Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Controlling complex dynamics with synthetic magnetism in optomechanical systems: A route to enhanced sensor performance

Deivasundari Muthukumar1, Stella Rolande Mbokop Tchounda2, Sifeu Takougang Kingni3,*, Karthikeyan Rajagopal1,4, and Serge Guy Nana Engo2

  • *Contact author: sifeu.takougang@facsciences-uy1.cm, stkingni@gmail.com

Phys. Rev. Applied 24, 014053 – Published 29 July, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/f6sv-4fq9

Abstract

This paper investigates the complex nonlinear dynamics of an optomechanical system featuring an optical cavity coupled to two mechanical resonators interconnected by a phase-dependent interaction. We specifically explore the role of this phase-dependent phonon hopping as a mechanism for generating synthetic gauge fields without relying on gain-loss or PT-symmetric elements, offering a potentially more robust approach to manipulating mechanical energy transfer. By deriving the semiclassical dynamical equations, we map out the system’s behavior across different parameter regimes. Our findings reveal a rich spectrum of dynamics, including bistability (the coexistence of two steady states) and the emergence of complex attractors such as self-excited oscillations, hidden attractors, and chaos. We demonstrate how controlling system parameters, particularly the mechanical coupling phase and optical drive, allows for tunability between these distinct dynamical states. The presence of tunable bistability and sensitive chaotic regimes offers significant potential for practical applications. Specifically, we discuss how these controlled dynamics could be leveraged for state switching in optical information processing and for enhancing sensitivity in advanced sensor technologies through chaos-based mechanisms. This work deepens our understanding of how synthetic gauge fields, generated via phase-dependent interactions, can sculpt the nonlinear dynamics of optomechanical systems, providing a pathway toward designing robust and tunable devices for signal processing, communication, and sensing.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (30)

  1. Markus Aspelmeyer, Tobias J. Kippenberg, and Florian Marquardt, Cavity optomechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 1391 (2014).
  2. Zhong-Peng Liu, Jing Zhang, Sahin Kaya Özdemir, Bo Peng, Hui Jing, Xin-You Lü, Chun-Wen Li, Lan Yang, Franco Nori, and Yu xi Liu, Metrology with PT-symmetric cavities: Enhanced sensitivity near the PT-phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 110802 (2016).
  3. Dan Browne, Sougato Bose, Florian Mintert, and M. S. Kim, From quantum optics to quantum technologies, Prog. Quantum Electron. 54, 2 (2017).
  4. K. Stannigel, P. Komar, S. J. M. Habraken, S. D. Bennett, Mikhail D. Lukin, P. Zoller, and P. Rabl, Optomechanical quantum information processing with photons and phonons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 013603 (2012).
  5. T. Li, W. Wang, and Xuexi Yi, Enhancing the sensitivity of optomechanical mass sensors with a laser in a squeezed state, Phys. Rev. A 104, 013521 (2021).
  6. Carl M. Bender and Stefan Boettcher, Real spectra in non-Hermitian Hamiltonians having PT symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5243 (1998).
  7. Yuto Ashida, Zongping Gong, and Masahito Ueda, Non-Hermitian physics, Adv. Phys. 69, 249 (2020).
  8. S. R. Mbokop Tchounda, P. Djorwé, M. V. Tchakui, and S. G. Nana Engo, Chaos control and exceptional point engineering via dissipative optomechanical coupling, Phys. Scr. 99, 025215 (2024).
  9. Ramy El-Ganainy, K. G. Makris, D. N. Christodoulides, and Ziad H. Musslimani, Theory of coupled optical PT-symmetric structures, Opt. Lett. 32, 2632 (2007).
  10. Mohammad-Ali Miri and Andrea Alù, Exceptional points in optics and photonics, Science 363, eaar7709 (2019).
  11. Sahin Kaya Özdemir, Stefan Rotter, Franco Nori, and Lan Yang, Parity–time symmetry and exceptional points in photonics, Nat. Mater. 18, 783 (2019).
  12. Liang Feng, Ramy El-Ganainy, and Li Ge, Non-Hermitian photonics based on parity–time symmetry, Nat. Photonics 11, 752 (2017).
  13. Hossein Hodaei, Absar U. Hassan, Steffen Wittek, Hipolito Garcia-Gracia, Ramy El-Ganainy, Demetrios N. Christodoulides, and Mercedeh Khajavikhan, Enhanced sensitivity at higher-order exceptional points, Nature 548, 187 (2017).
  14. B. Peng, Ş. K. Özdemir, S. Rotter, H. Yilmaz, M. Liertzer, F. Monifi, C. M. Bender, F. Nori, and L. Yang, Loss-induced suppression and revival of lasing, Science 346, 328 (2014).
  15. Jung-Wan Ryu, Jae-Ho Han, Chang-Hwan Yi, Moon Jip Park, and Hee Chul Park, Exceptional classifications of non-Hermitian systems, Commun. Phys. 7, 109 (2024).
  16. Muhib Ullah and Said Mikki, Nonreciprocal microwave field transmission in a quantum magnomechanical system controlled by magnetostriction and Kerr nonlinearities, Phys. Rev. B 109, 214303 (2024).
  17. Manuel Reisenbauer, Henning Rudolph, Livia Egyed, Klaus Hornberger, Anton V. Zasedatelev, Murad Abuzarli, Benjamin A. Stickler, and Uroš Delić, Non-Hermitian dynamics and non-reciprocity of optically coupled nanoparticles, Nat. Phys. 20, 1629 (2024).
  18. P. Djorwe, Y. Pennec, and B. Djafari-Rouhani, Exceptional point enhances sensitivity of optomechanical mass sensors, Phys. Rev. Appl. 12, 024002 (2019).
  19. Xi-guang Wang, Guang-hua Guo, and Jamal Berakdar, Enhanced sensitivity at magnetic high-order exceptional points and topological energy transfer in magnonic planar waveguides, Phys. Rev. Appl. 15, 034050 (2021).
  20. Tamar Goldzak, Alexei A. Mailybaev, and Nimrod Moiseyev, Light stops at exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 013901 (2018).
  21. P. Djorwé, Y. Pennec, and B. Djafari-Rouhani, Self-organized synchronization of mechanically coupled resonators based on optomechanics gain-loss balance, Phys. Rev. B 102, 155410 (2020).
  22. Daniel Hey and Enbang Li, Advances in synthetic gauge fields for light through dynamic modulation, R. Soc. Open. Sci. 5, 172447 (2018).
  23. S. R. Mbokop Tchounda, P. Djorwé, S. G. Nana Engo, and B. Djafari-Rouhani, Sensor sensitivity based on exceptional points engineered via synthetic magnetism, Phys. Rev. Appl. 19, 064016 (2023).
  24. Guanhao Huang, Alberto Beccari, Nils J. Engelsen, and Tobias J. Kippenberg, Room-temperature quantum optomechanics using an ultralow noise cavity, Nature 626, 512 (2024).
  25. Matt Eichenfield, Ryan Camacho, Jasper Chan, Kerry J. Vahala, and Oskar Painter, A picogram-and nanometre-scale photonic-crystal optomechanical cavity, Nature 459, 550 (2009).
  26. B. J. Lawrie, P. D. Lett, A. M. Marino, and R. C. Pooser, Quantum sensing with squeezed light, ACS Photonics 6, 1307 (2019).
  27. Kejie Fang, Jie Luo, Anja Metelmann, Matthew H. Matheny, Florian Marquardt, Aashish A. Clerk, and Oskar Painter, Generalized non-reciprocity in an optomechanical circuit via synthetic magnetism and reservoir engineering, Nat. Phys. 13, 465 (2017).
  28. Hengjiang Ren, Tirth Shah, Hannes Pfeifer, Christian Brendel, Vittorio Peano, Florian Marquardt, and Oskar Painter, Topological phonon transport in an optomechanical system, Nat. Commun. 13, 3476 (2022).
  29. Karl Pelka, Guilhem Madiot, Rémy Braive, and André Xuereb, Floquet control of optomechanical bistability in multimode systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 123603 (2022).
  30. Gui-Lei Zhu, Chang-Sheng Hu, Ying Wu, and Xin-You Lü, Cavity optomechanical chaos, Fundam. Res. 3, 63 (2023).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation