Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Measuring deviations from a perfectly circular cross section of an optical nanofiber at the angstrom scale

Jihao Jia, Felix Tebbenjohanns, Thomas Hoinkes, Jürgen Volz, Arno Rauschenbeutel, and Philipp Schneeweiss*

  • *Contact author: philipp.schneeweiss@hu-berlin.de

Phys. Rev. A 112, 053509 – Published 10 November, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/w1vv-4ys7

Abstract

Tapered optical fibers (TOFs) with sub-wavelength-diameter waists, known as optical nanofibers, are powerful tools for interfacing quantum emitters and nanophotonics. These applications demand stable polarization of the fiber-guided light field. However, the linear birefringence resulting from Ångström-scale (Å-scale) deviations in the nanofiber's ideally circular cross section can lead to significant polarization changes within mm of light propagation. Here, we experimentally investigate such deviations using two in situ approaches. First, we measure the resonance frequencies of hundreds of flexural modes along the nanofiber, which exhibit splitting due to the noncircular cross section. By analyzing the mean resonance frequencies of each pair and the corresponding frequency splitting, we conclude that the nanofiber can be well described as having an elliptical cross section with a mean radius of 255.2(8)nm, where the semiaxes differ by only about 2Å. Second, we monitor the polarization of the guided light field by imaging the light scattered out of the nanofiber and observe a periodic polarization change along it. From the linear birefringence due to the elliptical cross section, we infer a comparable difference in the semiaxes as the first method, and determine the orientation of the polarization eigenaxes. Our work is crucial for any fundamental or applied study that requires a well-controlled interaction between guided light and matter, in particular for quantum memories, frequency conversion, or lasing that require a large interaction length.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (54)

  1. L. Tong, F. Zi, X. Guo, and J. Lou, Opt. Commun. 285, 4641 (2012).
  2. M. J. Morrissey, K. Deasy, M. Frawley, R. Kumar, E. Prel, L. Russell, V. G. Truong, and S. Nic Chormaic, Sensors 13, 10449 (2013).
  3. P. Solano, J. A. Grover, J. E. Hoffman, S. Ravets, F. K. Fatemi, L. A. Orozco, and S. L. Rolston, Advances in Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2017), Vol. 66, pp. 439–505
  4. K. P. Nayak, M. Sadgrove, R. Yalla, F. Le Kien, and K. Hakuta, J. Opt. 20, 073001 (2018).
  5. F. Le Kien, J. Liang, K. Hakuta, and V. Balykin, Opt. Commun. 242, 445 (2004).
  6. T. A. Birks, W. J. Wadsworth, and P. S. J. Russell, Opt. Lett. 25, 1415 (2000).
  7. S. M. Spillane, G. S. Pati, K. Salit, M. Hall, P. Kumar, R. G. Beausoleil, and M. S. Shahriar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 233602 (2008).
  8. U. Wiedemann, K. Karapetyan, C. Dan, D. Pritzkau, W. Alt, S. Irsen, and D. Meschede, Opt. Express 18, 7693 (2010).
  9. J. Zhang, Y. Kang, X. Guo, Y. Li, K. Liu, Y. Xie, H. Wu, D. Cai, J. Gong, Z. Shi et al., Light Sci. Appl. 12, 89 (2023).
  10. G. Keiser, Fiber Optic Communications (Springer, Berlin, 2021).
  11. T. A. Birks, P. S. J. Russell, and D. Culverhouse, J. Lightwave Technol. 14, 2519 (1996).
  12. M. Blaha, A. Rauschenbeutel, and R. Pennetta, Phys. Rev. Appl. 22, 054008 (2024).
  13. P. Praveen Kamath, S. Sil, V. G. Truong, and S. Nic Chormaic, Biomed. Opt. Express 14, 6172 (2023).
  14. R. Nagai and T. Aoki, Opt. Express 22, 28427 (2014).
  15. J. Hoffman, S. Ravets, J. Grover, P. Solano, P. Kordell, J. Wong-Campos, L. Orozco, and S. Rolston, AIP Adv. 4, 067124 (2014).
  16. M. C. Frawley, A. Petcu-Colan, V. G. Truong, and S. Nic Chormaic, Opt. Commun. 285, 4648 (2012).
  17. S. Ravets, J. Hoffman, L. Orozco, S. Rolston, G. Beadie, and F. Fatemi, Opt. Express 21, 18325 (2013).
  18. F. Warken and H. Giessen, Opt. Lett. 29, 1727 (2004).
  19. M. Sumetsky, Y. Dulashko, J. Fini, A. Hale, and J. Nicholson, Opt. Lett. 31, 2393 (2006).
  20. L. S. Madsen, C. Baker, H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, and W. P. Bowen, Nano Lett. 16, 7333 (2016).
  21. F. K. Fatemi, J. E. Hoffman, P. Solano, E. F. Fenton, G. Beadie, S. L. Rolston, and L. A. Orozco, Optica 4, 157 (2017).
  22. Y. Yu, X. Zhang, Z. Song, J. Wang, and Z. Meng, Appl. Opt. 53, 8222 (2014).
  23. Y. Kang, J. Gong, Y. Xu, N. Yao, W. Fang, X. Guo, and L. Tong, IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 32, 219 (2020).
  24. S. Holleis, T. Hoinkes, C. Wuttke, P. Schneeweiss, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 163109 (2014).
  25. T. Birks and Y. Li, J. Lightwave Technol. 10, 432 (1992).
  26. J. Ward, A. Maimaiti, V. H. Le, and S. Chormaic, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 85, 111501 (2014).
  27. A. Goban, K. S. Choi, D. J. Alton, D. Ding, C. Lacroûte, M. Pototschnig, T. Thiele, N. Stern, and H. J. Kimble, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 033603 (2012).
  28. C. Wang, L. Song, J. Wang, J. Zhou, K. Feng, Q. Zhang, C. L. Zou, G. Li, P. Zhang, and T. Zhang, Opt. Express 33, 14964 (2025).
  29. E. Vetsch, S. T. Dawkins, R. Mitsch, D. Reitz, P. Schneeweiss, and A. Rauschenbeutel, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 18, 1763 (2012).
  30. C. Wuttke, G. D. Cole, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Phys. Rev. A 88, 061801(R) (2013).
  31. F. Tebbenjohanns, J. Jia, M. Antesberger, A. S. Prasad, S. Pucher, A. Rauschenbeutel, J. Volz, and P. Schneeweiss, Phys. Rev. A 108, L031101 (2023).
  32. D. Su, Y. Jiang, P. Solano, L. A. Orozco, J. Lawall, and Y. Zhao, Photon. Res. 11, 2179 (2023).
  33. L. Song, C. Wang, Y. Hu, J. Zhou, Q. Zhang, C.-L. Zou, G. Li, P. Zhang, and T. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 033801 (2024).
  34. S. Rao, Mechanical Vibrations in SI Units, 6th ed. (Addison-Wesley, New York, 2017).
  35. M. Joos, A. Bramati, and Q. Glorieux, Opt. Express 27, 18818 (2019).
  36. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/w1vv-4ys7 for two videos (Movies S1 and S2) showing images recorded by cameras 1 and 2 during rotation of the first half-wave plate.
  37. U. Delic, Cavity cooling by coherent scattering of a levitated nanosphere in vacuum, Ph.D. thesis, University of Vienna, 2019, https://utheses.univie.ac.at/detail/50464.
  38. F. Ricci, M. T. Cuairan, A. W. Schell, E. Hebestreit, R. A. Rica, N. Meyer, and R. Quidant, ACS Nano 16, 8677 (2022).
  39. Y. Jung, G. Brambilla, K. Oh, and D. J. Richardson, Opt. Lett. 35, 378 (2010).
  40. H. Xuan, J. Ju, and W. Jin, Opt. Express 18, 3828 (2010).
  41. J. C. Beugnot, S. Lebrun, G. Pauliat, H. Maillotte, V. Laude, and T. Sylvestre, Nat. Commun. 5, 5242 (2014).
  42. O. Florez, P. F. Jarschel, Y. A. Espinel, C. Cordeiro, T. Mayer Alegre, G. S. Wiederhecker, and P. Dainese, Nat. Commun. 7, 11759 (2016).
  43. J. Petersen, J. Volz, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Science 346, 67 (2014).
  44. J. Lee, J. Grover, J. Hoffman, L. Orozco, and S. Rolston, J. Phys. B 48, 165004 (2015).
  45. S. Ruddell, K. Webb, I. Herrera, A. Parkins, and M. Hoogerland, Optica 4, 576 (2017).
  46. C. Østfeldt, J.-B. S. Béguin, F. T. Pedersen, E. S. Polzik, J. H. Müller, and J. Appel, Opt. Lett. 42, 4315 (2017).
  47. N. V. Corzo, J. Raskop, A. Chandra, A. S. Sheremet, B. Gouraud, and J. Laurat, Nature (London) 566, 359 (2019).
  48. R. K. Gupta, J. L. Everett, A. D. Tranter, R. Henke, V. Gokhroo, P. K. Lam, and S. Nic Chormaic, AVS Quantum Sci. 4, 026801 (2022).
  49. G. Kestler, K. Ton, D. Filin, C. Cheung, P. Schneeweiss, T. Hoinkes, J. Volz, M. S. Safronova, A. Rauschenbeutel, and J. T. Barreiro, PRX Quantum 4, 040308 (2023).
  50. R. Pennetta, S. Xie, R. Zeltner, J. Hammer, and P. S. J. Russell, Photon. Res. 8, 844 (2020).
  51. M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 1391 (2014).
  52. P. Treutlein, C. Genes, K. Hammerer, M. Poggio, and P. Rabl, Hybrid mechanical systems, in Cavity Optomechanics: Nano- and Micromechanical Resonators Interacting with Light, edited by M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt (Springer, Berlin, 2014), pp. 327–351.
  53. C. Yeh and F. I. Shimabukuro, The Essence of Dielectric Waveguides (Springer, Berlin, 2008).
  54. N. W. McLachlan, Theory and Application of Mathieu Functions (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1947).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation