Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Nonlinear dynamics optimization based on minimizing resonance driving terms along a storage ring

Bingfeng Wei, Zhenghe Bai*, and Guangyao Feng

Pascale Brunelle, Alexandre Loulergue, and Laurent S. Nadolski†

  • *Contact author: baizhe@ustc.edu.cn
  • †Contact author: laurent.nadolski@synchrotron-soleil.fr

Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 29, 083404 – Published 28 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/hlyb-qqx6

Abstract

The optimization of nonlinear dynamics for a storage ring lattice aims to achieve large dynamic aperture (DA) and momentum aperture (MA), which are critical for beam injection and lifetime. One of the main factors affecting MA is off-momentum DA. In our previous work, it was demonstrated that reducing on- and off-momentum resonance driving terms (RDTs) along the ring is very effective in enlarging on- and off-momentum DAs. In this paper, the previous effectiveness analysis is formulated into a practical nonlinear optimization method, in which the on- and off-momentum ring-averaged RDTs are minimized simultaneously while constraints on tune shifts and the working point are imposed. Off-momentum ring-averaged RDTs are evaluated over a range of momentum deviations to optimize MA more effectively. The dependence of the ring-averaged RDT and DA on tune is also analyzed, showing that reducing the ring-averaged RDT can help guide the working point away from structural resonance lines and control tune shifts with momentum to avoid dangerous resonance lines. Applied to the SOLEIL storage ring, this efficient ring-averaged RDT optimization enables a rapid iterative workflow of optimization, analysis, and refinement, providing physical insight into the lattice and leading to improved nonlinear solutions. One optimized solution achieves a DA comparable to that of the reference solution obtained from tracking-based optimization while improving the beam lifetime, as validated experimentally on the SOLEIL storage ring.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (35)

  1. C. Steier, D. Robin, L. Nadolski, W. Decking, Y. Wu, and J. Laskar, Measuring and optimizing the momentum aperture in a particle accelerator, Phys. Rev. E 65, 056506 (2002).
  2. M. Borland, G. Decker, L. Emery, V. Sajaev, Y. Sun, and A. Xiao, Lattice design challenges for fourth-generation storage-ring light sources, J. Synchrotron Radiat. 21, 912 (2014).
  3. J. Bengtsson, The sextupole scheme for the Swiss Light Source (SLS): An analytic approach, Report No. SLS Note 9/97, 1997.
  4. M. Borland, V. Sajaev, L. Emery, and A. Xiao, Direct methods of optimization of storage ring dynamic and momentum aperture, in Proceedings of the 23rd Particle Accelerator Conference, Vancouver, Canada, 2009 (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2009), pp. 3850–3852.
  5. C. Steier and W. Wan, Quantitative lattice optimization using frequency map analysis, in Proceedings of the International Particle Accelerator Conference, Kyoto, Japan, 2010 (ICR, Kyoto, Japan, 2010), pp. 4746–4748.
  6. L. Yang, Y. Li, W. Guo, and S. Krinsky, Multiobjective optimization of dynamic aperture, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 14, 054001 (2011).
  7. Z. Bai, W. Lin, and W. Li, Enlarging dynamic and momentum aperture by particle swarm optimization, Proceedings of the 24th Particle Accelerator Conference, PAC-2011, New York (IEEE, New York, 2011), pp. 948–950.
  8. L. H. Yu, Analysis of nonlinear dynamics by square matrix method, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 20, 034001 (2017).
  9. Y. Li, W. Cheng, L. H. Yu, and R. Rainer, Genetic algorithm enhanced by machine learning in dynamic aperture optimization, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 21, 054601 (2018).
  10. Y. Li, K. Hwang, C. Mitchell, R. Rainer, R. Ryne, and V. Smaluk, Design of double-bend and multibend achromat lattices with large dynamic aperture and approximate invariants, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 24, 124001 (2021).
  11. Y. Li and R. Rainer, Approximate entropy analysis for nonlinear beam dynamics, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 27, 011601 (2024).
  12. H. Owen, J. Jones, and S. Smith, Optimisation of the DIAMOND storage ring lattice, Proceedings of the 8th European Particle Accelerator Conference, Paris, 2002 (EPS-IGA and CERN, Geneva, 2002), pp. 751–753.
  13. J. Bengtsson, A control theory approach for dynamic aperture, Proceedings of the 10th European Particle Accelerator Conference, Edinburgh, Scotland, 2006 (EPS-AG, Edinburgh, Scotland, 2006), pp. 3478–3480.
  14. T. Shun-Qiang, L. Gui-Min, H. Jie, C. Guang-Ling, and C. Sen-Yu, Improved nonlinear optimization in the storage ring of the modern synchrotron radiation light source, Chin. Phys. C 33, 65 (2009).
  15. Y. Cai, K. Bane, R. Hettel, Y. Nosochkov, M.-H. Wang, and M. Borland, Ultimate storage ring based on fourth-order geometric achromats, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 15, 054002 (2012).
  16. Y. Cai, Parametrization, characterization, and optimization of double-bend achromat cell, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 23, 034002 (2020).
  17. J. Bengtsson and A. Streun, Robust design strategy for SLS-2, Report No. SLS2-BJ84-001-2, 2017.
  18. P. O. C. Gonzalez-Ortiz and R. Ainsworth, Optimizing the sextupole configuration for simultaneous correction of third order resonances at the recycler ring, in Proceedings of the 15th International Particle Accelerator Conference, Nashville, TN (JACoW, Geneva, Switzerland, 2024), pp. 736–739.
  19. B. Wei, Z. Bai, J. Tan, L. Wang, and G. Feng, Minimizing the fluctuation of resonance driving terms in dynamic aperture optimization, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 26, 084001 (2023).
  20. B. Wei, J. Tan, Z. Bai, and G. Feng, Analyzing and optimizing dynamic aperture based on minimizing the fluctuation of resonance driving terms, in Proceedings of the 14th International Particle Accelerator Conference, Venice, Italy (JACoW, Geneva, Switzerland, 2023), pp. 3288–3291.
  21. Z. Bai, A. Loulergue, L. Nadolski, R. Nagaoka, and B. Wei, Minimizing the fluctuation of resonance driving terms for analyzing and optimizing the storage ring dynamic aperture, in Proceedings of the 67th ICFA Advanced Beam Dynamics Workshop Future Light Sources (FLS’23)(JACoW, Geneva, Switzerland, 2024), pp. 66–69.
  22. B. Wei, Z. Bai, G. Feng, A. Loulergue, L. S. Nadolski, and R. Nagaoka, Analysis of off-momentum nonlinear driving terms for enlarging off-momentum dynamic apertures, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 27, 104001 (2024).
  23. B. Riemann, M. Aiba, J. Kallestrup, and A. Streun, Efficient algorithms for dynamic aperture and momentum acceptance calculation in synchrotron light sources, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 27, 094002 (2024).
  24. C.-X. Wang, Explicit formulas for 2nd-order driving terms due to sextupoles and chromatic effects of quadrupoles, Report No. ANL/APS/LS-330, 2012.
  25. S. Krecic, S. Dastan, E. Karantzoulis, and K. Manukyan, Optics optimization and commissioning simulations for ELETTRA 2.0, in Proc. IPAC’25, IPAC’25—16th International Particle Accelerator Conference No. 16 (JACoW Publishing, Geneva, Switzerland, 2025), pp. 1960–1963.
  26. A. Franchi, L. Farvacque, F. Ewald, G. Le Bec, and K. B. Scheidt, First simultaneous measurement of sextupolar and octupolar resonance driving terms in a circular accelerator from turn-by-turn beam position monitor data, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 17, 074001 (2014).
  27. Simplestoragering: Simple storage ring simulation, GitHub repository, https://github.com/wei0852/simplestoragering.
  28. A. Terebilo, Accelerator modeling with MATLAB accelerator toolbox, in Proceedings of the 2001 Particle Accelerator Conference, Chicago, IL, USA (IEEE, 2001).
  29. Accelerator toolbox collaboration, GitHub repository, https://github.com/.
  30. J. Filhol, J. Besson, P. Brunelle, M. Couprie, J. Denard, J. Godefroy, C. Herbeaux, P. Lebasque, V. L. Roux, M. Level, A. Lestrade, A. Loulergue, P. Marchand, J. Marlats, A. Nadji, L. Nadolski, R. Nagaoka, B. Pottin, and M. Tordeux, Overview of the status of the SOLEIL project, in Proceedings of the 2006 European Particle Accelerator Conference (EPAC 2006) (JACoW, Edinburgh, Scotland, 2006), p. 2723, paper THXPA02.
  31. P. Brunelle, N. Béchu, V. Briois, F. Marteau, M. Ribbens, P. Berteaud, X. Delétoille, E. Dupuy, C. Herbeaux, M. Labat, A. Lestrade, A. Nadji, L. Nadolski, M. Nouna, and J.-B. Pruvost, Development of a custom-made 2.8 T permanent-magnet dipole photon source for the ROCK beamline at SOLEIL, J. Synchrotron Radiat. 30, 695 (2023).
  32. K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan, A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: Nsga-ii, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6, 182 (2002).
  33. J. Blank and K. Deb, pymoo: Multi-objective optimization in python, IEEE Access 8, 89497 (2020).
  34. C. Sun, D. S. Robin, H. Nishimura, C. Steier, and W. Wan, Small-emittance and low-beta lattice designs and optimizations, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 15, 054001 (2012).
  35. M. P. Ehrlichman, Genetic algorithm for chromaticity correction in diffraction limited storage rings, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 19, 044001 (2016).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation