Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Inchworm quasi Monte Carlo for quantum impurities

Hugo U. R. Strand1,2,*, Joseph Kleinhenz3, and Igor Krivenko4

  • *Contact author: hugo.strand@oru.se

Phys. Rev. B 110, L121120 – Published 24 September, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.110.L121120

Abstract

The inchworm expansion is a promising approach to solving strongly correlated quantum impurity models due to its reduction of the sign problem in real and imaginary time. However, inchworm Monte Carlo is computationally expensive, converging as 1/N where N is the number of samples. We show that the imaginary-time integration is amenable to quasi Monte Carlo, with parametrically better 1/N convergence, by mapping the Sobol low-discrepancy sequence from the hypercube to the simplex with the so-called Root transform. This extends the applicability of the inchworm method to, e.g., multiorbital Anderson impurity models with off-diagonal hybridization, relevant for materials simulation, where continuous-time hybridization expansion Monte Carlo has a severe sign problem.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (57)

  1. R. Hanson, L. P. Kouwenhoven, J. R. Petta, S. Tarucha, and L. M. K. Vandersypen, Spins in few-electron quantum dots, Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 1217 (2007).
  2. G. D. Scott and D. Natelson, Kondo resonances in molecular devices, ACS Nano 4, 3560 (2010).
  3. I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and W. Zwerger, Many-body physics with ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 885 (2008).
  4. C. W. J. Beenakker, Theory of Coulomb-blockade oscillations in the conductance of a quantum dot, Phys. Rev. B 44, 1646 (1991).
  5. J. Kondo, Resistance minimum in dilute magnetic alloys, Prog. Theor. Phys. 32, 37 (1964).
  6. K. G. Wilson, The renormalization group: Critical phenomena and the Kondo problem, Rev. Mod. Phys. 47, 773 (1975).
  7. A. Georges, G. Kotliar, W. Krauth, and M. J. Rozenberg, Dynamical mean-field theory of strongly correlated fermion systems and the limit of infinite dimensions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 13 (1996).
  8. G. Rohringer, H. Hafermann, A. Toschi, A. A. Katanin, A. E. Antipov, M. I. Katsnelson, A. I. Lichtenstein, A. N. Rubtsov, and K. Held, Diagrammatic routes to nonlocal correlations beyond dynamical mean field theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 025003 (2018).
  9. T. Ayral and O. Parcollet, Mott physics and spin fluctuations: A unified framework, Phys. Rev. B 92, 115109 (2015).
  10. T. Ayral and O. Parcollet, Mott physics and collective modes: An atomic approximation of the four-particle irreducible functional, Phys. Rev. B 94, 075159 (2016).
  11. P. Sun and G. Kotliar, Extended dynamical mean-field theory and GW method, Phys. Rev. B 66, 085120 (2002).
  12. S. S. Kancharla, B. Kyung, D. Sénéchal, M. Civelli, M. Capone, G. Kotliar, and A.-M. S. Tremblay, Anomalous superconductivity and its competition with antiferromagnetism in doped Mott insulators, Phys. Rev. B 77, 184516 (2008).
  13. M. J. Rozenberg, G. Kotliar, and X. Y. Zhang, Mott-Hubbard transition in infinite dimensions. II, Phys. Rev. B 49, 10181 (1994).
  14. H. Shinaoka, S. Hoshino, M. Troyer, and P. Werner, Phase diagram of pyrochlore iridates: All-in–all-out magnetic ordering and non-Fermi-liquid properties, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 156401 (2015).
  15. H. Zhang, K. Haule, and D. Vanderbilt, Metal-insulator transition and topological properties of pyrochlore iridates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 026404 (2017).
  16. N. V. Prokof'ev, B. V. Svistunov, and I. S. Tupitsyn, Exact, complete, and universal continuous-time worldline Monte Carlo approach to the statistics of discrete quantum systems, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 87, 310 (1998).
  17. A. N. Rubtsov, V. V. Savkin, and A. I. Lichtenstein, Continuous-time quantum Monte Carlo method for fermions, Phys. Rev. B 72, 035122 (2005).
  18. E. Gull, A. J. Millis, A. I. Lichtenstein, A. N. Rubtsov, M. Troyer, and P. Werner, Continuous-time Monte Carlo methods for quantum impurity models, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 349 (2011).
  19. P. Werner, A. Comanac, L. de' Medici, M. Troyer, and A. J. Millis, Continuous-time solver for quantum impurity models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 076405 (2006).
  20. P. Werner and A. J. Millis, Hybridization expansion impurity solver: General formulation and application to Kondo lattice and two-orbital models, Phys. Rev. B 74, 155107 (2006).
  21. K. Haule, Quantum Monte Carlo impurity solver for cluster dynamical mean-field theory and electronic structure calculations with adjustable cluster base, Phys. Rev. B 75, 155113 (2007).
  22. G. Cohen, E. Gull, D. R. Reichman, and A. J. Millis, Taming the dynamical sign problem in real-time evolution of quantum many-body problems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 266802 (2015).
  23. E. Eidelstein, E. Gull, and G. Cohen, Multiorbital quantum impurity solver for general interactions and hybridizations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 206405 (2020).
  24. N. Prokof'ev and B. Svistunov, Bold diagrammatic Monte Carlo technique: When the sign problem is welcome, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 250201 (2007).
  25. N. Prokof'ev and B. Svistunov, Bold diagrammatic Monte Carlo: A generic sign-problem tolerant technique for polaron models and possibly interacting many-body problems, Phys. Rev. B 77, 125101 (2008).
  26. E. Gull, D. R. Reichman, and A. J. Millis, Bold-line diagrammatic Monte Carlo method: General formulation and application to expansion around the noncrossing approximation, Phys. Rev. B 82, 075109 (2010).
  27. G. Cohen, E. Gull, D. R. Reichman, and A. J. Millis, Green's functions from real-time bold-line Monte Carlo calculations: Spectral properties of the nonequilibrium Anderson impurity model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 146802 (2014).
  28. G. Cohen, D. R. Reichman, A. J. Millis, and E. Gull, Green's functions from real-time bold-line Monte Carlo, Phys. Rev. B 89, 115139 (2014).
  29. A. E. Antipov, Q. Dong, J. Kleinhenz, G. Cohen, and E. Gull, Currents and Green's functions of impurities out of equilibrium: Results from inchworm quantum Monte Carlo, Phys. Rev. B 95, 085144 (2017).
  30. J. Dick, F. Y. Kuo, and I. H. Sloan, High-dimensional integration: The quasi-Monte Carlo way, Acta Numer. 22, 133 (2013).
  31. A. B. Owen and P. W. Glynn, Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods, Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics (Springer, Cham, 2018).
  32. D. Nuyens, The Construction of Good Lattice Rules and Polynomial Lattice Rules (De Gruyter, Berlin, 2014), pp. 223–256.
  33. O. Parcollet, M. Ferrero, T. Ayral, H. Hafermann, I. Krivenko, L. Messio, and P. Seth, TRIQS: A toolbox for research on interacting quantum systems, Comput. Phys. Commun. 196, 398 (2015).
  34. P. Seth, I. Krivenko, M. Ferrero, and O. Parcollet, TRIQS/CTHYB: A continuous-time quantum Monte Carlo hybridisation expansion solver for quantum impurity problems, Comput. Phys. Commun. 200, 274 (2016).
  35. M. Eckstein and P. Werner, Nonequilibrium dynamical mean-field calculations based on the noncrossing approximation and its generalizations, Phys. Rev. B 82, 115115 (2010).
  36. I. M. Sobol', On the distribution of points in a cube and the approximate evaluation of integrals, USSR Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 7, 86 (1967).
  37. T. Pillards and R. Cools, Transforming low-discrepancy sequences from a cube to a simplex, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 174, 29 (2005).
  38. M. Maček, P. T. Dumitrescu, C. Bertrand, B. Triggs, O. Parcollet, and X. Waintal, Quantum quasi-Monte Carlo technique for many-body perturbative expansions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 047702 (2020).
  39. A. B. Owen, On dropping the first Sobol' point, in Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods, edited by A. Keller (Springer, Cham, 2022), pp. 71–86.
  40. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevB.110.L121120 for details, which includes Refs. [55, 56, 57].
  41. I. Krivenko, H. U. R. Strand, and J. Kleinhenz, QInchworm.jl: A quasi-Monte Carlo inchworm impurity solver for multi-orbital models (2023), https://github.com/krivenko/QInchworm.jl.
  42. J. Kleinhenz, Keldysh.jl: Julia package for working with Keldysh Green's functions (2023), https://github.com/kleinhenz/Keldysh.jl.
  43. I. Krivenko, KeldyshED.jl: Equilibrium ED solver for finite fermionic models that can compute Keldysh Green's functions (2023), https://github.com/krivenko/KeldyshED.jl.
  44. Strictly speaking, the rate can be proven to scale as N−1log(N)d where d is the dimension for sufficiently smooth integrands (for details, see Supplemental Material [40]).
  45. A. Erpenbeck, W.-T. Lin, T. Blommel, L. Zhang, S. Iskakov, L. Bernheimer, Y. Núñez-Fernández, G. Cohen, O. Parcollet, X. Waintal, and E. Gull, Tensor train continuous time solver for quantum impurity models, Phys. Rev. B 107, 245135 (2023).
  46. A. Boag, E. Gull, and G. Cohen, Inclusion-exclusion principle for many-body diagrammatics, Phys. Rev. B 98, 115152 (2018).
  47. J. Kanamori, Electron correlation and ferromagnetism of transition metals, Prog. Theor. Phys. 30, 275 (1963).
  48. A. Georges, L. d. Medici, and J. Mravlje, Strong correlations from Hund's coupling, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 4, 137 (2013).
  49. J. Kaye, Z. Huang, H. U. R. Strand, and D. Golež, Decomposing imaginary-time Feynman diagrams using separable basis functions: Anderson impurity model strong-coupling expansion, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031034 (2024).
  50. J. Kaye, K. Chen, and O. Parcollet, Discrete Lehmann representation of imaginary time Green's functions, Phys. Rev. B 105, 235115 (2022).
  51. J. Kaye, K. Chen, and H. U. Strand, libdlr: Efficient imaginary time calculations using the discrete Lehmann representation, Comput. Phys. Commun. 280, 108458 (2022).
  52. P. Gunacker, M. Wallerberger, E. Gull, A. Hausoel, G. Sangiovanni, and K. Held, Continuous-time quantum Monte Carlo using worm sampling, Phys. Rev. B 92, 155102 (2015).
  53. P. Gunacker, M. Wallerberger, T. Ribic, A. Hausoel, G. Sangiovanni, and K. Held, Worm-improved estimators in continuous-time quantum Monte Carlo, Phys. Rev. B 94, 125153 (2016).
  54. M. Wallerberger, A. Hausoel, P. Gunacker, A. Kowalski, N. Parragh, F. Goth, K. Held, and G. Sangiovanni, w2dynamics: Local one- and two-particle quantities from dynamical mean field theory, Comput. Phys. Commun. 235, 388 (2019).
  55. A. Meurer, C. P. Smith, M. Paprocki, O. Čertík, S. B. Kirpichev, M. Rocklin, A. Kumar, S. Ivanov, J. K. Moore, S. Singh, T. Rathnayake, S. Vig, B. E. Granger, R. P. Muller, F. Bonazzi, H. Gupta, S. Vats, F. Johansson, F. Pedregosa, M. J. Curry et al., SymPy: Symbolic computing in Python, PeerJ Comput. Sci. 3, e103 (2017).
  56. J. Abate and P. P. Valkó, Multi-precision Laplace transform inversion, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 60, 979 (2004).
  57. J. Dick, Digital Nets and Sequences Discrepancy Theory and Quasi-Monte Carlo Integration (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2010).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation