- Open Access
Experimental quantum reservoir computing with a circuit-quantum-electrodynamics system
Phys. Rev. Applied 25, 054005 – Published 4 May, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/fmm7-3qm9
Abstract
Quantum reservoir computing is a machine-learning framework that offers ease of training compared to other quantum neural networks, as it does not rely on gradient-based optimization. Learning is performed in a single step on the output features measured from the quantum system. Various implementations of quantum reservoir computing have been explored in simulations, with different measured features. Although simulations have shown that quantum reservoirs present advantages in performance compared to classical reservoirs, experimental implementations have remained scarce. This is due to the challenge of obtaining a large number of output features that are nonlinear transformations of the input data. In this work, we show that even with a circuit quantum electrodynamics system as simple as a single transmon coupled to a readout resonator, we can implement a proof-of-concept realization of quantum reservoir computing. We obtain a large number of nonlinear features from a single physical system by encoding the input data in the amplitude of a coherent drive and measuring the cavity state in the Fock basis. We demonstrate classification of two classical tasks with significantly smaller hardware resources and fewer measured features compared to classical neural networks. Our experimental results are supported by numerical simulations that show additional Kerr nonlinearity is beneficial to reservoir performance. Our work demonstrates a hardware-efficient quantum neural-network implementation that can be further scaled up and generalized to other quantum machine-learning models.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (34)
- M. Larocca, S. Thanasilp, S. Wang, K. Sharma, J. Biamonte, P. J. Coles, L. Cincio, J. R. McClean, Z. Holmes, and M. Cerezo, Barren plateaus in variational quantum computing, Nat. Rev. Phys. 7, 174 (2025).
- K. Fujii and K. Nakajima, Harnessing disordered-ensemble quantum dynamics for machine learning, Phys. Rev. Appl. 8, 024030 (2017).
- S. Ghosh, A. Opala, M. Matuszewski, T. Paterek, and T. C. H. Liew, Quantum reservoir processing, Npj Quantum Inf. 5, 35 (2019).
- L. C. G. Govia, G. J. Ribeill, G. E. Rowlands, H. K. Krovi, and T. A. Ohki, Quantum reservoir computing with a single nonlinear oscillator, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 013077 (2021).
- J. Nokkala, R. Martínez-Peña, G. L. Giorgi, V. Parigi, M. C. Soriano, and R. Zambrini, Gaussian states of continuous-variable quantum systems provide universal and versatile reservoir computing, Commun. Phys. 4, 53 (2021).
- G. Angelatos, S. A. Khan, and H. E. Türeci, Reservoir computing approach to quantum state measurement, Phys. Rev. X 11, 041062 (2021).
- F. Hu, S. A. Khan, N. T. Bronn, G. Angelatos, G. E. Rowlands, G. J. Ribeill, and H. E. Türeci, Overcoming the coherence time barrier in quantum machine learning on temporal data, Nat. Commun. 15, 7491 (2024).
- Y. Suzuki, Q. Gao, K. C. Pradel, K. Yasuoka, and N. Yamamoto, Natural quantum reservoir computing for temporal information processing, Sci. Rep. 12, 1353 (2022).
- J. Chen, H. I. Nurdin, and N. Yamamoto, Temporal information processing on noisy quantum computers, Phys. Rev. Appl. 14, 024065 (2020).
- M. Negoro, K. Mitarai, K. Fujii, K. Nakajima, and M. Kitagawa, Machine learning with controllable quantum dynamics of a nuclear spin ensemble in a solid, arXiv:1806.10910.
- A. Suprano, D. Zia, L. Innocenti, S. Lorenzo, V. Cimini, T. Giordani, I. Palmisano, E. Polino, N. Spagnolo, F. Sciarrino, G. M. Palma, A. Ferraro, and M. Paternostro, Experimental property reconstruction in a photonic quantum extreme learning machine, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 160802 (2024).
- D. Zia, L. Innocenti, G. Minati, S. Lorenzo, A. Suprano, R. D. Bartolo, N. Spagnolo, T. Giordani, V. Cimini, G. M. Palma, A. Ferraro, F. Sciarrino, and M. Paternostro, Quantum reservoir computing for photonic entanglement witnessing, Sci. Adv. 11, eady7987 (2025).
- A. Senanian, S. Prabhu, V. Kremenetski, S. Roy, Y. Cao, J. Kline, T. Onodera, L. G. Wright, X. Wu, V. Fatemi, and P. L. McMahon, Microwave signal processing using an analog quantum reservoir computer, Nat. Commun. 15, 7490 (2024).
- D. I. Schuster, A. A. Houck, J. A. Schreier, A. Wallraff, J. M. Gambetta, A. Blais, L. Frunzio, J. Majer, B. Johnson, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Resolving photon number states in a superconducting circuit, Nature 445, 515 (2007).
- M. D. Reed, L. DiCarlo, B. R. Johnson, L. Sun, D. I. Schuster, L. Frunzio, and R. J. Schoelkopf, High-fidelity readout in circuit quantum electrodynamics using the Jaynes-Cummings nonlinearity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 173601 (2010).
- J. Heinsoo, C. K. Andersen, A. Remm, S. Krinner, T. Walter, Y. Salathé, S. Gasparinetti, J.-C. Besse, A. Potočnik, A. Wallraff, and C. Eichler, Rapid high-fidelity multiplexed readout of superconducting qubits, Phys. Rev. Appl. 10, 034040 (2018).
- A. Essig, Q. Ficheux, T. Peronnin, N. Cottet, R. Lescanne, A. Sarlette, P. Rouchon, Z. Leghtas, and B. Huard, Multiplexed photon number measurement, Phys. Rev. X 11, 031045 (2021).
- B. Lienhard, A. Vepsäläinen, Luke C. G. Govia, C. R. Hoffer, J. Y. Qiu, D. Ristè, M. Ware, D. Kim, R. Winik, A. Melville, B. Niedzielski, J. Yoder, G. J. Ribeill, T. A. Ohki, H. K. Krovi, T. P. Orlando, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver, Deep-neural-network discrimination of multiplexed superconducting-qubit states, Phys. Rev. Appl. 17, 014024 (2022).
- J. Dudas, B. Carles, E. Plouet, F. A. Mizrahi, J. Grollier, and D. Marković, Quantum reservoir computing implementation on coherently coupled quantum oscillators, Npj Quantum Inf. 9, 64 (2023).
- A. Palacios, R. Martínez-Peña, M. C. Soriano, G. L. Giorgi, and R. Zambrini, Role of coherence in many-body quantum reservoir computing, Commun. Phys. 7, 369 (2024).
- S. A. Khan, F. Hu, G. Angelatos, and H. E. Türeci, Physical reservoir computing using finitely-sampled quantum systems, arXiv:2110.13849.
- M. C. Mackey and L. Glass, Oscillation and chaos in physiological control systems, Science 197, 287 (1977).
- D. Stanev, N. Spagnolo, and F. Sciarrino, Deterministic optimal quantum cloning via a quantum-optical neural network, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 013139 (2023).
- A. Motamedi, H. Zadeh-Haghighi, and C. Simon, Quantumness and learning performance in reservoir computing with a single oscillator, arXiv:2304.03462.
- G. R. Steinbrecher, J. P. Olson, D. Englund, and J. Carolan, Quantum optical neural networks, Npj Quantum Inf. 5, 60 (2019).
- H. Xu, T. Krisnanda, R. Bao, and T. C. H. Liew, The roles of Kerr nonlinearity in a bosonic quantum neural network, New J. Phys. 25, 023028 (2023).
- A. Bengtsson, P. Krantz, M. Simoen, I.-M. Svensson, B. Schneider, V. Shumeiko, P. Delsing, and J. Bylander, Nondegenerate parametric oscillations in a tunable superconducting resonator, Phys. Rev. B 97, 144502 (2018).
- C. Zhu, P. J. Ehlers, H. I. Nurdin, and D. Soh, Practical few-atom quantum reservoir computing, Phys. Rev. Research 7, 023290 (2025).
- M. Kornjača et al., Large-scale quantum reservoir learning with an analog quantum computer, arXiv:2407.02553.
- D. Marković and J. Grollier, Quantum neuromorphic computing, Appl. Phys. Lett. 117, 150501 (2020).
- H.-Y. Huang, M. Broughton, J. Cotler, S. Chen, J. Li, M. Mohseni, H. Neven, R. Babbush, R. Kueng, J. Preskill, and J. R. McClean, Quantum advantage in learning from experiments, Science 376, 1182 (2022).
- Q. H. Tran and K. Nakajima, Learning temporal quantum tomography, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 260401 (2021).
- L. Balembois, Magnetic resonance of a single electron spin and its magnetic environment by photon counting, Theses, Université Paris-Saclay (2023).
- The data and code that support this study are available in Zenodo with the identifier, https://zenodo.org/records/15745370.