Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Quantized helicity in optical media

Neel Mackinnon, Jörg B. Götte, Stephen M. Barnett, and Niclas Westerberg*

  • *Contact author: Niclas.Westerberg@glasgow.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. A 112, 053504 – Published 4 November, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/y5d5-6xxb

Abstract

We present an alternative approach to the definition of optical helicity in a medium. Our approach resolves the problem that duality transformations which simultaneously combine E with H and D with B are incompatible with linear constitutive relations. We find that the helicity density in a medium, as the conserved quantity associated with duality transforms, must contain an explicit contribution associated with the polarization and magnetization of the matter, and that it can be expressed naturally in terms of the elementary polarized excitations of the system. In media for which the helicity is conserved, each circular excitation carries a well-defined helicity. However, in a medium for which the helicity is not conserved, we find that the time-varying helicity can be viewed in terms of oscillations between different helicity eigenstates, analogous to neutrino oscillations. Here we explicitly study the helicity in homogeneous and lossless media but we believe that, differently to other choices, this helicity is readily generalizable to media that may be inhomogeneous, lossy, chiral or nonreciprocal.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (45)

  1. S. Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995).
  2. M. Srednicki, Quantum Field Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007).
  3. M. Born and E. Wolf, Principes of Optics, 7th ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999).
  4. D. P. Craig and T. Thirunamachandran, Molecular Quantum Electrodynamics (Dover, New York 1998).
  5. L. D. Barron, Molecular Light Scattering and Optical Activity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004).
  6. F. Crimin, N. Mackinnon, J. B. Götte, and S. M. Barnett, Optical helicity and chirality: Conservation and sources, Appl. Sci. 9, 828 (2019).
  7. R. P. Cameron, S. M. Barnett, and A. M. Yao, Discriminatory optical force for chiral molecules, New J. Phys. 16, 013020 (2014).
  8. N. Kravets, A. Aleksanyan, and E. Brasselet, Chiral optical stern-Gerlach Newtonian experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 024301 (2019).
  9. O. Heaviside, On the forces, stresses, and fluxes of energy in the electromagnetic field, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 183, 423 (1892).
  10. J. Larmor, A dynamical theory of the electric and luminiferous medium. Part III. Relations with material media, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 190, 205 (1897).
  11. G. Nienhuis, Conservation laws and symmetry transformations of the electromagnetic field with sources, Phys. Rev. A 93, 023840 (2016).
  12. H. Bateman, The Mathematical Analysis of Electrical and Optical Wave-motion on the Basis of Maxwell's Equations (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1915).
  13. J. A. Stratton, Electromagnetic Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1941).
  14. S. M. Barnett, R. P. Cameron, and A. M. Yao, Duplex symmetry and its relation to the conservation of optical helicity, Phys. Rev. A 86, 013845 (2012).
  15. M. E. Rose, Multipole Fields (Wiley, New York, 1955), Chap. 1.5.
  16. J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1998). Chap. 6.
  17. A. Einstein and J. Laub, Über die im elektromagnetischen Felde auf ruhende Körper ausgeübten ponderomotorischen Kräfte, Ann. Phys. 331, 541 (1908).
  18. S. M. Barnett and R. Loudon, Theory of radiation pressure on magneto-dielectric materials, New J. Phys. 17, 063027 (2015).
  19. M. P. Silverman, Reflection and refraction at the surface of a chiral medium: Comparison of gyrotropic constitutive relations invariant or noninvariant under a duality transformation, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 3, 830 (1986).
  20. J. Lekner, Optical properties of isotropic Chiral media, Pure Appl. Opt. 5, 417 (1996).
  21. I. Fernandez-Corbaton, X. Zambrana-Puyalto, N. Tischler, X. Vidal, M. L. Juan, and G. Molina-Terriza, Electromagnetic duality symmetry and helicity conservation for the macroscopic Maxwell's equations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 060401 (2013).
  22. K. van Kruining and J. B. Götte, The conditions for the preservation of duality symmetry in a linear medium, J. Opt. 18, 085601 (2016).
  23. F. Alpeggiani, K. Y. Bliokh, F. Nori, and L. Kuipers, Electromagnetic helicity in complex media, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 243605 (2018).
  24. F. Crimin, N. Mackinnon, J. B. Götte, and S. M. Barnett, On the conservation of helicity in a chiral medium, J. Opt. 21, 094003 (2019).
  25. J. J. Hopfield, Theory of the contribution of excitons to the complex dielectric constant of crystals, Phys. Rev. 112, 1555 (1958).
  26. B. Huttner, J. J. Baumberg, and S. M. Barnett, Canonical quantization of light in a linear dielectric, Europhys. Lett. 16, 177 (1991).
  27. S. M. Barnett and R. Loudon, Optical Thomas-Reiche-Kuhn sum rules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 013601 (2012).
  28. J. L. Trueba and A. F. Rañada, The electromagnetic helicity, Eur. J. Phys. 17, 141 (1996).
  29. D. Candlin, Analysis of the new conservation law in electromagnetic theory, Il Nuovo Cimento 37, 1390 (1965).
  30. C. Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2004).
  31. V. Barger, D. Marfatia, and K. L. Whisnant, The Physics of Neutrinos (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2012).
  32. I. I. Bigi and A. I. Sanda, CP Violation, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009), Chap. 16.2.
  33. I. Fernandez-Corbaton, Total helicity of electromagnetic fields and matter, Phys. Rev. B 103, 054406 (2021).
  34. Y. Tang and A. E. Cohen, Optical chirality and its interaction with matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 163901 (2010).
  35. J. E. Vàzquez-Lozano and A. Martìnez, Optical chirality in dispersive and lossy media, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 043901 (2018).
  36. B. Huttner and S. M. Barnett, Dispersion and loss in a Hopfield dielectric, Europhys. Lett. 18, 487 (1992).
  37. B. Huttner and S. M. Barnett, Quantization of the electromagnetic field in dielectrics, Phys. Rev. A 46, 4306 (1992).
  38. N. A. R. Bhat and J. E. Sipe, Hamiltonian treatment of the electromagnetic field in dispersive and absorptive structured media, Phys. Rev. A 73, 063808 (2006).
  39. S. Scheel and S. Y. Buhmann, Macroscopic QED - concepts and applications, Acta Phys. Slovaca 58, 675 (2008).
  40. F. Kheirandish and M. Soltani, Extension of the Huttner-Barnett model to a magnetodielectric medium, Phys. Rev. A 78, 012102 (2008).
  41. T. G. Philbin, Canonical quantization of macroscopic electromagnetism, New J. Phys. 12, 123008 (2010).
  42. S. A. R. Horsley, Consistency of certain constitutive relations with quantum electromagnetism, Phys. Rev. A 84, 063822 (2011).
  43. E. Noether, Invariante variationsprobleme, Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse 1918, 235 (1918).
  44. D. E. Neuenschwander, Emmy Noether's Wonderful Theorem (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 2010).
  45. M. Bañados and I. Reyes, A short review on Noether's theorems, gauge symmetries and boundary terms, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 25, 1630021 (2016).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation