Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Extended depth-of-field magneto-optical Kerr microscopy for applications in three-dimensional nanomagnetism

Le Zhao1,*, Alexander Rabensteiner1, Miguel Ángel Cascales-Sandoval1, Naëmi Leo1,2, Sabri Koraltan1, and Amalio Fernández-Pacheco1,†

  • *Contact author: le.zhao@tuwien.ac.at
  • †Contact author: amalio.fernandez-pacheco@tuwien.ac.at

Phys. Rev. Applied 26, 034044 – Published 21 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/jb45-29sy

Abstract

High-resolution imaging of magnetic nanostructures is essential for understanding fundamental spin phenomena and designing advanced devices. Recent developments in three-dimensional (3D) nanomagnetism have highlighted the growing need for imaging techniques that can capture magnetic structures across curved or tilted surfaces with high sensitivity. Though widely used as a powerful technique for imaging magnetization states, conventional magneto-optical Kerr effect (MOKE) microscopy faces inherent limitations in measuring nonplanar systems due to its shallow depth of field (DOF). Here, we present an extended depth-of-field MOKE imaging approach, combining through-focus scanning with image-stitching-based reconstruction, to obtain sharp and well-resolved magnetic domain images across nonplanar sample geometries. The method is validated on both perpendicularly and in-plane magnetized films tilted on purpose for this study, enabling quantitative analysis of domain morphology and detection sensitivity. This laboratory-accessible technique provides a fast and versatile route for 3D magnetic imaging, complementing large-scale x-ray-based methods and offering a practical tool for investigating nonplanar magnetic samples with tilted or curved 3D geometries.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (48)

  1. R. Streubel, P. Fischer, F. Kronast, V. P. Kravchuk, D. D. Sheka, Y. Gaididei, O. G. Schmidt, and D. Makarov, Magnetism in curved geometries, J. Phys. D 49, 363001 (2016).
  2. A. Fernández-Pacheco, R. Streubel, O. Fruchart, R. Hertel, P. Fischer, and R. P. Cowburn, Three-dimensional nanomagnetism, Nat. Commun. 8, 15756 (2017).
  3. P. Fischer, D. Sanz-Hernández, R. Streubel, and A. Fernández-Pacheco, Launching a new dimension with 3D magnetic nanostructures, APL Mater. 8, 010701 (2020).
  4. R. Streubel, E. Y. Tsymbal, and P. Fischer, Magnetism in curved geometries, J. Appl. Phys. 129, 210902 (2021).
  5. G. Gubbiotti et al., 2025 roadmap on 3D nanomagnetism, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 37, 143502 (2025).
  6. J. Tang, Y. Wu, W. Wang, L. Kong, B. Lv, W. Wei, J. Zang, M. Tian, and H. Du, Magnetic skyrmion bundles and their current-driven dynamics, Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 1086 (2021).
  7. N. Kent, N. Reynolds, D. Raftrey, I. T. G. Campbell, S. Virasawmy, S. Dhuey, R. V. Chopdekar, A. Hierro-Rodriguez, A. Sorrentino, E. Pereiro, S. Ferrer, F. Hellman, P. Sutcliffe, and P. Fischer, Creation and observation of hopfions in magnetic multilayer systems, Nat. Commun. 12, 1562 (2021).
  8. F. Zheng, N. S. Kiselev, F. N. Rybakov, L. Yang, W. Shi, S. Blügel, and R. E. Dunin-Borkowski, Hopfion rings in a cubic chiral magnet, Nature (London) 623, 718 (2023).
  9. L. Skoric, C. Donnelly, A. Hierro-Rodriguez, M. A. Cascales-Sandoval, S. Ruiz-Gómez, M. Foerster, M. A. Niño, R. Belkhou, C. Abert, D. Suess, and A. Fernández-Pacheco, Domain wall automotion in three-dimensional magnetic helical interconnectors, ACS Nano 16, 8860 (2022).
  10. L. Zhao, C. Hua, C. Song, W. Yu, and W. Jiang, Realization of skyrmion shift register, Sci. Bull. 69, 2370 (2024).
  11. A. M. A. Farinha, S.-H. Yang, J. Yoon, B. Pal, and S. S. P. Parkin, Interplay of geometrical and spin chiralities in 3D twisted magnetic ribbons, Nature (London) 639, 67 (2025).
  12. C. Donnelly, M. Guizar-Sicairos, V. Scagnoli, S. Gliga, M. Holler, J. Raabe, and L. J. Heyderman, Three-dimensional magnetization structures revealed with X-ray vector nanotomography, Nature (London) 547, 328 (2017).
  13. C. Donnelly, S. Finizio, S. Gliga, M. Holler, A. Hrabec, M. Odstrčil, S. Mayr, V. Scagnoli, L. J. Heyderman, M. Guizar-Sicairos, and J. Raabe, Time-resolved imaging of three-dimensional nanoscale magnetization dynamics, Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 356 (2020).
  14. C. Donnelly, A. Hierro-Rodríguez, C. Abert, K. Witte, L. Skoric, D. Sanz-Hernández, S. Finizio, F. Meng, S. McVitie, J. Raabe, D. Suess, R. Cowburn, and A. Fernández-Pacheco, Complex free-space magnetic field textures induced by three-dimensional magnetic nanostructures, Nat. Nanotechnol. 17, 136 (2022).
  15. D. Wolf, S. Schneider, U. K. Rößler, Aás Kovács, M. Schmidt, R. E. Dunin-Borkowski, B. Büchner, B. Rellinghaus, and A. Lubk, Unveiling the three-dimensional magnetic texture of skyrmion tubes, Nat. Nanotechnol. 17, 250 (2022).
  16. A. Rana et al., Three-dimensional topological magnetic monopoles and their interactions in a ferromagnetic meta-lattice, Nat. Nanotechnol. 18, 227 (2023).
  17. F. S. Yasin, J. Masell, Y. Takahashi, T. Akashi, N. Baba, K. Karube, D. Shindo, T. Arima, Y. Taguchi, Y. Tokura, T. Tanigaki, and X. Yu, Bloch point quadrupole constituting hybrid topological strings revealed with electron holographic vector field tomography, Adv. Mater. 36, 2311737 (2024).
  18. S. Koraltan, F. Porrati, R. Kraft, S. Barth, M. Weigand, C. Abert, D. Suess, M. Huth, and S. Wintz, Reconfigurable 3D magnetic nanoarchitectures, Adv. Funct. Mater. 35, e15338 (2025).
  19. J. McCord, Progress in magnetic domain observation by advanced magneto-optical microscopy, J. Phys. D 48, 333001 (2015).
  20. D. Sanz-Hernández, L. Skoric, M. A. Cascales-Sandoval, and A. Fernández-Pacheco, Probing 3D magnetic nanostructures by dark-field magneto-optical Kerr effect, J. Appl. Phys. 133, 043901 (2023).
  21. I. V. Soldatov and R. Schäfer, Selective sensitivity in Kerr microscopy, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 88, 073701 (2017).
  22. Y. Zhou, L. Yu, C. Zhi, C. Huang, S. Wang, M. Zhu, Z. Ke, Z. Gao, Y. Zhang, and S. Fu, A survey of multi-focus image fusion methods, Appl. Sci. 12, 6281 (2022).
  23. Z. Wang, Y. Peng, L. Fang, and L. Gao, Computational optical imaging: On the convergence of physical and digital layers, Optica 12, 113 (2025).
  24. R. Attota, T. A. Germer, and R. M. Silver, Through-focus scanning-optical-microscope imaging method for nanoscale dimensional analysis, Opt. Lett. 33, 1990 (2008).
  25. A. G. Valdecasas, D. Marshall, J. M. Becerra, and J. J. Terrero, On the extended depth of focus algorithms for bright field microscopy, Micron 32, 559 (2001).
  26. J. Madrid-Wolff and M. Forero-Shelton, 4f Koehler transmitted illumination condenser for teaching and low-cost microscopic imaging, Biophysicist 1, 10 (2020).
  27. M. A. Cascales-Sandoval, J. Jurczyk, L. Skoric, D. Sanz-Hernández, N. Leo, A. Kovacs, T. Schrefl, A. Hierro-Rodríguez, and A. Fernández-Pacheco, Remote-sensing based control of 3D magnetic fields using machine learning for in operando applications, J. Appl. Phys. 137, 113905 (2025).
  28. J. Schindelin, I. Arganda-Carreras, E. Frise, V. Kaynig, M. Longair, T. Pietzsch, S. Preibisch, C. Rueden, S. Saalfeld, B. Schmid, J.-Y. Tinevez, D. J. White, V. Hartenstein, K. Eliceiri, P. Tomancak, and A. Cardona, Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis, Nat. Methods 9, 676 (2012).
  29. Q. Tseng, E. Duchemin-Pelletier, A. Deshiere, M. Balland, H. Guillou, O. Filhol, and M. Théry, Spatial organization of the extracellular matrix regulates cell–cell junction positioning, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 1506 (2012).
  30. A. Boyde, Quantitative photogrammetric analysis and qualitative stereoscopic analysis of SEM images, J. Microsc. 98, 452 (1973).
  31. Y. Wang, F. Xie, S. Ma, and L. Dong, Review of surface profile measurement techniques based on optical interferometry, Opt. Lasers Eng. 93, 164 (2017).
  32. X. Xie, H. Zhuang, H. He, X. Xu, H. Liang, Y. Liu, and J. Zhou, Extended depth-resolved imaging through a thin scattering medium with PSF manipulation, Sci. Rep. 8, 4585 (2018).
  33. B. Richards and E. Wolf, Electromagnetic diffraction in optical systems, II. Structure of the image field in an aplanatic system, Proc. R. Soc. A 253, 358 (1959).
  34. H. Kirshner, F. Aguet, D. Sage, and M. Unser, 3-D PSF fitting for fluorescence microscopy: Implementation and localization application, J. Microsc. 249, 13 (2013).
  35. D. Sage, H. Kirshner, T. Pengo, N. Stuurman, J. Min, S. Manley, and M. Unser, Quantitative evaluation of software packages for single-molecule localization microscopy, Nat. Methods 12, 717 (2015).
  36. I. Goodfellow, Y. Bengio, and A. Courville, Deep Learning (MIT press, Cambridge, 2016).
  37. P. C. Hansen, REGULARIZATION TOOLS: A Matlab package for analysis and solution of discrete ill-posed problems, Numer. Algorithms 6, 1 (1994).
  38. M. Seul and D. Andelman, Domain shapes and patterns: The phenomenology of modulated phases, Science 267, 476 (1995).
  39. I. Soldatov, V. Kolesnikova, V. Rodionova, and R. Schäfer, Interpretation of Kerr microscopic domain contrast on curved surfaces, IEEE Magn. Lett. 12, 1 (2021).
  40. I. V. Soldatov and R. Schäfer, Advanced MOKE magnetometry in wide-field Kerr-microscopy, J. Appl. Phys. 122, 153906 (2017).
  41. I. V. Soldatov, J. Zehner, K. Leistner, T. Kang, D. Karnaushenko, and R. Schäfer, Advanced, Kerr-microscopy-based MOKE magnetometry for the anisotropy characterisation of magnetic films, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 529, 167889 (2021).
  42. K. Gu, Y. Guan, B. K. Hazra, H. Deniz, A. Migliorini, W. Zhang, and S. S. P. Parkin, Three-dimensional racetrack memory devices designed from freestanding magnetic heterostructures, Nat. Nanotechnol. 17, 1065 (2022).
  43. A. May, M. Saccone, A. Van Den Berg, J. Askey, M. Hunt, and S. Ladak, Magnetic charge propagation upon a 3D artificial spin-ice, Nat. Commun. 12, 3217 (2021).
  44. H. Guo, A. J. M. Deenen, M. Xu, M. Hamdi, and D. Grundler, Realization and control of bulk and surface modes in 3D nanomagnonic networks by additive manufacturing of ferromagnets, Adv. Mater. 35, 2303292 (2023).
  45. R. H. Webb, Confocal optical microscopy, Rep. Prog. Phys. 59, 427 (1996).
  46. J. Unguris, R. J. Celotta, and D. T. Pierce, Determination of the exchange coupling strengths for Fe/Au/Fe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2734 (1997).
  47. Y. Liu, L. Wang, J. Cheng, C. Li, and X. Chen, Multi-focus image fusion: A survey of the state of the art, Inf. Fusion 64, 71 (2020).
  48. L. Zhao and A. Fernández-Pacheco, Dataset for extended depth of field magneto-optical kerr microscopy for applications in 3D nanomagnetism [Data set]. TU Wien (2026). 10.48436/0196e-9b515

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation