Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Bundling of bipartite entanglement

Maike Drieb-Schön1,*, Florian Dreier1,2,†, and Wolfgang Lechner1,2

  • 1Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
  • 2Parity Quantum Computing GmbH, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria

  • *Contact author: maike.schoen@uibk.ac.at
  • †Contact author: f.dreier@parityqc.com

Phys. Rev. A 114, 012401 – Published 1 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/ss6r-ktrr

Abstract

We investigate bipartite entanglement and prove that in constrained energy subspaces, the entanglement spectra of multiple bipartitions are the same across the whole subspace. We show that in quantum many-body systems the bipartite entanglement entropy is affected in such a way that it forms “bundles” under unitary time evolution. Leveraging the structure of the subspace, we present methods to verify whether the entanglement spectrum of two bipartitions is identical throughout the entire subspace. For the subspace defined by the parity embedding, we further provide an algorithm that can determine this in polynomial time.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (38)

  1. G. De Chiara and A. Sanpera, Genuine quantum correlations in quantum many-body systems: A review of recent progress, Rep. Prog. Phys. 81, 074002 (2018).
  2. H. Li and F. D. M. Haldane, Entanglement spectrum as a generalization of entanglement entropy: Identification of topological order in non-Abelian fractional quantum Hall effect states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 010504 (2008).
  3. J. R. Garrison and T. Grover, Does a single eigenstate encode the full Hamiltonian? Phys. Rev. X 8, 021026 (2018).
  4. S. D. Geraedts, R. Nandkishore, and N. Regnault, Many-body localization and thermalization: Insights from the entanglement spectrum, Phys. Rev. B 93, 174202 (2016).
  5. S. D. Geraedts, N. Regnault, and R. M. Nandkishore, Characterizing the many-body localization transition using the entanglement spectrum, New J. Phys. 19, 113021 (2017).
  6. P. Hauke, H. G. Katzgraber, W. Lechner, H. Nishimori, and W. D. Oliver, Perspectives of quantum annealing: Methods and implementations, Rep. Prog. Phys. 83, 054401 (2020).
  7. A. Rajak, S. Suzuki, A. Dutta, and B. K. Chakrabarti, Quantum annealing: An overview, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 381, 20210417 (2023).
  8. E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, S. Gutmann, and M. Sipser, Quantum computation by adiabatic evolution, arXiv:quant-ph/0001106.
  9. M. Cerezo, A. Arrasmith, R. Babbush, S. C. Benjamin, S. Endo, K. Fujii, J. R. McClean, K. Mitarai, X. Yuan, L. Cincio, and P. J. Coles, Variational quantum algorithms, Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 625 (2021).
  10. R. Orús and J. I. Latorre, Universality of entanglement and quantum-computation complexity, Phys. Rev. A 69, 052308 (2004).
  11. T. Lanting, A. J. Przybysz, A. Y. Smirnov, F. M. Spedalieri, M. H. Amin, A. J. Berkley, R. Harris, F. Altomare, S. Boixo, P. Bunyk, N. Dickson, C. Enderud, J. P. Hilton, E. Hoskinson, M. W. Johnson, E. Ladizinsky, N. Ladizinsky, R. Neufeld, T. Oh, I. Perminov, et al., Entanglement in a quantum annealing processor, Phys. Rev. X 4, 021041 (2014).
  12. P. Hauke, L. Bonnes, M. Heyl, and W. Lechner, Probing entanglement in adiabatic quantum optimization with trapped ions, Front. Phys. 3 (2015).
  13. F. Arute, K. Arya, R. Babbush, D. Bacon, J. C. Bardin, R. Barends, R. Biswas, S. Boixo, F. G. Brandao, D. A. Buell, et al., Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor, Nature (London) 574, 505 (2019).
  14. H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. Keesling, H. Levine, A. Omran, H. Pichler, S. Choi, A. S. Zibrov, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator, Nature (London) 551, 579 (2017).
  15. J. Koch, T. M. Yu, J. Gambetta, A. A. Houck, D. I. Schuster, J. Majer, A. Blais, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box, Phys. Rev. A 76, 042319 (2007).
  16. M. Saffman, T. G. Walker, and K. Mølmer, Quantum information with Rydberg atoms, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2313 (2010).
  17. L. Henriet, L. Beguin, A. Signoles, T. Lahaye, A. Browaeys, G.-O. Reymond, and C. Jurczak, Quantum computing with neutral atoms, Quantum 4, 327 (2020).
  18. I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and W. Zwerger, Many-body physics with ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 885 (2008).
  19. T. Vyskocil and H. Djidjev, Embedding equality constraints of optimization problems into a quantum annealer, Algorithms 12, 77 (2019).
  20. I. Hen and F. M. Spedalieri, Quantum annealing for constrained optimization, Phys. Rev. Appl. 5, 034007 (2016).
  21. I. Hen and M. S. Sarandy, Driver Hamiltonians for constrained optimization in quantum annealing, Phys. Rev. A 93, 062312 (2016).
  22. M. Drieb-Schön, K. Ender, Y. Javanmard, and W. Lechner, Parity quantum optimization: Encoding constraints, Quantum 7, 951 (2023).
  23. K. Binder and A. P. Young, Spin glasses: Experimental facts, theoretical concepts, and open questions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 801 (1986).
  24. B. K. Chakrabarti, J.-i. Inoue, R. Tamura, and S. Tanaka, Quantum Spin Glasses, Annealing and Computation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2017).
  25. R. D. Somma, D. Nagaj, and M. Kieferová, Quantum speedup by quantum annealing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 050501 (2012).
  26. A. K. Pati and S. L. Braunstein, Role of entanglement in quantum computation, J. Indian Inst. Sci. 89, 295 (2009).
  27. R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and K. Horodecki, Quantum entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865 (2009).
  28. G. Vidal and R. F. Werner, Computable measure of entanglement, Phys. Rev. A 65, 032314 (2002).
  29. P. Calabrese and A. Lefevre, Entanglement spectrum in one-dimensional systems, Phys. Rev. A 78, 032329 (2008).
  30. F. Pollmann and J. E. Moore, Entanglement spectra of critical and near-critical systems in one dimension, New J. Phys. 12, 025006 (2010).
  31. H. Pichler, G. Zhu, A. Seif, P. Zoller, and M. Hafezi, Measurement protocol for the entanglement spectrum of cold atoms, Phys. Rev. X 6, 041033 (2016).
  32. J. I. Cirac, D. Poilblanc, N. Schuch, and F. Verstraete, Entanglement spectrum and boundary theories with projected entangled-pair states, Phys. Rev. B 83, 245134 (2011).
  33. N. Schuch, D. Poilblanc, J. I. Cirac, and D. Pérez-García, Topological order in the projected entangled-pair states formalism: Transfer operator and boundary Hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 090501 (2013).
  34. K. Ender, R. ter Hoeven, B. E. Niehoff, M. Drieb-Schön, and W. Lechner, Parity quantum optimization: Compiler, Quantum 7, 950 (2023).
  35. W. Lechner, P. Hauke, and P. Zoller, A quantum annealing architecture with all-to-all connectivity from local interactions, Sci. Adv. 1, e1500838 (2015).
  36. V. Choi, Minor-embedding in adiabatic quantum computation: I. The parameter setting problem, Quantum Info. Proc. 7, 193 (2008).
  37. F. Dreier and W. Lechner, On the uniqueness of compiling graphs under the parity transformation, J. Math. Phys. 67, 022201 (2026).
  38. J. Johansson, P. Nation, and F. Nori, Qutip 2: A Python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 1234 (2013).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation