- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review A

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

General quantum resources providing advantages in work-extraction tasks

Chung-Yun Hsieh1,* and Manuel Gessner2,†

  • *Contact author: chung-yun.hsieh@bristol.ac.uk
  • †Contact author: manuel.gessner@uv.es
PDF

Phys. Rev. A 114, 022456 – Published 25 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/p5mg-s3dw

Abstract

In developing quantum science and technologies, it is essential to demonstrate so-called quantum advantages, which are performances that can be achieved only with the assistance of quantum resources. Most of the time, different quantum features lead to different advantages. Interestingly, there are certain classes of tasks where quantum advantages are achievable by general quantum resources. This work reports such a class of tasks in thermodynamics—we provide a work-extraction task that certifies general quantum resources of both states and channels, suggesting general quantum effects can provide nonclassical advantages in work extraction. We also show that such work-extraction tasks can be applied to certify quantum entanglement in a one-sided device-independent way. As an application, we report a novel type of anomalous energy flow—a type of locally extractable energy that is attributed to the globally distributed entanglement. Finally, we show that the existence of this novel anomalous energy flow is equivalent to measurement incompatibility.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

See Also

Complete Characterization of State Conversions by Work Extraction

Chung-Yun Hsieh and Manuel Gessner
Phys. Rev. Lett. 137, 070403 (2026)

Article Text

References (116)

  1. K. Kuroiwa, R. Takagi, G. Adesso, and H. Yamasaki, Every quantum helps: Operational advantage of quantum resources beyond convexity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 150201 (2024).
  2. K. Kuroiwa, R. Takagi, G. Adesso, and H. Yamasaki, Robustness- and weight-based resource measures without convexity restriction: Multicopy witness and operational advantage in static and dynamical quantum resource theories, Phys. Rev. A 109, 042403 (2024).
  3. F. Meier and H. Yamasaki, Energy-consumption advantage of quantum computation, PRX Energy 4, 023008 (2025).
  4. C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, C. Crépeau, R. Jozsa, A. Peres, and W. K. Wootters, Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895 (1993).
  5. C. H. Bennett and S. J. Wiesner, Communication via one- and two-particle operators on Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2881 (1992).
  6. L. Pezzé and A. Smerzi, Entanglement, nonlinear dynamics, and the Heisenberg limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 100401 (2009).
  7. L. Pezzè, A. Smerzi, M. K. Oberthaler, R. Schmied, and P. Treutlein, Quantum metrology with nonclassical states of atomic ensembles, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 035005 (2018).
  8. Z. Ren, W. Li, A. Smerzi, and M. Gessner, Metrological detection of multipartite entanglement from Young diagrams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 080502 (2021).
  9. R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and K. Horodecki, Quantum entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865 (2009).
  10. N. Brunner, D. Cavalcanti, S. Pironio, V. Scarani, and S. Wehner, Bell nonlocality, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 419 (2014).
  11. A. Acín, N. Brunner, N. Gisin, S. Massar, S. Pironio, and V. Scarani, Device-independent security of quantum cryptography against collective attacks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 230501 (2007).
  12. R. Uola, A. C. S. Costa, H. C. Nguyen, and O. Gühne, Quantum steering, Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 015001 (2020).
  13. D. Cavalcanti and P. Skrzypczyk, Quantum steering: A review with focus on semidefinite programming, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 024001 (2017).
  14. C. Branciard, E. G. Cavalcanti, S. P. Walborn, V. Scarani, and H. M. Wiseman, One-sided device-independent quantum key distribution: Security, feasibility, and the connection with steering, Phys. Rev. A 85, 010301(R) (2012).
  15. H.-Y. Ku, C.-Y. Hsieh, S.-L. Chen, Y.-N. Chen, and C. Budroni, Complete classification of steerability under local filters and its relation with measurement incompatibility, Nat. Commun. 13, 4973 (2022).
  16. C.-Y. Hsieh, H.-Y. Ku, and C. Budroni, Characterisation and fundamental limitations of irreversible stochastic steering distillation, arXiv:2309.06191.
  17. O. Gühne, E. Haapasalo, T. Kraft, J.-P. Pellonpää, and R. Uola, Colloquium: Incompatible measurements in quantum information science, Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 011003 (2023).
  18. H.-Y. Ku, C.-Y Hsieh, C. Budroni, No-go theorems on probabilistically enhancing measurement incompatibility's advantages, npj Quantum Inf. (2026), doi: 10.1038/s41534-026-01270-7.
  19. C.-Y. Hsieh, R. Uola, and P. Skrzypczyk, Quantum complementarity: A novel resource for unambiguous exclusion and encryption, arXiv:2309.11968.
  20. D. Rosset, F. Buscemi, and Y.-C. Liang, Resource theory of quantum memories and their faithful verification with minimal assumptions, Phys. Rev. X 8, 021033 (2018).
  21. X. Yuan, Y. Liu, Q. Zhao, B. Regula, J. Thompson, and M. Gu, Universal and operational benchmarking of quantum memories, npj Quantum Inf. 7, 108 (2021).
  22. H.-Y. Ku, J. Kadlec, A. Černoch, M. T. Quintino, W. Zhou, K. Lemr, N. Lambert, A. Miranowicz, S.-L. Chen, F. Nori, and Y.-N. Chen, Quantifying quantumness of channels without entanglement, PRX Quantum 3, 020338 (2022).
  23. L. B. Vieira, H.-Y. Ku, and C. Budroni, Entanglement-breaking channels are a quantum memory resource, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 043281 (2025).
  24. P. Abiuso, Verification of continuous-variable quantum memories, Quantum Sci. Technol. 9, 01LT02 (2024).
  25. V. Narasimhachar, J. Thompson, J. Ma, G. Gour, and M. Gu, Quantifying memory capacity as a quantum thermodynamic resource, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 060601 (2019).
  26. C.-Y. Hsieh, B. Stratton, C.-H. Wu, and H.-Y. Ku, Dynamical resource theory of incompatibility preservability, Phys. Rev. A 111, 022422 (2025).
  27. R. Takagi, K. Wang, and M. Hayashi, Application of the resource theory of channels to communication scenarios, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 120502 (2020).
  28. C.-Y. Hsieh, Communication, dynamical resource theory, and thermodynamics, PRX Quantum 2, 020318 (2021).
  29. C.-Y. Hsieh, Dynamical Landauer principle: Quantifying information transmission by thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 050404 (2025).
  30. C.-Y. Hsieh, Dynamical Landauer principle: Thermodynamic criteria of transmitting classical information, Phys. Rev. A 111, 022207 (2025).
  31. C.-Y. Hsieh, Resource preservability, Quantum 4, 244 (2020).
  32. Z.-W. Liu and A. Winter, Resource theories of quantum channels and the universal role of resource erasure, arXiv:1904.04201.
  33. Y. Liu and X. Yuan, Operational resource theory of quantum channels, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 012035(R) (2020).
  34. C.-Y. Hsieh, M. Lostaglio, and A. Acín, Entanglement preserving local thermalization, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013379 (2020).
  35. A. Streltsov, U. Singh, H. S. Dhar, M. N. Bera, and G. Adesso, Measuring quantum coherence with entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 020403 (2015).
  36. B. Stratton, C.-Y. Hsieh, and P. Skrzypczyk, Dynamical resource theory of informational nonequilibrium preservability, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 110202 (2024).
  37. E. Chitambar and G. Gour, Quantum resource theories, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 025001 (2019).
  38. C.-Y. Hsieh and M. Gessner, companion paper, Complete characterization of state conversions by work extraction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 137, 070403 (2026).
  39. M. Piani and J. Watrous, All entangled states are useful for channel discrimination, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 250501 (2009).
  40. R. Takagi, B. Regula, K. Bu, Z.-W. Liu, and G. Adesso, Operational advantage of quantum resources in subchannel discrimination, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 140402 (2019).
  41. P. Skrzypczyk and N. Linden, Robustness of measurement, discrimination games, and accessible information, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 140403 (2019).
  42. J. Bae, D. Chruściński, and M. Piani, More entanglement implies higher performance in channel discrimination tasks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 140404 (2019).
  43. R. Takagi and B. Regula, General resource theories in quantum mechanics and beyond: Operational characterization via discrimination tasks, Phys. Rev. X 9, 031053 (2019).
  44. P. Skrzypczyk, I. Šupić, and D. Cavalcanti, All sets of incompatible measurements give an advantage in quantum state discrimination, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 130403 (2019).
  45. C.-Y. Hsieh, G. N. M. Tabia, Y.-C. Yin, and Y.-C. Liang, Resource marginal problems, Quantum 8, 1353 (2024).
  46. C.-Y. Hsieh, M. Lostaglio, and A. Acín, Quantum channel marginal problem, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 013249 (2022).
  47. A. F. Ducuara and P. Skrzypczyk, Operational interpretation of weight-based resource quantifiers in convex quantum resource theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 110401 (2020).
  48. R. Uola, T. Bullock, T. Kraft, J.-P. Pellonpää, and N. Brunner, All quantum resources provide an advantage in exclusion tasks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 110402 (2020).
  49. K. C. Tan, V. Narasimhachar, and B. Regula, Fisher information universally identifies quantum resources, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 200402 (2021).
  50. R. Uola, T. Kraft, and A. A. Abbott, Quantification of quantum dynamics with input-output games, Phys. Rev. A 101, 052306 (2020).
  51. D. Rosset, D. Schmid, and F. Buscemi, Type-independent characterization of spacelike separated resources, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 210402 (2020).
  52. R. Kosloff and T. Feldmann, Discrete four-stroke quantum heat engine exploring the origin of friction, Phys. Rev. E 65, 055102(R) (2002).
  53. T. Feldmann and R. Kosloff, Quantum lubrication: Suppression of friction in a first-principles four-stroke heat engine, Phys. Rev. E 73, 025107(R) (2006).
  54. W. Ji, Z. Chai, M. Wang, Y. Guo, X. Rong, F. Shi, C. Ren, Y. Wang, and J. Du, Spin quantum heat engine quantified by quantum steering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 090602 (2022).
  55. K. Beyer, K. Luoma, and W. T. Strunz, Steering heat engines: A truly quantum Maxwell demon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 250606 (2019).
  56. F.-J. Chan, Y.-T. Huang, J.-D. Lin, H.-Y. Ku, J.-S. Chen, H.-B. Chen, and Y.-N. Chen, Maxwell's two-demon engine under pure dephasing noise, Phys. Rev. A 106, 052201 (2022).
  57. T. Biswas, C. Datta, and L. P. García-Pintos, Quantum thermodynamic advantage in work extraction from steerable quantum correlations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 110402 (2025).
  58. C.-Y. Hsieh and S.-L. Chen, Thermodynamic approach to quantifying incompatible instruments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 170401 (2024).
  59. M. Lostaglio, D. Jennings, and T. Rudolph, Thermodynamic resource theories, non-commutativity and maximum entropy principles, New J. Phys. 19, 043008 (2017).
  60. S. Majidy, W. F. Braasch, A. Lasek, T. Upadhyaya, A. Kalev, and N. Yunger Halpern, Noncommuting conserved charges in quantum thermodynamics and beyond, Nat. Rev. Phys. 5, 689 (2023).
  61. N. Yunger Halpern, P. Faist, J. Oppenheim, and A. Winter, Microcanonical and resource-theoretic derivations of the thermal state of a quantum system with noncommuting charges, Nat. Commun. 7, 12051 (2016).
  62. Y. Guryanova, S. Popescu, A. J. Short, R. Silva, and P. Skrzypczyk, Thermodynamics of quantum systems with multiple conserved quantities, Nat. Commun. 7, 12049 (2016).
  63. M. Lostaglio, Certifying quantum signatures in thermodynamics and metrology via contextuality of quantum linear response, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 230603 (2020).
  64. A. Levy and M. Lostaglio, Quasiprobability distribution for heat fluctuations in the quantum regime, PRX Quantum 1, 010309 (2020).
  65. S. Puliyil, M. Banik, and M. Alimuddin, Thermodynamic signatures of genuinely multipartite entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 070601 (2022).
  66. T. Upadhyaya, W. F. Braasch, G. T. Landi, and N. Y. Halpern, Non-Abelian transport distinguishes three usually equivalent notions of entropy production, PRX Quantum 5, 030355 (2024).
  67. F. Centrone and M. Gessner, Breaking local quantum speed limits with steering, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, L042067 (2024).
  68. P. Lipka-Bartosik, G. F. Diotallevi, and P. Bakhshinezhad, Fundamental limits on anomalous energy flows in correlated quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 140402 (2024).
  69. M. Perarnau-Llobet, K. V. Hovhannisyan, M. Huber, P. Skrzypczyk, N. Brunner, and A. Acín, Extractable work from correlations, Phys. Rev. X 5, 041011 (2015).
  70. D. Jennings and T. Rudolph, Entanglement and the thermodynamic arrow of time, Phys. Rev. E 81, 061130 (2010).
  71. L. d. Rio, J. Åberg, R. Renner, O. Dahlsten, and V. Vedral, The thermodynamic meaning of negative entropy, Nature (London) 474, 61 (2011).
  72. P. Skrzypczyk, A. J. Short, and S. Popescu, Work extraction and thermodynamics for individual quantum systems, Nat. Commun. 5, 4185 (2014).
  73. N. Shiraishi and R. Takagi, Arbitrary amplification of quantum coherence in asymptotic and catalytic transformation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 180202 (2024).
  74. K. Korzekwa, M. Lostaglio, J. Oppenheim, and D. Jennings, The extraction of work from quantum coherence, New J. Phys. 18, 023045 (2016).
  75. A. de Oliveira Junior, J. B. Brask, and P. Lipka-Bartosik, Heat as a witness of quantum properties, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 050401 (2025).
  76. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?, Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).
  77. E. Schrödinger, Discussion of probability relations between separated systems, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 31, 555 (1935).
  78. E. Schrödinger, Probability relations between separated systems, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 32, 446 (1936).
  79. H. M. Wiseman, S. J. Jones, and A. C. Doherty, Steering, entanglement, nonlocality, and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 140402 (2007).
  80. S. J. Jones, H. M. Wiseman, and A. C. Doherty, Entanglement, Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations, Bell nonlocality, and steering, Phys. Rev. A 76, 052116 (2007).
  81. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, 10th anniversary ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010).
  82. G. N. M. Tabia, C.-Y. Hsieh, and M.-H. Hsieh, Bell nonlocality from compatibility of entanglement-breaking channels, arXiv:2410.13499.
  83. M. Horodecki, P. W. Shor, and M. B. Ruskai, Entanglement breaking channels, Rev. Math. Phys. 15, 629 (2003).
  84. E. Haapasalo, T. Heinosaari, and J.-P. Pellonpää, When do pieces determine the whole? Extreme marginals of a completely positive map, Rev. Math. Phys. 26, 1450002 (2014).
  85. M. Girard, M. Plávala, and J. Sikora, Jordan products of quantum channels and their compatibility, Nat. Commun. 12, 2129 (2021).
  86. P. D. Johnson and L. Viola, On state versus channel quantum extension problems: Exact results for U⊗U⊗U symmetry, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 48, 035307 (2015).
  87. E. Haapasalo, T. Kraft, N. Miklin, and R. Uola, Quantum marginal problem and incompatibility, Quantum 5, 476 (2021).
  88. E. Haapasalo, Robustness of incompatibility for quantum devices, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 48, 255303 (2015).
  89. C. Carmeli, T. Heinosaari, and A. Toigo, Quantum incompatibility witnesses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 130402 (2019).
  90. C. Carmeli, T. Heinosaari, T. Miyadera, and A. Toigo, Witnessing incompatibility of quantum channels, J. Math. Phys. 60, 122202 (2019).
  91. G. N. M. Tabia, K.-S. Chen, C.-Y. Hsieh, Y.-C. Yin, and Y.-C. Liang, Entanglement transitivity problems, npj Quantum Inf. 8, 98 (2022).
  92. K.-S. Chen, G. N. M. Tabia, C.-Y. Hsieh, Y.-C. Yin, and Y.-C. Liang, Nonlocality of quantum states can be transitive, npj Quantum Inf. 12, 37 (2026).
  93. M.-E. Liu, K.-S. Chen, C.-Y. Hsieh, G. N. M. Tabia, and Y.-C. Liang, Large parts are generically entangled across all cuts, Quantum Sci. Technol. 11, 015036 (2026).
  94. J. Watrous, The Theory of Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2018).
  95. F. G. S. L. Brandão, M. Horodecki, J. Oppenheim, J. M. Renes, and R. W. Spekkens, Resource theory of quantum states out of thermal equilibrium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 250404 (2013).
  96. H. Umegaki, Conditional expectation in an operator algebra, IV (Entropy and information), Kodai Math. Semin. Rep. 14, 59 (1962).
  97. J. Oppenheim, M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Thermodynamical approach to quantifying quantum correlations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 180402 (2002).
  98. M. Alimuddin, T. Guha, and P. Parashar, Independence of work and entropy for equal-energetic finite quantum systems: Passive-state energy as an entanglement quantifier, Phys. Rev. E 102, 012145 (2020).
  99. M. Alimuddin, T. Guha, and P. Parashar, Bound on ergotropic gap for bipartite separable states, Phys. Rev. A 99, 052320 (2019).
  100. J. A. Vaccaro, F. Anselmi, H. M. Wiseman, and K. Jacobs, Tradeoff between extractable mechanical work, accessible entanglement, and ability to act as a reference system, under arbitrary superselection rules, Phys. Rev. A 77, 032114 (2008).
  101. H. Kwon, H. Jeong, D. Jennings, B. Yadin, and M. S. Kim, Clock–work trade-off relation for coherence in quantum thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 150602 (2018).
  102. C.-Y. Hsieh, A. Tavakoli, H.-Y. Ku, and P. Skrzypczyk, Resource theory of interactive quantum instruments, Phys. Rev. A 113, 062445 (2026).
  103. M. F. Pusey, Negativity and steering: A stronger Peres conjecture, Phys. Rev. A 88, 032313 (2013).
  104. M. Piani and J. Watrous, Necessary and sufficient quantum information characterization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 060404 (2015).
  105. R. Gallego and L. Aolita, Resource theory of steering, Phys. Rev. X 5, 041008 (2015).
  106. M. D. Reid, Demonstration of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox using nondegenerate parametric amplification, Phys. Rev. A 40, 913 (1989).
  107. B. Yadin, M. Fadel, and M. Gessner, Metrological complementarity reveals the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox, Nat. Commun. 12, 2410 (2021).
  108. C.-Y. Hsieh, Y.-C. Liang, and R.-K. Lee, Quantum steerability: Characterization, quantification, superactivation, and unbounded amplification, Phys. Rev. A 94, 062120 (2016).
  109. M. T. Quintino, N. Brunner, and M. Huber, Superactivation of quantum steering, Phys. Rev. A 94, 062123 (2016).
  110. R. Uola, T. Kraft, J. Shang, X.-D. Yu, and O. Gühne, Quantifying quantum resources with conic programming, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 130404 (2019).
  111. J. Mori, Operational characterization of incompatibility of quantum channels with quantum state discrimination, Phys. Rev. A 101, 032331 (2020).
  112. C.-Y. Hsieh and M. Gessner, Uncertainty principle's advantages in work extraction (in preparation).
  113. B. Regula, Probabilistic transformations of quantum resources, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 110505 (2022).
  114. B. Regula, Tight constraints on probabilistic convertibility of quantum states, Quantum 6, 817 (2022).
  115. G. Gour, M. P. Müller, V. Narasimhachar, R. W. Spekkens, and N. Yunger Halpern, The resource theory of informational nonequilibrium in thermodynamics, Phys. Rep. 583, 1 (2015).
  116. C.-Y. Hsieh, B. Stratton, H.-C. Weng, and V. Scarani, Informational nonequilibrium concentration, Phys. Rev. A 111, 052423 (2025).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. A 114, 022456– Published 25 August, 2026
  • Received 9 March 2026
  • Accepted 13 July 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation