Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Dual-quadrature phasemeter for space-based interferometry

Callum S. Sambridge* and Kirk McKenzie

  • *Contact author: callum.sambridge@anu.edu.au

Phys. Rev. Applied 24, 014009 – Published 2 July, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/35vl-5wh1

Abstract

This letter presents a dual-quadrature phasemeter, an implementation of a phase-locked loop designed to track the phase of homodyne and heterodyne intersatellite laser links. Dual-quadrature phasemeters use dual-quadrature optical detection to enable an alternate phase readout scheme that operates with wider bandwidths and on signals with carrier-frequency differences down to dc. Analytical modeling demonstrates that dual-quadrature phasemeters overcome the bandwidth limitations of conventional phasemeters. Numerical simulations of noise linearity tests found that the phase-tracking error of the dual-quadrature phasemeter is less than 10 microcycle/Hz in the presence of nonlinear cyclic errors. The dual-quadrature phasemeter enables exploration of an optical configuration for retroreflector-based space geodesy missions with architecture similar to that implemented in the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment Follow-On mission. One such alternate configuration is proposed that is capable of tracking satellite separation without requiring a frequency offset between local and incoming light, eliminating the need for optical frequency shifters.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (20)

  1. G.-C. Hsieh and J. Hung, Phase-locked loop techniques. A survey, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 43, 609 (1996).
  2. R. C. Stephens Phase-Locked Loops for Wireless Communications: Digital, Analog and Optical Implementations (Springer US, Boston, MA, 2002), 2nd ed.
  3. D. Shaddock, B. Ware, P. G. Halverson, R. E. Spero, and B. Klipstein, in AIP Conference Proceedings, (AIP, Greenbelt, Maryland (USA), 2006), Vol. 873, p. 654, ISSN: 0094243X.
  4. F. W. Landerer et al., Extending the global mass change data record: GRACE Follow-On instrument and science data performance, Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2020GL088306 (2020).
  5. B. Bachman, G. d. Vine, J. Dickson, S. Dubovitsky, J. Liu, W. Klipstein, K. McKenzie, R. Spero, A. Sutton, B. Ware, and C. Woodruff, Flight phasemeter on the Laser Ranging Interferometer on the GRACE Follow-On mission, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 840, 012011 (2017).
  6. K. Nicklaus, S. Cesare, L. Massotti, L. Bonino, S. Mottini, M. Pisani, and P. Silvestrin, Laser metrology concept consolidation for NGGM, CEAS Space J. 12, 313 (2020).
  7. C. S. Sambridge, J. T. Valliyakalayil, and K. McKenzie, Comparing link budget requirements for future space-based interferometers, Remote Sens. 16, 3598 (2024).
  8. M. Taylor, Coherent detection method using DSP for demodulation of signal and subsequent equalization of propagation impairments, IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 16, 674 (2004).
  9. M. G. Taylor, Phase estimation methods for optical coherent detection using digital signal processing, J. Lightwave Technol. 27, 901 (2009).
  10. L. Paillier, R. Le Bidan, J.-M. Conan, G. Artaud, N. Vedrenne, and Y. Jaouen, Space-ground coherent optical links: Ground receiver performance with adaptive optics and digital phase-locked loop, J. Lightwave Technol. 38, 5716 (2020).
  11. A. J. H. Sutton, Digital techniques for coherent optical metrology, Ph.D. thesis, The Australian National University, Canberra, 2013, https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/151725.
  12. T. Keem, S. Gonda, I. Misumi, Q. Huang, and T. Kurosawa, Removing nonlinearity of a homodyne interferometer by adjusting the gains of its quadrature detector systems, Appl. Opt. 43, 2443 (2004).
  13. R. B. Garreis, 90 degree optical hybrid for coherent receivers, in Proc. SPIE 1522, Optical Space Communication II (1991).
  14. J. Pietzsch, Scattering matrix analysis of 3*3 fiber couplers, J. Lightwave Technol. 7, 303 (1989).
  15. T. Eom, J. Kim, and K. Jeong, The dynamic compensation of nonlinearity in a homodyne laser interferometer, Meas. Sci. Technol. 12, 1734 (2001).
  16. P. Hu, J. Zhu, X. Guo, and J. Tan, Compensation for the variable cyclic error in homodyne laser interferometers, Sensors 15, 3090 (2015).
  17. K. Nicklaus, K. Voss, A. Feiri, M. Kaufer, C. Dahl, M. Herding, B. A. Curzadd, A. Baatzsch, J. Flock, M. Weller, V. Müller, G. Heinzel, M. Misfeldt, and J. J. E. Delgado, Towards NGGM: Laser tracking instrument for the next generation of gravity missions, Remote Sens. 14, 4089 (2022).
  18. L. G. Kazovsky, L. Curtis, W. C. Young, and N. K. Cheung, All-fiber 90∘ optical hybrid for coherent communications, Appl. Opt. 26, 437 (1987).
  19. G. B. Amata, A. Anselmi, S. Cesare, L. Massotti, and P. Silvestrin, in Sensors, Systems, and Next-Generation Satellites XXIII, edited by S. P. Neeck, T. Kimura, and P. Martimort (SPIE, Strasbourg, France, 2019), p. 32.
  20. T. Bandikova, C. McCullough, G. L. Kruizinga, H. Save, and B. Christophe, GRACE accelerometer data transplant, Adv. Space Res. 64, 623 (2019).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation