Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Normalization of exact quasiparticle wave functions in the Green's function method guaranteed by the Ward identity

Takeru Nakashima, Hannes Raebiger, and Kaoru Ohno*

  • Department of Physics, Yokohama National University, 79-5 Tokiwadai, Hodogaya-ku, Yokohama 240-8501, Japan

  • *ohno@ynu.ac.jp

Phys. Rev. B 104, L201116 – Published 29 November, 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.104.L201116

Abstract

It has been a long-standing problem in N-electron systems as to how to solve the Dyson equation with the quasiparticle wave functions defined as 〈Ψ0N|ψs(r)|ΨνN+1〉 and 〈ΨμN−1|ψs(r)|Ψ0N〉, which are not mutually orthogonal and have a norm less than 1. We show that quasiparticle wave functions without multiple excitations can exactly be normalized to unity owing to the Ward identity and the vertex function in (q,ω′−ω)→0, although they are not necessarily mutually orthogonal. Since they satisfy an eigenvalue equation with the hermitized self-energy due to Baym-Kadanoff's conservation laws, the present theory can be regarded as an extension of the Kohn-Sham density functional theory, with correlated, interacting, one-electron orbitals.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (35)

  1. L. Hedin, Phys. Rev. 139, A796 (1965).
  2. L. Hedin and S. Lundqvist, in Solid State Physics, edited by F. Seitz, D. Turnbull, and H. Ehrenreich (Academic Press, New York, 1969), Vol. 23, pp. 1–180.
  3. M. S. Hybertsen and S. G. Louie, Phys. Rev. B 34, 5390 (1986).
  4. R. W. Godby, M. Schlüter, and L. J. Sham, Phys. Rev. B 37, 10159 (1988).
  5. B. Holm and U. von Barth, Phys. Rev. B 57, 2108 (1998).
  6. F. Arywasetiawan and O. Gunnarsson, Rep. Prog. Phys. 61, 237 (1998).
  7. G. Onida, L. Reining, and A. Rubio, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 601 (2002).
  8. T. Kotani, M. van Schilfgaarde, and S. V. Faleev, Phys. Rev. B 76, 165106 (2007).
  9. M. Shishkin, M. Marsman, and G. Kresse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 246403 (2007).
  10. F. Caruso, P. Rinke, X. Ren, A. Rubio, and M. Scheffler, Phys. Rev. B 88, 075105 (2013).
  11. P. Koval, D. Foerster, and D. Sánchez-Portal, Phys. Rev. B 89, 155417 (2014).
  12. R. Kuwahara and K. Ohno, Phys. Rev. A 90, 032506 (2014).
  13. M. J. van Setten, F. Caruso, S. Sharifzadeh, X. Ren, M. Scheffler, F. Liu, J. Lischner, L. Lin, J. R. Deslippe, S. G. Louie, C. Yang, F. Weigend, J. B. Neaton, F. Evers, and P. Rinke, J. Chem. Theor. Comp. 11, 5665 (2015).
  14. Y. Takada, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 226402 (2001).
  15. A. Grüneis, G. Kresse, Y. Hinuma, and F. Oba, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 096401 (2014).
  16. R. Kuwahara, Y. Noguchi, and K. Ohno, Phys. Rev. B 94, 121116(R) (2016).
  17. G. Y. Csanak, H. S. Taylor, and R. Yaris, Adv. Atomic Mol. Phys. 7, 287 (1971).
  18. A. B. Migdal, Sov. Phys. JETP 5, 333 (1957) [Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 32, 399 (1957)].
  19. A. J. Layzer, Phys. Rev. 129, 897 (1963).
  20. F. Hüser, T. Olsen, and K. S. Thygesen, Phys. Rev. B 87, 235132 (2013).
  21. F. Aryasetiawan, R. Sakuma, and K. Karlsson, Phys. Rev. B 85, 035106 (2012).
  22. Y. Takahashi, Nuovo Cimento 6, 371 (1957).
  23. J. R. Schrieffer, Theory of Superconductivity (Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 1964; CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2018).
  24. G. Strinati, Nuovo Cimento 11, 1 (1988).
  25. P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. 136, B864 (1964).
  26. W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Phys. Rev. 140, A1133 (1965).
  27. L. J. Sham and M. Schlüter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1888 (1983).
  28. G. Baym and L. P. Kadanoff, Phys. Rev. 124, 287 (1961).
  29. G. Strinati, H. J. Mattausch, and W. Hanke, Phys. Rev. B 25, 2867 (1982).
  30. A. Klein and R. Prange, Phys. Rev. 112, 994 (1958).
  31. For i≤N, ϕ̃i(1,s) can be made from ϕ¯i(1,s) by using the Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization to all the other N−1 orbitals ϕ¯j*(1,s) (j≠i). For i>N, an analogous procedure is possible.
  32. This comes from the Dyson equation in two equivalent forms G(ω)=G0(ω)+G0(ω)Σ(ω)G(ω)=G0(ω)+G(ω)Σ(ω)G0(ω), which corresponds to Σ=Σ¯ in Eq. (6.6) of Ref. [24].
  33. P. Nozières, Theory of Interacting Fermi Systems (Westview Press, 1964; CRC Press, FL, 2018).
  34. K. Ohno, S. Ono, and T. Isobe, J. Chem. Phys. 146, 084108 (2017).
  35. K. Ohno, K. Esfarjani, and Y. Kawazoe, Computational Materials Science: From Ab Initio to Monte Carlo Methods, 2nd ed. (Springer, Berlin, 2018).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation