Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Sub-Riemannian geometry of measurement-based quantum computation

Lukas Hantzko1,*, Arnab Adhikary1,2,3,†, and Robert Raussendorf1,3,‡

  • *Contact author: lukas.hantzko@itp.uni-hannover.de
  • †Contact author: arnab.adhikary@itp.uni-hannover.de
  • ‡Contact author: robert.raussendorf@itp.uni-hannover.de

Phys. Rev. A 113, 012444 – Published 30 January, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/zq4l-vwbz

Abstract

The computational power of quantum phases of matter with symmetry can be accessed through local measurements, but what is the most efficient way of doing so? In this work we show that minimizing operational resources in measurement-based quantum computation (MBQC) on subsystem symmetric resource states amounts to solving a sub-Riemannian geodesic problem between the identity and the target logical unitary. This reveals a geometric structure underlying MBQC and offers a principled route to optimize quantum processing in computational phases.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (38)

  1. B. Eastin and E. Knill, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 110502 (2009).
  2. N. E. Bonesteel, L. Hormozi, G. Zikos, and S. H. Simon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 140503 (2005).
  3. M. A. Nielsen, M. R. Dowling, M. Gu, and A. C. Doherty, Phys. Rev. A 73, 062323 (2006).
  4. M. A. Nielsen, M. R. Dowling, M. Gu, and A. C. Doherty, Science 311, 1133 (2006).
  5. N. Khaneja, R. Brockett, and S. J. Glaser, Phys. Rev. A 63, 032308 (2001).
  6. N. Khaneja, S. J. Glaser, and R. Brockett, Phys. Rev. A 65, 032301 (2002).
  7. R. Raussendorf and H. J. Briegel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5188 (2001).
  8. S. D. Bartlett, G. K. Brennen, A. Miyake, and J. M. Renes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 110502 (2010).
  9. A. C. Doherty and S. D. Bartlett, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 020506 (2009).
  10. A. Miyake, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 040501 (2010).
  11. D. V. Else, I. Schwarz, S. D. Bartlett, and A. C. Doherty, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 240505 (2012).
  12. J. Miller and A. Miyake, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 120506 (2015).
  13. R. Raussendorf, C. Okay, D.-S. Wang, D. T. Stephen, and H. P. Nautrup, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 090501 (2019).
  14. R. Raussendorf, W. Yang, and A. Adhikary, Quantum 7, 1215 (2023).
  15. P. Herringer, V. B. Bulchandani, Y. Javanmard, D. T. Stephen, and R. Raussendorf, PRX Quantum 6, 040314 (2025).
  16. T. Devakul and D. J. Williamson, Phys. Rev. A 98, 022332 (2018).
  17. D. T. Stephen, H. P. Nautrup, J. Bermejo-Vega, J. Eisert, and R. Raussendorf, Quantum 3, 142 (2019).
  18. A. K. Daniel, R. N. Alexander, and A. Miyake, Quantum 4, 228 (2020).
  19. A. Mantri, T. F. Demarie, and J. F. Fitzsimons, Sci. Rep. 7, 42861 (2017).
  20. R. Raussendorf, D.-S. Wang, A. Prakash, T.-C. Wei, and D. T. Stephen, Phys. Rev. A 96, 012302 (2017).
  21. G. Rovelli, Chow theorem and structure of Carnot-Carathéodory balls, Ph.D. thesis, Università degli Studi di Padova, 2024.
  22. A. Adhikary, W. Yang, and R. Raussendorf, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 160601 (2024).
  23. A. A. Agrachev and Y. Sachkov, Control Theory from the Geometric Viewpoint, Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences (Springer, Berlin, 2013), Vol. 87.
  24. Y.-A. Chen, A. M. Childs, M. Hafezi, Z. Jiang, H. Kim, and Y. Xu, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 013191 (2022).
  25. R. S. Strichartz, J. Funct. Anal. 72, 320 (1987).
  26. F. Casas, A. Escorihuela-Tomàs, and P. A. Moreno Casares, Approximating exponentials of commutators by optimized product formulas, Quant. Inf. Process. 24, 47 (2025).
  27. N. Wiebe, D. Berry, P. Høyer, and B. C. Sanders, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 43, 065203 (2010).
  28. A. Nagel, E. M. Stein, and S. Wainger, Acta Math. 155, 103 (1985).
  29. A. Bellaïche, J. Math. Sci. 83, 461 (1997).
  30. I. D. Smith, M. Cautrès, D. T. Stephen, and H. P. Nautrup, Optimally generating Su(2N) using Pauli strings, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 200601 (2025).
  31. P. Herringer and R. Raussendorf, Quantum 7, 1041 (2023).
  32. A. H. da Silva, L. K. Castelano, and R. d. J. Napolitano, Phys. Rev. A 112, 052603 (2025).
  33. M. Goerz, D. Basilewitsch, F. Gago-Encinas, M. G. Krauss, K. P. Horn, D. M. Reich, and C. Koch, SciPost Phys. 7, 080 (2019).
  34. G. Sanguinetti, E. Bekkers, R. Duits, M. H. J. Janssen, A. Mashtakov, and J.-M. Mirebeau, in Progress in Pattern Recognition, Image Analysis, Computer Vision, and Applications, edited by A. Pardo and J. Kittler, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Springer, Cham, 2015), Vol. 9423, pp. 366–374.
  35. K. Crane, M. Livesu, E. Puppo, and Y. Qin, A survey of algorithms for geodesic paths and distances, arXiv:2007.10430.
  36. A. Adhikary, Symmetry protected measurement-based quantum computation in finite spin chains, M.Sc. thesis, University of British Columbia, 2021.
  37. D. T. Stephen, W. W. Ho, T.-C. Wei, R. Raussendorf, and R. Verresen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 250601 (2024).
  38. L. Hantzko, Simulation of geodesics (GitHub, San Francisco, 2025), https://github.com/HANTLUK/Simulation_Geodesics.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation