Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Universal freezing transitions of dipole-conserving chains

Jonathan Classen-Howes1,*,†, Riccardo Senese1,*,‡, and Abhishodh Prakash1,2

  • *These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • †Contact author: jonathan.classen-howes@physics.ox.ac.uk
  • ‡Contact author: riccardo.senese@physics.ox.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. B 112, 125148 – Published 22 September, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/2h1v-yx5l

Abstract

We demonstrate the existence of a universal phase diagram of quantum chains with range-k interactions subject to the conservation of a total charge and its dipole moment. These systems exhibit “freezing” transitions between strongly and weakly Hilbert-space-fragmented phases as the charge filling ν is varied. We show that these continuous phase transitions occur at a critical charge filling of νc=(k−2)−1 independently of the on-site Hilbert-space dimension d. To this end, we analytically prove that, for any d, any state with ν<νc hosts a finite density of sites belonging to “blockages,” which we define as subregions of the chain across which transport of charge and dipole moment cannot occur. Some blockages arise from sequences of frozen sites, i.e., sites with an unchanging on-site charge, while others do not involve frozen sites at all. We prove that the presence of blockages implies strong fragmentation of typical symmetry sectors into Krylov subspaces, each of which forms an exponentially vanishing fraction of the total sector. By studying the distribution of blockages we analytically characterize how typical states are subdivided into dynamically disconnected local “active bubbles” and prove that typical eigenstates at these charge fillings exhibit area-law entanglement entropy, while there exist rare eigenstates featuring non-area-law scaling. We also numerically show that for ν>νc and arbitrary d, typical symmetry sectors are weakly fragmented, with their dominant Krylov sectors constituted of states that are free of blockages. We analytically derive some critical exponents characterizing the transition and numerically determine the density of blockages at ν=νc, with clear implications for transport at the critical point. Finally, we investigate the properties of special-case models for which no phase transitions occur.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (83)

  1. J. M. Deutsch, Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system, Phys. Rev. A 43, 2046 (1991).
  2. M. Srednicki, Chaos and quantum thermalization, Phys. Rev. E 50, 888 (1994).
  3. L. D'Alessio, Y. Kafri, A. Polkovnikov, and M. Rigol, From quantum chaos and eigenstate thermalization to statistical mechanics and thermodynamics, Adv. Phys. 65, 239 (2016).
  4. J. M. Deutsch, Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, Rep. Prog. Phys. 81, 082001 (2018).
  5. P. W. Anderson, Absence of diffusion in certain random lattices, Phys. Rev. 109, 1492 (1958).
  6. D. Basko, I. Aleiner, and B. Altshuler, Metal–insulator transition in a weakly interacting many-electron system with localized single-particle states, Ann. Phys. (NY) 321, 1126 (2006).
  7. R. Nandkishore and D. A. Huse, Many-body localization and thermalization in quantum statistical mechanics, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 6, 15 (2015).
  8. D. A. Abanin, E. Altman, I. Bloch, and M. Serbyn, Colloquium: Many-body localization, thermalization, and entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 021001 (2019).
  9. C. Chamon, Quantum glassiness in strongly correlated clean systems: An example of topological overprotection, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 040402 (2005).
  10. J. Haah, Local stabilizer codes in three dimensions without string logical operators, Phys. Rev. A 83, 042330 (2011).
  11. S. Vijay, J. Haah, and L. Fu, A new kind of topological quantum order: A dimensional hierarchy of quasiparticles built from stationary excitations, Phys. Rev. B 92, 235136 (2015).
  12. R. M. Nandkishore and M. Hermele, Fractons, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 10, 295 (2019).
  13. M. Pretko, X. Chen, and Y. You, Fracton phases of matter, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 35, 2030003 (2020).
  14. A. Gromov and L. Radzihovsky, Colloquium: Fracton matter, Rev. Mod. Phys. 96, 011001 (2024).
  15. S. Pai, M. Pretko, and R. M. Nandkishore, Localization in fractonic random circuits, Phys. Rev. X 9, 021003 (2019).
  16. P. Sala, T. Rakovszky, R. Verresen, M. Knap, and F. Pollmann, Ergodicity breaking arising from Hilbert space fragmentation in dipole-conserving Hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. X 10, 011047 (2020).
  17. V. Khemani, M. Hermele, and R. Nandkishore, Localization from Hilbert space shattering: From theory to physical realizations, Phys. Rev. B 101, 174204 (2020).
  18. S. Moudgalya and O. I. Motrunich, Hilbert space fragmentation and commutant algebras, Phys. Rev. X 12, 011050 (2022).
  19. T. Rakovszky, P. Sala, R. Verresen, M. Knap, and F. Pollmann, Statistical localization: From strong fragmentation to strong edge modes, Phys. Rev. B 101, 125126 (2020).
  20. S. Moudgalya, A. Prem, R. Nandkishore, N. Regnault, and B. A. Bernevig, Thermalization and its absence within Krylov subspaces of a constrained Hamiltonian, in Memorial Volume for Shoucheng Zhang (World Scientific, Singapore, 2021), Chap. 7, pp. 147–209.
  21. Z.-C. Yang, F. Liu, A. V. Gorshkov, and T. Iadecola, Hilbert space fragmentation from strict confinement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 207602 (2020).
  22. G. De Tomasi, D. Hetterich, P. Sala, and F. Pollmann, Dynamics of strongly interacting systems: From Fock-space fragmentation to many-body localization, Phys. Rev. B 100, 214313 (2019).
  23. P. A. McClarty, M. Haque, A. Sen, and J. Richter, Disorder-free localization and many-body quantum scars from magnetic frustration, Phys. Rev. B 102, 224303 (2020).
  24. K. Lee, A. Pal, and H. J. Changlani, Frustration-induced emergent Hilbert space fragmentation, Phys. Rev. B 103, 235133 (2021).
  25. D. Hahn, P. A. McClarty, and D. J. Luitz, Information dynamics in a model with Hilbert space fragmentation, SciPost Phys. 11, 074 (2021).
  26. B. Mukherjee, Z. Cai, and W. V. Liu, Constraint-induced breaking and restoration of ergodicity in spin-1 PXP models, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 033201 (2021).
  27. C. M. Langlett and S. Xu, Hilbert space fragmentation and exact scars of generalized Fredkin spin chains, Phys. Rev. B 103, L220304 (2021).
  28. B. Mukherjee, D. Banerjee, K. Sengupta, and A. Sen, Minimal model for Hilbert space fragmentation with local constraints, Phys. Rev. B 104, 155117 (2021).
  29. A. Yoshinaga, H. Hakoshima, T. Imoto, Y. Matsuzaki, and R. Hamazaki, Emergence of Hilbert space fragmentation in Ising models with a weak transverse field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 090602 (2022).
  30. P. Frey, L. Hackl, and S. Rachel, Hilbert space fragmentation and interaction-induced localization in the extended Fermi-Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 106, L220301 (2022).
  31. P. Brighi, M. Ljubotina, and M. Serbyn, Hilbert space fragmentation and slow dynamics in particle-conserving quantum East models, SciPost Phys. 15, 093 (2023).
  32. S. Ghosh, I. Paul, and K. Sengupta, Prethermal fragmentation in a periodically driven fermionic chain, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 120401 (2023).
  33. D. T. Stephen, O. Hart, and R. M. Nandkishore, Ergodicity breaking provably robust to arbitrary perturbations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 040401 (2024).
  34. J. Classen-Howes, P. Fendley, A. Pandey, and S. A. Parameswaran, Bipartite Sachdev-Ye models with Read-Saleur symmetries, Phys. Rev. B 110, 125140 (2024).
  35. Y. H. Kwan, P. H. Wilhelm, S. Biswas, and S. A. Parameswaran, Minimal Hubbard models of maximal Hilbert space fragmentation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 010411 (2025).
  36. D. Adler, D. Wei, M. Will, K. Srakaew, S. Agrawal, P. Weckesser, R. Moessner, F. Pollmann, I. Bloch, and J. Zeiher, Observation of Hilbert space fragmentation and fractonic excitations in 2D, Nature (London) 636, 80 (2024).
  37. M. Will, R. Moessner, and F. Pollmann, Realization of Hilbert space fragmentation and fracton dynamics in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 196301 (2024).
  38. Z.-Y. Wang, S. Takayoshi, and M. Nakamura, Spin-chain description of fractional quantum Hall states in the Jain series, Phys. Rev. B 86, 155104 (2012).
  39. E. J. Bergholtz, M. Nakamura, and J. Suorsa, Effective spin chains for fractional quantum Hall states, Physica E (Amsterdam, Neth.) 43, 755 (2011).
  40. W. Morong, F. Liu, P. Becker, K. S. Collins, L. Feng, A. Kyprianidis, G. Pagano, T. You, A. V. Gorshkov, and C. Monroe, Observation of Stark many-body localization without disorder, Nature (London) 599, 393 (2021).
  41. E. van Nieuwenburg, Y. Baum, and G. Refael, From Bloch oscillations to many-body localization in clean interacting systems, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 9269 (2019).
  42. S. Scherg, T. Kohlert, P. Sala, F. Pollmann, B. Hebbe Madhusudhana, I. Bloch, and M. Aidelsburger, Observing non-ergodicity due to kinetic constraints in tilted Fermi-Hubbard chains, Nat. Commun. 12, 4490 (2021).
  43. T. Kohlert, S. Scherg, P. Sala, F. Pollmann, B. Hebbe Madhusudhana, I. Bloch, and M. Aidelsburger, Exploring the regime of fragmentation in strongly tilted Fermi-Hubbard chains, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 010201 (2023).
  44. Q. Guo, C. Cheng, H. Li, S. Xu, P. Zhang, Z. Wang, C. Song, W. Liu, W. Ren, H. Dong, R. Mondaini, and H. Wang, Stark many-body localization on a superconducting quantum processor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 240502 (2021).
  45. Y.-Y. Wang, Y.-H. Shi, Z.-H. Sun, C.-T. Chen, Z.-A. Wang, K. Zhao, H.-T. Liu. W.-G. Ma, Z. Wang, H. Li, J.-C. Zhang, Y. Liu, C.-L. Deng, T.-M. Li, Y. He, Z.-H. Liu, Z.-Y. Peng, X. Song, G. Xue, H. Yu, K. Huang, Z. Xiang, D. Zheng, K. Xu, and H. Fan, Exploring Hilbert-space fragmentation on a superconducting processor, PRX Quantum 6, 010325 (2025).
  46. A. Morningstar, V. Khemani, and D. A. Huse, Kinetically constrained freezing transition in a dipole-conserving system, Phys. Rev. B 101, 214205 (2020).
  47. C. Pozderac, S. Speck, X. Feng, D. A. Huse, and B. Skinner, Exact solution for the filling-induced thermalization transition in a one-dimensional fracton system, Phys. Rev. B 107, 045137 (2023).
  48. C. Wang and Z.-C. Yang, Freezing transition in the particle-conserving east model, Phys. Rev. B 108, 144308 (2023).
  49. O. Hart and R. Nandkishore, Hilbert space shattering and dynamical freezing in the quantum Ising model, Phys. Rev. B 106, 214426 (2022).
  50. A. Gromov, A. Lucas, and R. M. Nandkishore, Fracton hydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033124 (2020).
  51. J. Feldmeier, P. Sala, G. De Tomasi, F. Pollmann, and M. Knap, Anomalous diffusion in dipole- and higher-moment-conserving systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 245303 (2020).
  52. J. Iaconis, A. Lucas, and R. Nandkishore, Multipole conservation laws and subdiffusion in any dimension, Phys. Rev. E 103, 022142 (2021).
  53. N. S. Srivatsa, H. Yarloo, R. Moessner, and A. E. B. Nielsen, Mobility edges through inverted quantum many-body scarring, Phys. Rev. B 108, L100202 (2023).
  54. Q. Chen and Z. Zhu, Inverting multiple quantum many-body scars via disorder, Phys. Rev. B 109, 014212 (2024).
  55. N. S. Srivatsa, R. Moessner, and A. E. B. Nielsen, Many-body delocalization via emergent symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 240401 (2020).
  56. M. Iversen, N. S. Srivatsa, and A. E. B. Nielsen, Escaping many-body localization in an exact eigenstate, Phys. Rev. B 106, 214201 (2022).
  57. S. Melczer, G. Panova, and R. Pemantle, Counting partitions inside a rectangle, SIAM J. Discrete Math. 34, 2388 (2020).
  58. S. Wiseman and E. Domany, Lack of self-averaging in critical disordered systems, Phys. Rev. E 52, 3469 (1995).
  59. J. M. Deutsch, Thermodynamic entropy of a many-body energy eigenstate, New J. Phys. 12, 075021 (2010).
  60. L. F. Santos, A. Polkovnikov, and M. Rigol, Weak and strong typicality in quantum systems, Phys. Rev. E 86, 010102(R) (2012).
  61. J. M. Deutsch, H. Li, and A. Sharma, Microscopic origin of thermodynamic entropy in isolated systems, Phys. Rev. E 87, 042135 (2013).
  62. L. Vidmar and M. Rigol, Entanglement entropy of eigenstates of quantum chaotic Hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 220603 (2017).
  63. J. R. Garrison and T. Grover, Does a single eigenstate encode the full Hamiltonian? Phys. Rev. X 8, 021026 (2018).
  64. A. Dymarsky, N. Lashkari, and H. Liu, Subsystem eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, Phys. Rev. E 97, 012140 (2018).
  65. T. LeBlond, K. Mallayya, L. Vidmar, and M. Rigol, Entanglement and matrix elements of observables in interacting integrable systems, Phys. Rev. E 100, 062134 (2019).
  66. E. Bianchi, L. Hackl, M. Kieburg, M. Rigol, and L. Vidmar, Volume-law entanglement entropy of typical pure quantum states, PRX Quantum 3, 030201 (2022).
  67. S. Moudgalya, B. A. Bernevig, and N. Regnault, Quantum many-body scars and Hilbert space fragmentation: A review of exact results, Rep. Prog. Phys. 85, 086501 (2022).
  68. D. N. Page, Average entropy of a subsystem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1291 (1993).
  69. S. Sen, Average entropy of a quantum subsystem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1 (1996).
  70. E. Bianchi and P. Donà, Typical entanglement entropy in the presence of a center: Page curve and its variance, Phys. Rev. D 100, 105010 (2019).
  71. M. Fishman, S. R. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, The ITensor software library for tensor network calculations, SciPost Phys. Codebases 4 (2022).
  72. J. Lehmann, P. S. de Torres-Solanot, F. Pollmann, and T. Rakovszky, Fragmentation-induced localization and boundary charges in dimensions two and above, SciPost Phys. 14, 140 (2023).
  73. P. Sala, J. Lehmann, T. Rakovszky, and F. Pollmann, Dynamics in systems with modulated symmetries, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 170601 (2022).
  74. D. A. Huse, R. Nandkishore, V. Oganesyan, A. Pal, and S. L. Sondhi, Localization-protected quantum order, Phys. Rev. B 88, 014206 (2013).
  75. S. A. Parameswaran and R. Vasseur, Many-body localization, symmetry and topology, Rep. Prog. Phys. 81, 082501 (2018).
  76. A. Prakash, S. Ganeshan, L. Fidkowski, and T.-C. Wei, Eigenstate phases with finite on-site non-Abelian symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 96, 165136 (2017).
  77. A. Prakash, A. Goriely, and S. L. Sondhi, Classical nonrelativistic fractons, Phys. Rev. B 109, 054313 (2024).
  78. A. Prakash, Y. Sadki, and S. L. Sondhi, Machian fractons, Hamiltonian attractors, and nonequilibrium steady states, Phys. Rev. B 110, 024305 (2024).
  79. A. Babbar, Y. Sadki, A. Prakash, and S. L. Sondhi, Classical fractons: Local chaos, global broken ergodicity and an arrow of time, Phys. Rev. B 111, 245134 (2025).
  80. Y. Sadki, A. Prakash, S. L. Sondhi, and D. P. Arovas, Phase space fractons, arXiv:2502.02650.
  81. D. Stauffer and A. Aharony, Introduction to Percolation Theory (Taylor & Francis, 2018).
  82. S. Roy, J. T. Chalker, and D. E. Logan, Percolation in Fock space as a proxy for many-body localization, Phys. Rev. B 99, 104206 (2019).
  83. L. Takács, Some asymptotic formulas for lattice paths, J. Stat. Plann. Inference 14, 123 (1986).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation