Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Lower bounding the secret key capacity of bosonic Gaussian channels via optimal Gaussian measurements

Giuseppe Ortolano1,2, Stefano Pirandola3, and Leonardo Banchi1,2

Phys. Rev. A 114, 042464 – Published 28 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/v53z-9gtm

Abstract

We find the maximum rate achievable in the private communication over a bosonic quantum channel with a fully Gaussian protocol based on optimal single-mode Gaussian measurements. This rate establishes a lower bound on the secret rate capacity of the channel. We focus on the class of phase-insensitive Gaussian channels. For the thermal loss and thermal amplification channels, our results demonstrate the optimality, within the constraints of our analysis, of previously proposed protocols, while also providing a significantly simplified formula for their performance evaluation. For the added noise channel, our rate provides a better lower bound than any previously known.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (27)

  1. C. H. Bennett and G. Brassard, Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computers (Systems and Signal Processing, Bangalore, 1984), pp. 175–179.
  2. A. K. Ekert, Quantum cryptography based on Bell's theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 661 (1991).
  3. F. Grosshans and P. Grangier, Continuous variable quantum cryptography using coherent states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 057902 (2002).
  4. F. Grosshans, G. Van Assche, J. Wenger, R. Brouri, N. J. Cerf, and P. Grangier, Quantum key distribution using Gaussian-modulated coherent states, Nature (London) 421, 238 (2003).
  5. N. Gisin, G. Ribordy, W. Tittel, and H. Zbinden, Quantum cryptography, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 145 (2002).
  6. S. Pirandola, U. L. Andersen, L. Banchi, M. Berta, D. Bunandar, R. Colbeck, D. Englund, T. Gehring, C. Lupo, C. Ottaviani, J. L. Pereira, M. Razavi, J. Shamsul Shaari, M. Tomamichel, V. C. Usenko, G. Vallone, P. Villoresi, and P. Wallden, Advances in quantum cryptography, Adv. Opt. Photon. 12, 1012 (2020).
  7. S. L. Braunstein and P. van Loock, Quantum information with continuous variables, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 513 (2005).
  8. C. Weedbrook, S. Pirandola, R. García-Patrón, N. J. Cerf, T. C. Ralph, J. H. Shapiro, and S. Lloyd, Gaussian quantum information, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 621 (2012).
  9. A. Serafini, Quantum Continuous Variables: A Primer of Theoretical Methods, 1st ed. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2017).
  10. S. Pirandola, R. Laurenza, C. Ottaviani, and L. Banchi, Fundamental limits of repeaterless quantum communications, Nature Commun. 8, 15043 (2017).
  11. S. Pirandola, R. García-Patrón, S. L. Braunstein, and S. Lloyd, Direct and reverse secret-key capacities of a quantum channel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 050503 (2009).
  12. B. Schumacher and M. A. Nielsen, Quantum data processing and error correction, Phys. Rev. A 54, 2629 (1996).
  13. S. Lloyd, Capacity of the noisy quantum channel, Phys. Rev. A 55, 1613 (1997).
  14. R. García-Patrón, S. Pirandola, S. Lloyd, and J. H. Shapiro, Reverse coherent information, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 210501 (2009).
  15. V. Vedral, M. B. Plenio, K. Jacobs, and P. L. Knight, Statistical inference, distinguishability of quantum states, and quantum entanglement, Phys. Rev. A 56, 4452 (1997).
  16. V. Vedral and M. B. Plenio, Entanglement measures and purification procedures, Phys. Rev. A 57, 1619 (1998).
  17. M. B. Plenio and V. Vedral, Bounds on relative entropy of entanglement for multi-party systems, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 34, 6997 (2001).
  18. I. Devetak and A. Winter, Distilling common randomness from bipartite quantum states, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 50, 3183 (2004).
  19. S. Pirandola, S. L. Braunstein, and S. Lloyd, Characterization of collective Gaussian attacks and security of coherent-state quantum cryptography, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 200504 (2008).
  20. S. Pirandola, G. Spedalieri, S. L. Braunstein, N. J. Cerf, and S. Lloyd, Optimality of Gaussian discord, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 140405 (2014).
  21. C. Ottaviani, R. Laurenza, T. P. W. Cope, G. Spedalieri, S. L. Braunstein, and S. Pirandola, Secret key capacity of the thermal-loss channel: Improving the lower bound, in SPIE Proceedings (SPIE, Bellingham, 2016), Vol. 9996, p. 999609.
  22. F. A. Mele, L. Lami, and V. Giovannetti, Maximum tolerable excess noise in continuous-variable quantum key distribution and improved lower bound on two-way capacities, Nat. Photon. 19, 329 (2025).
  23. G. Wang, C. Ottaviani, H. Guo, and S. Pirandola, Improving the lower bound to the secret-key capacity of the thermal amplifier channel, Eur. Phys. J. D 73, 17 (2019).
  24. N. J. Cerf, A. Ipe, and X. Rottenberg, Cloning of continuous quantum variables, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1754 (2000).
  25. S. D. Bartlett, B. C. Sanders, S. L. Braunstein, and K. Nemoto, Efficient classical simulation of continuous variable quantum information processes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 097904 (2002).
  26. I. Devetak and A. Winter, Classical data compression with quantum side information, Phys. Rev. A 68, 042301 (2003).
  27. I. Csiszár and J. Körner, Information Theory: Coding Theorems for Discrete Memoryless Systems, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation