- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Applied

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Generalized approach for single-optical-access interferometric particle imaging

Christian Sax, Max Dreisbach, and Jochen Kriegseis*

  • *Contact author: jochen.kriegseis@kit.edu
PDF

Phys. Rev. Applied 24, 044083 – Published 27 October, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/7kc3-7yyh

Abstract

Interferometric particle imaging (IPI) enables the sizing of small transparent particles, from a few microns to several millimeters, across a large field of view, which is not feasible with typical imaging-based methods. However, current IPI setups typically require two separate optical accesses—one for coupling the illuminating laser beam into the measurement volume, and another to allow the scattered light to exit toward the camera—thereby limiting their applicability in constrained environments. This work presents a generalized IPI approach suitable across all scattering regimes—including backscatter for single-optical-access configurations—and is applicable to both droplets and bubbles. This study demonstrates how the scattering angle influences signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), measurable size range, and uncertainty. Polarization significantly affects signal quality, particularly in backscatter. Variations in light intensity with angular variations can introduce position-dependent uncertainties, and the sensitivity of the size measurement (transfer function) varies with scattering angle. Experimental validation with bubbles confirms the feasibility of backscatter IPI despite lower SNR. For droplets, the reduction in SNR is less pronounced; however, the transfer function behaves differently compared to bubbles, making both evaluation and uncertainty estimation more complex. Additional effects like glare-point splitting can add redundancy but increase complexity. Overall, this study demonstrates that IPI in backscatter is not only feasible but also a key step toward single-sided optical access, expanding the method’s practical applicability of the IPI method.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (38)

  1. L. Kirsten, T. Domaschke, C. Schneider, J. Walther, S. Meissner, R. Hampel, and E. Koch, Visualization of dynamic boiling processes using high-speed optical coherence tomography, Exp. Fluids 56, 52 (2015).
  2. B. Behroozpour, P. A. M. Sandborn, M. C. Wu, and B. E. Boser, Lidar system architectures and circuits, IEEE Commun. Mag. 55, 135 (2017).
  3. M. Maeda, Y. Akasaka, and T. Kawaguchi, Improvements of the interferometric technique for simultaneous measurement of droplet size and velocity vector field and its application to a transient spray, Exp. Fluids 33, 125 (2002).
  4. Y. Hardalupas, S. Sahu, A. Taylor, and K. Zarogoulidis, Simultaneous planar measurement of droplet velocity and size with gas phase velocities in a spray by combined ILIDS and PIV techniques, Exp. Fluids 49, 417 (2010).
  5. K. Matsuura, K. Zarogoulidis, Y. Hardalupas, A. Taylor, T. Kawaguchi, D. Sugimoto, and K. Hishida, Simultaneous planar measurement of size and three-component velocity of droplets in an aero-engine airblast fuel spray by stereoscopic interferometric laser imaging technique, in 10th International Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, ICLASS 2006 (2006).
  6. N. Fujisawa, A. Hosokawa, and S. Tomimatsu, Simultaneous measurement of droplet size and velocity field by an interferometric imaging technique in spray combustion, Meas. Sci. Technol. 14, 1341 (2003).
  7. C. Dunker, C. Roloff, and A. Grassmann, Interferometric laser imaging for in-flight cloud droplet sizing, Meas. Sci. Technol. 27, 124004 (2016).
  8. J. J. Kielar, Y. Wu, S. Coëtmellec, D. Lebrun, G. Gréhan, and M. Brunel, Size determination of mixed liquid and frozen water droplets using interferometric out-of-focus imaging, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 178, 108 (2016).
  9. A. Quérel, P. Lemaitre, M. Brunel, E. Porcheron, and G. Gréhan, Real-time global interferometric laser imaging for the droplet sizing (ILIDS) algorithm for airborne research, Meas. Sci. Technol. 21, 015306 (2009).
  10. G. Lacagnina, S. Grizzi, M. Falchi, F. D. Felice, and G. P. Romano, Simultaneous size and velocity measurements of cavitating microbubbles using interferometric laser imaging, Exp. Fluids 50, 1153 (2011).
  11. T. Kawaguchi, Y. Akasaka, and M. Maeda, Size measurements of droplets and bubbles by advanced interferometric laser imaging technique, Meas. Sci. Technol. 13, 308 (2002).
  12. Y. Niwa, Y. Kamiya, T. Kawaguchi, and M. Maeda, Bubble sizing by interferometric laser imaging, in 10th International Symposium on Application of Laser Techniques to Fluid Mechanics (2000).
  13. G. König, K. Anders, and A. Frohn, A new light-scattering technique to measure the diameter of periodically generated moving droplets, J. Aerosol. Sci. 17, 157 (1986).
  14. A. R. Glover, S. M. Skippon, and R. D. Boyle, Interferometric laser imaging for droplet sizing: A method for droplet-size measurement in sparse spray systems, Appl. Opt. 34, 8409 (1995).
  15. C. Mounaïm-Rousselle and O. Pajot, Droplet sizing by Mie scattering interferometry in a spark ignition engine, Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 16, 160 (1999).
  16. S. Dehaeck and J. van Beeck, Multifrequency interferometric particle imaging for gas bubble sizing, Exp. Fluids 45, 823 (2008).
  17. H. Shen, S. Coëtmellec, G. Grehan, and M. Brunel, Interferometric laser imaging for droplet sizing revisited: Elaboration of transfer matrix models for the description of complete systems., Appl. Opt. 51, 5357 (2012).
  18. H. Zhang, X. Wang, J. Sun, D. Jia, and T. Liu, Multidispersed bubble-size measurements by interferometric particle imaging at scattering angles of 90∘ and 45∘, Appl. Opt. 57, 10496 (2018).
  19. P. Russell, J. A. Venning, B. W. Pearce, and P. A. Brandner, Calibration of Mie scattering imaging for microbubble measurement in hydrodynamic test facilities, Exp. Fluids 61, 93 (2020).
  20. H. C. van de Hulst and V. Twersky, Light Scattering by Small Particles, Dover Books on Physics (Dover Publications, 1957 // 1958).
  21. H. C. van de Hulst and R. T. Wang, Glare points, Appl. Opt. 30, 4755 (1991).
  22. O. S. Heavens, R. W. Ditchburn, and S. George, Insight Into Optics, Chapter 4.13 (American Journal of Physics, Chichester, 1992), 1st ed.
  23. A. Lipson, S. G. Lipson, and H. Lipson, Optical Physics (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2010), 4th ed.
  24. N. Roth, K. D. I. Anders, and A. Frohn, Determination of size, evaporation rate and freezing of water droplets using light scattering and radiation pressure, Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 11, 207 (1994).
  25. N. Semidetnov and C. Tropea, Conversion relationships for multidimensional particle sizing techniques, Meas. Sci. Technol. 15, 112 (2003).
  26. M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics: 60th Anniversary Edition (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2019).
  27. W. Brouwer, Matrix Methods in Optical Instrument Design, Lecture Notes and Supplements in Physics (W. A. Benjamin, 1964). https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:106436488
  28. A. Gerrard and J. M. Burch, Introduction to Matrix Methods in Optics (Dover Publications, Inc., New York, 1975). https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:117068193
  29. P. Debye, Das elektromagnetische Feld um einen Zylinder und die Theorie des Regenbogens, Phys. Z. 9, 775 (1908).
  30. P. Laven, MiePlot, http://philiplaven.com/mieplot.htm [Online; last accessed March 7, 2025].
  31. V. Khare and H. M. Nussenzveig, Theory of the rainbow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 976 (1974).
  32. T. Fuchs, R. Hain, and C. J. Kähler, In situ calibrated defocusing PTV for wall-bounded measurement volumes, Meas. Sci. Technol. 27, 084005 (2016).
  33. M. G. Olsen and R. J. Adrian, Out-of-focus effects on particle image visibility and correlation in microscopic particle image velocimetry, Exp. Fluids 29, S166 (2000).
  34. R. Leister, T. Fuchs, and J. Kriegseis, Defocusing PTV applied to an open wet clutch: From macro to micro, Exp. Fluids 64, 94 (2023).
  35. R. Corey, M. Kissner, and P. Saulnier, Coherent backscattering of light, Am. J. Phys. 63, 560 (1995).
  36. S. Discetti and Y. Liu, Machine learning for flow field measurements: A perspective, Meas. Sci. Technol. 34, 021001 (2022).
  37. R. Barnkob, C. Cierpka, M. Chen, S. Sachs, P. Mäder, and M. Rossi, Defocus particle tracking: A comparison of methods based on model functions, cross-correlation, and neural networks, Meas. Sci. Technol. 32, 094011 (2021).
  38. The data repository is openly available at KITopen, https://doi.org/10.35097/95zej6qvxs2w6951.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Applied 24, 044083– Published 27 October, 2025
  • Received 29 March 2025
  • Revised 21 July 2025
  • Accepted 4 September 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation