Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Antichiral surface states and Su-Schrieffer-Heeger physics in rutile altermagnets

Sopheak Sorn*

  • *Contact author: sopheak.sorn@kit.edu

Phys. Rev. B 111, L161109 – Published 9 April, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.111.L161109

Abstract

We study surface states and domain wall bound states in altermagnets using a rutile-lattice tight-binding model of electrons coupled to a Néel order. We discover that two symmetry-protected Weyl nodal lines in the bulk band structure can give rise to unconventional antichiral surface states—surface states from opposite surfaces propagate in a parallel manner, as opposed to the antiparallel manner for the more conventional chiral surface states. We also find that the antichiral surface states can be turned into chiral surface states upon changing the surface termination. The origin of the surface states, the dependence on the surface termination, and key features of domain wall bound states are explained using a map from the altermagnet to a family of a modified Su-Schrieffer-Heeger chain and the associated bulk-boundary correspondence. Our work reveals rutile altermagnets as a promising candidate among very few quantum materials that can support antichiral surface states.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (41)

  1. L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conventional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022).
  2. L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging research landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040501 (2022).
  3. L. Bai, W. Feng, S. Liu, L. Šmejkal, Y. Mokrousov, and Y. Yao, Altermagnetism: Exploring new frontiers in magnetism and spintronics, Adv. Funct. Mater. 34, 2409327 (2024).
  4. S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Momentum-dependent spin splitting by collinear antiferromagnetic ordering, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 88, 123702 (2019).
  5. S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Bottom-up design of spin-split and reshaped electronic band structures in antiferromagnets without spin-orbit coupling: Procedure on the basis of augmented multipoles, Phys. Rev. B 102, 144441 (2020).
  6. K.-H. Ahn, A. Hariki, K.-W. Lee, and J. Kuneš, Antiferromagnetism in RuO2 as d-wave Pomeranchuk instability, Phys. Rev. B 99, 184432 (2019).
  7. M. Naka, S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, Y. Yanagi, Y. Motome, and H. Seo, Spin current generation in organic antiferromagnets, Nat. Commun. 10, 4305 (2019).
  8. Y. Noda, K. Ohno, and S. Nakamura, Momentum-dependent band spin splitting in semiconducting MnO2: a density functional calculation, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 13294 (2016).
  9. T. Berlijn, P. C. Snijders, O. Delaire, H.-D. Zhou, T. A. Maier, H.-B. Cao, S.-X. Chi, M. Matsuda, Y. Wang, M. R. Koehler, P. R. C. Kent, and H. H. Weitering, Itinerant antiferromagnetism in RuO2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 077201 (2017).
  10. L. Šmejkal, R. González-Hernández, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous Hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets, Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz8809 (2020).
  11. X. Zhou, W. Feng, R.-W. Zhang, L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, Y. Mokrousov, and Y. Yao, Crystal thermal transport in altermagnetic RuO2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 056701 (2024).
  12. R. M. Fernandes, V. S. de Carvalho, T. Birol, and R. G. Pereira, Topological transition from nodal to nodeless Zeeman splitting in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B 109, 024404 (2024).
  13. D. S. Antonenko, R. M. Fernandes, and J. W. F. Venderbos, Mirror Chern bands and Weyl nodal loops in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 096703 (2025).
  14. S. Bhowal and N. A. Spaldin, Ferroically ordered magnetic octupoles in d-wave altermagnets, Phys. Rev. X 14, 011019 (2024).
  15. C. R. W. Steward, R. M. Fernandes, and J. Schmalian, Dynamic paramagnon-polarons in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B 108, 144418 (2023).
  16. P. A. McClarty and J. G. Rau, Landau theory of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 176702 (2024).
  17. J. Ōiké, K. Shinada, and R. Peters, Nonlinear magnetoelectric effect under magnetic octupole order: Its application to a d-wave altermagnet and a pyrochlore lattice with all-in/all-out magnetic order, Phys. Rev. B 110, 184407 (2024).
  18. Y. Fang, J. Cano, and S. A. A. Ghorashi, Quantum geometry induced nonlinear transport in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 106701 (2024).
  19. S. Sorn and A. S. Patri, Signatures of hidden octupolar order from nonlinear Hall effects, Phys. Rev. B 110, 125127 (2024).
  20. R. P. Rao, R. C. Sherwood, and N. Bartlett, “Weak” ferromagnetism in PdF2, J. Chem. Phys. 49, 3728 (1968).
  21. Z. H. Zhu, J. Strempfer, R. R. Rao, C. A. Occhialini, J. Pelliciari, Y. Choi, T. Kawaguchi, H. You, J. F. Mitchell, Y. Shao-Horn, and R. Comin, Anomalous antiferromagnetism in metallic RuO2 determined by resonant X-ray scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 017202 (2019).
  22. Z. Feng, X. Zhou, L. Šmejkal, L. Wu, Z. Zhu, Huixin Guo, Rafael González-Hernández, X. Wang, H. Yan, P. Qin, X. Zhang, H. Wu, H. Chen, Z. Meng, Li Liu, Z. Xia, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, and Z. Liu, An anomalous Hall effect in altermagnetic ruthenium dioxide, Nat. Electron. 5, 735 (2022).
  23. L. Šmejkal, A. H. MacDonald, J. Sinova, S. Nakatsuji, and T. Jungwirth, Anomalous Hall antiferromagnets, Nat. Rev. Mater. 7, 482 (2022).
  24. M. Wang, K. Tanaka, S. Sakai, Z. Wang, K. Deng, Y. Lyu, C. Li, D. Tian, S. Shen, N. Ogawa, N. Kanazawa, P. Yu, R. Arita, and F. Kagawa, Emergent zero-field anomalous Hall effect in a reconstructed rutile antiferromagnetic metal, Nat. Commun. 14, 8240 (2023).
  25. E. Colomés and M. Franz, Antichiral edge states in a modified Haldane nanoribbon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 086603 (2018).
  26. M. M. Denner, J. L. Lado, and O. Zilberberg, Antichiral states in twisted graphene multilayers, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 043190 (2020).
  27. J. Medina Dueñas, H. L. Calvo, and L. E. F. Foa Torres, Copropagating edge states produced by the interaction between electrons and chiral phonons in two-dimensional materials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 066801 (2022).
  28. J. D. Mella, H. L. Calvo, and L. E. F. Foa Torres, Entangled states induced by electron-phonon interaction in two-dimensional materials, Nano Lett. 23, 11013 (2023).
  29. Y. Su and G. Li, Topological origin of antichiral edge states induced by a nonchiral phonon, Phys. Rev. B 109, 155410 (2024).
  30. M. Roig, A. Kreisel, Y. Yu, B. M. Andersen, and D. F. Agterberg, Minimal models for altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. B 110, 144412 (2024).
  31. I. I. Mazin, K. Koepernik, M. D. Johannes, R. González-Hernández, and L. Šmejkal, Prediction of unconventional magnetism in doped fesb2, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2108924118 (2021).
  32. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevB.111.L161109 for dependence of antichiral surface states on model parameters, properties of bound states at altermagnetic domain walls, and stability of Weyl nodal lines and antichiral surface states.
  33. W. P. Su, J. R. Schrieffer, and A. J. Heeger, Solitons in polyacetylene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1698 (1979).
  34. J. Cano, B. Bradlyn, Z. Wang, L. Elcoro, M. G. Vergniory, C. Felser, M. I. Aroyo, and B. A. Bernevig, Building blocks of topological quantum chemistry: Elementary band representations, Phys. Rev. B 97, 035139 (2018).
  35. H. C. Po, H. Watanabe, and A. Vishwanath, Fragile topology and Wannier obstructions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 126402 (2018).
  36. E. Khalaf, W. A. Benalcazar, T. L. Hughes, and R. Queiroz, Boundary-obstructed topological phases, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 013239 (2021).
  37. Y. Xu, L. Elcoro, Z.-D. Song, M. G. Vergniory, C. Felser, S. S. P. Parkin, N. Regnault, J. L. Mañes, and B. A. Bernevig, Filling-enforced obstructed atomic insulators, Phys. Rev. B 109, 165139 (2024).
  38. J. Kruthoff, J. de Boer, J. van Wezel, C. L. Kane, and R.-J. Slager, Topological classification of crystalline insulators through band structure combinatorics, Phys. Rev. X 7, 041069 (2017).
  39. J.-W. Rhim, J. Behrends, and J. H. Bardarson, Bulk-boundary correspondence from the intercellular Zak phase, Phys. Rev. B 95, 035421 (2017).
  40. A. Bouhon, A. M. Black-Schaffer, and R.-J. Slager, Wilson loop approach to fragile topology of split elementary band representations and topological crystalline insulators with time-reversal symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 100, 195135 (2019).
  41. P. Delplace, D. Ullmo, and G. Montambaux, Zak phase and the existence of edge states in graphene, Phys. Rev. B 84, 195452 (2011).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation