Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Interaction-driven first-order and higher-order topological superconductivity

Pietro M. Bonetti1,*, Debmalya Chakraborty2,*, Xianxin Wu3, and Andreas P. Schnyder1,4

  • *These two authors contributed equally.

Phys. Rev. B 109, L180509 – Published 29 May, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.109.L180509

Abstract

We investigate topological superconductivity in the Rashba-Hubbard model, describing heavy-atom superlattice and van der Waals materials with broken inversion. We focus in particular on fillings close to the van Hove singularities, where a large density of states enhances the superconducting transition temperature. To determine the topology of the superconducting gaps and to analyze the stability of their surface states in the presence of disorder and residual interactions, we employ an fRG+MFT approach, which combines the unbiased functional renormalization group (fRG) with a real-space mean-field theory (MFT). Our approach uncovers a cascade of topological superconducting states, including A1 and B1 pairings, whose wave functions are of dominant p- and d-wave character, respectively, as well as a time-reversal breaking A1+iB1 pairing. While the A1 and B1 states have first-order topology with helical and flat-band Majorana edge states, respectively, the A1+iB1 pairing exhibits second-order topology with Majorana corner modes. We investigate the disorder stability of the bulk superconducting states, analyze interaction-induced instabilities of the edge states, and discuss implications for experimental systems.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (97)

  1. C. Beenakker, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 4, 113 (2013).
  2. A. P. Schnyder and P. M. R. Brydon, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 27, 243201 (2015).
  3. C.-K. Chiu, J. C. Y. Teo, A. P. Schnyder, and S. Ryu, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 035005 (2016).
  4. M. Sato and Y. Ando, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 076501 (2017).
  5. M. M. Sharma, P. Sharma, N. K. Karn, and V. P. S. Awana, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 35, 083003 (2022).
  6. F. O. von Rohr, Chem. Mater. 35, 9455 (2023).
  7. K. Flensberg, F. von Oppen, and A. Stern, Nat. Rev. Mater. 6, 944 (2021).
  8. N. Hao and J. Hu, Natl. Sci. Rev. 6, 213 (2019).
  9. X. Wu, R.-X. Zhang, G. Xu, J. Hu, and C.-X. Liu, in Memorial Volume for Shoucheng Zhang (World Scientific, Singapore, 2021), pp. 35–60.
  10. J.-X. Yin, Z. Wu, J.-H. Wang, Z.-Y. Ye, J. Gong, X.-Y. Hou, L. Shan, A. Li, X.-J. Liang, X.-X. Wu et al., Nat. Phys. 11, 543 (2015).
  11. D. Wang, L. Kong, P. Fan, H. Chen, S. Zhu, W. Liu, L. Cao, Y. Sun, S. Du, J. Schneeloch et al., Science 362, 333 (2018).
  12. V. Mourik, K. Zuo, S. M. Frolov, S. R. Plissard, E. P. A. M. Bakkers, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, Science 336, 1003 (2012).
  13. M. Aghaee et al. (Microsoft Quantum), Phys. Rev. B 107, 245423 (2023).
  14. J. P. Carbotte and F. Marsiglio, Electron-phonon superconductivity, in The Physics of Superconductors, edited by K. H. Bennemann, J. B. Ketterson (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2003).
  15. P. M. R. Brydon, S. Das Sarma, H.-Y. Hui, and J. D. Sau, Phys. Rev. B 90, 184512 (2014).
  16. O. Can, T. Tummuru, R. P. Day, I. Elfimov, A. Damascelli, and M. Franz, Nat. Phys. 17, 519 (2021).
  17. W. Kohn and J. M. Luttinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 15, 524 (1965).
  18. R. Nandkishore, L. S. Levitov, and A. V. Chubukov, Nat. Phys. 8, 158 (2012).
  19. J. González and T. Stauber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 026801 (2019).
  20. S. Blundell, Magnetism in Condensed Matter, Oxford Master Series in Condensed Matter Physics 4 (Oxford University, Oxford, 2001).
  21. A. L. Sharpe, E. J. Fox, A. W. Barnard, J. Finney, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. A. Kastner, and D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Science 365, 605 (2019).
  22. M. Fleischmann, R. Gupta, F. Wullschläger, S. Theil, D. Weckbecker, V. Meded, S. Sharma, B. Meyer, and S. Shallcross, Nano Lett. 20, 971 (2020).
  23. D. Fay and J. Appel, Phys. Rev. B 22, 3173 (1980).
  24. C. Honerkamp and M. Salmhofer, Phys. Rev. B 64, 184516 (2001).
  25. K. S. Novoselov, A. Mishchenko, A. Carvalho, and A. H. C. Neto, Science 353, aac9439 (2016).
  26. Y. Liu, N. O. Weiss, X. Duan, H.-C. Cheng, Y. Huang, and X. Duan, Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 16042 (2016).
  27. R. Bian, C. Li, Q. Liu, G. Cao, Q. Fu, P. Meng, J. Zhou, F. Liu, and Z. Liu, Natl. Sci. Rev. 9, nwab164 (2022).
  28. M. Shimozawa, S. K. Goh, R. Endo, R. Kobayashi, T. Watashige, Y. Mizukami, H. Ikeda, H. Shishido, Y. Yanase, T. Terashima et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 156404 (2014).
  29. Z. Liu, Y.-X. Wang, Y.-H. Fang, S.-X. Qin, Z.-M. Wang, S.-D. Jiang, and S. Gao, Natl. Sci. Rev. 7, 1557 (2020).
  30. Y. Zhang, F. Xue, C. Tang, J. Li, L. Liao, L. Li, X. Liu, Y. Yang, C. Song, and X. Kou, ACS Nano 14, 17396 (2020).
  31. M.-G. Kang, J.-G. Choi, J. Jeong, J. Y. Park, H.-J. Park, T. Kim, T. Lee, K.-J. Kim, K.-W. Kim, J. H. Oh et al., Nat. Commun. 12, 7111 (2021).
  32. A. Greco and A. P. Schnyder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 177002 (2018).
  33. A. Greco, M. Bejas, and A. P. Schnyder, Phys. Rev. B 101, 174420 (2020).
  34. R. Ghadimi, M. Kargarian, and S. A. Jafari, Phys. Rev. B 99, 115122 (2019).
  35. S. Wolf and S. Rachel, Phys. Rev. B 102, 174512 (2020).
  36. K. Nogaki and Y. Yanase, Phys. Rev. B 102, 165114 (2020).
  37. M. Biderang, M.-H. Zare, and J. Sirker, Phys. Rev. B 105, 064504 (2022).
  38. M. Kawano and C. Hotta, Phys. Rev. B 107, 045123 (2023).
  39. J. Beyer, J. B. Profe, L. Klebl, T. Schwemmer, D. M. Kennes, R. Thomale, C. Honerkamp, and S. Rachel, Phys. Rev. B 107, 125115 (2023).
  40. H. J. Schulz, Europhys. Lett. 4, 609 (1987).
  41. P. Kopietz, L. Bartosch, and F. Schütz, Introduction to the Functional Renormalization Group (Springer, Berlin, 2010).
  42. W. Metzner, M. Salmhofer, C. Honerkamp, V. Meden, and K. Schönhammer, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 299 (2012).
  43. J. Lichtenstein, D. Sánchez de la Peña, D. Rohe, E. Di Napoli, C. Honerkamp, and S. A. Maier, Comput. Phys. Commun. 213, 100 (2017).
  44. Y. Wang, M. Lin, and T. L. Hughes, Phys. Rev. B 98, 165144 (2018).
  45. Z. Yan, F. Song, and Z. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 096803 (2018).
  46. Q. Wang, C.-C. Liu, Y.-M. Lu, and F. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 186801 (2018).
  47. X. Wu, X. Liu, R. Thomale, and C.-X. Liu, Natl. Sci. Rev. 9, nwab087 (2022).
  48. Y.-T. Hsu, W. S. Cole, R.-X. Zhang, and J. D. Sau, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 097001 (2020).
  49. M. Kheirkhah, Z. Yan, Y. Nagai, and F. Marsiglio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 017001 (2020).
  50. X. Wu, W. A. Benalcazar, Y. Li, R. Thomale, C.-X. Liu, and J. Hu, Phys. Rev. X 10, 041014 (2020).
  51. S. Ikegaya, W. B. Rui, D. Manske, and A. P. Schnyder, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 023007 (2021).
  52. T. Li, M. Geier, J. Ingham, and H. D. Scammell, 2D Mater. 9, 015031 (2022).
  53. M. Håkansson, T. Löfwander, and M. Fogelström, Nat. Phys. 11, 755 (2015).
  54. P. Holmvall, M. Fogelström, T. Löfwander, and A. B. Vorontsov, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013104 (2020).
  55. D. Chakraborty, T. Löfwander, M. Fogelström, and A. M. Black-Schaffer, npj Quantum Mater. 7, 44 (2022).
  56. See Supplemental Material, which contains Refs. [24, 42, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97], at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevB.109.L180509 for details on the fRG+MFT method, the symmetry classification of the superconducting states, the real-space MF theory, the topological edge and corner states, the magnetic fluctuations, the results for different parameter choices, the disorder effects, and the momentum dependence of the gap functions.
  57. C. Husemann and M. Salmhofer, Phys. Rev. B 79, 195125 (2009).
  58. W.-S. Wang, Y.-Y. Xiang, Q.-H. Wang, F. Wang, F. Yang, and D.-H. Lee, Phys. Rev. B 85, 035414 (2012).
  59. C. Husemann, K.-U. Giering, and M. Salmhofer, Phys. Rev. B 85, 075121 (2012).
  60. D. Vilardi, C. Taranto, and W. Metzner, Phys. Rev. B 96, 235110 (2017).
  61. N. Dupuis, L. Canet, A. Eichhorn, W. Metzner, J. Pawlowski, M. Tissier, and N. Wschebor, Phys. Rep. 910, 1 (2021).
  62. J. Wang, A. Eberlein, and W. Metzner, Phys. Rev. B 89, 121116(R) (2014).
  63. H. Yamase, A. Eberlein, and W. Metzner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 096402 (2016).
  64. D. Vilardi, P. M. Bonetti, and W. Metzner, Phys. Rev. B 102, 245128 (2020).
  65. P. M. Bonetti, Phys. Rev. B 102, 235160 (2020).
  66. S. Kashiwaya and Y. Tanaka, Rep. Prog. Phys. 63, 1641 (2000).
  67. T. Löfwander, V. S. Shumeiko, and G. Wendin, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 14, R53 (2001).
  68. S. Ryu and Y. Hatsugai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 077002 (2002).
  69. M. Sato, Y. Tanaka, K. Yada, and T. Yokoyama, Phys. Rev. B 83, 224511 (2011).
  70. A. P. Schnyder, C. Timm, and P. M. R. Brydon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 077001 (2013).
  71. X.-L. Qi, T. L. Hughes, and S.-C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B 81, 134508 (2010).
  72. P. Anderson, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 11, 26 (1959).
  73. A. Garg, M. Randeria, and N. Trivedi, Nat. Phys. 4, 762 (2008).
  74. D. Chakraborty and A. Ghosal, New J. Phys. 16, 103018 (2014).
  75. D. Chakraborty, N. Kaushal, and A. Ghosal, Phys. Rev. B 96, 134518 (2017).
  76. A. Ghosal, D. Chakraborty, and N. Kaushal, Phys. B (Amsterdam, Neth.) 536, 867 (2018).
  77. R. Queiroz and A. P. Schnyder, Phys. Rev. B 89, 054501 (2014).
  78. R. Queiroz and A. P. Schnyder, Phys. Rev. B 91, 014202 (2015).
  79. Y. Lu, P. Virtanen, and T. T. Heikkilä, Phys. Rev. B 102, 224510 (2020).
  80. H. Alloul, J. Bobroff, M. Gabay, and P. J. Hirschfeld, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 45 (2009).
  81. M. L. Kiesel and R. Thomale, Phys. Rev. B 86, 121105(R) (2012).
  82. X. Wu, T. Schwemmer, T. Müller, A. Consiglio, G. Sangiovanni, D. Di Sante, Y. Iqbal, W. Hanke, A. P. Schnyder, M. M. Denner et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 177001 (2021).
  83. M. Shimozawa, S. K. Goh, T. Shibauchi, and Y. Matsuda, Rep. Prog. Phys. 79, 074503 (2016).
  84. A. D. Caviglia, S. Gariglio, N. Reyren, D. Jaccard, T. Schneider, M. Gabay, S. Thiel, G. Hammerl, J. Mannhart, and J. M. Triscone, Nature (London) 456, 624 (2008).
  85. C. Liu, X. Yan, D. Jin, Y. Ma, H.-W. Hsiao, Y. Lin, T. M. Bretz-Sullivan, X. Zhou, J. Pearson, B. Fisher et al., Science 371, 716 (2021).
  86. Y. Mizukami, H. Shishido, T. Shibauchi, M. Shimozawa, S. Yasumoto, D. Watanabe, M. Yamashita, H. Ikeda, T. Terashima, H. Kontani et al., Nat. Phys. 7, 849 (2011).
  87. B. G. Jang, C. Lee, J.-X. Zhu, and J. H. Shim, npj 2D Mater Appl. 6, 80 (2022).
  88. H. Hegger, C. Petrovic, E. G. Moshopoulou, M. F. Hundley, J. L. Sarrao, Z. Fisk, and J. D. Thompson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4986 (2000).
  89. V. Posey et al., APS March Meeting 2023, https://meetings.aps.org/Meeting/MAR23/Session/G29.5 (2023).
  90. F. Ando, Y. Miyasaka, T. Li, J. Ishizuka, T. Arakawa, Y. Shiota, T. Moriyama, Y. Yanase, and T. Ono, Nature (London) 584, 373 (2020).
  91. A. Daido, Y. Ikeda, and Y. Yanase, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 037001 (2022).
  92. M. Chazono, H. Watanabe, and Y. Yanase, Phys. Rev. B 105, 024509 (2022).
  93. C. Wetterich, Phys. Lett. B 301, 90 (1993).
  94. G. A. H. Schober, J. Ehrlich, T. Reckling, and C. Honerkamp, Front. Phys. 6, 32 (2018).
  95. C. Platt, W. Hanke, and R. Thomale, Adv. Phys. 62, 453 (2013).
  96. J. Zhu, Bogoliubov-de Gennes Method and Its Applications, Lecture Notes in Physics (Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2016).
  97. A. P. Schnyder, P. M. R. Brydon, and C. Timm, Phys. Rev. B 85, 024522 (2012).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation