- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Applied

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Changes in bubble-cloud dissolution throughout the application of histotripsy pulses

Michael Gomez1, Katia Flores Basterrechea2, Muskan Singh2, Himanshu Shekhar3, and Kenneth B. Bader2,*

  • *Contact author: baderk@uchicago.edu
PDF

Phys. Rev. Applied 24, 044051 – Published 16 October, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/9vvg-yfmb

Abstract

Material damage is a consideration for any applications where pressure fields may initiate cavitation. Histotripsy is a focused ultrasound therapy that exploits the destructive property of bubble clouds to disrupt viscoelastic tissue. The resulting effect achieves the same outcomes as surgery without the need for an invasive procedure. This study investigated the relationship between changes in bubble clouds throughout focused ultrasound exposure. Specifically, the dissolution period of bubbles generated in water and agarose gel was tracked with ultrafast ultrasound imaging. This imaging marker was found to increase in agarose during the initial stages of exposure, and maintained steady-state values after 555 ± 64 applied histotripsy pulses. The relative change in damage area of the gel and bubble-dissolution period with exposure duration were found to be equivalent (p > 0.05). Acoustic emissions tracked with passive acoustic imaging were also evaluated and were found to have a different functional form with exposure duration than the bubble-dissolution period or area of damage to the gel. In contrast, there were no noted changes in these imaging markers throughout histotripsy exposure when bubble clouds were generated in water. A previously validated bubble-dynamics model was extended to calculate the anticipated changes to bubble expansion during histotripsy exposure under the assumption that the agarose elastic modulus approached 0 kPa (i.e., total fractionation). The calculations predicted larger changes in the bubble dynamics than was observed, which might reflect complicated dynamics of the bubble cloud during the final stages of treatment.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Multimedia

References (72)

  1. F. Caupin and E. Herbert, Cavitation in water: A review, C. R. Phys. 7, 1000 (2006).
  2. T. G. Leighton, The Acoustic Bubble (Academic Press, London, 1994).
  3. D. Lohse, Bubble puzzles, Phys. Today 56, 36 (2003).
  4. Lord Rayleigh, On the pressure developed in a liquid during the collapse of a spherical cavity, Philos. Mag. 34, 94 (1917).
  5. D. F. Gaitan, L. A. Crum, C. C. Church, and R. A. Roy, Sonoluminescence and bubble dynamics for a single, stable, cavitation bubble, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91, 3166 (1992).
  6. K. B. Bader, J. Mobley, C. C. Church, and D. F. Gaitan, The effect of static pressure on the strength of inertial cavitation events, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 132, 2286 (2012).
  7. L. Mancia, J. Yang, J. S. Spratt, J. R. Sukovich, Z. Xu, T. Colonius, C. Franck, and E. Johnsen, Acoustic cavitation rheometry, Soft Matter 17, 2931 (2021).
  8. A. Kaushik, B. A. Abeid, J. B. Estrada, J. B. Fowlkes, M. L. Fabiilli, and M. Aliabouzar, The radial dynamics and acoustic emissions of phase-shift droplets are impacted by mechanical properties of tissue-mimicking hydrogels, Ultrason. Sonochem. 109, 106984 (2024).
  9. K. B. Bader, E. Vlaisavljevich, and A. D. Maxwell, For whom the bubble grows: Physical principles of bubble nucleation and dynamics in histotripsy ultrasound therapy, Ultrasound Med. Biol. 45, 1056 (2019).
  10. Z. Xu, T. L. Hall, E. Vlaisavljevich, and F. T. Lee, Histotripsy: The first noninvasive, non-ionizing, non-thermal ablation technique based on ultrasound, Int. J. Hyperthermia 38, 561 (2021).
  11. clinicaltrials.gov identifiers NCT05820087 and NCT06282809
  12. E. Vlaisavljevich, A. Maxwell, L. Mancia, E. Johnsen, C. Cain, and Z. Xu, Visualizing the histotripsy process: Bubble cloud-cancer cell interactions in a tissue-mimicking environment, Ultrasound Med. Biol. 42, 2466 (2016).
  13. A. D. Maxwell, T.-Y. Wang, C. A. Cain, J. B. Fowlkes, O. A. Sapozhnikov, M. R. Bailey, and Z. Xu, Cavitation clouds created by shock scattering from bubbles during histotripsy, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 130, 1888 (2011).
  14. E. Vlaisavljevich, K.-W. Lin, M. T. Warnez, R. Singh, L. Mancia, A. J. Putnam, E. Johnsen, C. Cain, and Z. Xu, Effects of tissue stiffness, ultrasound frequency, and pressure on histotripsy- induced cavitation bubble behavior, Phys. Med. Biol. 60, 2271 (2015).
  15. E. L. Wallach, H. Shekhar, F. Flores-Guzman, S. L. Hernandez, and K. B. Bader, Histotripsy bubble cloud contrast with chirp-coded excitation in preclinical models, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 69, 787 (2022).
  16. K. B. Bader and V. Bollen, The influence of gas diffusion on bubble persistence in shock-scattering histotripsy, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 143, EL481 (2018).
  17. K. Miao, K. F. Basterrechea, S. L. Hernandez, O. S. Ahmed, M. V. Patel, and K. B. Bader, Development of convolutional neural network to segment ultrasound images of histotripsy ablation, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 71, 1789 (2024).
  18. G. J. Anthony, V. Bollen, S. Hendley, T. Antic, S. Sammet, and K. B. Bader, Assessment of histotripsy-induced liquefaction with diagnostic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in vitro and ex vivo, Phys. Med. Biol. 64, 095023 (2019).
  19. S. P. Allen, E. Vlaisavljevich, J. Shi, L. Hernandez-Garcia, C. A. Cain, Z. Xu, and T. L. Hall, The response of MRI contrast parameters in in vitro tissues and tissue mimicking phantoms to fractionation by histotripsy, Phys. Med. Biol. 62, 7167 (2017).
  20. K. B. Bader, K. Flores Basterrechea, and S. A. Hendley, In silico assessment of histotripsy-induced changes in catheter-directed thrombolytic delivery, Front. Physiol. 14, 1 (2023).
  21. S. C. Haskell, N. Lu, G. E. Stocker, Z. Xu, and J. R. Sukovich, Monitoring cavitation dynamics evolution in tissue mimicking hydrogels for repeated exposures via acoustic cavitation emissions, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 153, 237 (2023).
  22. K. B. Bader, E. L. Wallach, H. Shekhar, F. Flores-Guzman, H. J. Halpern, and S. L. Hernandez, Estimating the mechanical energy of histotripsy bubble clouds with high frame rate imaging, Phys. Med. Biol. 66, 165004 (2021).
  23. E. A. Neppiras, Acoustic cavitation, Phys. Rep. 61, 159 (1980).
  24. A. D. Maxwell, C. A. Cain, T. L. Hall, J. B. Fowlkes, and Z. Xu, Probability of cavitation for single ultrasound pulses applied to tissues and tissue-mimicking materials, Ultrasound Med. Biol. 39, 449 (2013).
  25. K. J. Haworth, K. B. Bader, K. T. Rich, C. K. Holland, and T. D. Mast, Quantitative frequency-domain passive cavitation imaging, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 64, 177 (2017).
  26. K. B. Bader, K. J. Haworth, A. D. Maxwell, and C. K. Holland, Post hoc analysis of passive cavitation imaging for classification of histotripsy-induced liquefaction in vitro, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 37, 106 (2018).
  27. A. K. Singh, P. Warbal, K. F. Basterrechea, K. B. Bader, and H. Shekhar, Enhancing passive cavitation imaging using pth root compression delay, sum, and integrate beamforming: In vitro and in vivo studies, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 72, 2283 (2025).
  28. A. D. Maxwell, T.-Y. Wang, L. Yuan, A. P. Duryea, Z. Xu, and C. A. Cain, A tissue phantom for visualization and measurement of ultrasound-induced cavitation damage, Ultrasound Med. Biol. 36, 2132 (2010).
  29. S. A. Hendley, V. Bollen, G. J. Anthony, J. D. Paul, and K. B. Bader, In vitro assessment of stiffness-dependent histotripsy bubble cloud activity in gel phantoms and blood clots, Phys. Med. Biol. 64, 145019 (2019).
  30. A. Levillain, C. B. Confavreux, M. Decaussin-Petrucci, E. Durieux, P. Paparel, K. Le-Bail Carval, L. Maillard, F. Bermond, D. Mitton, and H. Follet, Mechanical properties of breast, kidney, and thyroid tumours measured by AFM: Relationship with tissue structure, Materialia (Oxf) 25, 101555 (2022).
  31. K.-W. Lin, T. L. Hall, R. J. McGough, Z. Xu, and C. A. Cain, Synthesis of monopolar ultrasound pulses for therapy: The frequency-compounding transducer, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 61, 1123 (2014).
  32. V. Bollen, S. A. Hendley, J. D. Paul, A. D. Maxwell, K. J. Haworth, C. K. Holland, and K. B. Bader, In vitro thrombolytic efficacy of single-and five-cycle histotripsy pulses and rt-PA, Ultrasound Med. Biol. 46, 336 (2020).
  33. V. V. Trivedi, E. L. Wallach, K. B. Bader, and H. Shekhar, Contrast-enhanced imaging of histotripsy bubble clouds using chirp-coded excitation and Volterra filtering, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 70, 989 (2023).
  34. R. E. Apfel and C. K. Holland, Gauging the likelihood of cavitation from short-pulse, low-duty cycle diagnostic ultrasound, Ultrasound Med. Biol. 17, 179 (1991).
  35. C. Coviello, R. Kozick, J. Choi, M. Gyöngy, C. Jensen, P. P. Smith, and C.-C. Coussios, Passive acoustic mapping utilizing optimal beamforming in ultrasound therapy monitoring, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 137, 2573 (2015).
  36. K. B. Bader, S. A. Hendley, G. J. Anthony, and V. Bollen, Observation and modulation of the dissolution of histotripsy-induced bubble clouds with high-frame rate plane wave imaging, Phys. Med. Biol. 64, 115012 (2019).
  37. K. Sarkar, A. Katiyar, and P. Jain, Growth and dissolution of an encapsulated contrast microbubble: Effects of encapsulation permeability, Ultrasound Med. Biol. 35, 1385 (2009).
  38. C. C. Church, C. Labuda, and K. Nightingale, A theoretical study of inertial cavitation from acoustic radiation force impulse imaging and implications for the mechanical index, Ultrasound Med. Biol. 41, 472 (2015).
  39. A. H. Muhr and J. M. V. Blanshard, Diffusion in gels, Polymer (Guildf) 23, 1012 (1982).
  40. K. B. Bader, The influence of medium elasticity on the prediction of histotripsy-induced bubble expansion and erythrocyte viability, Phys. Med. Biol. 63, 095010 (2018).
  41. K. B. Bader and C. K. Holland, Predicting the growth of nanoscale nuclei by histotripsy pulses, Phys. Med. Biol. 61, 2947 (2016).
  42. T. Hall, J. Fowlkes, C. Cain, T.-Y. Wang, Z. Xu, J. B. Fowlkes, C. A. Cain, and T. L. Hall, Imaging feedback of histotripsy treatments using ultrasound shear wave elastography, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 59, 1167 (2012).
  43. A. Eller and H. G. Flynn, Rectified diffusion during nonlinear pulsations of cavitation bubbles, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 37, 493 (1965).
  44. P. B. Rosnitskiy, P. V. Yuldashev, B. A. Vysokanov, and V. A. Khokhlova, Setting boundary conditions on the Khokhlov–Zabolotskaya equation for modeling ultrasound fields generated by strongly focused transducers, Acoust Phys. 62, 151 (2016).
  45. K. Radhakrishnan, K. B. Bader, K. J. Haworth, J. A. Kopechek, J. L. Raymond, S. L. Huang, D. D. McPherson, and C. K. Holland, Relationship between cavitation and loss of echogenicity from ultrasound contrast agents, Phys. Med. Biol. 58, 6541 (2013).
  46. B. K. Sreedhar, S. K. Albert, and A. B. Pandit, Cavitation damage: Theory and measurements – a review, Wear 372–373, 177 (2017).
  47. K. B. Bader, M. J. Crowe, J. L. Raymond, and C. K. Holland, Effect of frequency-dependent attenuation on predicted histotripsy waveforms in tissue-mimicking phantoms, Ultrasound Med. Biol. 42, 1701 (2016).
  48. E. Vlaisavljevich, Y. Kim, G. Owens, W. Roberts, C. Cain, and Z. Xu, Effects of tissue mechanical properties on susceptibility to histotripsy-induced tissue damage, Phys. Med. Biol. 59, 253 (2013).
  49. T.-Y. Wang, T. L. Hall, Z. Xu, J. B. Fowlkes, and C. A. Cain, Imaging feedback for histotripsy by characterizing dynamics of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI)-induced shear waves excited in a treated volume, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 61, 1137 (2014).
  50. A. P. Sarvazyan, O. V. Rudenko, and W. L. Nyborg, Biomedical applications of radiation force of ultrasound: Historical roots and physical basis, Ultrasound Med. Biol. 36, 1379 (2010).
  51. S. A. Sapareto and W. C. Dewey, Thermal dose determination in cancer therapy, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol., Biol., Phys. 10, 787 (1984).
  52. V. Rieke and K. Butts Pauly, MR thermometry, J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 27, 376 (2008).
  53. M. Mendiratta-Lala, et al., The #HOPE4LIVER single-arm pivotal trial for histotripsy of primary and metastatic liver tumors, Radiology 312 (2024).
  54. R. M. Miller, X. Zhang, A. D. Maxwell, C. A. Cain, and Z. Xu, Bubble-induced color doppler feedback for histotripsy tissue fractionation, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 63, 408 (2016).
  55. K. T. Rich and T. D. Mast, Methods to calibrate the absolute receive sensitivity of single-element, focused transducers, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 138, EL193 (2015).
  56. M. D. Gray, E. Lyka, and C. C. Coussios, Diffraction effects and compensation in passive acoustic mapping, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 65, 258 (2018).
  57. K. W. Commander and A. Prosperetti, Linear pressure waves in bubbly liquids: Comparison between theory and experiments, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, 1 (1989).
  58. J. C. Simon, O. A. Sapozhnikov, W. Kreider, M. Breshock, J. C. J. Williams, and M. R. Bailey, The role of trapped bubbles in kidney stone detection with the color Doppler ultrasound twinkling artifact, Phys. Med. Biol. 63, 025011 (2018).
  59. D. L. Miller, A. Abo, J. S. Abramowicz, T. A. Bigelow, D. Dalecki, E. Dickman, J. Donlon, G. Harris, and J. Nomura, Diagnostic ultrasound safety review for point-of-care ultrasound practitioners, J. Ultrasound Med. 39, 1069 (2020).
  60. H. Lin, B. D. Storey, and A. J. Szeri, Rayleigh-Taylor instability of violently collapsing bubbles, Phys. Fluids 14, 2925 (2002).
  61. M. Postema, P. Marmottant, C. T. Lancée, S. Hilgenfeldt, and N. de Jong, Ultrasound-induced microbubble coalescence, Ultrasound Med. Biol. 30, 1337 (2004).
  62. Z. Xu, Numerical simulation of the coalescence of two bubbles in an ultrasound field, Ultrason. Sonochem. 49, 277 (2018).
  63. E. Vlaisavljevich, T. Gerhardson, T. Hall, and Z. Xu, Effects of f-number on the histotripsy intrinsic threshold and cavitation bubble cloud behavior, Phys. Med. Biol. 62, 1269 (2017).
  64. C. T. Wilson, T. L. Hall, E. Johnsen, L. Mancia, M. Rodriguez, J. E. Lundt, T. Colonius, D. L. Henann, C. Franck, Z. Xu, and J. R. Sukovich, Comparative study of the dynamics of laser and acoustically generated bubbles in viscoelastic media, Phys. Rev. E 99, 043103 (2019).
  65. K. P. Mercado-Shekhar, R. T. Kleven, H. Aponte Rivera, R. Lewis, K. B. Karani, H. J. Vos, T. A. Abruzzo, K. J. Haworth, and C. K. Holland, Effect of clot stiffness on recombinant tissue plasminogen activator lytic susceptibility in vitro, Ultrasound Med. Biol. 44, 2710 (2018).
  66. J. Vidal-Jove, X. Serres, E. Vlaisavljevich, J. Cannata, A. Duryea, R. Miller, X. Merino, M. Velat, Y. Kam, R. Bolduan, J. Amaral, T. Hall, Z. Xu, F. T. Lee Jr, and T. J. Ziemlewicz, First-in-man histotripsy of hepatic tumors: The THERESA trial, a feasibility study, Int. J. Hyperthermia 39, 1115 (2022).
  67. Z. Jiang, K. Sujarittam, B. I. Yildiz, R. J. Dickinson, and J. J. Choi, Passive cavitation detection with a needle hydrophone array, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 69, 233 (2022).
  68. K. Kieran, T. L. Hall, J. E. Parsons, J. S. Wolf Jr, J. B. Fowlkes, C. A. Cain, and W. W. Roberts, Refining histotripsy: Defining the parameter space for the creation of nonthermal lesions with high intensity, pulsed focused ultrasound of the in vitro kidney, J. Urol. 178, 672 (2007).
  69. Y. C. Wang and C. E. Brennen, Numerical computation of shock waves in a spherical cloud of cavitation bubbles, J. Fluids Eng. 121, 872 (1999).
  70. A. D. Maxwell, C. A. Cain, J. B. Fowlkes, and Z. Xu, in 2010 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IEEE, 2010), pp. 108–111.
  71. K. Maeda and T. Colonius, Bubble cloud dynamics in an ultrasound field, J. Fluid Mech. 862, 1105 (2019).
  72. J. L. Raymond, K. J. Haworth, K. B. Bader, K. Radhakrishnan, J. K. Griffin, S. L. Huang, D. D. McPherson, and C. K. Holland, Broadband attenuation measurements of phospholipid-shelled ultrasound contrast agents, Ultrasound Med. Biol. 40, 410 (2014).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Applied 24, 044051– Published 16 October, 2025
  • Received 15 November 2024
  • Revised 25 June 2025
  • Accepted 4 September 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation