Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Equal-spin and opposite-spin density-density correlations in the BCS-BEC crossover: Gauge symmetry, Pauli exclusion principle, Wick's theorem, and experiments

Nikolai Kaschewski1,*, Axel Pelster1, and Carlos A. R. Sá de Melo2

  • *Contact author: kaschews@rptu.de

Phys. Rev. A 114, 023323 – Published 25 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/xjhs-7z5w

Abstract

We develop a general theory of spin-dependent density-density correlations, that is valid for any temperature, interactions, dimensions, and mass or population status of Fermi gases with two internal states. We use gauge invariance and the Pauli principle to establish constraints on the spin-dependent density-density correlations that are consistent with the fluctuation-dissipation and Wick's theorem. As an example, we study the spin-dependent density-density correlations from the BCS to the Bose regime in two dimensions at zero temperature, inspired by recent continuum quantum gas microscope experiments in Li6. We show that two-particle irreducible contributions, involving collective excitations, many-particle scattering, and vertex corrections, are essential to describe the experimental data. In particular, the two-particle irreducible terms are responsible for the emergence of an experimentally observed minimum in the opposite-spin density-density correlations.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (80)

  1. T. Kaneko, H. Sakakibara, M. Ochi, and K. Kuroki, Pair correlations in the two-orbital Hubbard ladder: Implications for superconductivity in the bilayer nickelate La3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. B 109, 045154 (2024).
  2. C.-H. Huang, A. Skurativska, F. S. Bergeret, and M. A. Cazalilla, Probing magnetic and triplet correlations in spin-split superconductors with magnetic impurities, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 033022 (2024).
  3. J. C. Estrada Saldaña, A. Vekris, L. Pavešič, R. Žitko, K. Grove-Rasmussen, and J. Nygård, Correlation between two distant quasiparticles in separate superconducting islands mediated by a single spin, Nat. Commun. 15, 3465 (2024).
  4. M. Thumin and G. Bouzerar, Correlation functions and characteristic length scales in flat band superconductors, SciPost Phys. 18, 025 (2025).
  5. D. K. Mark, H.-Y. Hu, J. Kwan, C. Kokail, S. Choi, and S. F. Yelin, Efficiently measuring d-wave pairing and beyond in quantum gas microscopes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 123402 (2025).
  6. A. A. Isayev, Correlation functions for a di-neutron condensate in asymmetric nuclear matter, Phys. Rev. C 78, 014306 (2008).
  7. N. Pillet, N. Sandulescu, P. Schuck, and J.-F. Berger, Two-particle spatial correlations in superfluid nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 81, 034307 (2010).
  8. E. B. Balbutsev, L. A. Malov, and P. Schuck, Spatial dependence of pairing in deformed nuclei, Phys. At. Nucl. 74, 1651 (2011).
  9. R.-D. Lasseri, J.-P. Ebran, E. Khan, and N. Sandulescu, Localization of pairing correlations in nuclei within relativistic mean field models, Phys. Rev. C 98, 014310 (2018).
  10. E. Litvinova and P. Schuck, Many-body correlations in nuclear superfluidity, Phys. Rev. C 102, 034310 (2020).
  11. T. Frick, H. Müther, A. Rios, A. Polls, and A. Ramos, Correlations in hot asymmetric nuclear matter, Phys. Rev. C 71, 014313 (2005).
  12. H.-F. Zhu, X. Wu, and G.-Z. Liu, Nonperturbative study of quantum many-body correlation effects in neutron stars: Equation of state, Phys. Rev. C 110, 035810 (2024).
  13. A. Sedrakian, Short-range correlations and Urca process in neutron stars, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 171401 (2024).
  14. N. Chamel, Superfluid fraction in the crystalline crust of a neutron star: Role of BCS pairing, Phys. Rev. C 111, 045803 (2025).
  15. G. B. Partridge, K. E. Strecker, R. I. Kamar, M. W. Jack, and R. G. Hulet, Molecular probe of pairing in the BEC-BCS crossover, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 020404 (2005).
  16. G. E. Astrakharchik, J. Boronat, J. Casulleras, and S. Giorgini, Equation of state of a Fermi gas in the BEC-BCS crossover: A quantum Monte Carlo study, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 200404 (2004).
  17. C. Lobo, I. Carusotto, S. Giorgini, A. Recati, and S. Stringari, Pair correlations of an expanding superfluid Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 100405 (2006).
  18. S. Gandolfi, K. E. Schmidt, and J. Carlson, BEC-BCS crossover and universal relations in unitary Fermi gases, Phys. Rev. A 83, 041601(R) (2011).
  19. F. Werner and Y. Castin, General relations for quantum gases in two and three dimensions: Two-component fermions, Phys. Rev. A 86, 013626 (2012).
  20. L. He, Dynamic density and spin responses of a superfluid Fermi gas in the BCS–BEC crossover: Path integral formulation and pair fluctuation theory, Ann. Phys. 373, 470 (2016).
  21. J. C. Obeso-Jureidini and V. Romero-Rochín, Density correlation functions and the spatial structure of the two-dimensional BEC-BCS crossover, Phys. Rev. A 105, 043307 (2022).
  22. J. C. Obeso-Jureidini, G. A. Domínguez-Castro, E. Neri, R. Paredes, and V. Romero-Rochín, Universal correlations along the BEC-BCS crossover, New J. Phys. 25, 113019 (2023).
  23. I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and S. Nascimbène, Quantum simulations with ultracold quantum gases, Nat. Phys. 8, 267 (2012).
  24. C. Gross and I. Bloch, Quantum simulations with ultracold atoms in optical lattices, Science 357, 995 (2017).
  25. P. van Wyk, H. Tajima, D. Inotani, A. Ohnishi, and Y. Ohashi, Superfluid Fermi atomic gas as a quantum simulator for the study of the neutron-star equation of state in the low-density region, Phys. Rev. A 97, 013601 (2018).
  26. A. J. Daley, I. Bloch, C. Kokail, S. Flannigan, N. Pearson, M. Troyer, and P. Zoller, Practical quantum advantage in quantum simulation, Nature (London) 607, 667 (2022).
  27. T. M. Wright, A. Perrin, A. Bray, J. Schmiedmayer, and K. V. Kheruntsyan, Two-body anticorrelation in a harmonically trapped ideal Bose gas, Phys. Rev. A 86, 023618 (2012).
  28. T. Schweigler, V. Kasper, S. Erne, I. Mazets, B. Rauer, F. Cataldini, T. Langen, T. Gasenzer, J. Berges, and J. Schmiedmayer, Experimental characterization of a quantum many-body system via higher-order correlations, Nature (London) 545, 323 (2017).
  29. T. V. Zache, T. Schweigler, S. Erne, J. Schmiedmayer, and J. Berges, Extracting the field theory description of a quantum many-body system from experimental data, Phys. Rev. X 10, 011020 (2020).
  30. T. Schweigler, M. Gluza, M. Tajik, S. Sotiriadis, F. Cataldini, S.-C. Ji, F. S. Møller, J. Sabino, B. Rauer, J. Eisert, and J. Schmiedmayer, Decay and recurrence of non-Gaussian correlations in a quantum many-body system, Nat. Phys. 17, 559 (2021).
  31. M. Greiner, C. A. Regal, J. T. Stewart, and D. S. Jin, Probing pair-correlated fermionic atoms through correlations in atom shot noise, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 110401 (2005).
  32. S. Fölling, F. Gerbier, A. Widera, O. Mandel, T. Gericke, and I. Bloch, Spatial quantum noise interferometry in expanding ultracold atom clouds, Nature (London) 434, 481 (2005).
  33. A. Schirotzek, Y. I. Shin, C. H. Schunck, and W. Ketterle, Determination of the superfluid gap in atomic Fermi gases by quasiparticle spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 140403 (2008).
  34. K. Hueck, N. Luick, L. Sobirey, J. Siegl, T. Lompe, and H. Moritz, Two-dimensional homogeneous Fermi gases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 060402 (2018).
  35. H. Biss, L. Sobirey, N. Luick, M. Bohlen, J. J. Kinnunen, G. M. Bruun, T. Lompe, and H. Moritz, Excitation spectrum and superfluid gap of an ultracold Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 100401 (2022).
  36. X. Li, S. Wang, X. Luo, Y.-Y. Zhou, K. Xie, H.-C. Shen, Y.-Z. Nie, Q. Chen, H. Hu, Y.-A. Chen, X.-C. Yao, and J.-W. Pan, Observation and quantification of the pseudogap in unitary Fermi gases, Nature (London) 626, 288 (2024).
  37. H. Feshbach, Unified theory of nuclear reactions, Ann. Phys. 5, 357 (1958).
  38. U. Fano, Effects of configuration interaction on intensities and phase shifts, Phys. Rev. 124, 1866 (1961).
  39. C. Chin, R. Grimm, P. Julienne, and E. Tiesinga, Feshbach resonances in ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1225 (2010).
  40. C. A. R. Sá de Melo, M. Randeria, and J. R. Engelbrecht, Crossover from BCS to Bose superconductivity: Transition temperature and time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3202 (1993).
  41. J. R. Engelbrecht, M. Randeria, and C. A. R. Sá de Melo, BCS to Bose crossover: Broken-symmetry state, Phys. Rev. B 55, 15153 (1997).
  42. A. Perali, P. Pieri, L. Pisani, and G. C. Strinati, BCS-BEC crossover at finite temperature for superfluid trapped Fermi atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 220404 (2004).
  43. J. Hofmann and W. Zwerger, Deep inelastic scattering on ultracold gases, Phys. Rev. X 7, 011022 (2017).
  44. H. Deng, C. Li, Y. Wu, L. Sun, and Q. Chen, Flat band effects on the ground-state BCS-BEC crossover in atomic Fermi gases in a quasi-two-dimensional Lieb lattice, Ann. Phys. 463, 169639 (2024).
  45. E. Dizer, J. Horak, and J. M. Pawlowski, Spectral properties and observables in ultracold Fermi gases, Phys. Rev. A 109, 063311 (2024).
  46. B. Mukherjee, P. B. Patel, Z. Yan, R. J. Fletcher, J. Struck, and M. W. Zwierlein, Spectral response and contact of the unitary Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 203402 (2019).
  47. B. Nagler, K. Jägering, A. Sheikhan, S. Barbosa, J. Koch, S. Eggert, I. Schneider, and A. Widera, Dipole oscillations of fermionic quantum gases along the BEC-BCS crossover in disordered potentials, Phys. Rev. A 101, 053633 (2020).
  48. J. Koch, K. Menon, E. Cuestas, S. Barbosa, E. Lutz, T. Fogarty, T. Busch, and A. Widera, A quantum engine in the BEC–BCS crossover, Nature (London) 621, 723 (2023).
  49. M. Jäger and J. H. Denschlag, Methods for studying Tan's contact in the BCS-BEC crossover, Phys. Rev. A 109, 063330 (2024).
  50. D. J. Young, E. Y. Song, A. Chu, D. Barberena, Z. Niu, V. M. Schäfer, R. J. Lewis-Swan, A. M. Rey, and J. K. Thompson, Time-resolved spectral gap spectroscopy in a quantum simulator of fermionic superfluidity inside an optical cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 183404 (2025).
  51. Z. Su, T.-H. Shou, H. Yang, J. Cao, B.-Y. Wang, T. Xie, J. Rui, B. Zhao, and J.-W. Pan, Broad Feshbach resonance with a large background scattering length in a fermionic atom-molecule mixture, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 213401 (2025).
  52. R. Combescot, M. Y. Kagan, and S. Stringari, Collective mode of homogeneous superfluid Fermi gases in the BEC-BCS crossover, Phys. Rev. A 74, 042717 (2006).
  53. H. Kurkjian, S. N. Klimin, J. Tempere, and Y. Castin, Pair-breaking collective branch in BCS superconductors and superfluid Fermi gases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 093403 (2019).
  54. T. Enss, Bulk viscosity and contact correlations in attractive Fermi gases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 205301 (2019).
  55. S. N. Klimin, J. Tempere, and H. Kurkjian, Phononic collective excitations in superfluid Fermi gases at nonzero temperatures, Phys. Rev. A 100, 063634 (2019).
  56. S. Van Loon, J. Tempere, and H. Kurkjian, Beyond mean-field corrections to the quasiparticle spectrum of superfluid Fermi gases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 073404 (2020).
  57. S. N. Klimin, J. Tempere, and H. Kurkjian, Collective excitations of superfluid Fermi gases near the transition temperature, Phys. Rev. A 103, 043336 (2021).
  58. S. Van Loon and C. A. R. Sá de Melo, Effects of quantum fluctuations on the low-energy collective modes of two-dimensional superfluid Fermi gases from the BCS to the Bose limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 113001 (2023).
  59. J. Verstraten, K. Dai, M. Dixmerias, B. Peaudecerf, T. de Jongh, and T. Yefsah, In situ imaging of a single-atom wave packet in continuous space, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 083403 (2025).
  60. J. Xiang, E. Cruz-Colón, C. C. Chua, W. R. Milner, J. de Hond, J. F. Fricke, and W. Ketterle, In situ imaging of the thermal de Broglie wavelength in an ultracold Bose gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 183401 (2025).
  61. R. Yao, S. Chi, M. Wang, R. J. Fletcher, and M. Zwierlein, Measuring pair correlations in Bose and Fermi gases via atom-resolved microscopy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 183402 (2025).
  62. T. de Jongh, J. Verstraten, M. Dixmerias, C. Daix, B. Peaudecerf, and T. Yefsah, Quantum gas microscopy of fermions in the continuum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 183403 (2025).
  63. C. Daix, M. Dixmerias, Y.-Y. He, J. Verstraten, T. de Jongh, B. Peaudecerf, S. Zhang, and T. Yefsah, Observing spatial charge and spin correlations in a strongly interacting Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 153402 (2026).
  64. C. Daix, P. M. Tam, M. Dixmerias, J. Verstraten, T. de Jongh, B. Peaudecerf, C. L. Kane, and T. Yefsah, Probing the Fermi sea topology in a quantum gas, arXiv:2511.23353.
  65. W. S. Bakr, J. I. Gillen, A. Peng, S. Fölling, and M. Greiner, A quantum gas microscope for detecting single atoms in a Hubbard-regime optical lattice, Nature (London) 462, 74 (2009).
  66. J. G. Danzl, M. J. Mark, E. Haller, M. Gustavsson, R. Hart, J. Aldegunde, J. M. Hutson, and H.-C. Nägerl, An ultracold high-density sample of rovibronic ground-state molecules in an optical lattice, Nat. Phys. 6, 265 (2010).
  67. L. W. Cheuk, M. A. Nichols, M. Okan, T. Gersdorf, V. V. Ramasesh, W. S. Bakr, T. Lompe, and M. W. Zwierlein, Quantum-gas microscope for fermionic atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 193001 (2015).
  68. L. W. Cheuk, M. A. Nichols, K. R. Lawrence, M. Okan, H. Zhang, E. Khatami, N. Trivedi, T. Paiva, M. Rigol, and M. W. Zwierlein, Observation of spatial charge and spin correlations in the 2D Fermi-Hubbard model, Science 353, 1260 (2016).
  69. S. Hollerith, J. Zeiher, J. Rui, A. Rubio-Abadal, V. Walther, T. Pohl, D. M. Stamper-Kurn, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Quantum gas microscopy of Rydberg macrodimers, Science 364, 664 (2019).
  70. C. Gross and W. S. Bakr, Quantum gas microscopy for single atom and spin detection, Nat. Phys. 17, 1316 (2021).
  71. A. M. Kaufman and K.-K. Ni, Quantum science with optical tweezer arrays of ultracold atoms and molecules, Nat. Phys. 17, 1324 (2021).
  72. S. Kangjun and C. A. R. Sá de Melo, Compressibility and spin susceptibility in the evolution from BCS to BEC superfluids, arXiv:1105.4365.
  73. G. C. Wick, The evaluation of the collision matrix, Phys. Rev. 80, 268 (1950).
  74. R. L. Stratonovich, On a method of calculating quantum distribution functions, Sov. Phys. Dokl. 2, 416 (1957).
  75. J. Hubbard, Calculation of partition functions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 3, 77 (1959).
  76. E. E. Salpeter and H. A. Bethe, A relativistic equation for bound-state problems, Phys. Rev. 84, 1232 (1951).
  77. S. S. Botelho and C. A. R. Sá de Melo, Vortex-antivortex lattice in ultracold fermionic gases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 040404 (2006).
  78. C. Daix, M. Dixmerias, Y.-Y. He, J. Verstraten, T. de Jongh, B. Peaudecerf, S. Zhang, and T. Yefsah, Data for: Observing spatial charge and spin correlations in a strongly-interacting Fermi gas [Dataset], Zenodo, 2026, doi:10.5281/zenodo.18412437.
  79. Y. Castin, Pair distribution functions of a superfluid spin-1/2 Fermi gas with contact interactions in the linearized time-dependent BCS theory, arXiv:2601.01985v1.
  80. Y. Castin, Fonctions de distribution de paires d'un gaz superfluide de fermions de spin 1/2 en interaction de contact dans la théorie BCS dépendant du temps linéarisée, C. R. Phys. 27, 101 (2026).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation