- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review B

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access

Dynamical response theory of interacting Majorana fermions and its application to generic Kitaev quantum spin liquids in a field

Peng Rao1, Roderich Moessner2, and Johannes Knolle1,3,4

PDF

Phys. Rev. B 112, 024440 – Published 28 July, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/f4b4-h1yr

Abstract

Motivated by the appearance of Majorana fermions in a broad range of correlated and topological electronic systems, we develop a general method to compute the dynamical response of interacting Majorana fermions in the random-phase approximation (RPA). This can be applied self-consistently on top of Majorana mean-field theory backgrounds, thereby in particular providing a powerful tool to analyze generic behavior in the vicinity of (various heavily studied) exactly soluble models. Prime examples are quantum spin liquids (QSL) with emergent Majorana excitations, with the celebrated exact solution of Kitaev. We employ the RPA to study in considerable detail phase structure and dynamics of the extended Kitaev honeycomb KJΓ model, with and without an applied field. First, we benchmark our method with Kitaev's exactly soluble model, finding a remarkable agreement. The interactions between Majorana fermions even turn out to mimic the effect of local Z2 flux excitations, which we explain analytically. Second, we show how small non-Kitaev couplings J and Γ induce Majorana bound states, resulting in sharp features in the dynamical structure factor in the presence of fractionalization: such “spinon excitons” naturally appear, and can coexist and interact with the broad Majorana continuum. Third, for increasing couplings or field, our theory predicts instabilities of the Kitaev QSL (KQSL) triggered by the condensation of the sharp modes. From the high-symmetry momenta of the condensation we can deduce which magnetically ordered phases surround the KQSL, in good agreement with previous finite-size numerics. We discuss implications for experiments and the broad range of applicability of our method to other QSL and Majorana systems.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (83)

  1. T. D. Schultz, D. C. Mattis, and E. H. Lieb, Two-dimensional Ising model as a soluble problem of many fermions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 36, 856 (1964).
  2. V. Dotsenko and A. Polyakov, Fermion representations for the 2d and 3d Ising models, in Conformal Field Theory and Solvable Lattice Models (Mathematical Society of Japan, Tokyo, 1988), Vol. 16, pp. 171–204.
  3. A. Y. Kitaev, Unpaired Majorana fermions in quantum wires, Phys. Usp. 44, 131 (2001).
  4. D. A. Ivanov, Non-Abelian statistics of half-quantum vortices in p-wave superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 268 (2001).
  5. N. Read and D. Green, Paired states of fermions in two dimensions with breaking of parity and time-reversal symmetries and the fractional quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. B 61, 10267 (2000).
  6. F. Berezin and M. Marinov, Particle spin dynamics as the grassmann variant of classical mechanics, Ann. Phys. 104, 336 (1977).
  7. A. M. Tsvelik, New fermionic description of quantum spin liquid state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2142 (1992).
  8. B. S. Shastry and D. Sen, Majorana fermion representation for an antiferromagnetic spin-chain, Phys. Rev. B 55, 2988 (1997).
  9. J. Fu, J. Knolle, and N. B. Perkins, Three types of representation of spin in terms of Majorana fermions and an alternative solution of the Kitaev honeycomb model, Phys. Rev. B 97, 115142 (2018).
  10. Y. Schaden and J. Reuther, Bilinear Majorana representations for spin operators with spin magnitudes S > 1/2, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 023067 (2023).
  11. V. R. Vieira, Kondo lattice: Renormalization study using a new pseudofermion representation, Phys. Rev. B 23, 6043 (1981).
  12. P. Coleman, E. Miranda, and A. Tsvelik, Are Kondo insulators gapless? Phys. B: Condens. Matter 186-188, 362 (1993).
  13. A. M. Tsvelik, Quantum Field Theory in Condensed Matter Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007).
  14. R. R. Biswas, L. Fu, C. R. Laumann, and S. Sachdev, SU(2)-invariant spin liquids on the triangular lattice with spinful Majorana excitations, Phys. Rev. B 83, 245131 (2011).
  15. G. Chen, A. Essin, and M. Hermele, Majorana spin liquids and projective realization of SU(2) spin symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 85, 094418 (2012).
  16. L. Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, Nature (London) 464, 199 (2010).
  17. J. Knolle and R. Moessner, A field guide to spin liquids, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 10, 451 (2019).
  18. A. Kitaev, Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond, Ann. Phys. 321, 2 (2006), January special Issue.
  19. G. Jackeli and G. Khaliullin, Mott insulators in the strong spin-orbit coupling limit: From Heisenberg to a quantum compass and Kitaev models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 017205 (2009).
  20. K. Plumb, J. P. Clancy, L. J. Sandilands, V. V. Shankar, Y. F. Hu, K. S. Burch, H.-Y. Kee, and Y.-J. Kim, α−RuCl3: A spin-orbit assisted Mott insulator on a honeycomb lattice, Phys. Rev. B 90, 041112(R) (2014).
  21. M. Hermanns, I. Kimchi, and J. Knolle, Physics of the Kitaev model: Fractionalization, dynamic correlations, and material connections, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 9, 17 (2018).
  22. H. Takagi, T. Takayama, G. Jackeli, G. Khaliullin, and S. E. Nagler, Concept and realization of Kitaev quantum spin liquids, Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 264 (2019).
  23. Y. Motome and J. Nasu, Hunting Majorana fermions in Kitaev magnets, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 89, 012002 (2020).
  24. S. Trebst and C. Hickey, Kitaev materials, Phys. Rep. 950, 1 (2022).
  25. I. Rousochatzakis, N. B. Perkins, Q. Luo, and H.-Y. Kee, Beyond Kitaev physics in strong spin-orbit coupled magnets, Rep. Prog. Phys. 87, 026502 (2024).
  26. Y. Matsuda, T. Shibauchi, and H.-Y. Kee, Kitaev quantum spin liquids, arXiv:2501.05608.
  27. J. Knolle, D. L. Kovrizhin, J. T. Chalker, and R. Moessner, Dynamics of a two-dimensional quantum spin liquid: Signatures of emergent Majorana fermions and fluxes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 207203 (2014).
  28. J. Knolle, D. L. Kovrizhin, J. T. Chalker, and R. Moessner, Dynamics of fractionalization in quantum spin liquids, Phys. Rev. B 92, 115127 (2015).
  29. J. Knolle, G.-W. Chern, D. L. Kovrizhin, R. Moessner, and N. B. Perkins, Raman scattering signatures of Kitaev spin liquids in A2IrO3 iridates with A= Na or Li, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 187201 (2014).
  30. J. Knolle, Dynamics of a Quantum Spin Liquid (Springer, Berlin, 2016).
  31. Y. Kubota, H. Tanaka, T. Ono, Y. Narumi, and K. Kindo, Successive magnetic phase transitions in α−RuCl3: Xy-like frustrated magnet on the honeycomb lattice, Phys. Rev. B 91, 094422 (2015).
  32. A. Wolter, L. Corredor, L. Janssen, K. Nenkov, S. Schönecker, S.-H. Do, K.-Y. Choi, R. Albrecht, J. Hunger, T. Doert et al., Field-induced quantum criticality in the Kitaev system α−RuCl3, Phys. Rev. B 96, 041405(R) (2017).
  33. J. A. Sears, Y. Zhao, Z. Xu, J. W. Lynn, and Y.-J. Kim, Phase diagram of α−RuCl3 in an in-plane magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B 95, 180411(R) (2017).
  34. A. Banerjee, P. Lampen-Kelley, J. Knolle, C. Balz, A. A. Aczel, B. Winn, Y. Liu, D. Pajerowski, J. Yan, C. A. Bridges et al., Excitations in the field-induced quantum spin liquid state of α−RuCl3, npj Quantum Mater. 3, 8 (2018).
  35. Z. Wang, S. Reschke, D. Hüvonen, S.-H. Do, K.-Y. Choi, M. Gensch, U. Nagel, T. Rõõm, and A. Loidl, Magnetic excitations and continuum of a possibly field-induced quantum spin liquid in α−RuCl3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 227202 (2017).
  36. H. Li, H.-K. Zhang, J. Wang, H.-Q. Wu, Y. Gao, D.-W. Qu, Z.-X. Liu, S.-S. Gong, and W. Li, Identification of magnetic interactions and high-field quantum spin liquid in α−RuCl3, Nat. Commun. 12, 4007 (2021).
  37. A. N. Ponomaryov, L. Zviagina, J. Wosnitza, P. Lampen-Kelley, A. Banerjee, J.-Q. Yan, C. A. Bridges, D. G. Mandrus, S. E. Nagler, and S. A. Zvyagin, Nature of magnetic excitations in the high-field phase of α−RuCl3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 037202 (2020).
  38. D. Wulferding, Y. Choi, S.-H. Do, C. H. Lee, P. Lemmens, C. Faugeras, Y. Gallais, and K.-Y. Choi, Magnon bound states versus anyonic Majorana excitations in the Kitaev honeycomb magnet α−RuCl3, Nat. Commun. 11, 1603 (2020).
  39. Y. Wang, G. B. Osterhoudt, Y. Tian, P. Lampen-Kelley, A. Banerjee, T. Goldstein, J. Yan, J. Knolle, H. Ji, R. J. Cava et al., The range of non-kitaev terms and fractional particles in α−RuCl3, npj Quantum Mater. 5, 14 (2020).
  40. A. Sahasrabudhe, M. A. Prosnikov, T. C. Koethe, P. Stein, V. Tsurkan, A. Loidl, M. Grüninger, H. Hedayat, and P. H. M. van Loosdrecht, Chiral excitations and the intermediate-field regime in the Kitaev magnet α−RuCl3, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, L022005 (2024).
  41. Y. Kasahara, T. Ohnishi, Y. Mizukami, O. Tanaka, S. Ma, K. Sugii, N. Kurita, H. Tanaka, J. Nasu, Y. Motome et al., Majorana quantization and half-integer thermal quantum Hall effect in a Kitaev spin liquid, Nature (London) 559, 227 (2018).
  42. J. Bruin, R. Claus, Y. Matsumoto, N. Kurita, H. Tanaka, and H. Takagi, Robustness of the thermal Hall effect close to half-quantization in α−RuCl3, Nat. Phys. 18, 401 (2022).
  43. L. E. Chern, E. Z. Zhang, and Y. B. Kim, Sign structure of thermal Hall conductivity and topological magnons for in-plane field polarized Kitaev magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 147201 (2021).
  44. S. M. Winter, K. Riedl, P. A. Maksimov, A. L. Chernyshev, A. Honecker, and R. Valentí, Breakdown of magnons in a strongly spin-orbital coupled magnet, Nat. Commun. 8, 1152 (2017).
  45. P. Czajka, T. Gao, M. Hirschberger, P. Lampen-Kelley, A. Banerjee, N. Quirk, D. G. Mandrus, S. E. Nagler, and N. P. Ong, Planar thermal Hall effect of topological bosons in the Kitaev magnet α−RuCl3, Nat. Mater. 22, 36 (2023).
  46. P. A. Maksimov and A. L. Chernyshev, Rethinking α−RuCl3, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033011 (2020).
  47. M. Gohlke, R. Verresen, R. Moessner, and F. Pollmann, Dynamics of the Kitaev-Heisenberg model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 157203 (2017).
  48. M. Gohlke, R. Moessner, and F. Pollmann, Dynamical and topological properties of the Kitaev model in a [111] magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B 98, 014418 (2018).
  49. K. S. Tikhonov, M. V. Feigel'man, and A. Y. Kitaev, Power-law spin correlations in a perturbed spin model on a honeycomb lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 067203 (2011).
  50. X.-Y. Song, Y.-Z. You, and L. Balents, Low-energy spin dynamics of the honeycomb spin liquid beyond the Kitaev limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 037209 (2016).
  51. J. Knolle, S. Bhattacharjee, and R. Moessner, Dynamics of a quantum spin liquid beyond integrability: The Kitaev-Heisenberg-Γ model in an augmented parton mean-field theory, Phys. Rev. B 97, 134432 (2018).
  52. S.-S. Zhang, G. B. Halász, W. Zhu, and C. D. Batista, Variational study of the Kitaev-Heisenberg-Gamma model, Phys. Rev. B 104, 014411 (2021).
  53. A. P. Joy and A. Rosch, Dynamics of visons and thermal Hall effect in perturbed Kitaev models, Phys. Rev. X 12, 041004 (2022).
  54. C. Chen and I. S. Villadiego, Nature of visons in the perturbed ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic Kitaev honeycomb models, Phys. Rev. B 107, 045114 (2023).
  55. T. Cookmeyer and J. E. Moore, Dynamics of fractionalized mean-field theories: consequences for Kitaev materials, Phys. Rev. B 107, 224428 (2023).
  56. P. W. Anderson, The resonating valence bond state in La2CuO4 and superconductivity, Science 235, 1196 (1987).
  57. P. W. Anderson, G. Baskaran, Z. Zou, and T. Hsu, Resonating–valence-bond theory of phase transitions and superconductivity in La2CuO4-based compounds, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 2790 (1987).
  58. J. R. Schrieffer, X. G. Wen, and S. C. Zhang, Dynamic spin fluctuations and the bag mechanism of high-Tc superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B 39, 11663 (1989).
  59. A. V. Chubukov and D. M. Frenkel, Renormalized perturbation theory of magnetic instabilities in the two-dimensional hubbard model at small doping, Phys. Rev. B 46, 11884 (1992).
  60. J. Knolle, I. Eremin, A. V. Chubukov, and R. Moessner, Theory of itinerant magnetic excitations in the spin-density-wave phase of iron-based superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 81, 140506(R) (2010).
  61. J. Knolle, I. Eremin, and R. Moessner, Multiorbital spin susceptibility in a magnetically ordered state: Orbital versus excitonic spin density wave scenario, Phys. Rev. B 83, 224503 (2011).
  62. J. Willsher, H.-K. Jin, and J. Knolle, Magnetic excitations, phase diagram, and order-by-disorder in the extended triangular-lattice hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 107, 064425 (2023).
  63. C.-M. Ho, V. N. Muthukumar, M. Ogata, and P. W. Anderson, Nature of spin excitations in two-dimensional Mott insulators: Undoped cuprates and other materials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1626 (2001).
  64. J. Willsher and J. Knolle, Dynamics and stability of U(1) spin liquids beyond mean-field theory, arXiv:2503.13831.
  65. M. Drescher, L. Vanderstraeten, R. Moessner, and F. Pollmann, Dynamical signatures of symmetry-broken and liquid phases in an S=12 Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B 108, L220401 (2023).
  66. F. Ferrari and F. Becca, Dynamical structure factor of the J1−J2 1-j 2 Heisenberg model on the triangular lattice: magnons, spinons, and gauge fields, Phys. Rev. X 9, 031026 (2019).
  67. J. G. Rau, E. K.-H. Lee, and H.-Y. Kee, Generic spin model for the honeycomb iridates beyond the Kitaev limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 077204 (2014).
  68. F. J. Burnell and C. Nayak, SU(2) slave fermion solution of the Kitaev honeycomb lattice model, Phys. Rev. B 84, 125125 (2011).
  69. Y.-Z. You, I. Kimchi, and A. Vishwanath, Doping a spin-orbit Mott insulator: Topological superconductivity from the Kitaev-Heisenberg model and possible application to (Na2/Li2)IrO3, Phys. Rev. B 86, 085145 (2012).
  70. A. Ralko and J. Merino, Novel chiral quantum spin liquids in Kitaev magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 217203 (2020).
  71. F. Yılmaz, A. P. Kampf, and S. K. Yip, Phase diagrams of Kitaev models for arbitrary magnetic field orientations, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 043024 (2022).
  72. L. Pitaevskii, Properties of the spectrum of elementary excitations near the disintegration threshold of the excitations, Sov. Phys. JETP 9, 830 (1959) [Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 36, 1168 (1959)].
  73. M. E. Zhitomirsky and A. L. Chernyshev, Colloquium: Spontaneous magnon decays, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 219 (2013).
  74. W. Rowe, J. Knolle, I. Eremin, and P. Hirschfeld, Spin excitations in layered antiferromagnetic metals and superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 86, 134513 (2012).
  75. R. Verresen, R. Moessner, and F. Pollmann, Avoided quasiparticle decay from strong quantum interactions, Nat. Phys. 15, 750 (2019).
  76. D. Takikawa and S. Fujimoto, Impact of off-diagonal exchange interactions on the Kitaev spin-liquid state of α−RuCl3, Phys. Rev. B 99, 224409 (2019).
  77. K. Hwang, A. Go, J. Seong, T. Shibauchi, and E.-G. Moon, Identification of a Kitaev quantum spin liquid by magnetic field angle dependence, Nat. Commun. 13, 323 (2022).
  78. Y. Iqbal, W.-J. Hu, R. Thomale, D. Poilblanc, and F. Becca, Spin liquid nature in the Heisenberg J1−J2 triangular antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 93, 144411 (2016).
  79. Y. Iqbal, F. Becca, and D. Poilblanc, Projected wave function study of Z2 spin liquids on the kagome lattice for the spin-11 quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 84, 020407(R) (2011).
  80. L. Balents and O. A. Starykh, Collective spinon spin wave in a magnetized U(1) spin liquid, Phys. Rev. B 101, 020401(R) (2020).
  81. A. Rahmani, X. Zhu, M. Franz, and I. Affleck, Phase diagram of the interacting Majorana chain model, Phys. Rev. B 92, 235123 (2015).
  82. X. Ren, P. Rinke, C. Joas, and M. Scheffler, Random-phase approximation and its applications in computational chemistry and materials science, J. Mater. Sci. 47, 7447 (2012).
  83. P. Rao, Computing spin susceptibility for the Kitaev spin liquid in the kjγ model, Zenodo (2025), doi:10.5281/zenodo.15125435.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. B 112, 024440– Published 28 July, 2025
  • Received 2 April 2025
  • Accepted 14 July 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation