Comment on “Quantum measurement and decoherence”
Dominique Gobert, Jan von Delft, and Vinay Ambegaokar
Phys. Rev. A 70, 026101 (2004) - Published 17 August, 2004
Ford, Lewis, and O’Connell [Phys. Rev. A 64, 032101 (2001)] have recently discussed a thought experiment in which a Brownian particle is subjected to a double-slit measurement . Analyzing the decay of the emerging interference pattern, they derive a decoherence rate that is much faster than previous results and even persists in the limit of vanishing dissipation. This result is based on the definition of a certain attenuation factor, which they analyze for short times. In this note, we point out that this attenuation factor captures the physics of decoherence only for times larger than a certain time , which is the time it takes until the two emerging wave packets begin to overlap. Therefore, the strategy of Ford et al. of extracting the decoherence time from the regime is in our opinion not meaningful. If one analyzes the attenuation factor for , one recovers familiar behavior for the decoherence time; in particular, no decoherence is seen in the absence of dissipation. We confirm the latter conclusion by calculating the off-diagonal elements of the reduced density matrix.