Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Construction of multibend achromat lattices based on their substructures

B. C. Kuske* and P. Goslawski

  • *Contact author: bettina.kuske@helmholtz-berlin.de

Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 29, 061603 – Published 26 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/2y9b-ms8h

Abstract

This paper presents an alternative approach to designing multibend achromat (MBA) lattices with distributed sextupoles. It is based on the inherent structure of MBA lattices, which are composed of three smaller (recurring) substructures that can be optimized individually. These substructures consist of only a few elements; therefore, detailed parameter studies are feasible, and underlying principles can be revealed. The final linear lattice is a combination of the optimized substructures. Design decisions are mostly dictated by constraints, leaving limited alternatives under the given goals and boundary conditions. The linear lattice is constructed rather than optimized. Thus, it is justified to talk about a deterministic lattice design approach that provides a solid starting point for further fine-tuning and nonlinear optimization. The significance of time- and CPU-intensive optimization algorithms, such as multiobjective genetic algorithms, is much reduced. They can be used for fine-tuning the superperiod and for nonlinear optimization. Although the method optimizes the linear structure, it also considers nonlinear aspects such as chromatic sextupole strength and robustness against deviations from the design parameters. The approach was used to develop a lattice for the fourth-generation synchrotron light source BESSY III, planned at the Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin. The design criteria and target values were taken from the BESSY III project. Different goals or boundary conditions may lead to alternative decisions or objectives to be considered. Implications of using this approach for higher energy or higher superperiodic lattices are briefly discussed. The resulting solution for BESSY III and initial nonlinear studies are presented.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (22)

  1. S. C. Leemann, A. Andersson, M. Eriksson, L.-J. Lindgren, E. Wallén, J. Bengtsson, and A. Streun, Beam dynamics and expected performance of Sweden’s new storage-ring light source: MAX IV, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 12, 120701 (2009).
  2. MAX IV, Detailed design report, https://www.maxiv.lu.se/beamlines-accelerators/accelerators/accelerator-documentation-2/ [accessed November 29, 2025].
  3. L. Liu, N. Milas, A. H. C. Mukai, X. R. Resende, A. R. D. Rodrigues, and F. H. Sá, A new 5BA low emittance lattice for sirius, in Proceedings of the International Particle Accelerator Conference, IPAC2013 (JACoW, Geneva, Switzerland, 2013), TUPWO001.
  4. P. Raimondi, The extremely brilliant source storage ring of the European synchrotron radiation facility, Nat. Commun. Phys. 6, 82 (2023).
  5. EBS storage ring technical report, 2018, https://www.esrf.fr/files/live/sites/www/files/about/upgrade/documentation/Design Report-reduced-jan19.pdf [accessed November 29, 2025].
  6. J. Bengtsson, The sextupole scheme for the Swiss light source (SLS): An analytical approach, Technical Report No. SLS note 9-97, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villingen, Switzerland, 1997.
  7. J. Bengtsson and A. Streun, Robust design strategy for SLS-2, Technical Report No. SLS2-BJ84-001-2, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villingen, Switzerland, 2017.
  8. A. Streun, The anti-bend cell for ultralow emittance storage ring lattices, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 737, 148 (2014).
  9. A. Streun, SLS-2. Conceptual design report, Technical Report, Paul Scherrer Institut; PSI Bericht: 17-03, Villigen PSI, Switzerland, 2017.
  10. C.-X. Wang, Minimum emittance in storage rings with uniform or nonuniform dipoles, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 12, 061001 (2009).
  11. M. Aiba, M. Böge, M. Ehrlichman, and A. Streun, Magnetic field of longitudinal gradient bend, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 892, 41 (2018).
  12. M. Modica, E. Karantzoulis, I. Cudin, D. Caiazza, A. Gubertini, S. Dastan, and D. Castronovo, Superbend magnet for Elettra 2.0, in Proceedings of the International Particle Accelerator Conference, IPAC2023 (JACoW, Geneva, Switzerland, 2023), WEPM056.
  13. A. Streun, OPA lattice design code, https://ados.web.psi.ch/opa/ [accessed November 23, 2024].
  14. A. Streun, M. Aiba, M. Böge, C. Calzolaio, M. Ehrlichman, M. Negrazus, B. Riemann, and V. Vrankovic, Swiss light source upgrade lattice design, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 26, 091601 (2023).
  15. D. Robin, E. Forest, C. Pellegrini, and A. Amiry, Quasi-isochronous storage rings, Phys. Rev. E 48, 2149 (1993).
  16. S. C. Leemann and A. Streun, Perspectives for future light source lattices incorporating yet uncommon magnets, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 14, 030701 (2011).
  17. B. Kuske and B. Alberdi-Esuain, On the optimization of the non-linear lattice of Bessy III, in Proceedings of the International Particle Accelerator Conference, IPAC2025 (JACoW, Geneva, Switzerland, 2025), WEPM053.
  18. B. Riemann, M. Aiba, J. Kallestrup, and A. Streun, Efficient algorithms for dynamic aperture and momentum acceptance calculation in synchrotron light sources, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 27, 094002 (2024).
  19. J. Kallestrup, Private communication (2025), talk given at HZB.
  20. H. Ghasem, N. Blaskovic Kraljevic, B. Singh, and I. P. S. Martin, Lattice design for the Diamond-II light source storage ring, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 27, 110704 (2024).
  21. A. Loulergue, A. Gamelin, A. Nadji, L. Nadolski, M. Tordeux, P. Brunelle, R. Nagaoka, and V. Gubaidulin, TDR baseline lattice for SOLEIL2 upgrade project, in Proceedings of the International Particle Accelerator Conference, IPAC2024 (JACoW, Geneva, Switzerland, 2024), TUPG47.
  22. A. Streun, M. Aiba, M. Böge, C. Calzolaio, M. Ehrlichman, M. Negrazus, B. Riemann, and V. Vrankovic, Swiss light source upgrade lattice design, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 26, 091601 (2023).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation