Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access

Toward integrated sensors for optimized optical coherence tomography with undetected photons

Franz Roeder1,2,*, René Pollmann1,2, Viktor Quiring1,2, Christof Eigner1, Benjamin Brecht1,2, and Christine Silberhorn1,2

  • 1Paderborn University, Institute for Photonic Quantum Systems (PhoQS), Warburger Str. 100, 33098 Paderborn, Germany
  • 2Paderborn University, Integrated Quantum Optics, Warburger Str. 100, 33098 Paderborn, Germany

  • *Contact author: franz.roeder@uni-paderborn.de

Phys. Rev. Applied 25, 034031 – Published 10 March, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/cwsx-42c4

Abstract

The development of practical sensors for optical coherence tomography (OCT) with undetected photons requires miniaturization via integration. To be practical, these sensors must exhibit a large spectral bandwidth and a high brightness, which are linked to a high axial resolution and a sufficient signal-to-noise ratio, respectively. Here, we combine these requirements in a scheme for OCT measurements with undetected photons based on nonlinear Ti:LiNbO3 waveguides. We investigate the performance benchmarks of the commonly used SU(1,1) scheme in comparison to an induced-coherence scheme and find that the latter is actually better suited when implementing measurements with undetected photons in integrated systems. In both schemes, we perform pump-gain optimization and OCT measurements with undetected photons with an axial resolution as low as 28μm.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (29)

  1. R. Leitgeb, C. K. Hitzenberger, and A. F. Fercher, Performance of Fourier domain vs. time domain optical coherence tomography, Opt. Express 11, 889 (2003).
  2. P. Griffiths and J. Haseth, Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometry, Chap. 2 (John Wiley and Sons, 2007), pp. 19–55.
  3. C. Lindner, J. Kunz, S. J. Herr, S. Wolf, J. Kießling, and F. Kühnemann, Nonlinear interferometer for Fourier-transform mid-infrared gas spectroscopy using near-infrared detection, Opt. Express 29, 4035 (2021).
  4. A. Paterova, H. Yang, C. An, D. Kalashnikov, and L. Krivitsky, Measurement of infrared optical constants with visible photons, New J. Phys. 20, 043015 (2018).
  5. P. Kaufmann, H. M. Chrzanowski, A. Vanselow, and S. Ramelow, Mid-IR spectroscopy with NIR grating spectrometers, Opt. Express 30, 5926 (2022).
  6. G. B. Lemos, V. Borish, G. D. Cole, S. Ramelow, R. Lapkiewicz, and A. Zeilinger, Quantum imaging with undetected photons, Nature 512, 409 (2014).
  7. S. Töpfer, M. G. Basset, J. Fuenzalida, F. Steinlechner, J. P. Torres, and M. Gräfe, Quantum holography with undetected light, Sci. Adv. 8, eabl4301 (2022).
  8. I. Kviatkovsky, H. M. Chrzanowski, E. G. Avery, H. Bartolomaeus, and S. Ramelow, Microscopy with undetected photons in the mid-infrared, Sci. Adv. 6, eabd0264 (2020).
  9. J. R. León-Torres, F. Krajinić, M. Kumar, M. G. Basset, F. Setzpfandt, V. F. Gili, B. Jelenković, and M. Gräfe, Off-axis holographic imaging with undetected light, Opt. Express 32, 35449 (2024).
  10. A. Rojas-Santana, G. J. Machado, M. V. Chekhova, D. Lopez-Mago, and J. P. Torres, Analysis of the signal measured in spectral-domain optical coherence tomography based on nonlinear interferometers, Phys. Rev. A 106, 033702 (2022).
  11. A. Vallés, G. Jiménez, L. J. Salazar-Serrano, and J. P. Torres, Optical sectioning in induced coherence tomography with frequency-entangled photons, Phys. Rev. A 97, 023824 (2018).
  12. L. J. Wang, X. Y. Zou, and L. Mandel, Induced coherence without induced emission, Phys. Rev. A 44, 4614 (1991).
  13. B. Yurke, S. L. McCall, and J. R. Klauder, SU(2) and SU(1,1) interferometers, Phys. Rev. A 33, 4033 (1986).
  14. N. R. Gemmell, Y. Ma, E. Pearce, J. Flórez, O. Czerwinski, M. S. Kim, R. F. Oulton, A. S. Clark, and C. C. Phillips, Coupling undetected sensing modes by quantum erasure, APL Quantum 1, 036121 (2024).
  15. E. M. Kim, S. K. Lee, S. M. Lee, M. S. Kang, and H. S. Park, Quantum optical induced-coherence tomography by a hybrid interferometer, Quantum Sci. Technol. 9, 015024 (2024).
  16. G. J. Machado, G. Frascella, J. P. Torres, and M. V. Chekhova, Optical coherence tomography with a nonlinear interferometer in the high parametric gain regime, Appl. Phys. Lett. 117, 094002 (2020).
  17. A. Eckstein, B. Brecht, and C. Silberhorn, A quantum pulse gate based on spectrally engineered sum frequency generation, Opt. Express 19, 13770 (2011).
  18. R. Pollmann, F. Roeder, V. Quiring, R. Ricken, C. Eigner, B. Brecht, and C. Silberhorn, Integrated, bright broadband, two-colour parametric down-conversion source, Opt. Express 32, 23945 (2024).
  19. F. Roeder, A. Gnanavel, R. Pollmann, O. Brecht, M. Stefszky, L. Padberg, C. Eigner, C. Silberhorn, and B. Brecht, Ultra-broadband non-degenerate guided-wave bi-photon source in the near and mid-infrared, New J. Phys. 26, 123025 (2024).
  20. A. Vanselow, P. Kaufmann, I. Zorin, B. Heise, H. M. Chrzanowski, and S. Ramelow, Frequency-domain optical coherence tomography with undetected mid-infrared photons, Optica 7, 1729 (2020).
  21. F. Roeder, R. Pollmann, M. Stefszky, M. Santandrea, K.-H. Luo, V. Quiring, R. Ricken, C. Eigner, B. Brecht, and C. Silberhorn, Measurement of ultrashort biphoton correlation times with an integrated two-color broadband SU(1,1)-interferometer, PRX Quantum 5, 020350 (2024).
  22. See supplemental material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/cwsx-42c4 for derivations, raw data, and investigations of losses in the signal channel, the sensitivity to idler transmission changes, and the phase-compensation procedure, as well as improvements achieved via averaging.
  23. M. Wojtkowski, V. J. Srinivasan, T. H. Ko, J. G. Fujimoto, A. Kowalczyk, and J. S. Duker, Ultrahigh-resolution, high-speed, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography and methods for dispersion compensation, Opt. Express 12, 2404 (2004).
  24. X. Liu, M. Balicki, R. H. Taylor, and J. U. Kang, Towards automatic calibration of Fourier-domain OCT for robot-assisted vitreoretinal surgery, Opt. Express 18, 24331 (2010).
  25. S. Aumann, S. Donner, J. Fischer, and F. Müller, in High Resolution Imaging in Microscopy and Ophthalmology: New Frontiers in Biomedical Optics, edited by J. F. Bille (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019), pp. 59–85.
  26. M. Santandrea, K.-H. Luo, M. Stefszky, J. Sperling, H. Herrmann, B. Brecht, and C. Silberhorn, Lossy SU(1,1) interferometers in the single-photon-pair regime, Quantum Sci. Technol. 8, 025020 (2023).
  27. N. R. Gemmell, J. Flórez, E. Pearce, O. Czerwinski, C. C. Phillips, R. F. Oulton, and A. S. Clark, Loss-compensated and enhanced midinfrared interaction-free sensing with undetected photons, Phys. Rev. Appl. 19, 054019 (2023).
  28. M. I. Kolobov, E. Giese, S. Lemieux, R. Fickler, and R. W. Boyd, Controlling induced coherence for quantum imaging, J. Opt. 19, 054003 (2017).
  29. Y. Jeronimo-Moreno and A. B. U’Ren, Control, measurement, and propagation of entanglement in photon pairs generated through type-II parametric down-conversion, Phys. Rev. A 79, 033839 (2009).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation