- Open Access
Quantum-inspired dynamical models on quantum and classical annealers
Phys. Rev. Applied 25, 044055 – Published 21 April, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/rrf3-jm5m
Abstract
We propose a practical, physics-inspired benchmarking suite to challenge both quantum and classical computers by mapping real-time quantum dynamics to a common optimization format. Using a parallel-in-time encoding, we convert the real-time propagator of an -qubit, possibly non-Hermitian, Hamiltonian into quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) instances that are executable in a solver-agnostic manner on quantum annealers and classical optimizers alike. This enables direct, like-for-like performance comparisons across fundamentally different computational paradigms. To stress-test the framework, we consider eight representative dynamical models spanning single-qubit rotations, multiqubit entangling gates (Bell, Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger, cluster), and -symmetric and other non-Hermitian generators, and evaluate success probability and time to solution as standard benchmarking metrics. Applying this method to two generations of D-Wave quantum annealers and to state-of-the-art classical solvers (simulated annealing and the graphics-processing unit–accelerated VeloxQ), we find that Advantage2 consistently outperforms its predecessor, while VeloxQ retains the shortest absolute run-times, reflecting the maturity of classical heuristics. We further extend the benchmarks to large-scale instances (), establishing a demanding classical baseline for future hardware. Together, these results position the parallel-in-time QUBO framework as a versatile and physically motivated test bed for quantitatively tracking progress toward quantum-competitive simulation of dynamical systems.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (65)
- B. P. Lanyon, C. Hempel, D. Nigg, M. Müller, R. Gerritsma, F. Zähringer, P. Schindler, J. T. Barreiro, M. Rambach, G. Kirchmair, M. Hennrich, P. Zoller, R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos, Universal digital quantum simulation with trapped ions, Science 334, 57 (2011).
- H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. Keesling, H. Levine, A. Omran, H. Pichler, S. Choi, A. Zibrov, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator, Nature 551, 579 (2017).
- T. I. Andersen, N. Astrakhantsev, A. H. Karamlou, J. Berndtsson, J. Motruk, A. Szasz, J. A. Gross, A. Schuckert, T. Westerhout, Y. Zhang et al., Thermalization and criticality on an analogue–digital quantum simulator, Nature 638, 79 (2025).
- A. Aspuru-Guzik, A. D. Dutoi, P. J. Love, and M. Head-Gordon, Simulated quantum computation of molecular energies, Science 309, 1704 (2005).
- A. Peruzzo, J. McClean, P. Shadbolt, M.-H. Yung, X.-Q. Zhou, P. Love, A. Aspuru-Guzik, and J. L. O’Brien, A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor, Nat. Commun. 5, 4213 (2014).
- T. N. Georges, M. Bothe, C. Sünderhauf, B. K. Berntson, R. Izsák, and A. V. Ivanov, Quantum simulations of chemistry in first quantization with any basis set, npj Quantum Inf. 11, 55 (2025).
- S. Euchner and I. Lesanovsky, Rydberg atom arrays as quantum simulators for molecular dynamics, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, L042009 (2025).
- R. P. Feynman, Simulating physics with computers, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21, 467 (1982).
- S. Lloyd, Universal quantum simulators, Science 273, 1073 (1996).
- O. Lanes, M. Beji, A. D. Corcoles, C. Dalyac, J. M. Gambetta, L. Henriet, A. Javadi-Abhari, A. Kandala, A. Mezzacapo, C. Porter, S. Sheldon, J. Watrous, C. Zoufal, A. Dauphin, and B. Peropadre, A framework for quantum advantage, arXiv:2506.20658 [quant-ph].
- A. D. King, A. Nocera, M. M. Rams, J. Dziarmaga, R. Wiersema, W. Bernoudy, J. Raymond, N. Kaushal, N. Heinsdorf, R. Harris et al., Beyond-classical computation in quantum simulation, Science 388, 199 (2025).
- H. Munoz-Bauza and D. Lidar, Scaling advantage in approximate optimization with quantum annealing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 160601 (2025).
- J. Tindall, A. Mello, M. Fishman, M. Stoudenmire, and D. Sels, Dynamics of disordered quantum systems with two- and three-dimensional tensor networks, arXiv:2503.05693 [quant-ph].
- L. Mauron and G. Carleo, Challenging the quantum advantage frontier with large-scale classical simulations of annealing dynamics, arXiv:2503.08247 [quant-ph].
- J. Pawłowski, P. Tarasiuk, J. Tuziemski, L. Pawela, and B. Gardas, Closing the quantum-classical scaling gap in approximate optimization, arXiv:2505.22514 [quant-ph].
- J. Pawłowski, J. Tuziemski, P. Tarasiuk, A. Przybysz, R. Adamski, K. Hendzel, L. Pawela, and B. Gardas, VeloxQ: A fast and efficient QUBO solver, arXiv:2501.19221 [quant-ph].
- F. Arute, K. Arya, R. Babbush, D. Bacon, J. C. Bardin, R. Barends, R. Biswas, S. Boixo, F. G. S. L. Brandao, D. A. Buell et al., Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor, Nature 574, 505 (2019).
- Y. Wu, W.-S. Bao, S. Cao, F. Chen, M.-C. Chen, X. Chen, T.-H. Chung, H. Deng, Y. Du, D. Fan et al., Strong quantum computational advantage using a superconducting quantum processor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 180501 (2021).
- Y. Kim, A. Eddins, S. Anand, K. X. Wei, E. van den Berg, S. Rosenblatt, H. Nayfeh, Y. Wu, M. Zaletel, K. Temme, and A. Kandala, Evidence for the utility of quantum computing before fault tolerance, Nature 618, 500 (2023).
- H.-S. Zhong, H. Wang, Y.-H. Deng, M.-C. Chen, L.-C. Peng, Y.-H. Luo, J. Qin, D. Wu, X. Ding, Y. Hu et al., Quantum computational advantage using photons, Science 370, 1460 (2020).
- L. S. Madsen, F. Laudenbach, M. F. Askarani, F. Rortais, T. Vincent, J. F. F. Bulmer, F. M. Miatto, L. Neuhaus, L. G. Helt, M. J. Collins et al., Quantum computational advantage with a programmable photonic processor, Nature 606, 75 (2022).
- D. Hangleiter and J. Eisert, Computational advantage of quantum random sampling, Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 035001 (2023).
- K. Michielsen, M. Nocon, D. Willsch, F. Jin, T. Lippert, and H. De Raedt, Benchmarking gate-based quantum computers, Comput. Phys. Commun. 220, 44 (2017).
- B. Fauseweh, Quantum many-body simulations on digital quantum computers: State-of-the-art and future challenges, Nat. Commun. 15, 2123 (2024).
- I. M. Georgescu, S. Ashhab, and F. Nori, Quantum simulation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 153 (2014).
- V. Mehta, H. De Raedt, K. Michielsen, and F. Jin, Understanding the physics of D-wave annealers: From Schrödinger to Lindblad to Markovian dynamics, Phys. Rev. A 112, 032616 (2025).
- K. Jałowiecki, A. Więckowski, P. Gawron, and B. Gardas, Parallel in time dynamics with quantum annealers, Sci. Rep. 10, 13534 (2020).
- M. Born and V. Fock, Beweis des Adiabatensatzes, Z. Phys. 51, 165 (1928).
- H. Zhang, K. Boothby, and A. Kamenev, Cyclic quantum annealing: Searching for deep low-energy states in 5000-qubit spin glass, Sci. Rep. 14, 30784 (2024).
- H. Zhang and A. Kamenev, Computational complexity of three-dimensional Ising spin glass: Lessons from D-wave annealer, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 033098 (2025).
- H. Wang, H.-C. Yeh, and A. Kamenev, Many-body localization enables iterative quantum optimization, Nat. Commun. 13, 5503 (2022).
- M. H. Muñoz-Arias and P. M. Poggi, Quantum ergodicity and scrambling in quantum annealers, Quantum Sci. Technol. 10, 045027 (2025).
- H. Zhang and A. Kamenev, Quantum sequel of neural network training, Commun. Phys. 8, 478 (2025).
- S. Schulz, D. Willsch, and K. Michielsen, Learning-driven annealing with adaptive Hamiltonian modification for solving large-scale problems on quantum devices, Quantum 9, 1898 (2025).
- A. D. King, J. Raymond, T. Lanting, R. Harris, A. Zucca, F. Altomare, A. J. Berkley, K. Boothby, S. Ejtemaee, C. Enderud et al., Quantum critical dynamics in a 5,000-qubit programmable spin glass, Nature 617, 61 (2023).
- A. Teplukhin, B. K. Kendrick, S. M. Mniszewski, Y. Zhang, A. Kumar, C. F. A. Negre, P. M. Anisimov, S. Tretiak, and P. A. Dub, Computing molecular excited states on a D-Wave quantum annealer, Sci. Rep. 11, 18796 (2021).
- F. Neukart, G. Compostella, C. Seidel, D. von Dollen, S. Yarkoni, and B. Parney, Traffic flow optimization using a quantum annealer, Front. ICT 4, 29 (2017).
- M. Koniorczyk, K. Krawiec, L. Botelho, N. Bešinović, and K. Domino, Solving rescheduling problems in heterogeneous urban railway networks using hybrid quantum–classical approach, J. Rail Transp. Plan. Manage. 34, 100521 (2025).
- K. Domino, E. Doucet, R. Robertson, B. Gardas, and S. Deffner, On the Baltimore Light RailLink into the quantum future, Sci. Rep. 15, 29576 (2025).
- T. Śmierzchalski, J. Pawłowski, A. Przybysz, Ł. Pawela, Z. Puchała, M. Koniorczyk, B. Gardas, S. Deffner, and K. Domino, Hybrid quantum-classical computation for automatic guided vehicles scheduling, Sci. Rep. 14, 21809 (2024).
- K. Domino, M. Koniorczyk, K. Krawiec, K. Jałowiecki, S. Deffner, and B. Gardas, Quantum annealing in the NISQ era: Railway conflict management, Entropy 25, 191 (2023).
- E. Kędziera, W. Gamon, M. Koniorczyk, Z. Mzaouali, A. Galadíková, and K. Domino, EMU circulation planning for Silesian railways: Case study and a quantum approach, arXiv:2512.19340 [quant-ph].
- R. Robertson, E. Doucet, Z. Mzaouali, K. Domino, B. Gardas, and S. Deffner, in 2025 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) (IEEE, Albuquerque, NM, USA, 2025), Vol. 01, pp. 190–196.
- L. Buffoni and M. Campisi, Thermodynamics of a quantum annealer, Quantum Sci. Technol. 5, 035013 (2020).
- M. Campisi and L. Buffoni, Improved bound on entropy production in a quantum annealer, Phys. Rev. E 104, L022102 (2021).
- T. Śmierzchalski, Z. Mzaouali, S. Deffner, and B. Gardas, Efficiency optimization in quantum computing: balancing thermodynamics and computational performance, Sci. Rep. 14, 4555 (2024).
- E. Doucet, Z. Mzaouali, R. Robertson, B. Gardas, S. Deffner, and K. Domino, Thermodynamic significance of QUBO encoding on quantum annealers, arXiv:2601.04402 [quant-ph].
- M. S. Könz, W. Lechner, H. G. Katzgraber, and M. Troyer, Embedding overhead scaling of optimization problems in quantum annealing, PRX Quantum 2, 040322 (2021).
- V. Mehta, H. De Raedt, K. Michielsen, and F. Jin, Unraveling reverse annealing: A study of D-Wave quantum annealers, Phys. Rev. A 112, 012414 (2025).
- V. Mehta, H. De Raedt, K. Michielsen, and F. Jin, Performance of quantum annealing for 2-satisfiability problems with multiple satisfying assignments, Phys. Rev. A 112, 012405 (2025).
- J. Vodeb, V. Eržen, T. Hrga, and J. Povh, Accuracy and performance evaluation of quantum, classical and hybrid solvers for the max-cut problem, arXiv:2412.07460 [math.OC].
- A. Lucas, Ising formulations of many NP problems, Front. Phys. 2, 74887 (2014).
- B. Gardas, S. Deffner, and A. Saxena, -symmetric slowing down of decoherence, Phys. Rev. A 94, 040101(R) (2016).
- S. Croke, -symmetric Hamiltonians and their application in quantum information, Phys. Rev. A 91, 052113 (2015).
- N. Lambert, E. Giguère, P. Menczel, B. Li, P. Hopf, G. Suárez, M. Gali, J. Lishman, R. Gadhvi, R. Agarwal, A. Galicia, N. Shammah, P. Nation, J. R. Johansson, S. Ahmed, S. Cross, A. Pitchford, and F. Nori, QuTiP 5: The Quantum Toolbox in Python, arXiv:2412.04705 [quant-ph].
- J. Johansson, P. Nation, and F. Nori, QuTiP 2: A Python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 1234 (2013).
- J. Johansson, P. Nation, and F. Nori, QuTiP: An open-source Python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems, Comput. Phys. Commun. 183, 1760 (2012).
- B. Li, S. Ahmed, S. Saraogi, N. Lambert, F. Nori, A. Pitchford, and N. Shammah, Pulse-level noisy quantum circuits with QuTiP, Quantum 6, 630 (2022).
- N. Lambert, T. Raheja, S. Cross, P. Menczel, S. Ahmed, A. Pitchford, D. Burgarth, and F. Nori, QuTiP-BoFiN: A bosonic and fermionic numerical hierarchical-equations-of-motion library with applications in light-harvesting, quantum control, and single-molecule electronics, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 013181 (2023).
- E. Pelofske, Comparing three generations of D-Wave quantum annealers for minor embedded combinatorial optimization problems, Quantum Sci. Technol. 10, 025025 (2025).
- V. Mehta, F. Jin, H. De Raedt, and K. Michielsen, Quantum annealing for hard 2-satisfiability problems: Distribution and scaling of minimum energy gap and success probability, Phys. Rev. A 105, 062406 (2022).
- H. Zhang and A. Kamenev, Computational complexity of three-dimensional Ising spin glass: Lessons from D-Wave annealer, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 033098 (2025).
- A. Montanaro, Quantum speedup of branch-and-bound algorithms, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013056 (2020).
- https://www.flaticon.com/free-icons/gpu-mining, 433 Gpu mining icons, Ahmad Roaayala, Flaticon.
- P. Hanussek, J. Pawłowski, Z. Mzaouali, and B. Gardas, Quantum dynamics benchmarking framework, 2025, https://github.com/atg205/dynamics-benchmark.