Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

No bulk thermal currents in massive Dirac fermions

Feng Liu*, A. Daria Dumitriu-I.†, and Alessandro Principi‡

  • *Contact author: feng.liu-6@postgrad.manchester.ac.uk
  • †Contact author: alexandra-daria.dumitriu-iovanescu@outlook. com
  • ‡Contact author: alessandro.principi@manchester.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. B 110, L081404 – Published 9 August, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.110.L081404

Abstract

We calculate the energy current flowing in the bulk of a (2+1)-dimensional system of massive Dirac fermions and along a (1+1)-dimensional domain wall generated by flipping the sign of the particle mass. We show that, at low temperatures and in the long-wavelength limit, the system does not support a bulk thermal Hall current proportional to the temperature gradient. The only such contribution is due to states localized at the domain wall. This puts an end to a controversy existing in the literature and amends previous results obtained via first-order perturbation calculations.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (48)

  1. T. Ideue, T. Kurumaji, S. Ishiwata, and Y. Tokura, Giant thermal Hall effect in multiferroics, Nat. Mater. 16, 797 (2017).
  2. Y. Shimizu, A. Yamakage, and K. Nomura, Quantum thermal Hall effect of Majorana fermions on the surface of superconducting topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B 91, 195139 (2015).
  3. H. Katsura, N. Nagaosa, and P. A. Lee, Theory of the thermal Hall effect in quantum magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 066403 (2010).
  4. F. Zhuo, H. Li, and A. Manchon, Topological phase transition and thermal Hall effect in kagome ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 104, 144422 (2021).
  5. M. Kawano and C. Hotta, Thermal Hall effect and topological edge states in a square-lattice antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 99, 054422 (2019).
  6. S. A. Owerre, Topological thermal Hall effect in frustrated kagome antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 95, 014422 (2017).
  7. Y. Kasahara, K. Sugii, T. Ohnishi, M. Shimozawa, M. Yamashita, N. Kurita, H. Tanaka, J. Nasu, Y. Motome, T. Shibauchi et al., Unusual thermal Hall effect in a Kitaev spin liquid candidate α−RuCl3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 217205 (2018).
  8. Y. Kasahara, T. Ohnishi, Y. Mizukami, O. Tanaka, S. Ma, K. Sugii, N. Kurita, H. Tanaka, J. Nasu, Y. Motome et al., Majorana quantization and half-integer thermal quantum Hall effect in a Kitaev spin liquid, Nature (London) 559, 227 (2018).
  9. Y. Teng, Y. Zhang, R. Samajdar, M. S. Scheurer, and S. Sachdev, Unquantized thermal Hall effect in quantum spin liquids with spinon Fermi surfaces, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033283 (2020).
  10. T. Uehara, T. Ohtsuki, M. Udagawa, S. Nakatsuji, and Y. Machida, Phonon thermal Hall effect in a metallic spin ice, Nat. Commun. 13, 4604 (2022).
  11. A. Auerbach, Equilibrium formulae for transverse magnetotransport of strongly correlated metals, Phys. Rev. B 99, 115115 (2019).
  12. M. Banerjee, M. Heiblum, V. Umansky, D. E. Feldman, Y. Oreg, and A. Stern, Observation of half-integer thermal Hall conductance, Nature (London) 559, 205 (2018).
  13. G. Yang and D. E. Feldman, Influence of device geometry on tunneling in the ν=52 quantum Hall liquid, Phys. Rev. B 88, 085317 (2013).
  14. R. A. Melcer, A. Gil, A. K. Paul, P. Tiwari, V. Umansky, M. Heiblum, Y. Oreg, A. Stern, and E. Berg, Heat conductance of the quantum Hall bulk, Nature (London) 625, 489 (2024).
  15. T. Yokoi, S. Ma, Y. Kasahara, S. Kasahara, T. Shibauchi, N. Kurita, H. Tanaka, J. Nasu, Y. Motome, C. Hickey et al., Half-integer quantized anomalous thermal Hall effect in the Kitaev material candidate α−RuCl3, Science 373, 568 (2021).
  16. X.-T. Zhang, Y. H. Gao, and G. Chen, Thermal Hall effects in quantum magnets, Phys. Rep. 1070, 1 (2024).
  17. J. Luttinger, Theory of thermal transport coefficients, Phys. Rev. 135, A1505 (1964).
  18. N. R. Cooper, B. I. Halperin, and I. M. Ruzin, Thermoelectric response of an interacting two-dimensional electron gas in a quantizing magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B 55, 2344 (1997).
  19. T. Qin, Q. Niu, and J. Shi, Energy magnetization and the thermal Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 236601 (2011).
  20. A. Shitade, Heat transport as torsional responses and Keldysh formalism in a curved spacetime, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2014, 123I01 (2014).
  21. L. Saleem, U. Schwingenschlögl, and A. Manchon, Keldysh theory of thermal transport in multiband Hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. B 109, 134415 (2024).
  22. Y. D. Wang, Z.-G. Zhu, and G. Su, Quantum theory of nonlinear thermal response, Phys. Rev. B 106, 035148 (2022).
  23. R. Nakai, S. Ryu, and K. Nomura, Finite-temperature effective boundary theory of the quantized thermal Hall effect, New J. Phys. 18, 023038 (2016).
  24. R. Nakai, S. Ryu, and K. Nomura, Laughlin's argument for the quantized thermal Hall effect, Phys. Rev. B 95, 165405 (2017).
  25. M. Stone, Gravitational anomalies and thermal Hall effect in topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B 85, 184503 (2012).
  26. B. Bradlyn and N. Read, Low-energy effective theory in the bulk for transport in a topological phase, Phys. Rev. B 91, 125303 (2015).
  27. A. Gromov and A. G. Abanov, Thermal Hall effect and geometry with torsion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 016802 (2015).
  28. Z.-M. Huang, B. Han, and X.-Q. Sun, Torsion, energy magnetization, and thermal Hall effect, Phys. Rev. B 105, 085104 (2022).
  29. Y. Vinkler-Aviv, Bulk thermal transport coefficients in a quantum Hall system and the fundamental difference between thermal and charge response, Phys. Rev. B 100, 041106(R) (2019).
  30. T. L. Hughes, R. G. Leigh, and E. Fradkin, Torsional response and dissipationless viscosity in topological insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 075502 (2011).
  31. R. Samajdar, M. S. Scheurer, S. Chatterjee, H. Guo, C. Xu, and S. Sachdev, Enhanced thermal Hall effect in the square-lattice Néel state, Nat. Phys. 15, 1290 (2019).
  32. F. D. M. Haldane, Model for a quantum Hall effect without Landau levels: Condensed-matter realization of the “parity anomaly”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2015 (1988).
  33. H. Guo, R. Samajdar, M. S. Scheurer, and S. Sachdev, Gauge theories for the thermal Hall effect, Phys. Rev. B 101, 195126 (2020).
  34. J. G. Checkelsky, J. Ye, Y. Onose, Y. Iwasa, and Y. Tokura, Dirac-fermion-mediated ferromagnetism in a topological insulator, Nat. Phys. 8, 729 (2012).
  35. P. Czajka, Exotic thermal transport in a Kitaev magnet, Ph.D. thesis, Princeton University, 2022.
  36. Y. Vinkler-Aviv and A. Rosch, Approximately quantized thermal Hall effect of chiral liquids coupled to phonons, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031032 (2018).
  37. Note that the boundary energy current is not dependent on time, since the boundary free energy (11) and responses derived from it are static. Equation (1) is obtained by assuming that a steady state is achieved. Therefore, the divergence of the energy current must be equal to zero. At the boundary, the current has two contributions: the bulk one jE1(x1,x2) flowing in the x1 direction, and the boundary one jE2(x1,x2)=jEbdry(x2)δ(x1) flowing along the boundary in the direction x2 and localized at x1=0. Integrating the equation ∂μjEμ=0 over x1 across the boundary and using that, by symmetry, jE1(x1=−0)=−jE1(x1=+0), one readily obtains Eq. (1).
  38. K. Nomura, S. Ryu, A. Furusaki, and N. Nagaosa, Cross-correlated responses of topological superconductors and superfluids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 026802 (2012).
  39. In this Letter, we have adopted a form of the action that differs from the one in Ref. [23]. Specifically, we have added total derivatives to the Lagrangian to make it Hermitian. However, this difference does not alter our final conclusions. Based on the action from Ref. [23], the boundary free energy obtained is the same as the one presented in Eq. (11) of the main text, up to a constant that is independent of temperature.
  40. S. M. Carroll, Spacetime and Geometry (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2019).
  41. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevB.110.L081404 for details of the derivations.
  42. H. T. Stoof, K. B. Gubbels, and D. Dickerscheid, Ultracold Quantum Fields (Springer, Berlin, 2009).
  43. J. Hertz and M. Klenin, Fluctuations in itinerant-electron paramagnets, Phys. Rev. B 10, 1084 (1974).
  44. Since we neglected temperature-independent terms in our derivation, this form of the boundary free energy is only valid up to a constant which is independent of temperature.
  45. Y. Zhang, Y. Gao, and D. Xiao, Thermodynamics of energy magnetization, Phys. Rev. B 102, 235161 (2020).
  46. A. Sekine and N. Nagaosa, Quantum kinetic theory of thermoelectric and thermal transport in a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B 101, 155204 (2020).
  47. H. Varshney, K. Das, P. Bhalla, and A. Agarwal, Quantum kinetic theory of nonlinear thermal current, Phys. Rev. B 107, 235419 (2023).
  48. H. Varshney, R. Mukherjee, A. Kundu, and A. Agarwal, Intrinsic nonlinear thermal Hall transport of magnons: A quantum kinetic theory approach, Phys. Rev. B 108, 165412 (2023).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation