Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Fast scrambling in classically simulable quantum circuits

Mike Blake1, Noah Linden1, and Anthony P. Thompson1,2

  • 1School of Mathematics, University of Bristol, Fry Building, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UG, United Kingdom
  • 2Quantum Engineering Center for Doctoral Training, University of Bristol, Tyndall Avenue, Bristol BS8 1FD, United Kingdom

Phys. Rev. A 112, 022406 – Published 1 August, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/yx7v-m2zz

Abstract

We study operator scrambling in quantum circuits built from “super-Clifford” gates. For such circuits it was established by Blake and Linden [Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 030502 (2020)] that the time evolution of operator entanglement for a large class of many-body operators can be efficiently simulated on a classical computer, including for operators with volume-law entanglement. Here we extend the scope of this formalism in two key ways. First we provide evidence that these classically simulable circuits include examples of fast scramblers, by constructing a circuit for which operator entanglement is numerically found to saturate in a time t*∼ln(N) (with N the number of qubits). Second we demonstrate that, in addition to operator entanglement, certain out-of-time-ordered correlation functions (OTOCs) can be classically simulated within the same formalism. As a consequence such OTOCs can be computed numerically in super-Clifford circuits with thousands of qubits and we study several explicit examples in the aforementioned fast scrambling circuits.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (46)

  1. A. Nahum, J. Ruhman, S. Vijay, and J. Haah, Phys. Rev. X 7, 031016 (2017).
  2. A. Nahum, S. Vijay, and J. Haah, Phys. Rev. X 8, 021014 (2018).
  3. V. Khemani, A. Vishwanath, and D. A. Huse, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031057 (2018).
  4. C. W. von Keyserlingk, T. Rakovszky, F. Pollmann, and S. L. Sondhi, Phys. Rev. X 8, 021013 (2018).
  5. T. Rakovszky, F. Pollmann, and C. W. von Keyserlingk, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031058 (2018).
  6. D. A. Roberts, D. Stanford, and L. Susskind, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2015) 051.
  7. D. A. Roberts, D. Stanford, and A. Streicher, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2018) 122.
  8. S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2014) 067.
  9. J. Maldacena and D. Stanford, Phys. Rev. D 94, 106002 (2016).
  10. A. Kitaev and S. J. Suh, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2018) 183.
  11. M. Blake, H. Lee, and H. Liu, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2018) 127.
  12. P. Hosur, X.-L. Qi, D. A. Roberts, and B. Yoshida, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2016) 004.
  13. P. Zanardi, Phys. Rev. A 63, 040304(R) (2001).
  14. T. Prosen and I. Pižorn, Phys. Rev. A 76, 032316 (2007).
  15. I. Pižorn and T. Prosen, Phys. Rev. B 79, 184416 (2009).
  16. M. Žnidarič, T. Prosen, and I. Pižorn, Phys. Rev. A 78, 022103 (2008).
  17. C. Jonay, D. A. Huse, and A. Nahum, arXiv:1803.00089.
  18. M. Mezei and J. Virrueta, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2020) 013.
  19. T. Zhou and D. J. Luitz, Phys. Rev. B 95, 094206 (2017).
  20. L. Nie, M. Nozaki, S. Ryu, and M. T. Tan, J. Stat. Mech. (2019) 093107.
  21. R. Pal and A. Lakshminarayan, Phys. Rev. B 98, 174304 (2018).
  22. J. Iaconis, S. Vijay, and R. Nandkishore, Phys. Rev. B 100, 214301 (2019).
  23. V. Alba, J. Dubail, and M. Medenjak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 250603 (2019).
  24. M. Blake and N. Linden, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 030502 (2020).
  25. S. Gopalakrishnan, Phys. Rev. B 98, 060302(R) (2018).
  26. S. Gopalakrishnan and B. Zakirov, Quantum Sci. Technol. 3, 044004 (2018).
  27. Y. Sekino and L. Susskind, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2008) 065.
  28. P. Hayden and J. Preskill, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2007) 120.
  29. S. Aaronson and D. Gottesman, Phys. Rev. A 70, 052328 (2004).
  30. C. Dankert, arXiv:quant-ph/0512217.
  31. C. Dankert, R. Cleve, J. Emerson, and E. Livine, Phys. Rev. A 80, 012304 (2009).
  32. G. Bentsen, Y. Gu, and A. Lucas, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 6689 (2019).
  33. A. Keselman, L. Nie, and E. Berg, Phys. Rev. B 103, L121111 (2021).
  34. T. Zhou and X. Chen, Phys. Rev. E 99, 052212 (2019).
  35. C. Gidney, Quantum 5, 497 (2021).
  36. D. A. Roberts and B. Yoshida, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2017) 121.
  37. D. Stanford, Z. Yang, and S. Yao, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2022) 200.
  38. B. Yoshida and A. Kitaev, arXiv:1710.03363.
  39. N. Dowling, P. Kos, and K. Modi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 180403 (2023).
  40. B. Swingle, G. Bentsen, M. Schleier-Smith, and P. Hayden, Phys. Rev. A 94, 040302(R) (2016).
  41. C.-J. Lin and O. I. Motrunich, Phys. Rev. B 97, 144304 (2018).
  42. T. Zhou and B. Swingle, Nat. Commun. 14, 3411 (2023).
  43. I. Kukuljan, S. Grozdanov, and T. Prosen, Phys. Rev. B 96, 060301(R) (2017).
  44. J. Abajian, F. Aprile, R. C. Myers, and P. Vieira, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2023) 058.
  45. J. Abajian, F. Aprile, R. C. Myers, and P. Vieira, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2024) 118.
  46. M. Blake, A. P. Thompson, and N. Linden, “mablake90/super-cliffords: v.1.12 (2025)”, Zenodo, doi:10.5281/zenodo.15623117.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation