- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review B

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Computational studies on O2-P2 phase-transition dynamics in layered-oxide sodium-ion cathode materials

Konstantin Köster and Payam Kaghazchi*

  • Materials Synthesis and Processing (IMD-2), Institute of Energy Materials and Devices, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, 52425 Jülich, Germany and MESA+ Institute, University of Twente, Hallenweg 15, Enschede, 7522 NH, The Netherlands

  • *Contact author: p.kaghazchi@fz-juelich.de
PDF

Phys. Rev. B 114, 134101 – Published 2 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/1n3w-5q5n

Abstract

Sodium-ion batteries have gained much interest over the past years and especially layered oxides are highly considered as cathodes for the next generation of batteries. However, there are still significant challenges to overcome in these materials for practical applications mainly related to capacity degradation and voltage fading. A key influence factor for these challenges are phase transitions that occur by gliding of layers during operation of these materials. Until now there is limited atomistic-level understanding on such transitions as simulations of these processes are computationally demanding. In this work, we trained a classical pairwise Coulomb-Buckingham potential versus extensive ab initio data using a genetic algorithm to study O2-P2 phase transitions in NaxCoO2. Our density functional theory (DFT) and classical potential calculations show that phase-transition barriers decrease upon desodiation and are further lowered if dynamic conditions are considered through molecular dynamics simulations. Our developed classical potential is able to capture phase transitions and its related increase in the Na-ion diffusivity under standard laboratory conditions at the µs timescale of molecular dynamics simulation. Furthermore, it is found that the phase transition occurs gradually via various OPn phases.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (62)

  1. J. Wang, Y.-F. Zhu, Y. Su, J.-X. Guo, S. Chen, H.-K. Liu, S.-X. Dou, S.-L. Chou, and Y. Xiao, Routes to high-performance layered oxide cathodes for sodium-ion batteries, Chem. Soc. Rev. 53, 4230 (2024).
  2. H. Yang, D. Wang, Y. Liu, Y. Liu, B. Zhong, Y. Song, Q. Kong, Z. Wu, and X. Guo, Improvement of cycle life for layered oxide cathodes in sodium-ion batteries, Energy Environ. Sci. 17, 1756 (2024).
  3. P.-F. Wang, Y. You, Y.-X. Yin, and Y.-G. Guo, Layered oxide cathodes for sodium–ion batteries: Phase transition, air stability, and performance, Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1701912 (2018).
  4. J.-Y. Hwang, S.-T. Myung, and Y.-K. Sun, Sodium-ion batteries: Present and future, Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 3529 (2017).
  5. J. Zhang and X. Li, Perspective on phase transition in layered oxide cathodes for sodium-ion batteries: Mechanism, influenced factors, and inhibition strategies, Energy Fuels 38, 13906 (2024).
  6. C. Delmas, C. Fouassier, and P. Hagenmuller, Structural classification and properties of the layered oxides, Physica B+C 99, 81 (1980).
  7. Y. Tang, Q. Zhang, W. Zuo, S. Zhou, G. Zeng, B. Zhang, H. Zhang, Z. Huang, L. Zheng, J. Xu, W. Yin, Y. Qiu, Y. Xiao, Q. Zhang, T. Zhao, H.-G. Liao, I. Hwang, C.-J. Sun, K. Amine, Q. Wang, et al., Sustainable layered cathode with suppressed phase transition for long-life sodium-ion batteries, Nature Sustain. 7, 348 (2024).
  8. A. Langella, A. Massaro, A. B. Muñoz-García, and M. Pavone, Atomistic insights into solid-state phase transition mechanisms of P2-type layered Mn oxides for high-energy Na-ion battery cathodes, ACS Energy Lett. 10, 1089 (2025).
  9. A. Fellman, J. Byggmästar, F. Granberg, K. Nordlund, and F. Djurabekova, Fast and accurate machine-learned interatomic potentials for large-scale simulations of Cu, Al, and Ni, Phys. Rev. Mater. 9, 053807 (2025).
  10. Y. Li, X. Zhang, M. Liu, and L. Shen, A critical review of machine learning interatomic potentials and Hamiltonian, J. Mater. Inform. 5, 43 (2025).
  11. V. L. Deringer, M. A. Caro, and G. Csányi, Machine learning interatomic potentials as emerging tools for materials science, Adv. Mater. 31, 1902765 (2019).
  12. J. Behler, Perspective: Machine learning potentials for atomistic simulations, J. Chem. Phys. 145, 170901 (2016).
  13. T. Mueller, A. Hernandez, and C. Wang, Machine learning for interatomic potential models, J. Chem. Phys. 152, 050902 (2020).
  14. S. Lee and S. S. Park, Atomistic simulation study of mixed-metal oxide (LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2) cathode material for lithium ion battery, J. Phys. Chem. C 116, 6484 (2012).
  15. S. Kerisit, A. M. Chaka, T. C. Droubay, and E. S. Ilton, Shell model for atomistic simulation of lithium diffusion in mixed Mn/Ti oxides, J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 24231 (2014).
  16. J. He, L. Zhang, and L. Liu, Thermal transport in monocrystalline and polycrystalline lithium cobalt oxide, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. : PCCP 21, 12192 (2019).
  17. F. X. Hart and J. B. Bates, Lattice model calculation of the strain energy density and other properties of crystalline LiCoO2, J. Appl. Phys. 83, 7560 (1998).
  18. L. M. Morgan, M. M. Islam, H. Yang, K. O'Regan, A. N. Patel, A. Ghosh, E. Kendrick, M. Marinescu, G. J. Offer, B. J. Morgan, M. S. Islam, J. Edge, and A. Walsh, From atoms to cells: Multiscale modeling of LiNixMnyCozO2 cathodes for Li-ion batteries, ACS Energy Lett. 7, 108 (2022).
  19. R. Kutteh and M. Avdeev, Initial assessment of an empirical potential as a portable tool for rapid investigation of Li+ diffusion in Li+ -battery cathode materials, J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 11203 (2014).
  20. K. Sau and T. Ikeshoji, Insights of cationic diffusion in nickel-based honeycomb layered tellurates using molecular dynamics simulation, Solid State Ionics 383, 115982 (2022).
  21. T. Masese, Y. Miyazaki, J. Rizell, G. M. Kanyolo, C.-Y. Chen, H. Ubukata, K. Kubota, K. Sau, T. Ikeshoji, Z.-D. Huang, K. Yoshii, T. Takahashi, M. Ito, H. Senoh, J. Hwang, A. Alshehabi, K. Matsumoto, T. Matsunaga, K. Fujii, M. Yashima, et al., Mixed alkali-ion transport and storage in atomic-disordered honeycomb layered NaKNi2TeO6, Nat. Commun. 12, 4660 (2021).
  22. K. Sau and T. Ikeshoji, Ring mechanism of fast Na+ ion transport in Na2LiFeTeO6: Insight from molecular dynamics simulation, Phys. Rev. Mater. 6, 045406 (2022).
  23. W. B. Dapp and M. H. Müser, Redox reactions with empirical potentials: Atomistic battery discharge simulations, J. Chem. Phys. 139, 064106 (2013).
  24. C. Delmas, J. Braconnier, C. Fouassier, and P. Hagenmuller, Electrochemical intercalation of sodium in NaxCoO2 bronzes, Solid State Ion. 3-4, 165 (1981).
  25. V. R. R. Boddu, D. Puthusseri, P. M. Shirage, P. Mathur, and V. G. Pol, Layered NaxCoO2-based cathodes for advanced Na-ion batteries: Review on challenges and advancements, Ionics 27, 4549 (2021).
  26. J. L. Kaufman and A. Van der Ven, NaxCoO2 phase stability and hierarchical orderings in the O3/P3 structure family, Phys. Rev. Mater. 3, 015402 (2019).
  27. F. Rivadulla, J.-S. Zhou, and J. B. Goodenough, Chemical, structural, and transport properties of Na1−xCoO2, Phys. Rev. B 68, 075108 (2003).
  28. A. J. Toumar, S. P. Ong, W. D. Richards, S. Dacek, and G. Ceder, Vacancy ordering in O3-type layered metal oxide sodium-ion battery cathodes, Phys. Rev. Appl. 4, 064002 (2015).
  29. K. Köster and P. Kaghazchi, Hybrid functionals with nonempirical Hartree-Fock parameters for electronic structure calculation of layered oxides, Phys. Rev. B 109, 155134 (2024).
  30. Y. Biecher, A. Baux, F. Fauth, C. Delmas, G. R. Goward, and D. Carlier, Structure and electronic structure evolution of P2−NaxCoO2 phases from x-ray diffraction and Na23 magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance, Chem. Mater. 34, 6431 (2022).
  31. D. H. Lee, J. Xu, and Y. S. Meng, An advanced cathode for Na-ion batteries with high rate and excellent structural stability, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. : PCCP 15, 3304 (2013).
  32. P. P. Ewald, Die berechnung optischer und elektrostatischer gitterpotentiale, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 369, 253 (1921).
  33. R. A. Buckingham, The classical equation of state of gaseous helium, neon and argon, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 168, 264 (1938).
  34. K. Köster, T. Binninger, and P. Kaghazchi, Optimization of Coulomb energies in gigantic configurational spaces of multi-element ionic crystals, npj Comput. Mater. 11, 202 (2025).
  35. P. E. Blöchl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994).
  36. G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996).
  37. J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).
  38. S. Grimme, Semiempirical GGA-type density functional constructed with a long-range dispersion correction, J. Comput. Chem. 27, 1787 (2006).
  39. P. Virtanen, R. Gommers, T. E. Oliphant, M. Haberland, T. Reddy, D. Cournapeau, E. Burovski, P. Peterson, W. Weckesser, J. Bright, S. J. van der Walt, M. Brett, J. Wilson, K. J. Millman, N. Mayorov, A. R. J. Nelson, E. Jones, R. Kern, E. Larson, C. J. Carey, et al., SciPy 1.0: Fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python, Nat. Methods 17, 261 (2020).
  40. R. Storn and K. Price, Differential evolution – A simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces, J. Global Optim. 11, 341 (1997).
  41. D. C. Liu and J. Nocedal, On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimization, Math. Program. 45, 503 (1989).
  42. Z. Li, J. Yang, J. G. Hou, and Q. Zhu, First-principles lattice dynamics of NaCoO2, Phys. Rev. B 70, 144518 (2004).
  43. I. Petousis, D. Mrdjenovich, E. Ballouz, M. Liu, D. Winston, W. Chen, T. Graf, T. D. Schladt, K. A. Persson, and F. B. Prinz, High-throughput screening of inorganic compounds for the discovery of novel dielectric and optical materials, Sci. Data 4, 160134 (2017).
  44. A. P. Thompson, H. M. Aktulga, R. Berger, D. S. Bolintineanu, W. M. Brown, P. S. Crozier, P. J. in 't Veld, A. Kohlmeyer, S. G. Moore, T. D. Nguyen, R. Shan, M. J. Stevens, J. Tranchida, C. Trott, and S. J. Plimpton, LAMMPS - a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales, Comput. Phys. Commun. 271, 108171 (2022).
  45. S. Plimpton, Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics, J. Comput. Phys. 117, 1 (1995).
  46. E. Bitzek, P. Koskinen, F. Gähler, M. Moseler, and P. Gumbsch, Structural relaxation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 170201 (2006).
  47. S. Nosé, A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular dynamics methods, J. Chem. Phys. 81, 511 (1984).
  48. W. G. Hoover, Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase-space distributions, Phys. Rev. A 31, 1695 (1985).
  49. W. Shinoda, M. Shiga, and M. Mikami, Rapid estimation of elastic constants by molecular dynamics simulation under constant stress, Phys. Rev. B 69, 134103 (2004).
  50. M. E. Tuckerman, J. Alejandre, R. López-Rendón, A. L. Jochim, and G. J. Martyna, A Liouville-operator derived measure-preserving integrator for molecular dynamics simulations in the isothermal–isobaric ensemble, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 39, 5629 (2006).
  51. K. Momma and F. Izumi, VESTA: A three-dimensional visualization system for electronic and structural analysis, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 41, 653 (2008).
  52. R. Berthelot, D. Carlier, and C. Delmas, Electrochemical investigation of the P2−NaxCoO2 phase diagram, Nat. Mater. 10, 74 (2011).
  53. B. M. de Boisse, D. Carlier, M. Guignard, L. Bourgeois, and C. Delmas, P2−NaxMn1/2Fe1/2O2 phase used as positive electrode in Na batteries: Structural changes induced by the electrochemical (de)intercalation process, Inorg. Chem. 53, 11197 (2014).
  54. J. W. Somerville, A. Sobkowiak, N. Tapia-Ruiz, J. Billaud, J. G. Lozano, R. A. House, L. C. Gallington, T. Ericsson, L. Häggström, M. R. Roberts, U. Maitra, and P. G. Bruce, Nature of the “Z”-phase in layered Na-ion battery cathodes, Energy Environ. Sci. 12, 2223 (2019).
  55. A. L. Usler, D. Kemp, A. Bonkowski, and R. A. de Souza, A general expression for the statistical error in a diffusion coefficient obtained from a solid-state molecular-dynamics simulation, J. Comput. Chem. 44, 1347 (2023).
  56. Y. Mo, S. P. Ong, and G. Ceder, Insights into diffusion mechanisms in P2 layered oxide materials by first-principles calculations, Chem. Mater. 26, 5208 (2014).
  57. N. A. Katcho, J. Carrasco, D. Saurel, E. Gonzalo, M. Han, F. Aguesse, and T. Rojo, Origins of bistability and Na ion mobility difference in P2- and O3-Na2/3Fe2/3Mn1/3O2 cathode polymorphs, Adv. Energy Mater. 7, 1601477 (2017).
  58. G. J. Shu and F. C. Chou, Sodium-ion diffusion and ordering in single-crystal P2−NaxCoO2, Phys. Rev. B 78, 052101 (2008).
  59. R. Tatara, D. Igarashi, M. Nakayama, T. Hosaka, K. Ohishi, I. Umegaki, J. G. Nakamura, A. Koda, H. Ohta, R. Palm, M. Månsson, E. J. Kim, K. Kubota, J. Sugiyama, and S. Komaba, Revisiting the ion dynamics in LixCoO2 and NaxCoO2, Chem. Sci. 16, 19990 (2025).
  60. K. Ohishi, D. Igarashi, R. Tatara, I. Umegaki, J. G. Nakamura, A. Koda, M. Månsson, S. Komaba, and J. Sugiyama, Ion dynamics in P2−NaxCoO2 detected with operando muon spin rotation and relaxation, ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 6, 8111 (2023).
  61. T. Shibata, W. Kobayashi, and Y. Moritomo, Sodium ion diffusion in layered NaxCoO2, Appl. Phys. Express 6, 097101 (2013).
  62. P. Thörnig, JURECA: Data centric and booster modules implementing the modular supercomputing architecture at Jülich Supercomputing Centre, Journal of Large-Scale Research Facilities JLSRF 7, A182 (2021).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. B 114, 134101– Published 2 September, 2026
  • Received 10 November 2025
  • Accepted 22 July 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation