Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Structure, Design, and Mechanics of a Pop-Up Origami with Cuts

Taiju Yoneda1, Yoshinobu Miyamoto2, and Hirofumi Wada1,*

  • 1Department of Physical Sciences, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Shiga 525-8577, Japan
  • 2Department of Architecture, Aichi Institute of Technology, Toyota, Aichi 470-0392, Japan

  • *hwada@fc.ritsumei.ac.jp

Phys. Rev. Applied 17, L021004 – Published 23 February, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.17.L021004

Abstract

The rotational erection system (RES) is an origami-based design method to generate a three-dimensional (3D) structure from a planar sheet. Its rotational and translational kinematics are fully encoded in the form of prescribed cuts and folds. Here we characterize the mechanical properties of a threefold symmetric RES by combining finite element analysis and a physical experiment. Whereas the crease and cut patterns imply that the system is not rigid foldable, we demonstrate that plate bending creates a physical route connecting the two energetically separated configurations. The elasticity of the RES allows the RES to morph into a 3D shape via a snapthrough transition. We show that the energy barrier for bistability is independent of the entire span of the structure, and depends solely on its aspect ratio. We also indicate that the standing RES has structural rigidity and resilience, owing to its unique self-locking mechanism, indicating its superior load-bearing performance in a range of applications. The present study clarifies the fundamental actuation mechanism of an origami-based deployable structure extended with chiral patterned cuts, which facilitates a way to use the optimally designed RES in a variety of human-made systems.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (48)

  1. E. D. Demaine, M. L. Demaine, D. Koschitz, and T. Tachi, in Proc. IABSE-IASS Symp. Taller, Longer, Light. (IABSE-IASS 2011, 2011).
  2. T. Tachi, Designing freeform origami tessellations by generalizing resch’s patterns, J. Mech. Des. 135, 111006 (2013).
  3. A. Lebée, From folds to structures, a review, Int. J. Space Struct. 30, 55 (2015).
  4. M. Schenk and S. D. Guest, Geometry of miura-folded metamaterials, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 3276 (2013).
  5. J. L. Silverberg, A. A. Evans, L. McLeod, R. C. Hayward, T. Hull, C. D. Santangelo, and I. Cohen, Using origami design principles to fold reprogrammable mechanical metamaterials, Science 345, 647 (2014).
  6. J. L. Silverberg, J.-H. Ha, A. A. Evans, B. Liu, T. Hull, C. D. Santangelo, R. J. Lang, R. C. Hayward, and I. Cohen, Origami structures with a critical transition to bistability arising from hidden degrees of freedom, Nat. Mater. 14, 389 (2015).
  7. F. Lechenault and M. Adda-Bedia, Generic Bistability in Creased Conical Surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 235501 (2015).
  8. H. Yasuda and J. Yang, Reentrant Origami-Based Metamaterials with Negative Poisson’s Ratio and Bistability, ’ Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 185502 (2015).
  9. J. A. Faber, A. F. Arrieta, and A. R. Studart, Bioinspired spring origami, Science 359, 1386 (2018).
  10. H. Kobayashi, B. Kresling, and J. F. V. Vincent, The geometry of unfolding of tree leaves, Proc. R. Soc. B 265, 147 (1998).
  11. L. Mahadevan and S. Rica, Self-organized origami, Science 307, 1740 (2005).
  12. C. Py, P. Reverdy, L. Doppler, J. Bico, B. Roman, and C. N. Baroud, Capillary Origami: Spontaneous Wrapping of a Droplet with an Elastic Sheet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 156103 (2007).
  13. M. J. Harrington, K. Razghandi, F. Ditsch, L. Guiducci, M. Rueggeberg, J. W. C. Dunlop, P. Fratzl, C. Neinhuis, and I. Burgert, Origami-like unfolding of hydro-actuated ice plant seed capsules, Nat. Commun. 2, 2 (2011).
  14. W. T. M. Forbes, The wing folding pattern of the coleoptera, J. NY Entomol. Soc. 24, 91 (1926).
  15. K. Saito, S. Nomura, S. Yamamoto, R. Niyama, and Y. Okabe, Investigation of hindwing folding in ladybird beetles by artificial elytron transplantation and microcomputed tomography, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, 5624 (2017).
  16. K. Miura, Method of packaging and deployment of large membranes in space, Tech. Rep. (Inst. Space Astronaut Sci., 1985).
  17. J. T. Bruton, T. G. Nelson, T. K. Zimmerman, J. D. Fernelius, S. P. Magleby, and L. L. Howell, Packing and deploying soft origami to and from cylindrical volumes with application to automotive airbags, R. Soc. Open Sci 3, 160429 (2016).
  18. K. Kuribayashi, K. Tsuchiya, Z. You, D. Tomus, M. Umemoto, and M. Sasaki, Self-deployable origami stent grafts as a biomedical application of ni-rich tini shape memory alloy foil, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 419, 131 (2005).
  19. Z. Qi, D. K. Campbell, and H. S. Park, Atomistic simulations of tension-induced large deformation and stretchability in graphene kirigami, Phys. Rev. B 90, 245437 (2014).
  20. M. Isobe and K. Okumura, Initial rigid response and softening transition of highly stretchable kirigami sheet materials, Sci. Rep. 6, 24758 (2016).
  21. A. Rafsanjani and K. Bertoldi, Buckling-Induced Kirigami, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 084301 (2017).
  22. M. A. Dias, M. P. McCarron, D. J. Rayneau-Kirkhope, P. Z. Hanataka, D. K. Campbell, H. S. Park, and D. P. Holmes, Kirigami actuators, Soft Matter 13, 9087 (2017).
  23. Z. Liu, H. Du, J. Li, L. Lu, Z.-Y. Li, and N. X. Fang, Nano-kirigami with giant optical chirality, Sci. Adv. 4, eaat4436 (2018).
  24. M. H. Kaspersen, S. Hines, M. Moore, M. K. Rasmussen, and M. A. Dias, in Procceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (2019), p. 935.
  25. Y. Zhang, F. Zhang, Z. Yan, Q. Ma, X. Li, Y. Huang, and J. A. Rogers, Printing, folding and assembly methods for forming 3d mesostructures in advanced materials, Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 1 (2017).
  26. T. Nojima and K. Saito, Development of newly designed ultra-light core structures, JSME Int. J. A 49, 38 (2006).
  27. K. Saito, F. Agnese, and F. Scarpa, A cellular kirigami morphing wingbox concept, J. Int. Mat. Sys. Struct. 22, 935 (2011).
  28. T. Castle, Y. Cho, X. Gong, E. Jung, D. M. Sussman, S. Yang, and R. D. Kamien, Making the cut: Lattice Kirigami Rules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 245502 (2014).
  29. R. M. Neville, F. Scarpa, and A. Pirrera, Shape morphing kirigami mechanical metamaterials, Sci. Rep. 6, 31067 (2016).
  30. K. Bertoldi, V. Vitelli, J. Christensen, and M. van Hecke, Flexible mechanical metamaterials, Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 17066 (2017).
  31. A. Rafsanjani, Y. Zhang, B. Liu, S. M. Rubinstein, and K. Bertoldi, Kirigami skins make a simple soft actuator crawl, Sci. Robotics 3, eaar7555 (2018).
  32. D. P. Holmes, Elasticity and stability of shape-shifting structures, Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 40, 118 (2019).
  33. M. Liu, L. Domino, and D. Vella, Tapered elastica as a route for axisymmetric morphing structures, Soft Matter 16, 7739 (2020).
  34. Z. Zhai, L. Wu, and H. Jiang, Mechanical metamaterials based on origami and kirigami, Appl. Phys. Rev. 8, 041319 (2021).
  35. Y. Miyamoto, in Origmai 6: The 6th International Meeting on Origami in Science, Mathematics and Education, Vol. II (2014), p. 537.
  36. Y. Miyamoto, in Origami 7: The 7th International Meeting on Origami in Science, Mathematics and Education, Vol. III (2018), p. 731.
  37. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.17.L021004 for details of experiments and FEA simulation, additional experimental and FEA data, theoretical argument on the rigid foldability of RES, and Movie S1, which includes Refs. [36, 40, 41, 42, 43].
  38. A. Ghassaei, E. Demaine, and N. Gershenfeld, Fast, interactive origami simulation using GPU computation, in Origami 7, Vol.4 (2018), p. 1151.
  39. To be exact, our threefold symmetric RES is tristable. It can pop out either upwards or downwards, where resulting structures are mirror-symmetric, with their chiralities being opposite, and all the vally and mountain folds being interchanged. As those reflection-symmetric strucutres are mechanically identical, we describe in this study our RES as being bistable.
  40. J. C. Maxwell, On the calculation of the equilibrium and stiffness of frames, Philos. Mag. 27, 294 (1864).
  41. C. R. Calladine, Buckminster Fuller tensegrity structures and Clerk Maxwell rules for the construction of stiff frames, Int. J. Solids Struct. 14, 161 (1978).
  42. T. C. Lubensky, C. Kane, X. Mao, A. Souslov, and K. Sun, Phonons and elasticity in critically coordinated lattices, Rep. Prog. Phys. 78, 073901 (2015).
  43. T. Tachi, in Proceedings of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures (IASS) Symposium, Vol. 12 (2010).
  44. Owning to small (but unavoidable) imperfections in the fabrication, the rotational axis of the hub and of the base did not match completely, and some strains remained in the both stable configurations, which is unimportant to our main results.
  45. B. Audoly and Y. Pomeau, Elasticity and Geometry: from Hair Curls to the Non-Linear Response of Shells (Oxford University Press, New York, 2010).
  46. For a planar buckling of a uniform rod, we have α=π2,4π2 and π2/4, for hinged, clamped, and free boundary conditions, respectively. For more general boundary conditions and specific strip geometry including our case, the exact value of α will also fall within the range of π2/4−4π2.
  47. B. Liu, J. L. Silverberg, A. A. Evans, C. D. Santangelo, R. J. Lang, and I. Cohen, Topological kinematics of origami metamaterials, Nat. Phys. 14, 811 (2018).
  48. Z. Chang, T. D. Ta, K. Narumi, H. Kim, F. Okuya, D. Li, K. Kato, J. Qi, Y. Miyamoto, K. Saito, and Y. Kawahara, in Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’20) (2020), p. 1.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation