Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

General framework for signal processing in nonlinear mass-spring networks with application to keyword spotting

Finn Bohte, Theophile Louvet, Vincent Maillou, and Marc Serra-Garcia*

  • AMOLF, Science Park 104, 1098 XG Amsterdam, Netherlands

  • *Contact author: m.serragarcia@amolf.nl

Phys. Rev. Applied 24, 044041 – Published 14 October, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/5hhw-sk9c

Abstract

Mechanical systems played a foundational role in computing history, and have regained interest due to their unique properties, such as low damping and the ability to process mechanical signals without transduction. However, recent efforts have focused primarily on elementary computations, implemented in systems based on predefined reservoirs, or in periodic systems such as arrays of buckling beams. Here we numerically demonstrate a passive mechanical system—in the form of a nonlinear mass-spring model—that tackles a real-world benchmark for keyword spotting in speech signals. The model is organized in a hierarchical architecture combining feature extraction and continuous-time convolution, with each individual stage tailored to the physics of the mass-spring systems considered. For each step in the computation, a subsystem is designed by combining a small set of low-order polynomial potentials. These potentials act as fundamental components that interconnect a network of masses. In analogy to electronic circuit design, where complex functional circuits are constructed by combining basic components into hierarchical designs, we refer to this framework as “springtronics.” We introduce springtronic systems with hundreds of degrees of freedom, achieving speech classification accuracy comparable to that of existing submilliwatt electronic systems.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (55)

  1. H. Jaeger, B. Noheda, and W. G. V. D. Wiel, Toward a formal theory for computing machines made out of whatever physics offers, Nat. Commun. 14, 4911 (2023).
  2. S. A. Wolf, A. Y. Chtchelkanova, and D. M. Treger, Spintronics—A retrospective and perspective, IBM J. Res. Dev. 50, 101 (2006).
  3. P. L. McMahon, The physics of optical computing, Nat. Rev. Phys. 5, 717 (2023).
  4. S. Yang, B. W. A. Bögels, F. Wang, C. Xu, H. Dou, S. Mann, C. Fan, and T. F. A. de Greef, DNA as a universal chemical substrate for computing and data storage, Nat. Rev. Chem. 8, 179 (2024).
  5. T. Dubček, D. Moreno-Garcia, T. Haag, P. Omidvar, H. R. Thomsen, T. S. Becker, L. Gebraad, C. Bärlocher, F. Andersson, S. D. Huber, et al., In-sensor passive speech classification with phononic metamaterials, Adv. Funct. Mater. 34, 2311877 (2024).
  6. B. Barazani, G. Dion, J.-F. Morissette, L. Beaudoin, and J. Sylvestre, Microfabricated neuroaccelerometer: Integrating sensing and reservoir computing in MEMS, J. Microelectromech. Syst. 29, 338 (2020).
  7. M. Sitti, Physical intelligence as a new paradigm, Extreme Mech. Lett. 46, 101340 (2021).
  8. S. Dago, J. Pereda, N. Barros, S. Ciliberto, and L. Bellon, Information and thermodynamics: Fast and precise approach to Landauer’s bound in an underdamped micromechanical oscillator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 170601 (2021).
  9. S. C. Masmanidis, R. B. Karabalin, I. D. Vlaminck, G. Borghs, M. R. Freeman, and M. L. Roukes, Multifunctional nanomechanical systems via tunably coupled piezoelectric actuation, Science 317, 780 (2007).
  10. A. G. Bromley, Charles Babbage’s analytical engine 1838, IEEE Ann. Hist. Comput. 4, 196 (1982).
  11. T. Freeth, Y. Bitsakis, X. Moussas, J. H. Seiradakis, A. Tselikas, H. Mangou, M. Zafeiropoulou, R. Hadland, D. Bate, A. Ramsey, et al., Decoding the ancient Greek astronomical calculator known as the Antikythera Mechanism, Nature 444, 587 (2006).
  12. Z. Meng, W. Chen, T. Mei, Y. Lai, Y. Li, and C. Q. Chen, Bistability-based foldable origami mechanical logic gates, Extreme Mech. Lett. 43, 101180 (2021).
  13. M. Serra-Garcia, Turing-complete mechanical processor via automated nonlinear system design, Phys. Rev. E 100, 042202 (2019).
  14. J. Liu, M. Teunisse, G. Korovin, I. R. Vermaire, L. Jin, H. Bense, and M. van Hecke, Controlled pathways and sequential information processing in serially coupled mechanical hysterons, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2308414121 (2024).
  15. G. Dion, S. Mejaouri, and J. Sylvestre, Reservoir computing with a single delay-coupled non-linear mechanical oscillator, J. Appl. Phys. 124, 154502 (2018).
  16. L. J. Kwakernaak and M. van Hecke, Counting and sequential information processing in mechanical metamaterials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 268204 (2023).
  17. J. C. Coulombe, M. C. A. York, and J. Sylvestre, Computing with networks of nonlinear mechanical oscillators, PLoS ONE 12, e0178663 (2017).
  18. G. Cerutti, L. Cavigelli, R. Andri, M. Magno, E. Farella, and L. Benini, Sub-mw keyword spotting on an MCU: Analog binary feature extraction and binary neural networks, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I: Regul. Pap. 69, 2002 (2022).
  19. C. V. Raman, Experimental investigations on the maintenance of vibrations, Bull. Indian Assoc. Cult. Sci. 6, 1 (1912).
  20. G. Duffing, Erzwungene Schwingungen bei veränderlicher Eigenfrequenz und Ihre Technische Bedeutung (Vieweg, Braunschweig, 1918).
  21. J. W. Rocks, N. Pashine, I. Bischofberger, C. P. Goodrich, A. J. Liu, and S. R. Nagel, Designing allostery-inspired response in mechanical networks, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, 2520 (2017).
  22. G. Urbain, J. Degrave, B. Carette, J. Dambre, and F. Wyffels, Morphological properties of mass–spring networks for optimal locomotion learning, Front. Neurorobot. 11, 16 (2017).
  23. M. Serra-Garcia, M. Molerón, and C. Daraio, Tunable, synchronized frequency down-conversion in magnetic lattices with defects, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 376, 20170137 (2018).
  24. M. Serra-Garcia, A. Foehr, M. Molerón, J. Lydon, C. Chong, and C. Daraio, Mechanical autonomous stochastic heat engine, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 010602 (2016).
  25. W. A. Benalcazar, B. A. Bernevig, and T. L. Hughes, Quantized electric multipole insulators, Science 357, 61 (2017).
  26. M. Serra-Garcia, V. Peri, R. Süsstrunk, O. R. Bilal, T. Larsen, L. G. Villanueva, and S. D. Huber, Observation of a phononic quadrupole topological insulator, Nature 555, 342 (2018).
  27. M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt, Cavity optomechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 1391 (2014).
  28. W. G. Conley, A. Raman, C. M. Krousgrill, and S. Mohammadi, Nonlinear and nonplanar dynamics of suspended nanotube and nanowire resonators, Nano Lett. 8, 1590 (2008).
  29. K. Asadi, J. Yeom, and H. Cho, Strong internal resonance in a nonlinear, asymmetric microbeam resonator, Microsyst. Nanoeng. 7, 9 (2021).
  30. I. López-Espejo, Z.-H. Tan, J. H. L. Hansen, and J. Jensen, Deep spoken keyword spotting: An overview, IEEE Access 10, 4169 (2021).
  31. S. Davis and P. Mermelstein, Comparison of parametric representations for monosyllabic word recognition in continuously spoken sentences, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 28, 357 (1980).
  32. S. Choi, S. Seo, B. Shin, H. Byun, M. Kersner, B. Kim, D. Kim, and S. Ha, in Interspeech 2019 (International Speech Communication Association, Graz (Austria), 2019), p. 3372.
  33. T. Louvet, P. Omidvar, and M. Serra-Garcia, Reprogrammable, in-materia matrix-vector multiplication with floppy modes, Adv. Intell. Syst., 2500062 (2025).
  34. J. G. Lyons and K. K. Paliwal, in Interspeech 2008 (International Speech Communication Association, Brisbane (Australia), 2008), p. 387.
  35. Y.-W. Chang, C.-J. Hsieh, K.-W. Chang, M. Ringgaard, and C.-J. Lin, Training and testing low-degree polynomial data mappings via linear SVM, J. Mach. Learn. Res. 11, 1471 (2010).
  36. R.-E. Fan, K.-W. Chang, C.-J. Hsieh, X.-R. Wang, and C.-J. Lin, LIBLINEAR: A library for large linear classification, J. Mach. Learn. Res. 9, 1871 (2008).
  37. M. S. Hajhashemi, A. Amini, and B. Bahreyni, A micromechanical bandpass filter with adjustable bandwidth and bidirectional control of centre frequency, Sens. Actuators A: Phys. 187, 10 (2012).
  38. A. L. Fetter and J. D. Walecka, Theoretical Mechanics of Particles and Continua (Courier, Mineola, 2003).
  39. S. S. Verbridge, J. M. Parpia, R. B. Reichenbach, L. M. Bellan, and H. G. Craighead, High quality factor resonance at room temperature with nanostrings under high tensile stress, J. Appl. Phys. 99, 124304 (2006).
  40. X. Zhu, K. Li, P. Zhang, J. Zhu, J. Zhang, C. Tian, and S. Liu, Implementation of dispersion-free slow acoustic wave propagation and phase engineering with helical-structured metamaterials, Nat. Commun. 7, 11731 (2016).
  41. R. W. Schafer, What is a Savitzky–Golay filter? IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 28, 111 (2011).
  42. Y. Shi, D. Wang, L. Li, J. Han, and S. Yin, in Interspeech 2023 (International Speech Communication Association, Dublin (Ireland), 2023), p. 1488.
  43. K. Ma, H. Chen, Z. Wu, X. Hao, G. Yan, W. Li, L. Shao, G. Meng, and W. Zhang, A wave-confining metasphere beamforming acoustic sensor for superior human-machine voice interaction, Sci. Adv. 8, eadc9230 (2022).
  44. W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes in C (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1992).
  45. J. Sanders and E. Kandrot, CUDA by Example: An Introduction to General-Purpose GPU Programming (Addison-Wesley, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2010).
  46. B. Kim, S. Chang, J. Lee, and D. Sung, in Interspeech 2021 (International Speech Communication Association, Brno (Czech Republic), 2021), p. 4538.
  47. M. Scherer, C. Cioflan, M. Magno, and L. Benini, in Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE) (IEEE, Valencia (Spain), 2024), p. 1.
  48. Y. Zhang, N. Suda, L. Lai, and V. Chandra, Hello edge: Keyword spotting on microcontrollers, ArXiv:1711.07128.
  49. A. L. Vanel, O. Schnitzer, and R. V. Craster, Asymptotic network models of subwavelength metamaterials formed by closely packed photonic and phononic crystals, Europhys. Lett. 119, 64002 (2017).
  50. K. H. Matlack, M. Serra-Garcia, A. Palermo, S. D. Huber, and C. Daraio, Designing perturbative metamaterials from discrete models, Nat. Mater. 17, 323 (2018).
  51. F. Bohte, T. Louvet, V. Maillou, and M. Serra-Garcia, Replication package for the article ‘Mass-spring models for passive keyword spotting: A springtronics approach’, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17056163 (2025).
  52. A. Efimovskaya, D. Wang, and A. M. Shkel, Mechanical trimming with focused ion beam for permanent tuning of MEMS dual-mass gyroscope, Sens. Actuators A: Phys. 313, 112189 (2020).
  53. J. Doster, T. Shah, T. Fösel, P. Paulitschke, F. Marquardt, and E. M. Weig, Observing polarization patterns in the collective motion of nanomechanical arrays, Nat. Commun. 13, 2478 (2022).
  54. C. Dorn, V. Kannan, U. Dreschler, and D. M. Kochmann, Graded phononic metamaterials: Scalable design meets scalable microfabrication, ArXiv:2507.01874.
  55. S. Borkar, Designing reliable systems from unreliable components: The challenges of transistor variability and degradation, IEEE Micro 25, 10 (2006).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation