Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Finite-temperature real-time properties of magnetic polarons in two-dimensional quantum antiferromagnets

Toni Guthardt1, Markus Scheb1, Jan von Delft1,2, Fabian Grusdt1,2, and Annabelle Bohrdt1,2,3

Phys. Rev. B 112, 205118 – Published 14 November, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/bm51-wq36

Abstract

Due to significant progress in quantum gas microscopy in recent years, there is a rapidly growing interest in real-space properties of single mobile dopands created in correlated antiferromagnetic (AFM) Mott insulators. However, a detailed numerical description remains challenging, even for simple toy models. As a consequence, previous numerical simulations for large systems were largely limited to T=0. To provide guidance for cold-atom experiments, numerical calculations at finite temperature are required. Here, we numerically study the real-time properties of a single mobile hole in the 2D t−J model at finite temperature and draw a comparison to features observed at T=0. We find that a three-stage process of hole motion, which was reported at T=0, is valid even at finite temperature. However, already at low temperatures, the average hole velocity at long times is not simply proportional to the spin coupling, contrary to the T=0 behavior. Comparing our finite-temperature numerical results with the experimental data from quantum gas microscopy we find a qualitative disagreement: in experiment, hole spreading speeds up with increasing J/t, while in our numerics it slows down. The latter is consistent with the numerical findings previously reported at T=0.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

See Also

Magnetic polarons at finite temperature: One-hole spectroscopy study

Toni Guthardt, Markus Scheb, Jan von Delft, Annabelle Bohrdt, and Fabian Grusdt
Phys. Rev. B 112, 205117 (2025)

Article Text

References (70)

  1. P. A. Lee, N. Nagaosa, and X.-G. Wen, Doping a Mott insulator: Physics of high-temperature superconductivity, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 17 (2006).
  2. C. Proust and L. Taillefer, The remarkable underlying ground states of cuprate superconductors, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 10, 409 (2019).
  3. M. Kanász-Nagy, I. Lovas, F. Grusdt, D. Greif, M. Greiner, and E. A. Demler, Quantum correlations at infinite temperature: The dynamical Nagaoka effect, Phys. Rev. B 96, 014303 (2017).
  4. K. K. Nielsen, T. Pohl, and G. Bruun, Nonequilibrium hole dynamics in antiferromagnets: damped strings and polarons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 246601 (2022).
  5. K. Nielsen, M. Bastarrachea-Magnani, T. Pohl, and G. Bruun, Spatial structure of magnetic polarons in strongly interacting antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 104, 155136 (2021).
  6. J. Vijayan, P. Sompet, G. Salomon, J. Koepsell, S. Hirthe, A. Bohrdt, F. Grusdt, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Time-resolved observation of spin-charge deconfinement in fermionic Hubbard chains, Science 367, 186 (2020).
  7. K. Kurokawa, S. Isono, Y. Kohama, S. Kunisada, S. Sakai, R. Sekine, M. Okubo, M. D. Watson, T. K. Kim, C. Cacho et al., Unveiling phase diagram of the lightly doped high-Tc cuprate superconductors with disorder removed, Nat. Commun. 14, 4064 (2023).
  8. M. Qiao, G. Emperauger, C. Chen, L. Homeier, S. Hollerith, G. Bornet, R. Martin, B. Gély, L. Klein, D. Barredo et al., Realization of a doped quantum antiferromagnet with dipolar tunnelings in a Rydberg tweezer array, Nature (London) 644, 889 (2025).
  9. A. Bohrdt, D. Wei, D. Adler, K. Srakaew, S. Agrawal, P. Weckesser, I. Bloch, F. Grusdt, and J. Zeiher, Microscopy of bosonic charge carriers in staggered magnetic fields, arXiv:2410.19500.
  10. L. Hahn, A. Bohrdt, and F. Grusdt, Dynamical signatures of thermal spin-charge deconfinement in the doped Ising model, Phys. Rev. B 105, L241113 (2022).
  11. G. Ji, M. Xu, L. H. Kendrick, C. S. Chiu, J. C. Brüggenjürgen, D. Greif, A. Bohrdt, F. Grusdt, E. Demler, M. Lebrat, and M. Greiner, Coupling a mobile hole to an antiferromagnetic spin background: Transient dynamics of a magnetic polaron, Phys. Rev. X 11, 021022 (2021).
  12. K. Shen, K. Sun, M. F. Gelin, and Y. Zhao, Finite-temperature hole–magnon dynamics in an antiferromagnet, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 15, 447 (2024).
  13. A. Bohrdt, F. Grusdt, and M. Knap, Dynamical formation of a magnetic polaron in a two-dimensional quantum antiferromagnet, New J. Phys. 22, 123023 (2020).
  14. F. Grusdt, M. Kánasz-Nagy, A. Bohrdt, C. S. Chiu, G. Ji, M. Greiner, D. Greif, and E. Demler, Parton theory of magnetic polarons: Mesonic resonances and signatures in dynamics, Phys. Rev. X 8, 011046 (2018).
  15. Z. Su, Y. Li, W. Lai, and L. Yu, Self-consistent renormalized hole motion in a quantum antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1318 (1989).
  16. S. A. Trugman, Interaction of holes in a Hubbard antiferromagnet and high-temperature superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B 37, 1597 (1988).
  17. P. Béran, Dynamics of a single hole in the two-dimensional t-J model in the presence of a magnetic field and the composite nature of quasiparticles, Phys. Rev. B 54, 1391 (1996).
  18. A. Ramšak and P. Horsch, Spatial structure of spin polarons in the t-J model, Phys. Rev. B 57, 4308 (1998).
  19. A. Bohrdt, E. Demler, F. Pollmann, M. Knap, and F. Grusdt, Parton theory of angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy spectra in antiferromagnetic Mott insulators, Phys. Rev. B 102, 035139 (2020).
  20. V. Elser, D. A. Huse, B. I. Shraiman, and E. D. Siggia, Ground state of a mobile vacancy in a quantum antiferromagnet: Small-cluster study, Phys. Rev. B 41, 6715 (1990).
  21. E. Dagotto, R. Joynt, A. Moreo, S. Bacci, and E. Gagliano, Strongly correlated electronic systems with one hole: Dynamical properties, Phys. Rev. B 41, 9049 (1990).
  22. P. W. Leung and R. J. Gooding, Dynamical properties of the single-hole t-J model on a 32-site square lattice, Phys. Rev. B 52, R15711 (1995).
  23. M. Brunner, F. F. Assaad, and A. Muramatsu, Single-hole dynamics in the t-J model on a square lattice, Phys. Rev. B 62, 15480 (2000).
  24. A. Mishchenko, N. Prokof'ev, and B. Svistunov, Single-hole spectral function and spin-charge separation in the t-J model, Phys. Rev. B 64, 033101 (2001).
  25. S. R. White and I. Affleck, Density matrix renormalization group analysis of the Nagaoka polaron in the two-dimensional t-J model, Phys. Rev. B 64, 024411 (2001).
  26. G. Sangiovanni, A. Toschi, E. Koch, K. Held, M. Capone, C. Castellani, O. Gunnarsson, S.-K. Mo, J. Allen, H.-D. Kim et al., Static versus dynamical mean-field theory of Mott antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 73, 205121 (2006).
  27. F. Mezzacapo, Variational study of a mobile hole in a two-dimensional quantum antiferromagnet using entangled-plaquette states, Phys. Rev. B 83, 115111 (2011).
  28. C. Kane, P. Lee, and N. Read, Motion of a single hole in a quantum antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 39, 6880 (1989).
  29. S. Sachdev, Hole motion in a quantum Néel state, Phys. Rev. B 39, 12232 (1989).
  30. P. Bermes, A. Bohrdt, and F. Grusdt, Magnetic polarons beyond linear spin-wave theory: Mesons dressed by magnons, Phys. Rev. B 109, 205104 (2024).
  31. S. Schmitt-Rink, C. Varma, and A. Ruckenstein, Spectral function of holes in a quantum antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2793 (1988).
  32. G. Martinez and P. Horsch, Spin polarons in the t-J model, Phys. Rev. B 44, 317 (1991).
  33. A. Auerbach and B. E. Larson, Small-polaron theory of doped antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2262 (1991).
  34. Z. Liu and E. Manousakis, Dynamical properties of a hole in a Heisenberg antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 45, 2425 (1992).
  35. M. Boninsegni and E. Manousakis, Green's-function Monte Carlo study of the t-J model, Phys. Rev. B 46, 560 (1992).
  36. M. Boninsegni and E. Manousakis, Variational description of a quasihole excitation in a quantum antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 45, 4877 (1992).
  37. O. A. Starykh, O. F. de Alcantara Bonfim, and G. F. Reiter, Self-consistent born approximation for the hole motion in the three-band model: a comparison with photoemission experiments, Phys. Rev. B 52, 12534 (1995).
  38. E. Manousakis, String excitations of a hole in a quantum antiferromagnet and photoelectron spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. B 75, 035106 (2007).
  39. F. Grusdt, A. Bohrdt, and E. Demler, Microscopic spinon-chargon theory of magnetic polarons in the t-J model, Phys. Rev. B 99, 224422 (2019).
  40. P. Béran, D. Poilblanc, and R. Laughlin, Evidence for composite nature of quasiparticles in the 2D t-J model, Nucl. Phys. B 473, 707 (1996).
  41. F. Grusdt, Z. Zhu, T. Shi, and E. Demler, Meson formation in mixed-dimensional t-J models, SciPost Phys. 5, 057 (2018).
  42. A. Bohrdt, L. Homeier, C. Reinmoser, E. Demler, and F. Grusdt, Exploration of doped quantum magnets with ultracold atoms, Ann. Phys. 435, 168651 (2021).
  43. C. Gross and I. Bloch, Quantum simulations with ultracold atoms in optical lattices, Science 357, 995 (2017).
  44. J. Koepsell, J. Vijayan, P. Sompet, F. Grusdt, T. A. Hilker, E. Demler, G. Salomon, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Imaging magnetic polarons in the doped Fermi–Hubbard model, Nature (London) 572, 358 (2019).
  45. V. Emery, Theory of high-Tc superconductivity in oxides, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 2794 (1987).
  46. E. Dagotto, Correlated electrons in high-temperature superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 763 (1994).
  47. J. Spalek, t-J model then and now: a personal perspective from the pioneering times, arXiv:0706.4236.
  48. S. R. White, Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2863 (1992).
  49. S. R. White, Density-matrix algorithms for quantum renormalization groups, Phys. Rev. B 48, 10345 (1993).
  50. U. Schollwöck, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Ann. Phys. 326, 96 (2011).
  51. A. Nocera and G. Alvarez, Symmetry-conserving purification of quantum states within the density matrix renormalization group, Phys. Rev. B 93, 045137 (2016).
  52. A. E. Feiguin and S. R. White, Finite-temperature density matrix renormalization using an enlarged Hilbert space, Phys. Rev. B 72, 220401 (2005).
  53. A. E. Feiguin and G. A. Fiete, Spectral properties of a spin-incoherent Luttinger liquid, Phys. Rev. B 81, 075108 (2010).
  54. J. M. Hauschild, Quantum many-body systems far out of equilibrium—simulations with tensor networks, Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universität München, 2019.
  55. S. Paeckel, T. Köhler, A. Swoboda, S. R. Manmana, U. Schollwöck, and C. Hubig, Time-evolution methods for matrix-product states, Ann. Phys. 411, 167998 (2019).
  56. J. J. García-Ripoll, Time evolution of matrix product states, New J. Phys. 8, 305 (2006).
  57. P. E. Dargel, A. Wöllert, A. Honecker, I. P. McCulloch, U. Schollwöck, and T. Pruschke, Lanczos algorithm with matrix product states for dynamical correlation functions, Phys. Rev. B 85, 205119 (2012).
  58. M. L. Wall, Out-of-equilibrium dynamics with matrix product states, Quantum Many-Body Physics of Ultracold Molecules in Optical Lattices (Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2015), pp. 177–222.
  59. J. Haegeman, J. I. Cirac, T. J. Osborne, I. Pižorn, H. Verschelde, and F. Verstraete, Time-dependent variational principle for quantum lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 070601 (2011).
  60. J. Haegeman, C. Lubich, I. Oseledets, B. Vandereycken, and F. Verstraete, Unifying time evolution and optimization with matrix product states, Phys. Rev. B 94, 165116 (2016).
  61. C. Karrasch, J. H. Bardarson, and J. E. Moore, Finite-temperature dynamical density matrix renormalization group and the Drude weight of spin-1/2 chains, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 227206 (2012).
  62. D. Kennes and C. Karrasch, Extending the range of real time density matrix renormalization group simulations, Comput. Phys. Commun. 200, 37 (2016).
  63. C. Karrasch, J. Bardarson, and J. Moore, Reducing the numerical effort of finite-temperature density matrix renormalization group calculations, New J. Phys. 15, 083031 (2013).
  64. A. Gleis, J.-W. Li, and J. von Delft, Controlled bond expansion for density matrix renormalization group ground state search at single-site costs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 246402 (2023).
  65. J.-W. Li, A. Gleis, and J. von Delft, Time-dependent variational principle with controlled bond expansion for matrix product states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 026401 (2024).
  66. A. Bohrdt, E. Demler, and F. Grusdt, Dichotomy of heavy and light pairs of holes in the t-J model, Nat. Commun. 14, 8017 (2023).
  67. T. Guthardt, M. Scheb, J. von Delft, A. Bohrdt, and F. Grusdt, preceding paper, Magnetic polarons at finite temperature: One-hole spectroscopy study, Phys. Rev. B 112, 205117 (2025).
  68. A. Weichselbaum, Non-Abelian symmetries in tensor networks: A quantum symmetry space approach, Ann. Phys. 327, 2972 (2012).
  69. A. Weichselbaum, X-symbols for non-Abelian symmetries in tensor networks, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023385 (2020).
  70. A. Weichselbaum, QSpace – an open source tensor library for Abelian and non-Abelian symmetries, SciPost Phys. Codebases 40 (2024).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation