Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access

Relaxation dynamics of a quantum spin coupled to a topological edge state

Qiyu Liu1, Christoph Karrasch1, Dante Marvin Kennes2,3, and Roman Rausch1

Phys. Rev. B 111, 235153 – Published 30 June, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/5qpv-b7l3

Abstract

A classical impurity spin coupled to the spinful Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (SSH) chain is known to exhibit complex switching dynamics with incomplete spin relaxation. Here, we study the corrections that result from a full quantum treatment of the impurity spin. We find that in the topologically trivial case, the quantum spin behaves similarly to the classical one due to the absence of the Kondo effect for the trivial insulator. In the topological case, the quantum spin is significantly less likely to relax: It can be stuck at a prerelaxation plateau with a sizable deviation from the expected relaxed value, and there is a large parameter regime where it does not relax at all but features an anomalously large Larmor frequency. Furthermore, we find an additional quantum effect where the prerelaxation plateau can be hyperpolarized, i.e., the spin is stuck at a polarization value larger than the ground-state expectation value. This is possible due to the (incomplete) Kondo screening of the quantum spin, which is absent in the classical case. Our results are obtained via the ground-state density-matrix renormalization group algorithm (DMRG) and the time-dependent variational principle (TDVP), where the charge-SU(2) symmetry of the problem was exploited. Furthermore, we introduce and benchmark a method to predict the dynamics from the given numerical data based on the sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics (SINDy). This allows us to prolong the simulation timescale by a factor of 2.5, up to a maximal time of 103 inverse hoppings.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (33)

  1. J. Kondo, in Solid State Physics, edited by F. Seitz, D. Turnbull, and H. Ehrenreich (Academic, New York, 1969), Vol. 23, p. 183.
  2. K. G. Wilson, The renormalization group: Critical phenomena and the Kondo problem, Rev. Mod. Phys. 47, 773 (1975).
  3. L. Kohn and G. E. Santoro, Quench dynamics of the Anderson impurity model at finite temperature using matrix product states: entanglement and bath dynamics, J. Stat. Mech. (2022) 063102.
  4. J. Thoenniss, M. Sonner, A. Lerose, and D. A. Abanin, Efficient method for quantum impurity problems out of equilibrium, Phys. Rev. B 107, L201115 (2023).
  5. T. A. Costi, Renormalization-group approach to nonequilibrium green functions in correlated impurity systems, Phys. Rev. B 55, 3003 (1997).
  6. P. Nordlander, M. Pustilnik, Y. Meir, N. S. Wingreen, and D. C. Langreth, How long does it take for the Kondo effect to develop? Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 808 (1999).
  7. B. Lechtenberg and F. B. Anders, Spatial and temporal propagation of Kondo correlations, Phys. Rev. B 90, 045117 (2014).
  8. J. Bouaziz, M. S. Dias, Filipe Souza Mendes Guimarães, and S. Lounis, Spin dynamics of 3d and 4d impurities embedded in prototypical topological insulators, Phys. Rev. Mater. 3, 054201 (2019).
  9. A. Narayan, I. Rungger, and S. Sanvito, Single atom anisotropic magnetoresistance on a topological insulator surface, New J. Phys. 17, 033021 (2015).
  10. L. Chotorlishvili, A. Ernst, V. K. Dugaev, A. Komnik, M. G. Vergniory, E. V. Chulkov, and J. Berakdar, Magnetic fluctuations in topological insulators with ordered magnetic adatoms: Cr on Bi2Se3 from first principles, Phys. Rev. B 89, 075103 (2014).
  11. A. Sarsen and C. Valagiannopoulos, Robust polarization twist by pairs of multilayers with tilted optical axes, Phys. Rev. B 99, 115304 (2019).
  12. S. A. Hassani Gangaraj, C. Valagiannopoulos, and F. Monticone, Topological scattering resonances at ultralow frequencies, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023180 (2020).
  13. W. P. Su, J. R. Schrieffer, and A. J. Heeger, Soliton excitations in polyacetylene, Phys. Rev. B 22, 2099 (1980).
  14. A. J. Heeger, S. Kivelson, J. R. Schrieffer, and W. P. Su, Solitons in conducting polymers, Rev. Mod. Phys. 60, 781 (1988).
  15. M. Elbracht and M. Potthoff, Long-time relaxation dynamics of a spin coupled to a Chern insulator, Phys. Rev. B 103, 024301 (2021).
  16. J. Haegeman, C. Lubich, I. Oseledets, B. Vandereycken, and F. Verstraete, Unifying time evolution and optimization with matrix product states, Phys. Rev. B 94, 165116 (2016).
  17. S. L. Brunton, J. L. Proctor, and J. N. Kutz, Discovering governing equations from data by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 3932 (2016).
  18. M. Quade, M. Abel, J. Nathan Kutz, and S. L. Brunton, Sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics for rapid model recovery, Chaos 28, 063116 (2018).
  19. K. Kaheman, J. N. Kutz, and S. L. Brunton, SINDy-PI: a robust algorithm for parallel implicit sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics, Proc. R. Soc. A 476, 20200279 (2020).
  20. F. Abdullah and P. D. Christofides, Data-based modeling and control of nonlinear process systems using sparse identification: An overview of recent results, Comput. Chem. Eng. 174, 108247 (2023).
  21. S. Zhang, Pseudospin symmetry and new collective modes of the Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 120 (1990).
  22. F. H. Essler, H. Frahm, F. Göhmann, A. Klümper, and V. E. Korepin, The One-Dimensional Hubbard Model (Cambridge University, Cambridge, 2005).
  23. I. P. McCulloch and M. Gulácsi, The non-Abelian density matrix renormalization group algorithm, Europhys. Lett. 57, 852 (2002).
  24. C. Hubig, I. P. McCulloch, U. Schollwöck, and F. A. Wolf, Strictly single-site DMRG algorithm with subspace expansion, Phys. Rev. B 91, 155115 (2015).
  25. H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford University, New York, 2002).
  26. J. Fransson, Detection of spin reversal and nutations through current measurements, Nanotechnology 19, 285714 (2008).
  27. S. Bhattacharjee, L. Nordström, and J. Fransson, Atomistic spin dynamic method with both damping and moment of inertia effects included from first principles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 057204 (2012).
  28. M. Sayad and M. Potthoff, Spin dynamics and relaxation in the classical-spin Kondo-impurity model beyond the Landau-Lifschitz-Gilbert equation, New J. Phys. 17, 113058 (2015).
  29. E. Vedmedenko and M. Potthoff, Fluctuations and dynamics of magnetic nanoparticles, in Atomic- and Nanoscale Magnetism, edited by R. Wiesendanger (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2018), pp. 267–284.
  30. M. Elbracht and M. Potthoff, Pre-relaxation in quantum, classical, and quantum-classical two-impurity models, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 033275 (2024).
  31. M. Sayad, R. Rausch, and M. Potthoff, Inertia effects in the real-time dynamics of a quantum spin coupled to a Fermi sea, Europhys. Lett. 116, 17001 (2016).
  32. F. Heidrich-Meisner, S. R. Manmana, M. Rigol, A. Muramatsu, A. E. Feiguin, and E. Dagotto, Quantum distillation: Dynamical generation of low-entropy states of strongly correlated fermions in an optical lattice, Phys. Rev. A 80, 041603(R) (2009).
  33. C. Stahl and M. Potthoff, Anomalous spin precession under a geometrical torque, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 227203 (2017).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation