- Open Access
Optimal interpolation of entanglement purification protocols
Phys. Rev. A 114, 032416 – Published 8 September, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/v55w-6x44
Abstract
Bipartite entanglement purification is the conversion of copies of weakly entangled pairs shared between two separated parties into a smaller number of strongly entangled shared pairs using only local operations and classical communication. Choosing between different entanglement purification protocols generally involves weighing up a trade-off between the ratio of strongly entangled pairs produced to weakly entangled pairs consumed, which we call the rate of the protocol, and the degree of the entanglement of the strongly entangled pairs, typically measured by the fidelity of those pairs to maximally entangled states. By randomly choosing a protocol according to a probability distribution over a list of protocols for each pair we want to produce, we can achieve rates and fidelities not achieved by any of the original protocols. Here, we show how to choose this distribution to maximize the rate at which we produce qubit pairs with a given fidelity to a Bell state or, equivalently, to maximize the fidelity to a Bell state of the qubit pairs produced at a given rate. We investigate both the asymptotic case, where the number of initial pairs goes to infinity, and the finite-size regime, where protocols are restricted to a finite number of weakly entangled pairs.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (23)
- C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, C. Crépeau, R. Jozsa, A. Peres, and W. K. Wootters, Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895 (1993).
- C. H. Bennett and S. J. Wiesner, Communication via one- and two-particle operators on Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2881 (1992).
- C. H. Bennett and G. Brassard, Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing, Theor. Comput. Sci. 560, 7 (2014).
- A. K. Ekert, Quantum cryptography based on Bell's theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 661 (1991).
- S. Pirandola, U. L. Andersen, L. Banchi, M. Berta, D. Bunandar, R. Colbeck, D. Englund, T. Gehring, C. Lupo, C. Ottaviani, et al., Advances in quantum cryptography, Adv. Opt. Photon. 12, 1012 (2020).
- S. Pirandola, R. Laurenza, C. Ottaviani, and L. Banchi, Fundamental limits of repeaterless quantum communications, Nat. Commun. 8, 15043 (2017).
- R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and K. Horodecki, Quantum entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865 (2009).
- C. H. Bennett, D. P. DiVincenzo, J. A. Smolin, and W. K. Wootters, Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction, Phys. Rev. A 54, 3824 (1996).
- Á. G. Iñesta and S. Wehner, Performance metrics for the continuous distribution of entanglement in multiuser quantum networks, Phys. Rev. A 108, 052615 (2023).
- C. Harney and S. Pirandola, Practical routing and criticality in large-scale quantum communication networks, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 043168 (2025).
- F. Rozpędek, T. Schiet, L. P. Thinh, D. Elkouss, A. C. Doherty, and S. Wehner, Optimizing practical entanglement distillation, Phys. Rev. A 97, 062333 (2018).
- D. Deutsch, A. Ekert, R. Jozsa, C. Macchiavello, S. Popescu, and A. Sanpera, Quantum privacy amplification and the security of quantum cryptography over noisy channels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2818 (1996).
- R. F. Werner, Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model, Phys. Rev. A 40, 4277 (1989).
- C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, S. Popescu, B. Schumacher, J. A. Smolin, and W. K. Wootters, Purification of noisy entanglement and faithful teleportation via noisy channels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 722 (1996).
- V. Vedral and M. B. Plenio, Entanglement measures and purification procedures, Phys. Rev. A 57, 1619 (1998).
- K. Audenaert, J. Eisert, E. Jané, M. B. Plenio, S. Virmani, and B. De Moor, Asymptotic relative entropy of entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 217902 (2001).
- S. Pirandola, End-to-end capacities of a quantum communication network, Commun. Phys. 2, 51 (2019).
- E. Shchukin, F. Schmidt, and P. van Loock, Waiting time in quantum repeaters with probabilistic entanglement swapping, Phys. Rev. A 100, 032322 (2019).
- N. Lo Piparo, M. Hanks, K. Nemoto, and W. J. Munro, Aggregating quantum networks, Phys. Rev. A 102, 052613 (2020).
- C. Harney and S. Pirandola, Analytical methods for high-rate global quantum networks, PRX Quantum 3, 010349 (2022).
- C. Harney, A. I. Fletcher, and S. Pirandola, End-to-end capacities of hybrid quantum networks, Phys. Rev. Appl. 18, 014012 (2022).
- N. Lo Piparo, W. J. Munro, and K. Nemoto, Quality of service in aggregated quantum networks, arXiv:2501.18846.
- W Dür and H. J. Briegel, Entanglement purification and quantum error correction, Rep. Prog. Phys. 70, 1381 (2007).
