Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Strain-induced antiferromagnetic domain switching via the spin Jahn-Teller effect

Dylan Behr1,*, Leonid S. Taran2, Daniel G. Porter3, Alessandro Bombardi3, Dharmalingam Prabhakaran4, Sergey V. Streltsov2,5, and Roger D. Johnson1,3

  • *Contact author: dylan.behr.20@ucl.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. B 110, L060408 – Published 15 August, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.110.L060408

Abstract

The spin Jahn-Teller effect, where a degeneracy of magnetic ground states is spontaneously lifted by structural distortions, lends itself to exploitation by the implied magnetoelastic coupling. CoTi2O5 hosts a frustrated topology of magnetic interactions that could realize such coupling, since the observed magnetic ground state requires a spontaneous monoclinic distortion of the crystal. Using resonant elastic x-ray scattering to simultaneously probe the magnetic structure and lattice distortion of CoTi2O5, we demonstrate near complete magnetic domain switching by an applied uniaxial stress that is conjugate to the monoclinic strain. Our results, supported by density functional theory calculations, confirm that CoTi2O5 displays spin Jahn-Teller effects that can be understood in terms of modulated Heisenberg exchange interactions, and demonstrate the potential functionality of spin Jahn-Teller materials in spintronic devices sensitive to uniaxial strain.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (47)

  1. S.-W. Cheong and M. Mostovoy, Multiferroics: A magnetic twist for ferroelectricity, Nat. Mater. 6, 13 (2007).
  2. D. Khomskii, Classifying multiferroics: Mechanisms and effects, Physics 2, 20 (2009).
  3. D. I. Khomskii, Transition Metal Compounds (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2014).
  4. A. Ceulemans, The Theory of the Jahn-Teller Effect: When a Boson Meets a Fermion (Springer, Berlin, 2022).
  5. A. Steppke, L. Zhao, M. E. Barber, T. Scaffidi, F. Jerzembeck, H. Rosner, A. S. Gibbs, Y. Maeno, S. H. Simon, A. P. Mackenzie, and C. W. Hicks, Strong peak in Tc of Sr2RuO4 under uniaxial pressure, Science 355, eaaf9398 (2017).
  6. H. H. Kim, S. M. Souliou, M. E. Barber, E. Lefrançois, M. Minola, M. Tortora, R. Heid, N. Nandi, R. A. Borzi, G. Garbarino, A. Bosak, J. Porras, T. Loew, M. König, P. M. Moll, A. P. Mackenzie, B. Keimer, C. W. Hicks, and M. Le Tacon, Uniaxial pressure control of competing orders in a high-temperature superconductor, Science 362, 1040 (2018).
  7. H.-H. Kim, E. Lefrançois, K. Kummer, R. Fumagalli, N. B. Brookes, D. Betto, S. Nakata, M. Tortora, J. Porras, T. Loew, M. E. Barber, L. Braicovich, A. P. Mackenzie, C. W. Hicks, B. Keimer, M. Minola, and M. Le Tacon, Charge density waves in YBa2Cu3O6.67 probed by resonant x-ray scattering under uniaxial compression, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 037002 (2021).
  8. P. Malinowski, Q. Jiang, J. J. Sanchez, J. Mutch, Z. Liu, P. Went, J. Liu, P. J. Ryan, J. W. Kim, and J. H. Chu, Suppression of superconductivity by anisotropic strain near a nematic quantum critical point, Nat, Phys, 16, 1189 (2020).
  9. C. Dhital, Z. Yamani, W. Tian, J. Zeretsky, A. S. Sefat, Z. Wang, R. J. Birgeneau, and S. D. Wilson, Effect of uniaxial strain on the structural and magnetic phase transitions in BaFe2As2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 087001 (2012).
  10. T. Janssen, M. Gidding, C. S. Davies, A. V. Kimel, and A. Kirilyuk, Strain-induced magnetic pattern formation in antiferromagnetic iron borate, Phys. Rev. B 108, L140405 (2023).
  11. N. B. Aetukuri, A. X. Gray, M. Drouard, M. Cossale, L. Gao, A. H. Reid, R. Kukreja, H. Ohldag, C. A. Jenkins, E. Arenholz, K. P. Roche, H. A. Dürr, M. G. Samant, and S. S. Parkin, Control of the metalinsulator transition in vanadium dioxide by modifying orbital occupancy, Nat. Phys. 9, 661 (2013).
  12. S. Riccò, M. Kim, A. Tamai, S. McKeown Walker, F. Y. Bruno, I. Cucchi, E. Cappelli, C. Besnard, T. K. Kim, P. Dudin, M. Hoesch, M. J. Gutmann, A. Georges, R. S. Perry, and F. Baumberger, In situ strain tuning of the metal-insulator-transition of Ca2RuO4 in angle-resolved photoemission experiments, Nat. Commun. 9, 4535 (2018).
  13. A. Najev, S. Hameed, D. Gautreau, Z. Wang, J. Joe, M. Požek, T. Birol, R. M. Fernandes, M. Greven, and D. Pelc, Uniaxial strain control of bulk ferromagnetism in rare-earth titanates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 167201 (2022).
  14. O. Rousseau, R. Weil, S. Rohart, and A. Mougin, Strain-induced magnetic domain wall control by voltage in hybrid piezoelectric BaTiO3 ferrimagnetic TbFe structures, Sci. Rep. 6, 23038 (2016).
  15. R. G. Hunt, K. J. A. Franke, P. M. Shepley, and T. A. Moore, Strain-coupled domains in BaTiO3(111)-CoFeB heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B 107, 014409 (2023).
  16. M. Schmitz, A. Weber, O. Petracic, M. Waschk, P. Zakalek, S. Mattauch, A. Koutsioubas, and T. Brückel, Strain and electric field control of magnetism in La(1−x)SrxMnO3 thin films on ferroelectric BaTiO3 substrates, New J. Phys. 22, 053018 (2020).
  17. E. A. Tereshina-Chitrova, L. V. Pourovskii, S. Khmelevskyi, L. Horak, Z. Bao, A. Mackova, P. Malinsky, T. Gouder, and R. Caciuffo, Strain-driven switching between antiferromagnetic states in frustrated antiferromagnet UO2 probed by exchange bias effect, Adv. Funct. Mater. 34, 2311895 (2023).
  18. Z. Ni, A. V. Haglund, H. Wang, B. Xu, C. Bernhard, D. G. Mandrus, X. Qian, E. J. Mele, C. L. Kane, and L. Wu, Imaging the Néel vector switching in the monolayer antiferromagnet MnPSe3 with strain-controlled Ising order, Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 782 (2021).
  19. A. A. Sapozhnik, R. Abrudan, Y. Skourski, M. Jourdan, H. Zabel, M. Kläui, and H. J. Elmers, Manipulation of antiferromagnetic domain distribution in Mn2Au by ultrahigh magnetic fields and by strain, Phys. Status Solidi RRL 11, 1600438 (2017).
  20. C. Schmitt, L. Baldrati, L. Sanchez-Tejerina, F. Schreiber, A. Ross, M. Filianina, S. Ding, F. Fuhrmann, R. Ramos, F. Maccherozzi, D. Backes, M. A. Mawass, F. Kronast, S. Valencia, E. Saitoh, G. Finocchio, and M. Klaüi, Identification of Neél vector orientation in antiferromagnetic domains switched by currents in NiO/Pt thin films, Phys. Rev. Appl. 15, 034047 (2021).
  21. F. K. K. Kirschner, R. D. Johnson, F. Lang, D. D. Khalyavin, P. Manuel, T. Lancaster, D. Prabhakaran, and S. J. Blundell, Spin Jahn-Teller antiferromagnetism in CoTi2O5, Phys. Rev. B 99, 064403 (2019).
  22. Y. Yamashita and K. Ueda, Spin-driven Jahn-Teller distortion in a pyrochlore system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4960 (2000).
  23. O. Tchernyshyov, R. Moessner, and S. L. Sondhi, Order by distortion and string modes in pyrochlore antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 067203 (2002).
  24. O. Tchernyshyov and G. W. Chern, in Introduction to Frustrated Magnetism: Materials, Experiments, Theory, Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences, edited by C. Lacroix, P. Mendels, and F. Mila (Springer, Berlin, 2010), Vol. 164, Chap. 11, pp. 269–290.
  25. R. F. L. Evans, U. Atxitia, and R. W. Chantrell, Quantitative simulation of temperature-dependent magnetization dynamics and equilibrium properties of elemental ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 91, 144425 (2015).
  26. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevB.110.L060408 for a description of the sample mounting within the strain cell, calibration of the strain, details of the density functional theory calculations, analysis of magnetic susceptibility data, and the derivation of the Ehrenfest relation.
  27. B. J. Campbell, H. T. Stokes, D. E. Tanner, and D. M. Hatch, ISODISPLACE: A web-based tool for exploring structural distortions, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 39, 607 (2006).
  28. V. I. Anisimov, F. Aryasetiawan, and A. I. Lichtenstein, First-principles calculations of the electronic structure and spectra of strongly correlated systems: the LDA+U method, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 9, 767 (1997).
  29. J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).
  30. G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996).
  31. H. J. Monkhorst and J. D. Pack, Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations, Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188 (1976).
  32. S. L. Dudarev, G. A. Botton, S. Y. Savrasov, C. J. Humphreys, and A. P. Sutton, Electron-energy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: An LSDA+U study, Phys. Rev. B 57, 1505 (1998).
  33. P. A. Maksimov, A. V. Ushakov, Z. V. Pchelkina, Y. Li, S. M. Winter, and S. V. Streltsov, Ab initio guided minimal model for the “Kitaev” material BaCo2(AsO4)2: Importance of direct hopping, third-neighbor exchange, and quantum fluctuations, Phys. Rev. B 106, 165131 (2022).
  34. S. V. Streltsov, A. S. Mylnikova, A. O. Shorikov, Z. V. Pchelkina, D. I. Khomskii, and V. I. Anisimov, Crystal-field splitting for low symmetry systems in ab initio calculations, Phys. Rev. B 71, 245114 (2005).
  35. R. Dingle, M. E. Lines, and S. L. Holt, Linear-chain antiferromagnetism in [(CH3)4N][MnCl3], Phys. Rev. 187, 643 (1969).
  36. G. R. Wagner and S. A. Friedberg, Linear chain antiferromagnetism in Mn(HCOO)2 2H2O, Phys. Lett. 9, 11 (1964).
  37. D. Mannix, D. F. McMorrow, R. A. Ewings, A. T. Boothroyd, D. Prabhakaran, Y. Joly, B. Janousova, C. Mazzoli, L. Paolasini, and S. B. Wilkins, X-ray scattering study of the order parameters in multiferroic TbMnO3, Phys. Rev. B 76, 184420 (2007).
  38. V. Scagnoli and S. W. Lovesey, Analysis of azimuthal-angle scans in resonant x-ray Bragg diffraction and parity even and odd atomic multipoles in the multiferroic modification of the terbium manganate TbMnO3, Phys. Rev. B 79, 035111 (2009).
  39. Y. Yamasaki, S. Miyasaka, Y. Kaneko, J. P. He, T. Arima, and Y. Tokura, Magnetic reversal of the ferroelectric polarization in a multiferroic spinel oxide, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 207204 (2006).
  40. M. Kenzelmann, A. B. Harris, S. Jonas, C. Broholm, J. Schefer, S. B. Kim, C. L. Zhang, S. W. Cheong, O. P. Vajk, and J. W. Lynn, Magnetic inversion symmetry breaking and ferroelectricity in TbMnO3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 087206 (2005).
  41. H. C. Walker, F. Fabrizi, L. Paolasini, F. De Bergevin, J. Herrero-Martin, A. T. Boothroyd, D. Prabhakaran, and D. F. McMorrow, Femtoscale magnetically induced lattice distortions in multiferroic TbMnO3, Science 333, 1273 (2011).
  42. We note that exchange interactions in real materials can be complicated, and generally include not only coupling with further neighbors, but also nonbilinear terms. However, DFT calculations take into account all these contributions.
  43. P. B. Moin, Second-order phase transitions and Ehrenfest equation for strained solids, Philos. Mag. 93, 4593 (2013).
  44. M. Matsumoto and M. Sigrist, Ehrenfest relations and magnetoelastic effects in field-induced ordered phases, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 74, 2310 (2005).
  45. X. Chen, X. Zhou, R. Cheng, C. Song, J. Zhang, Y. Wu, Y. Ba, H. Li, Y. Sun, Y. You, Y. Zhao, and F. Pan, Electric field control of Néel spin-orbit torque in an antiferromagnet, Nat. Mater. 18, 931 (2019).
  46. B. Barbara, M. F. Rossignol, J. X. Boucherle, and C. Vettier, Multiple-q⃗ structure or coexistence of different magnetic phases in CeAl2? Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 938 (1980).
  47. A. B. Harris and J. Schweizer, Theoretical analysis of the double-q magnetic structure of CeAl2, Phys. Rev. B 74, 134411 (2006).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation