Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Antiferromagnetism, spin liquid, and plaquette singlet phases in the Shastry-Sutherland model: A variational cluster approximation approach

Jean Paul Latyr Faye1,*, Oumar Ndiaye1, and David Sénéchal2

  • *Contact author: jeanpaullatyr.faye@ucad.edu.sn

Phys. Rev. B 114, 074406 – Published 5 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/fmrx-4pxw

Abstract

We study the half-filled single-band Hubbard model on the Shastry-Sutherland lattice with nearest-neighbor hopping t, incorporating (i) a frustrating diagonal hopping t′ to probe the emergence of spin-liquid behavior, and (ii) an additional Heisenberg exchange J that explicitly stabilizes plaquette-singlet correlations. Using the variational cluster approximation (VCA) with exact diagonalization at zero temperature on an eight-site cluster, we map the phase diagrams in the (U/t,t′/t) and (U/t,J/t) parameter planes. In the (U/t,t′/t) plane, our analysis uncovers a competition between Néel antiferromagnetic (AFM) order with staggered magnetization and a nonmagnetic regime lacking conventional order, consistent with a nonmagnetic insulating phase that may be related to the spin-liquid-like regimes reported in previous studies. In contrast, the (U/t,J/t) phase diagram exhibits a competition between the Néel antiferromagnet and a solid valence-bonding valence bond plaquette (PS), where spins form localized singlet plaquettes. Most notably, we observe that the transition from the PS phase to the Néel AFM phase is a first-order phase transition, with a discontinuous jump of the order parameters at the phase boundary, in quantitative agreement with high-pressure heat-capacity measurements on SrCu2(BO3)2 [J. Guo et al., Commun. Phys. 8, 75 (2025)]. Thus, our VCA analysis underscores the subtle interplay of geometric frustration, quantum fluctuations, and dimensionality, and elucidates the crucial role of short-range correlations in stabilizing and competing ground states of frustrated quantum magnets.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (40)

  1. F. Ferrari and R. Valentí, Altermagnetism on the Shastry-Sutherland lattice, Phys. Rev. B 110, 205140 (2024).
  2. L. Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, Nature (London) 464, 199 (2010).
  3. R. Ma and C. Wang, Average symmetry-protected topological phases, Phys. Rev. X 13, 031016 (2023).
  4. H.-D. Liu, Y.-H. Chen, H.-F. Lin, H.-S. Tao, and W.-M. Liu, Antiferromagnetic metal and Mott transition on Shastry-Sutherland lattice, Sci. Rep. 4, 4829 (2014).
  5. M. E. Zayed, C. Rüegg, J. Larrea J, A. M. Läuchli, C. Panagopoulos, S. S. Saxena, M. Ellerby, D. F. McMorrow, T. Strässle, S. Klotz, et al., 4-spin plaquette singlet state in the Shastry–Sutherland compound SrCu2(BO3)2, Nat. Phys. 13, 962 (2017).
  6. T. Senthil, A. Vishwanath, L. Balents, S. Sachdev, and M. P. Fisher, Deconfined quantum critical points, Science 303, 1490 (2004).
  7. S. Sachdev, Quantum magnetism and criticality, Nat. Phys. 4, 173 (2008).
  8. A. W. Sandvik, Evidence for deconfined quantum criticality in a two-dimensional Heisenberg model with four-spin interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 227202 (2007).
  9. N. Xi, H. Chen, Z. Y. Xie, and R. Yu, Plaquette valence bond solid to antiferromagnet transition and deconfined quantum critical point of the Shastry-Sutherland model, Phys. Rev. B 107, L220408 (2023).
  10. J. Y. Lee, Y.-Z. You, S. Sachdev, and A. Vishwanath, Signatures of a deconfined phase transition on the Shastry-Sutherland lattice: Applications to quantum critical SrCu2(BO3)2, Phys. Rev. X 9, 041037 (2019).
  11. H. Kageyama, K. Yoshimura, R. Stern, N. V. Mushnikov, K. Onizuka, M. Kato, K. Kosuge, C. P. Slichter, T. Goto, and Y. Ueda, Exact dimer ground state and quantized magnetization plateaus in the two-dimensional spin system SrCu2(BO3)2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3168 (1999).
  12. R. W. Smith and D. A. Keszler, Synthesis, structure, and properties of the orthoborate SrCu2(BO3)2, J. Solid State Chem. 93, 430 (1991).
  13. B. S. Shastry and B. Sutherland, Exact ground state of a quantum mechanical antiferromagnet, Physica B+C 108, 1069 (1981).
  14. S. Miyahara and K. Ueda, Theory of the orthogonal dimer Heisenberg spin model for SrCu2(BO3)2, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15, R327 (2003).
  15. A. Koga and N. Kawakami, Quantum phase transitions in the Shastry-Sutherland model for SrCu2(BO3)2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4461 (2000).
  16. Y. Cui, L. Liu, H. Lin, K.-H. Wu, W. Hong, X. Liu, C. Li, Z. Hu, N. Xi, S. Li, et al., Proximate deconfined quantum critical point in SrCu2(BO3)2, Science 380, 1179 (2023).
  17. J. Guo, G. Sun, B. Zhao, L. Wang, W. Hong, V. A. Sidorov, N. Ma, Q. Wu, S. Li, Z. Y. Meng, A. W. Sandvik, and L. Sun, Quantum phases of SrCu2(BO3)2 from high-pressure thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 206602 (2020).
  18. J. L. Jiménez, S. P. G. Crone, E. Fogh, M. E. Zayed, R. Lortz, E. Pomjakushina, K. Conder, A. M. Läuchli, L. Weber, S. Wessel, et al., A quantum magnetic analogue to the critical point of water, Nature (London) 592, 370 (2021).
  19. A. Maity, F. Ferrari, J. Y. Lee, J. Potten, T. Müller, R. Thomale, R. Samajdar, and Y. Iqbal, Evidence for a Z2 Dirac spin liquid in the generalized Shastry-Sutherland model, arXiv:2501.00096.
  20. P. Corboz, Y. Zhang, B. Ponsioen, and F. Mila, Quantum spin liquid phase in the Shastry-Sutherland model revealed by high-precision infinite projected entangled-pair states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 186701 (2026).
  21. S. Wessel, I. Niesen, J. Stapmanns, B. Normand, F. Mila, P. Corboz, and A. Honecker, Thermodynamic properties of the Shastry-Sutherland model from quantum Monte Carlo simulations, Phys. Rev. B 98, 174432 (2018).
  22. J. Guo et al., Deconfined quantum critical point lost in pressurized SrCu2(BO3)2, Commun. Phys. 8, 75 (2025).
  23. C. Dahnken, M. Aichhorn, W. Hanke, E. Arrigoni, and M. Potthoff, Variational cluster approach to spontaneous symmetry breaking: The itinerant antiferromagnet in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 70, 245110 (2004).
  24. D. Sénéchal, P.-L. Lavertu, M.-A. Marois, and A.-M. S. Tremblay, Competition between antiferromagnetism and superconductivity in high-Tc cuprates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 156404 (2005).
  25. M. Aichhorn, E. Arrigoni, M. Potthoff, and W. Hanke, Variational cluster approach to the Hubbard model: Phase-separation tendency and finite-size effects, Phys. Rev. B 74, 235117 (2006).
  26. A. H. Nevidomskyy, C. Scheiber, D. Sénéchal, and A.-M. S. Tremblay, Magnetism and d-wave superconductivity on the half-filled square lattice with frustration, Phys. Rev. B 77, 064427 (2008).
  27. T. Yoshikawa and M. Ogata, Role of frustration and dimensionality in the Hubbard model on the stacked square lattice: Variational cluster approach, Phys. Rev. B 79, 144429 (2009).
  28. S. Horiuchi, S. Kudo, T. Shirakawa, and Y. Ohta, Antiferromagnetism versus Kondo screening in the two-dimensional periodic Anderson model at half filling: Variational cluster approach, Phys. Rev. B 78, 155128 (2008).
  29. M. Ebato, T. Kaneko, and Y. Ohta, Metal–insulator transition of dirac fermions: Variational cluster study, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 84, 044714 (2015).
  30. M. Potthoff, Self-energy-functional theory, in Theoretical methods for Strongly Correlated Systems, edited by A. Avella and F. Mancini, Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences Vol. 171, (Springer, New York, 2012), Chap. 9.
  31. M. Potthoff, Variational cluster approximation, in DMFT at 25: Infinite dimensions, Lecture Notes of the Autumn School on Correlated Electrons 2014, edited by E. Pavarini, E. Koch, D. Vollhardt, and A. Lichtenstein (Forschungszentrum Jülich, 2014).
  32. H. Park, K. Haule, and G. Kotliar, Cluster dynamical mean field theory of the Mott transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 186403 (2008).
  33. D. Sénéchal, Cluster dynamical mean field theory, in Strongly Correlated Systems: Theoretical Methods (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2012), pp. 341–371.
  34. M. H. Hettler, M. Mukherjee, M. Jarrell, and H. R. Krishnamurthy, Dynamical cluster approximation: Nonlocal dynamics of correlated electron systems, Phys. Rev. B 61, 12739 (2000).
  35. M. Potthoff, Self-energy-functional approach to systems of correlated electrons, Eur. Phys. J. B 32, 429 (2003).
  36. M. Potthoff, Systematics of approximations constructed from dynamical variational principles, in Effective Models for Low-Dimensional Strongly Correlated Systems, AIP Conf. Proc No. 816 (AIP, Melville, NY, 2006), pp. 41–54.
  37. T. N. Dionne, A. Foley, M. Rousseau, and D. Sénéchal, pyqcm: An open-source Python library for quantum cluster methods, SciPost Phys. Codebases 23 (2023).
  38. J. P. L. Faye, D. Sénéchal, and S. R. Hassan, Topological phases of the Kitaev-Hubbard model at half filling, Phys. Rev. B 89, 115130 (2014).
  39. P. Ram and B. Kumar, Theory of quantum oscillations of magnetization in Kondo insulators, Phys. Rev. B 96, 075115 (2017).
  40. J. P. L. Faye, O. Ndiaye, and D. Senechal, Antiferromagnetism, spin liquid, and plaquette singlet phases in the Shastry-Sutherland model: A variational cluster approximation approach, OSF, 2026, https://osf.io/ty2cz/.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation