Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Influence of an external static magnetic field on prebreakdown electron emission and heating

Roni Koitermaa1,2,*, Marzhan Toktaganova1, Andreas Kyritsakis2, Tauno Tiirats2, Alexej Grudiev3, Veronika Zadin2,†, and Flyura Djurabekova1,‡

  • *Contact author: roni.koitermaa@helsinki.fi; roni.koitermaa@iki.fi
  • †Contact author: veronika.zadin@ut.ee
  • ‡Contact author: flyura.djurabekova@helsinki.fi

Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 29, 074301 – Published 22 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/m9d7-tycw

Abstract

High magnetic fields can increase the occurrence of vacuum arcing, suggesting that both electric and magnetic fields can play a role in the vacuum arcing process. The mechanism of vacuum arcing in high magnetic fields is believed to involve both the cathode and the anode, with the cathode serving as the originator of field-emitting nanoprotrusions or tips, while the anode serves a secondary role. Significant heating of the anode surface can be achieved by magnetic focusing of the emitted electron beam, leading to an increased heat flux due to greater current density. We simulated the emitted electron beam in different configurations of the electric and magnetic fields using the particle-in-cell and finite-element methods. The heating caused by the impacting electron beam was simulated for magnetic fields ranging from 0 to 30 T. The directions of the electric and magnetic fields were found to play a major role in the focusing of the electron beam. We found that a sufficient temperature increase on the anode surface for evaporation can be reached at magnetic fields on the order of 10–30 T, suggesting the possibility of plasma initiation on the anode side.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (36)

  1. Z. Zhou, A. Kyritsakis, Z. Wang, Y. Li, Y. Geng, and F. Djurabekova, Direct observation of vacuum arc evolution with nanosecond resolution, Sci. Rep. 9, 7814 (2019).
  2. A. Anders, Cathodic arcs: From fractal spots to energetic condensation, in Springer Series on Atomic, Optical, and Plasma Physics, 1st ed. (Springer, New York, NY, 2008), Vol. 50, p. 544.
  3. Z. Zhou, A. Kyritsakis, Z. Wang, Y. Li, Y. Geng, and F. Djurabekova, Spectroscopic study of vacuum arc plasma expansion, J. Phys. D 53, 125501 (2020).
  4. Z. Zhou, A. Kyritsakis, Z. Wang, Y. Li, Y. Geng, and F. Djurabekova, Effect of the anode material on the evolution of the vacuum breakdown process, J. Phys. D 54, 445104 (2021).
  5. T. Utsumi, Cathode- and anode-induced electrical breakdown in vacuum, J. Appl. Phys. 38, 2989 (1967).
  6. F. M. Charbonnier, C. J. Bennette, and L. W. Swanson, Electrical breakdown between metal electrodes in high vacuum. I. Theory, J. Appl. Phys. 38, 627 (1967).
  7. I. M. C. Collaboration (International Muon Collider), Interim report for the International Muon Collider Collaboration (IMCC), 2024, Technical Report, arXiv:2407.12450.
  8. A. Descoeudres, Y. Levinsen, S. Calatroni, M. Taborelli, and W. Wuensch, Investigation of the DC vacuum breakdown mechanism, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 12, 092001 (2009).
  9. I. Profatilova, X. Stragier, S. Calatroni, A. Kandratsyeu, E. R. Castro, and W. Wuensch, Breakdown localisation in a pulsed dc electrode system, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 953, 163079 (2020).
  10. R. Zhu, C. Rogers, J. Yang, H. Zhao, C. Guo, and J. Li, Design method, performance evaluation, and tolerance analysis of the rectilinear cooling channel for a muon collider, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 28, 041003 (2025).
  11. L. Bottura, C. Accettura, N. Amemiya, B. Auchmann, J. S. Berg, A. Bersani, A. Bertarelli, F. Boattini, B. Bordini, P. B. de Sousa, M. Breschi, B. Caiffi, X. Chaud, F. Debray, A. Dudarev, M. Eisterer, S. Fabbri, S. Farinon, P. Ferracin et al., Magnets for a muon collider—needs and plans, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 34, 1 (2024).
  12. H. Kamal Sayed, R. B. Palmer, and D. Neuffer, High field—low energy muon ionization cooling channel, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 18, 091001 (2015).
  13. M. Chung, D. L. Bowring, P. G. Lane, A. Moretti, R. J. Pasquinelli, D. W. Peterson, R. P. Schultz, L. Somaschini, and Y. Torun, Instrumentation for characterizing 201-mHz mice cavity at Fermilab, in Proceedings of the 5th International Particle Accelerator Conference, IPAC-2014, Dresden, Germany (JACoW, Geneva, Switzerland, 2014), pp. 3930–3932, paper THPRI071.
  14. D. Bowring et al., Operation of normal-conducting rf cavities in multi-tesla magnetic fields for muon ionization cooling: A feasibility demonstration, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 23, 072001 (2020).
  15. R. B. Palmer, R. C. Fernow, J. C. Gallardo, D. Stratakis, and D. Li, rf breakdown with external magnetic fields in 201 and 805 mhz cavities, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 12, 031002 (2009).
  16. D. L. Bowring, A. J. DeMello, A. R. Lambert, D. Li, S. P. Virostek, M. S. Zisman, D. M. Kaplan, and R. B. Palmer, Progress on a cavity with beryllium walls for muon ionization cooling channel r&d, in Proceedings of the 3rd International Particle Accelerator Conference, New Orleans, LA, 2012 (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2012), pp. 3356–3358, paper THPPC033.
  17. W. Wuensch, S. Calatroni, F. Djurabekova, A. Kyritsakis, and Y. Ashkenazy, Fundamental mechanisms of high-electric-field vacuum arc initiation, arXiv:2502.03967.
  18. A. Kyritsakis, M. Veske, K. Eimre, V. Zadin, and F. Djurabekova, Thermal runaway of metal nano-tips during intense electron emission, J. Phys. D 51, 225203 (2018).
  19. M. Veske, A. Kyritsakis, F. Djurabekova, K. N. Sjobak, A. Aabloo, and V. Zadin, Dynamic coupling between particle-in-cell and atomistic simulations, Phys. Rev. E 101, 053307 (2020).
  20. A. S. Pohjonen, S. Parviainen, T. Muranaka, and F. Djurabekova, Dislocation nucleation on a near surface void leading to surface protrusion growth under an external electric field, J. Appl. Phys. 114, 033519 (2013).
  21. V. Zadin, A. Pohjonen, A. Aabloo, K. Nordlund, and F. Djurabekova, Electrostatic-elastoplastic simulations of copper surface under high electric fields, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 17, 103501 (2014).
  22. V. Jansson, E. Baibuz, A. Kyritsakis, S. Vigonski, V. Zadin, S. Parviainen, A. Aabloo, and F. Djurabekova, Growth mechanism for nanotips in high electric fields, Nanotechnology 31, 355301 (2020).
  23. J. Kimari, Y. Wang, A. Kyritsakis, V. Zadin, and F. Djurabekova, Biased self-diffusion on Cu surface due to electric field gradients, J. Phys. D 55, 465302 (2022).
  24. R. Koitermaa, A. Kyritsakis, T. Tiirats, V. Zadin, and F. Djurabekova, Simulating vacuum arc initiation by coupling emission, heating and plasma processes, Vacuum 224, 113176 (2024).
  25. A. Moretti, Z. Qian, J. Norem, Y. Torun, D. Li, and M. Zisman, Effects of high solenoidal magnetic fields on rf accelerating cavities, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 8, 072001 (2005).
  26. D. Stratakis, J. C. Gallardo, and R. B. Palmer, Effects of external magnetic fields on the operation of high-gradient accelerating structures, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res, Sect. A 620, 147 (2010).
  27. P. Urbański, P. Szyszka, M. Białas, and T. Grzebyk, Point field emission electron source with a magnetically focused electron beam, Ultramicroscopy 258, 113911 (2024).
  28. J. D. Zuber, K. L. Jensen, and T. E. Sullivan, An analytical solution for microtip field emission current and effective emission area, J. Appl. Phys. 91, 9379 (2002).
  29. D. Tskhakaya, K. Matyash, R. Schneider, and F. Taccogna, The particle-in-cell method, Contrib. Plasma Phys. 47, 563 (2007).
  30. T. Takizuka and H. Abe, A binary collision model for plasma simulation with a particle code, J. Comput. Phys. 25, 205 (1977).
  31. A. Kyritsakis and F. Djurabekova, A general computational method for electron emission and thermal effects in field emitting nanotips, Comput. Mater. Sci. 128, 15 (2017).
  32. D. Arndt, W. Bangerth, B. Blais, M. Fehling, R. Gassmöller, T. Heister, L. Heltai, U. Köcher, M. Kronbichler, M. Maier, P. Munch, J.-P. Pelteret, S. Proell, K. Simon, B. Turcksin, D. Wells, and J. Zhang, The deal.II library, version 9.3, J. Numer. Math. 29, 171 (2021).
  33. C. Geuzaine and J.-F. Remacle, Gmsh: A 3-D finite element mesh generator with built-in pre- and post-processing facilities, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 79, 1309 (2009).
  34. H. Si, TetGen, a delaunay-based quality tetrahedral mesh generator, ACM Trans. Math. Software 41, 1 (2015).
  35. M. Berger, J. Coursey, and M. Zucker, ESTAR, PSTAR, and ASTAR: Computer programs for calculating stopping-power and range tables for electrons, protons, and helium ions (version 1.21) (1999).
  36. H. Timko, K. Ness Sjobak, L. Mether, S. Calatroni, F. Djurabekova, K. Matyash, K. Nordlund, R. Schneider, and W. Wuensch, From field emission to vacuum arc ignition: A new tool for simulating copper vacuum arcs, Contrib. Plasma Phys. 55, 299 (2015).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation