Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access

Cross-correlation scheme for quantum optical coherence tomography based on Michelson interferometer

Anna Romanova1,2,*, Vadim Rodimin1, and Konstantin Katamadze1

  • *Contact author: romanova.phys@gmail.com

Phys. Rev. Applied 24, 064048 – Published 18 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/246p-64hd

Abstract

Quantum optical coherence tomography (QOCT) offers a simple way to cancel dispersion broadening in a sample while also providing twice the resolution compared to classical OCT. However, to achieve these advantages, a bright and broadband source of entangled photon pairs is required. A simple implementation uses collinear spontaneous parametric down-conversion in a Michelson interferometer (MI), yet this autocorrelation scheme suffers from parasitic terms and sensitivity to phase noise. Here, we introduce a cross-correlation MI-based QOCT that overcomes these drawbacks, significantly advancing QOCT toward practical applications.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (33)

  1. Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy, edited by J. B. Pawley (Springer US, Boston, MA, 2006).
  2. Optical Coherence Tomography: Technology and Applications, edited by W. Drexler and J. G. Fujimoto (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2015).
  3. D. Huang, E. A. Swanson, C. P. Lin, J. S. Schuman, W. G. Stinson, W. Chang, M. R. Hee, T. Flotte, K. Gregory, C. A. Puliafito, and J. G. Fujimoto, Optical coherence tomography, Science 254, 1178 (1991).
  4. C. K. Hitzenberger, A. Baumgartner, W. Drexler, and A. F. Fercher, Dispersion effects in partial coherence interferometry: Implications for intraocular ranging, J. Biomed. Opt. 4, 144 (1999).
  5. B. I. Erkmen and J. H. Shapiro, Phase-conjugate optical coherence tomography, Phys. Rev. A 74, 041601(R) (2006).
  6. R. Kaltenbaek, J. Lavoie, D. N. Biggerstaff, and K. J. Resch, Quantum-inspired interferometry with chirped laser pulses, Nat. Phys. 4, 864 (2008).
  7. J. Le Gouët, D. Venkatraman, F. N. C. Wong, and J. H. Shapiro, Experimental realization of phase-conjugate optical coherence tomography, Opt. Lett. 35, 1001 (2010).
  8. J. Lavoie, R. Kaltenbaek, and K. J. Resch, Quantum-optical coherence tomography with classical light, Opt. Express 17, 3818 (2009).
  9. K. Banaszek, A. S. Radunsky, and I. A. Walmsley, Blind dispersion compensation for optical coherence tomography, Opt. Commun. 269, 152 (2007).
  10. K. J. Resch, P. Puvanathasan, J. S. Lundeen, M. W. Mitchell, and K. Bizheva, Classical dispersion-cancellation interferometry, Opt. Express 15, 8797 (2007).
  11. P. Ryczkowski, J. Turunen, A. T. Friberg, and G. Genty, Experimental demonstration of spectral intensity optical coherence tomography, Sci. Rep. 6, 22126 (2016).
  12. T. Shirai and A. T. Friberg, Intensity-interferometric spectral-domain optical coherence tomography with dispersion cancellation, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 31, 258 (2014).
  13. M. Jensen, N. M. Israelsen, M. Maria, T. Feuchter, A. Podoleanu, and O. Bang, All-depth dispersion cancellation in spectral domain optical coherence tomography using numerical intensity correlations, Sci. Rep. 8, 9170 (2018).
  14. D. Liu, C. Ge, Y. Xin, Q. Li, and R. Tao, Dispersion correction for optical coherence tomography by the stepped detection algorithm in the fractional Fourier domain, Opt. Express 28, 5919 (2020).
  15. A. F. Abouraddy, M. B. Nasr, B. E. A. Saleh, A. V. Sergienko, and M. C. Teich, Quantum-optical coherence tomography with dispersion cancellation, Phys. Rev. A 65, 053817 (2002).
  16. M. B. Nasr, B. E. A. Saleh, A. V. Sergienko, and M. C. Teich, Demonstration of dispersion-cancelled quantum-optical coherence tomography, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 083601 (2003).
  17. C. K. Hong, Z. Y. Z. Ou, and L. Mandel, Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2044 (1987).
  18. D. N. Klyshko, Photons and Nonlinear Optics (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1988), p. 415.
  19. M. Okano, R. Okamoto, A. Tanaka, S. Ishida, N. Nishizawa, and S. Takeuchi, Dispersion cancellation in high-resolution two-photon interference, Phys. Rev. A 88, 043845 (2013).
  20. K. G. Katamadze, A. V. Pashchenko, A. V. Romanova, and S. P. Kulik, Generation and application of broadband biphoton fields (brief review), JETP Lett. 115, 581 (2022).
  21. S.-Y. Baek and Y.-H. Kim, Spectral properties of entangled photon pairs generated via frequency-degenerate type-I spontaneous parametric down-conversion, Phys. Rev. A 77, 043807 (2008).
  22. S. Odate, H.-b. Wang, and T. Kobayashi, Two-photon quantum interference in a Michelson interferometer, Phys. Rev. A 72, 063812 (2005).
  23. D. Lopez-Mago and L. Novotny, Coherence measurements with the two-photon Michelson interferometer, Phys. Rev. A 86, 023820 (2012).
  24. D. Lopez-Mago and L. Novotny, Quantum-optical coherence tomography with collinear entangled photons, Opt. Lett. 37, 4077 (2012).
  25. A. Yoshizawa, D. Fukuda, and H. Tsuchida, Telecom-band two-photon Michelson interferometer using frequency entangled photon pairs generated by spontaneous parametric down-conversion, Opt. Commun. 313, 333 (2014).
  26. K. Katamadze, A. Romanova, D. Chupakhin, A. Pashchenko, and S. Kulik, Broadband biphoton source for quantum optical coherence tomography based on a Michelson interferometer, Phys. Rev. Appl. 23, 014076 (2025).
  27. M. Reisner, F. Mazeas, R. Dauliat, B. Leconte, D. Aktas, R. Cannon, P. Roy, R. Jamier, G. Sauder, F. Kaiser, S. Tanzilli, and L. Labonté, Quantum-limited determination of refractive index difference by means of entanglement, npj Quantum Inf. 8, 58 (2022).
  28. Yu. M. Mikhailova, P. A. Volkov, and M. V. Fedorov, Biphoton wave packets in parametric down-conversion: Spectral and temporal structure and degree of entanglement, Phys. Rev. A 78, 062327 (2008).
  29. M. V. Fedorov, Y. M. Mikhailova, and P. A. Volkov, Gaussian modelling and Schmidt modes of SPDC biphoton states, J. Phys. B: At., Mol. Opt. Phys. 42, 175503 (2009).
  30. M. Y. Li-Gomez, P. Yepiz-Graciano, T. Hrushevskyi, O. Calderón-Losada, E. Saglamyurek, D. Lopez-Mago, V. Salari, T. Ngo, A. B. U’Ren, and S. Barzanjeh, Quantum enhanced probing of multilayered samples, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 023170 (2023).
  31. P. B. Dixon, D. Rosenberg, V. Stelmakh, M. E. Grein, R. S. Bennink, E. A. Dauler, A. J. Kerman, R. J. Molnar, and F. N. C. Wong, Heralding efficiency and correlated-mode coupling of near-IR fiber-coupled photon pairs, Phys. Rev. A 90, 043804 (2014).
  32. E. Beckert, O. De Vries, R. Ursin, F. Steinlechner, M. Gräfe, and M. Gilaberte Basset, in Free-Space Laser Communications XXXI, edited by H. Hemmati and D. M. Boroson (SPIE, San Francisco, United States, 2019), p. 42.
  33. B. Tatian, Fitting refractive-index data with the Sellmeier dispersion formula, Appl. Opt. 23, 4477 (1984).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation