Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Adiabatic non-Abelian braiding of imperfect Majorana bound states

Maximilian Nitsch1, Viktor Svensson2, William Samuelson1, Konstantin Nestmann1, Jeroen Danon3, Karsten Flensberg4, Rubén Seoane Souto5,6, and Martin Leijnse1

Phys. Rev. B 113, L201408 – Published 21 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/3vcb-pxp6

Abstract

Demonstration of a nontrivial result of quasiparticle exchange (or braiding) is usually considered the definitive proof of a topological phase with non-Abelian excitations, such as Majorana bound states (MBSs). However, in finite systems with disorder and smooth potential variations, the MBSs are imperfect in the sense that they are not fully isolated in space and can, to a varying degree, resemble conventional fermions. The main goal of this work is to reveal the braiding properties of isolated MBSs, regular fermions, and anything in between. We start from an experimentally attractive braiding protocol and find a way to compensate for the undesired splitting of the ground-state degeneracy which occurs during the protocol for imperfect MBSs. This leads to a braiding outcome that depends on the degree of MBS isolation but remains robust and non-Abelian except in the perfect fermion limit. Our protocol could be implemented in different platforms with non-Abelian excitations, including quantum-dot-based minimal Kitaev chains.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (53)

  1. C. Nayak, S. H. Simon, A. Stern, M. Freedman, and S. Das Sarma, Non-Abelian anyons and topological quantum computation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1083 (2008).
  2. C. W. J. Beenakker, Search for non-Abelian Majorana braiding statistics in superconductors, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes 15 (2020).
  3. A. Yazdani, F. von Oppen, B. I. Halperin, and A. Yacoby, Hunting for Majoranas, Science 380, eade0850 (2023).
  4. S. Das Sarma, M. Freedman, and C. Nayak, Majorana zero modes and topological quantum computation, npj Quantum Inf. 1, 15001 (2015).
  5. T. Karzig, et al., Scalable designs for quasiparticle-poisoning-protected topological quantum computation with Majorana zero modes, Phys. Rev. B 95, 235305 (2017).
  6. P. Marra, Majorana nanowires for topological quantum computation, J. Appl. Phys. 132, 231101 (2022).
  7. F. Wilczek, Majorana returns, Nat. Phys. 5, 614 (2009).
  8. J. Alicea, New directions in the pursuit of Majorana fermions in solid state systems, Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 076501 (2012).
  9. M. Leijnse and K. Flensberg, Introduction to topological superconductivity and Majorana fermions, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 27, 124003 (2012).
  10. C. Beenakker, Search for Majorana fermions in superconductors, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 4, 113 (2013).
  11. D. A. Ivanov, Non-Abelian statistics of half-quantum vortices in p-wave superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 268 (2001).
  12. J. Alicea, Y. Oreg, G. Refael, F. von Oppen, and M. P. A. Fisher, Non-Abelian statistics and topological quantum information processing in 1D wire networks, Nat. Phys. 7, 412 (2011).
  13. K. Flensberg, Non-Abelian operations on Majorana fermions via single-charge control, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 090503 (2011).
  14. J. D. Sau, D. J. Clarke, and S. Tewari, Controlling non-Abelian statistics of Majorana fermions in semiconductor nanowires, Phys. Rev. B 84, 094505 (2011).
  15. B. van Heck, A. R. Akhmerov, F. Hassler, M. Burrello, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Coulomb-assisted braiding of Majorana fermions in a Josephson junction array, New J. Phys. 14, 035019 (2012).
  16. D. Aasen et al., Milestones toward Majorana-based quantum computing, Phys. Rev. X 6, 031016 (2016).
  17. M. Hell, M. Leijnse, and K. Flensberg, Two-dimensional platform for networks of Majorana bound states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 107701 (2017).
  18. S. Plugge, A. Rasmussen, R. Egger, and K. Flensberg, Majorana box qubits, New J. Phys. 19, 012001 (2017).
  19. D. J. Clarke, J. D. Sau, and S. Das Sarma, Probability and braiding statistics in Majorana nanowires, Phys. Rev. B 95, 155451 (2017).
  20. A. Y. Kitaev, Unpaired Majorana fermions in quantum wires, Phys. Usp. 44, 131 (2001).
  21. J. D. Sau and S. Das Sarma, Realizing a robust practical Majorana chain in a quantum-dot-superconductor linear array, Nat. Commun. 3, 964 (2012).
  22. M. Leijnse and K. Flensberg, Parity qubits and poor man's Majorana bound states in double quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 86, 134528 (2012).
  23. I. C. Fulga, A. Haim, A. R. Akhmerov, and Y. Oreg, Adaptive tuning of Majorana fermions in a quantum dot chain, New J. Phys. 15, 045020 (2013).
  24. A. Tsintzis, R. S. Souto, and M. Leijnse, Creating and detecting poor man's Majorana bound states in interacting quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 106, L201404 (2022).
  25. C.-X. Liu, G. Wang, T. Dvir, and M. Wimmer, Tunable superconducting coupling of quantum dots via Andreev bound states in semiconductor-superconductor nanowires, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 267701 (2022).
  26. R. Seoane Souto and R. Aguado, Subgap states in semiconductor-superconductor devices for quantum technologies: Andreev qubits and minimal Majorana chains, in New Trends and Platforms for Quantum Technologies, edited by R. Aguado, R. Citro, M. Lewenstein, and M. Stern (Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2024), p. 133.
  27. G. Wang, T. Dvir, G. P. Mazur, C.-X. Liu, N. van Loo, S. L. D. ten Haaf, A. Bordin, S. Gazibegovic, G. Badawy, E. P. A. M. Bakkers, M. Wimmer, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, Singlet and triplet Cooper pair splitting in hybrid superconducting nanowires, Nature (London) 612, 448 (2022).
  28. T. Dvir, G. Wang, N. van Loo, C.-X. Liu, G. P. Mazur, A. Bordin, S. L. D. ten Haaf, J.-Y. Wang, D. van Driel, F. Zatelli, X. Li, F. K. Malinowski, S. Gazibegovic, G. Badawy, E. P. A. M. Bakkers, M. Wimmer, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, Realization of a minimal Kitaev chain in coupled quantum dots, Nature (London) 614, 445 (2023).
  29. Q. Wang, S. L. D. ten Haaf, I. Kulesh, D. Xiao, C. Thomas, M. J. Manfra, and S. Goswami, Triplet correlations in Cooper pair splitters realized in a two-dimensional electron gas, Nat. Commun. 14, 4876 (2023).
  30. A. Bordin, G. Wang, C.-X. Liu, S. L. D. ten Haaf, N. van Loo, G. P. Mazur, D. Xu, D. van Driel, F. Zatelli, S. Gazibegovic, G. Badawy, E. P. A. M. Bakkers, M. Wimmer, L. P. Kouwenhoven, and T. Dvir, Tunable crossed Andreev reflection and elastic cotunneling in hybrid nanowires, Phys. Rev. X 13, 031031 (2023).
  31. D. van Driel, R. Koch, V. P. M. Sietses, S. L. D. ten Haaf, C.-X. Liu, F. Zatelli, B. Roovers, A. Bordin, N. van Loo, G. Wang, J. C. Wolff, G. P. Mazur, T. Dvir, I. Kulesh, Q. Wang, A. M. Bozkurt, S. Gazibegovic, G. Badawy, E. P. A. M. Bakkers, M. Wimmer, et al., Cross-platform autonomous control of minimal Kitaev chains, arXiv:2405.04596.
  32. A. Bordin, X. Li, D. van Driel, J. C. Wolff, Q. Wang, S. L. D. ten Haaf, G. Wang, N. van Loo, L. P. Kouwenhoven, and T. Dvir, Crossed Andreev reflection and elastic cotunneling in three quantum dots coupled by superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 056602 (2024).
  33. S. L. D. ten Haaf, Q. Wang, A. M. Bozkurt, C.-X. Liu, I. Kulesh, P. Kim, D. Xiao, C. Thomas, M. J. Manfra, T. Dvir, M. Wimmer, and S. Goswami, A two-site Kitaev chain in a two-dimensional electron gas, Nature (London) 630, 329 (2024).
  34. A. Bordin, F. J. B. Evertsz', B. Roovers, J. D. T. Luna, W. D. Huisman, F. Zatelli, G. P. Mazur, S. L. D. ten Haaf, G. Badawy, E. P. A. M. Bakkers, C.-X. Liu, R. S. Souto, N. van Loo, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, Probing Majorana localization of a phase-controlled three-site Kitaev chain with an additional quantum dot, arXiv:2504.13702.
  35. A. Tsintzis, R. S. Souto, K. Flensberg, J. Danon, and M. Leijnse, Majorana qubits and non-Abelian physics in quantum dot–based minimal Kitaev chains, PRX Quantum 5, 010323 (2024).
  36. S. Miles, F. Zatelli, A. M. Bozkurt, M. Wimmer, and C.-X. Liu, Braiding Majoranas in a linear quantum dot-superconductor array: Mitigating the errors from Coulomb repulsion and residual tunneling Phys. Rev. B 113, 085302 (2026).
  37. T. Huang, R. Zhang, X. Li, X.-J. Liu, X. C. Xie, and Y. Wu, Unified model for non-Abelian braiding of Majorana and Dirac fermion zero modes Sci. China: Phys., Mech. Astron. 69, 227211 (2026).
  38. Y. Zhang, Y. Wu, J. Liu, and X. C. Xie, Quantifying the non-Abelian property of Andreev bound states in inhomogeneous Majorana nanowires, Phys. Rev. B 111, 205411 (2025).
  39. P. Boross and A. Pályi, Braiding-based quantum control of a Majorana qubit built from quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 109, 125410 (2024).
  40. A. Vuik, B. Nijholt, A. R. Akhmerov, and M. Wimmer, Reproducing topological properties with quasi-Majorana states, SciPost Phys. 7, 061 (2019).
  41. D. J. Clarke, Experimentally accessible topological quality factor for wires with zero energy modes, Phys. Rev. B 96, 201109(R) (2017).
  42. E. Prada, R. Aguado, and P. San-Jose, Measuring Majorana nonlocality and spin structure with a quantum dot, Phys. Rev. B 96, 085418 (2017).
  43. M. T. Deng, S. Vaitiekėnas, E. B. Hansen, J. Danon, M. Leijnse, K. Flensberg, J. Nygård, P. Krogstrup, and C. M. Marcus, Majorana bound state in a coupled quantum-dot hybrid-nanowire system, Science 354, 1557 (2016).
  44. M.-T. Deng, S. Vaitiekėnas, E. Prada, P. San-Jose, J. Nygård, P. Krogstrup, R. Aguado, and C. M. Marcus, Nonlocality of Majorana modes in hybrid nanowires, Phys. Rev. B 98, 085125 (2018).
  45. T. Karzig, F. Pientka, G. Refael, and F. von Oppen, Shortcuts to non-Abelian braiding, Phys. Rev. B 91, 201102(R) (2015).
  46. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/3vcb-pxp6 for the full analytical derivation of all results and additional numerical investigations.
  47. N. Sedlmayr and C. Bena, Visualizing Majorana bound states in one and two dimensions using the generalized Majorana polarization, Phys. Rev. B 92, 115115 (2015).
  48. N. Sedlmayr, J. M. Aguiar-Hualde, and C. Bena, Majorana bound states in open quasi-one-dimensional and two-dimensional systems with transverse Rashba coupling, Phys. Rev. B 93, 155425 (2016).
  49. S. V. Aksenov, A. O. Zlotnikov, and M. S. Shustin, Strong Coulomb interactions in the problem of Majorana modes in a wire of the nontrivial topological class BDI, Phys. Rev. B 101, 125431 (2020).
  50. W. Samuelson, V. Svensson, and M. Leijnse, Minimal quantum dot based Kitaev chain with only local superconducting proximity effect, Phys. Rev. B 109, 035415 (2024).
  51. J. E. Avron, L. Sadun, J. Segert, and B. Simon, Chern numbers, quaternions, and Berry's phases in Fermi systems, Commun. Math. Phys. 124, 595 (1989).
  52. F. Hassler, Topological quantum computing, arXiv:2410.13547.
  53. M. Nitsch, V. Svensson, W. Samuelson, K. Nestmann, J. Danon, K. Flensberg, R. Seoane Souto, and M. Leijnse, Code for the article “Adiabatic nonabelian braiding of imperfect Majoranas” (v1-arXiv), Zenodo (2025), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15879397.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation