Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Competing charge and magnetic order in the candidate centrosymmetric skyrmion host EuGa2Al2

A. M. Vibhakar1,*, D. D. Khalyavin2, J. M. Moya3,4,5, P. Manuel2, F. Orlandi2, S. Lei4,5, E. Morosan3,4,5, and A. Bombardi1,6

  • 1Diamond Light Source Ltd, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire OX11 0DE, United Kingdom
  • 2ISIS facility, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory-STFC, Chilton, Didcot OX11 0QX, United Kingdom
  • 3Applied Physics Program, Smalley-Curl Institute, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, USA
  • 4Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, USA
  • 5Rice Center for Quantum Materials (RCQM), Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, USA
  • 6Clarendon Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PU, United Kingdom

  • *Corresponding author: anuradha.vibhakar@diamond.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. B 108, L100404 – Published 22 September, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.108.L100404

Abstract

Eu(Ga1−xAlx)4 are centrosymmetric systems that have recently been identified as candidates to stabilize topologically nontrivial magnetic phases, such as skyrmion lattices. In this Letter, we present a high-resolution resonant x-ray and neutron scattering study on EuGa2Al2 that provides new details of the complex coupling between the electronic ordering phenomena. Our results unambiguously demonstrate that the system orders to form a spin density wave with moments aligned perpendicular to the direction of the propagation vector below 19.5 K, and upon further cooling below 15 K, a cycloid with moments in the ab plane, in contrast to what has been reported in the literature. We show that concomitant with the onset of the spin density wave is the suppression of the charge density wave order, indicative of a coupling between the localized 4f electrons and itinerant electron density. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the charge density wave order breaks the fourfold symmetry present in the I4/mmm crystal structure, thus declassifying these systems as square-net magnets.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (31)

  1. S. Ishiwata, T. Nakajima, J.-H. Kim, D. S. Inosov, N. Kanazawa, J. S. White, J. L. Gavilano, R. Georgii, K. M. Seemann, G. Brandl, P. Manuel, D. D. Khalyavin, S. Seki, Y. Tokunaga, M. Kinoshita, Y. W. Long, Y. Kaneko, Y. Taguchi, T. Arima, B. Keimer et al., Phys. Rev. B 101, 134406 (2020).
  2. T. Okubo, S. Chung, and H. Kawamura, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 017206 (2012).
  3. A. O. Leonov and M. Mostovoy, Nat. Commun. 6, 8275 (2015).
  4. C. D. Batista, S.-Z. Lin, S. Hayami, and Y. Kamiya, Rep. Prog. Phys. 79, 084504 (2016).
  5. S.-Z. Lin and S. Hayami, Phys. Rev. B 93, 064430 (2016).
  6. R. Ozawa, S. Hayami, and Y. Motome, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 147205 (2017).
  7. R. Yambe and S. Hayami, Sci. Rep. 11 11184 (2021).
  8. S. Hayami and Y. Motome, Phys. Rev. B 103, 024439 (2021).
  9. J. A. M. Paddison, B. K. Rai, A. F. May, S. Calder, M. B. Stone, M. D. Frontzek, and A. D. Christianson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 137202 (2022).
  10. T. Kurumaji, T. Nakajima, M. Hirschberger, A. Kikkawa, Y. Yamasaki, H. Sagayama, H. Nakao, Y. Taguchi, T. hisa Arima, and Y. Tokura, Science 365, 914 (2019).
  11. M. Hirschberger, L. Spitz, T. Nomoto, T. Kurumaji, S. Gao, J. Masell, T. Nakajima, A. Kikkawa, Y. Yamasaki, H. Sagayama et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 076602 (2020).
  12. M. Hirschberger, T. Nakajima, S. Gao, L. Peng, A. Kikkawa, T. Kurumaji, M. Kriener, Y. Yamasaki, H. Sagayama, H. Nakao et al., Nat. Commun. 10, 5831 (2019).
  13. N. D. Khanh, T. Nakajima, X. Yu, S. Gao, K. Shibata, M. Hirschberger, Y. Yamasaki, H. Sagayama, H. Nakao, L. Peng et al., Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 444 (2020).
  14. Y. Yasui, C. J. Butler, N. D. Khanh, S. Hayami, T. Nomoto, T. Hanaguri, Y. Motome, R. Arita, T.-h. Arima, Y. Tokura et al., Nat. Commun. 11, 5925 (2020).
  15. J. M. Moya, S. Lei, E. M. Clements, C. S. Kengle, S. Sun, K. Allen, Q. Li, Y. Y. Peng, A. A. Husain, M. Mitrano, M. J. Krogstad, R. Osborn, A. B. Puthirath, S. Chi, L. Debeer-Schmitt, J. Gaudet, P. Abbamonte, J. W. Lynn, and E. Morosan, Phys. Rev. Mater. 6, 074201 (2022).
  16. R. Takagi, N. Matsuyama, V. Ukleev, L. Yu, J. S. White, S. Francoual, J. R. Mardegan, S. Hayami, H. Saito, K. Kaneko et al., Nat. Commun. 13, 1472 (2022).
  17. M. Stavinoha, J. A. Cooley, S. G. Minasian, T. M. McQueen, S. M. Kauzlarich, C.-L. Huang, and E. Morosan, Phys. Rev. B 97, 195146 (2018).
  18. Private Communication.
  19. K. Kaneko, T. Kawasaki, A. Nakamura, K. Munakata, A. Nakao, T. Hanashima, R. Kiyanagi, T. Ohhara, M. Hedo, T. Nakama, and Y. Ōnuki, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 90, 064704 (2021).
  20. S. P. Collins, A. Bombardi, A. R. Marshall, J. H. Williams, G. Barlow, A. G. Day, M. R. Pearson, R. J. Woolliscroft, R. D. Walton, G. Beutier, and G. Nisbet, AIP Conf. Proc. 1234, 303 (2010).
  21. See Supplemental Material at https://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevB.108.L100404 for further details of the resonant x-ray scattering experiments, the analysis used to determine the symmetry of the incommensurately modulated crystal structure, temperature dependent data of the charge density wave reflections, the magnetic symmetry analysis, details of the resonant magnetic x-ray simulations, data used to determine the magnetic structure in the AFM1 phase, and the refinement of the neutron powder diffraction data used to determine the magnetic structure in the AFM3 phase. It also contains Refs.  [22, 23].
  22. S. Watanabe, A. K. Adya, L. Rycerz, A. C. Barnes, M. Gaune-Escard, Y. Okamoto, H. Akatsuka, and H. Matsuura, Prog. Nucl. Energy 47, 632 (2005).
  23. B. J. Campbell, H. T. Stokes, D. E. Tanner, and D. M. Hatch, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 39, 607 (2006).
  24. S. Ramakrishnan, S. R. Kotla, T. Rekis, J.-K. Bao, C. Eisele, L. Noohinejad, M. Tolkiehn, C. Paulmann, B. Singh, R. Verma, B. Bag, R. Kulkarni, A. Thamizhavel, B. Singh, S. Ramakrishnan, and S. van Smaalen, IUCrJ 9, 378 (2022).
  25. M. Kobata, S.-i. Fujimori, Y. Takeda, T. Okane, Y. Saitoh, K. Kobayashi, H. Yamagami, A. Nakamura, M. Hedo, T. Nakama, and Y. Ōnuki, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 85, 094703 (2016).
  26. T. H. Salters, F. Orlandi, T. Berry, J. F. Khoury, E. Whittaker, P. Manuel, and L. M. Schoop, Phys. Rev. Mater. 7, 044203 (2023).
  27. Private Communication.
  28. L. C. Chapon, P. Manuel, P. G. Radaelli, C. Benson, L. Perrott, S. Ansell, N. J. Rhodes, D. Raspino, D. Duxbury, E. Spill, and J. Norris, Neutron News 22, 22 (2011).
  29. M. Kenzelmann, A. B. Harris, S. Jonas, C. Broholm, J. Schefer, S. B. Kim, C. L. Zhang, S.-W. Cheong, O. P. Vajk, and J. W. Lynn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 087206 (2005).
  30. A. Daoud-Aladine, B. Kundys, C. Martin, P. G. Radaelli, P. J. Brown, C. Simon, and L. C. Chapon, Phys. Rev. B 80, 220402(R) (2009).
  31. A. M. Vibhakar, D. D. Khalyavin, J. M. Moya, P. Manuel, F. Orlandi, S. Lei, E. Morosan, and A. Bombardi, doi:10.5286/ISIS.E.RB2310461.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation