circuits, Phys. Rev. B 103, 035420 (2021).
  70. X. Zhang, K. Xu, C. Liu, X. Song, B. Hou, R. Yu, H. Zhang, D. Li, and J. Li, Gauge-dependent topology in non-reciprocal hopping systems with pseudo-Hermitian symmetry, Commun. Phys. 4, 166 (2021).
  71. D. Zou, T. Chen, W. He, J. Bao, C. H. Lee, H. Sun, and X. Zhang, Observation of hybrid higher-order skin-topological effect in non-Hermitian topolectrical circuits, Nat. Commun. 12, 7201 (2021).
  72. X. Xie, F. Ma, W. B. Rui, Z. Dong, Y. Du, W. Xie, Y. X. Zhao, H. Chen, F. Gao, and H. Xue, Non-Hermitian Dirac cones with valley-dependent lifetimes, Nat. Commun. 16, 1627 (2025).
  73. H. Sahin, M. B. A. Jalil, and C. H. Lee, Topolectrical circuits—recent experimental advances and developments, APL Electron. Dev. 1, 021503 (2025).
  74. J. Arkinstall, M. H. Teimourpour, L. Feng, R. El-Ganainy, and H. Schomerus, Topological tight-binding models from nontrivial square roots, Phys. Rev. B 95, 165109 (2017).
  75. G. Pelegrí, A. M. Marques, R. G. Dias, A. J. Daley, V. Ahufinger, and J. Mompart, Topological edge states with ultracold atoms carrying orbital angular momentum in a diamond chain, Phys. Rev. A 99, 023612 (2019).
  76. M. Kremer, I. Petrides, E. Meyer, M. Heinrich, O. Zilberberg, and A. Szameit, A square-root topological insulator with non-quantized indices realized with photonic Aharonov-Bohm cages, Nat. Commun. 11, 907 (2020).
  77. M. Ezawa, Systematic construction of square-root topological insulators and superconductors, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033397 (2020).
  78. A. M. Marques, L. Madail, and R. G. Dias, One-dimensional 2n-root topological insulators and superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 103, 235425 (2021).
  79. B. Li, S. Qiu, L. Xu, S. Guo, R. Huang, and W. Qiu, Investigation of square-root higher-order topological insulator based on honeycomb-kagome lattice of graphene plasmonic crystals, Phys. Scr. 99, 1159100 (2024).
  80. H. Huang, M. Sarker, P. Zahl, C. S. Hellberg, J. Levy, I. Petrides, A. Sinitskii, and P. Narang, Topological solitons in square-root graphene nanoribbons controlled by electric fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 256601 (2025).
  81. Y. Zhao, X. Zhang, Z. Cui, C. Wu, and N. Liu, Square-root topological insulator with high winding number, Phys. Rev. B 111, 014109 (2025).
  82. L. Song, H. Yang, Y. Cao, and P. Yan, Realization of the square-root dirac semimetal in electrical circuits, J. Appl. Phys. 137, 124902 (2025).
  83. R. J. Baxter, A simple solvable ZN Hamiltonian, Phys. Lett. A 140, 155 (1989).
  84. R. J. Baxter, Superintegrable chiral Potts model: Thermodynamic properties, an “inverse” model, and a simple associated Hamiltonian, J. Stat. Phys. 57, 1 (1989).
  85. K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, S. V. Morozov, D. Jiang, Y. Zhang, S. V. Dubonos, I. V. Grigorieva, and A. A. Firsov, Electric field effect in atomically thin Carbon films, Science 306, 666 (2004).
  86. A. H. Castro Neto, F. Guinea, N. M. R. Peres, K. S. Novoselov, and A. K. Geim, The electronic properties of graphene, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 109 (2009).
  87. E. McCann and M. Koshino, The electronic properties of bilayer graphene, Rep. Prog. Phys. 76, 056503 (2013).
  88. M. V. Berry, Quantal phase factors accompanying adiabatic changes, Proc. R. Soc. London A 392, 45 (1984).
  89. H. Shen, B. Zhen, and L. Fu, Topological band theory for non-Hermitian Hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 146402 (2018).
  90. A. Fan, G.-Y. Huang, and S.-D. Liang, Complex Berry curvature pair and quantum Hall admittance in non-Hermitian systems, J. Phys. Commun. 4, 115006 (2020)
  91. S. Tsubota, H. Yang, Y. Akagi, and H. Katsura, Symmetry-protected quantization of complex Berry phases in non-Hermitian many-body systems, Phys. Rev. B 105, L201113 (2022).
  92. S. Longhi and L. Feng, Complex Berry phase and imperfect non-Hermitian phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B 107, 085122 (2023).
  93. J.-K. Lee, S.-C. Lee, J.-P. Ahn, S.-C. Kim, J. I. B. Wilson, and P. John, The growth of AA graphite on (111) diamond, J. Chem. Phys. 129, 234709 (2008).
  94. A. V. Rozhkov, A. O. Sboychakov, A. L. Rakhmanov, and F. Nori, Electronic properties of graphene-based bilayer systems, Phys. Rep. 648, 1 (2016).
  95. K. Kawabata, S. Higashikawa, Z. Gong, Y. Ashida, and M. Ueda, Topological unification of time-reversal and particle-hole symmetries in non-Hermitian physics, Nat. Commun. 10, 297 (2019).
  96. K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, M. Ueda, and M. Sato, Symmetry and topology in non-Hermitian physics, Phys. Rev. X 9, 041015 (2019).
  97. A. Mostafazadeh, Pseudo-Hermiticity versus PT symmetry: The necessary condition for the reality of the spectrum of a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian, J. Math. Phys. 43, 205 (2002).
  98. D. Leykam, S. Flach, O. Bahat-Treidel, and A. S. Desyatnikov, Flat band states: Disorder and nonlinearity, Phys. Rev. B 88, 224203 (2013).
  99. S. Flach, D. Leykam, J. D. Bodyfelt, P. Matthies, and A. S. Desyatnikov, Detangling flat bands into Fano lattices, Europhys. Lett. 105, 30001 (2014).
  100. D. Leykam, A. Andreanov, and S. Flach, Artificial flat band systems: From lattice models to experiments, Adv. Phys. X 3, 1473052 (2018).
  101. C. Danieli, A. Andreanov, D. Leykam, and S. Flach, Flat band fine-tuning and its photonic applications, Nanophoton. 13, 3925 (2024).
  102. M. J. Rice and E. J. Mele, Elementary excitations of a linearly conjugated diatomic polymer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1455 (1982).
  103. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/hdzd-94qm for additional plots for model H(1,2) describing the evolution of the spectrum as a function of the degree of universality. There is a description of the non-Hermitian skin effect, which occurs when the parent SSH model has nonreciprocal hopping, a description of the role of spatially inhomogeneous values of the auxiliary hopping γ, and of small, random deviations from perfect unidirectionality.
  104. R. T. Clay and S. Mazumdar, Cooperative density wave and giant spin gap in the quarter-filled zigzag electron ladder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 207206 (2005).
  105. X. Li, E. Zhao, and W. V. Liu, Topological states in a ladder-like optical lattice containing ultracold atoms in higher orbital bands, Nat. Commun. 4, 1523 (2013).
  106. S. Cheon, T.-H. Kim, S.-H. Lee, and H. W. Yeom, Chiral solitons in a coupled double Peierls chain, Science 350, 182 (2015).
  107. T. Zhang and G. B. Jo, One-dimensional sawtooth and zigzag lattices for ultracold atoms, Sci. Rep. 5, 16044 (2015).
  108. S.-L. Zhang and Q. Zhou, Two-leg Su-Schrieffer-Heeger chain with glide reflection symmetry, Phys. Rev. A 95, 061601(R) (2017).
  109. C. Li, S. Lin, G. Zhang, and Z. Song, Topological nodal points in two coupled Su-Schrieffer-Heeger chains, Phys. Rev. B 96, 125418 (2017).
  110. P. Matveeva, T. Hewitt, D. Liu, K. Reddy, D. Gutman, and S. T. Carr, One-dimensional noninteracting topological insulators with chiral symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 107, 075422 (2023).
  111. M. I. S. A. Trugman, and E. Abrahams, Unusual properties of midband states in systems with off-diagonal disorder, Phys. Rev. B 49, 3190 (1994).
  112. R. E. J. Allen, H. V. Gibbons, A. M. Sherlock, H. R. M. Stanfield, and E. McCann, Nonsymmorphic chiral symmetry and solitons in the Rice-Mele model, Phys. Rev. B 106, 165409 (2022).
  113. R. Saito, M. S. Dresselhaus, and G. Dresselhaus, Physical Properties of Carbon Nanotubes (Imperial College Press, London, 1998).
  114. C. H. Lee, S. Imhof, C. Berger, F. Bayer, J. Brehm, L. W. Molenkamp, T. Kiessling, and R. Thomale, Topolectrical circuits, Commun. Phys. 1, 39 (2018).
  115. K. Luo, J. Feng, Y. X. Zhao, and R. Yu, Nodal manifolds bounded by exceptional points on non-Hermitian honeycomb lattices and electrical-circuit realizations, arXiv:1810.0923.
  116. J. Yao, X. Hao, B. Song, Y. Jia, C. Hua, and M. Zhou, Multi-orbital topolectrical circuit for topological quantum states, Nano Futures 6, 021001 (2022).
  117. S. Luo, L. Song, H. Yang, P. Yan, and Y. Cao, Topolectrical circuit simulation of two-dimensional graphyne structures, Phys. Rev. B 111, 024113 (2025).
  118. J. Wiersig, Sensors operating at exceptional points: General theory, Phys. Rev. A 93, 033809 (2016).
  119. J. Wiersig, Review of exceptional point-based sensors, Photon. Res. 8, 1457 (2020).
  120. https://doi.org/10.17635/lancaster/researchdata/738

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. B 113, 045403– Published 2 January, 2026
  • Received 8 September 2025
  • Revised 18 November 2025
  • Accepted 16 December 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation