Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Efimov spectrum in the Born-Oppenheimer picture of a 2+1 system with zero-range heavy-light interactions

Hamidreza Saberbaghi*

  • *Contact author: hamidreza.saberbaghi@uninsubria.it

Phys. Rev. A 113, 063320 – Published 22 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/kxd7-t5rc

Abstract

We study the Born–Oppenheimer approximation of a mass-imbalanced three-body system made of two heavy particles of mass M and one light particle of mass m for arbitrary angular momentum. In this system, heavy-light pairs interact via a zero-range force. We construct the light-particle Hamiltonian using self-adjoint extensions of the two-center point interaction and show that the corresponding effective potential is regular at the coincidence point of the heavy particles. Consequently, this model presents an alternative method to finite-range, cutoff, or short-distance heavy-heavy regularizations: the necessary three-body input is encoded in the self-adjoint realization of the light-particle Hamiltonian, while the heavy-light interactions remain point-like. In the unitary limit, after fixing the characteristic length scale, we derive an explicit Efimov spectrum. Our results recover the zero-angular-momentum case of [J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 57, 055303 (2024)] and provide a sufficient condition ensuring the absence of non-Efimov bound states. Away from unitarity, we show that the spatial size of the shallowest trimer near the threshold is approximately 2.8 times the heavy-light scattering length, in contrast with the common assumption that these two length scales coincide. We also derive a Bargmann-type bound on the number of three-body bound states and obtain an estimate sharper than previous results. Finally, we illustrate the method with numerical results for selected alkali mixtures.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (71)

  1. V. Efimov, Energy levels arising from resonant two-body forces in a three-body system, Phys. Lett. B 33, 563 (1970).
  2. V. Efimov, Energy levels of three resonantly interacting particles, Nucl. Phys. A 210, 157 (1973).
  3. S. K Tung, K. Jiménez-García, J. Johansen, C. V. Parker, and C. Chin, Geometric scaling of Efimov states in a Li6–Cs133 mixture, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 240402 (2014).
  4. R. Pires, J. Ulmanis, S. Häfner, M. Repp, A. Arias, E. D. Kuhnle, and M. Weidemüller, Observation of Efimov resonances in a mixture with extreme mass imbalance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 250404 (2014).
  5. E. Kolganova, A. Motovilov, and W. Sandhas, The He4 trimer as an Efimov system: Latest developments, Few-Body Syst. 58, 35 (2017).
  6. C. Chin, R. Grimm, P. Julienne, and E. Tiesinga, Feshbach resonances in ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1225 (2010).
  7. F. Schäfer, Y. Haruna, and Y. Takahashi, Observation of Feshbach Resonances in an Er167−Li6 Fermi–Fermi Mixture, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 92, 054301 (2023).
  8. J. Kalia, J. Rivera, R. R. Emran, W. J. S. Hernandez, K. Kwon, and R. J. Fletcher, Creation of a degenerate Bose-Bose mixture of erbium and lithium atoms, Phys. Rev. A 113, 013321 (2026).
  9. K. Xie, X. Li, Y.-Y. Zhou, J.-H. Luo, S. Wang, Y.-Z. Nie, H.-C. Shen, Y.-A. Chen, X.-C. Yao, and J.-W. Pan, Feshbach spectroscopy of ultracold mixtures of Li6 and Dy164 atoms, Phys. Rev. A 111, 023327 (2025).
  10. E. Braaten and H.-W. Hammer, Universality in few-body systems with large scattering length, Phys. Rep. 428, 259 (2006).
  11. E. Fermi, Sul moto dei neutroni nelle sostanze idrogenate, Ric. Sci. 7, 13 (1936).
  12. G. Breit, The scattering of slow neutrons by bound protons. I. Methods of calculation, Phys. Rev. 71, 215 (1947).
  13. H. Bethe and R. Peierls, Quantum theory of the diplon, Proc. A 148, 146 (1935).
  14. L. H. Thomas, The interaction between a neutron and a proton and the structure of H3, Phys. Rev. 47, 903 (1935).
  15. R. A. Minlos and L. D. Faddeev, On the point interaction for a three-particle system in quantum mechanics, Soviet Phys. Dokl. 6, 1072 (1962).
  16. R. A. Minlos and L. D. Faddeev, Comment on the problem of three particles with point interactions, Sov. Phys. JETP 14, 1315 (1962).
  17. G. V. Skorniakov and K. A. Ter-Martirosian, Three body problem for short range forces. I. Scattering of low energy neutrons by deuterons, Sov. Phys. JETP 4, 648 (1957).
  18. G. S. Danilov, On the three-body problem in the case of short-range forces, Sov. Phys. JETP 13 (1961).
  19. G. Basti, C. Cacciapuoti, D. Finco, and A. Teta, Three-body Hamiltonian with regularized zero-range interactions in dimension three, Ann. Henri Poincaré 24, 223 (2023).
  20. M. Gallone and A. Michelangeli, Self-adjoint Extension Schemes and Modern Applications to Quantum Hamiltonians (Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Cham, 2022).
  21. D. Ferretti and A. Teta, Some remarks on the regularized Hamiltonian for three bosons with contact interactions, in Quantum Mathematics I (Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, 2023), p. 229.
  22. D. Ferretti and A. Teta, Hamiltonian for a Bose gas with contact interactions, Rev. Math. Phys. 38, 2550020 (2026).
  23. D. Ferretti and A. Teta, Hamiltonians for quantum systems with contact interactions, in Operator Theory, edited by D. Alpay, I. Sabadini, and F. Colombo (Springer Basel, Basel, 2024), p. 1.
  24. V. F. Kharchenko, Solution of the Skornyov-Ter-Martirosyan equations for three nucleons with cut off at large momenta., Yadern. Fiz. 16, 310 (1972).
  25. P. Naidon and S. Endo, Efimov physics: A review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 056001 (2017).
  26. D. Fermi, D. Ferretti, and A. Teta, Rigorous derivation of the Efimov effect in a simple model, Lett. Math. Phys. 113, 113 (2023).
  27. J. Wang, J. P. D'Incao, B. D. Esry, and C. H. Greene, Origin of the three-body parameter universality in Efimov physics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 263001 (2012).
  28. P. Naidon, S. Endo, and M. Ueda, Physical origin of the universal three-body parameter in atomic Efimov physics, Phys. Rev. A 90, 022106 (2014).
  29. Y. Wang, J. Wang, J. P. D'Incao, and C. H. Greene, Universal three-body parameter in heteronuclear atomic systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 243201 (2012).
  30. S. Albeverio, F. Gesztesy, R. Høegh-Krohn, and H. Holden, Solvable Models in Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed. (AMS Chelsea Publishing, Providence, 2005).
  31. R. M. Corless, G. H. Gonnet, D. E. G. Hare, D. J. Jeffrey, and D. E. Knuth, On the Lambert-W function, Adv. Comput. Math. 5, 329 (1996).
  32. K. Oi, P. Naidon, and S. Endo, Universality of Efimov states in highly mass-imbalanced cold-atom mixtures with van der Waals and dipole interactions, Phys. Rev. A 110, 033305 (2024).
  33. K. Oi and S. Endo, Universal Efimov spectra and fermionic doublets in highly mass-imbalanced cold-atom mixtures with van der Waals and dipole interactions, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 033236 (2025).
  34. A. Fonseca, E. Redish, and P. Shanley, Efimov effect in an analytically solvable model, Nucl. Phys. A 320, 273 (1979).
  35. Y. Yamaguchi, Two-nucleon problem when the potential is nonlocal but separable. I, Phys. Rev. 95, 1628 (1954).
  36. F. Loran and A. Mostafazadeh, Renormalization of multi-delta-function point scatterers in two and three dimensions, the coincidence-limit problem, and its resolution, Ann. Phys. (NY) 443, 168966 (2022).
  37. R. Figari, H. Saberbaghi, and A. Teta, On a family of finitely many point interaction Hamiltonians free of ultraviolet pathologies, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 57, 055303 (2024).
  38. S. Albeverio, S. Fassari, and F. Rinaldi, The behaviour of the three-dimensional Hamiltonian −Δ+λ[δ(x+x0)+δ(x−x0)] as the distance between the two centres vanishes, Nanosyst.: Phys. Chem. Math. 8, 153 (2017).
  39. L. Dabrowski and H. Grosse, On nonlocal point interactions in one, two, and three dimensions, J. Math. Phys. 26, 2777 (1985).
  40. H. Saberbaghi, On a family of finitely many point interactions Hamiltonians free of ultraviolet pathologies in two and three dimensions, Gran Sasso Science Institute (2025), https://iris.gssi.it/retrieve/e6e1017d-1ee2-455a-92b6-79d3713d38ef/2025_PhD_Thesis_Saberbaghi.pdf.
  41. M. Correggi, G. Dell'Antonio, D. Finco, A. Michelangeli, and A. Teta, Stability for a system of N fermions plus a different particle with zero-range interactions, Rev. Math. Phys. 24, 1250017 (2012).
  42. S. Becker, A. Michelangeli, and A. Ottolini, Spectral analysis of the 2+1 fermionic trimer with contact interactions, Math. Phys. Anal. Geom. 21, 35 (2018).
  43. M. C. Reed and B. Simon, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics, Vol. II: Fourier Analysis, Self-Adjointness (Academic Press, New York, 1975).
  44. B. Simon, Semiclassical analysis of low lying eigenvalues. I. Non-degenerate minima: Asymptotic expansions, Ann. I.H.P. Phys. Théor. 38, 295 (1983).
  45. G. Flamand, Applications of mathematics to problems in theoretical physics, Cargèse Lectures in Theoretical Physics, edited by F. Lurçat (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1967), p. 247.
  46. T. Jecko, On the mathematical treatment of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation, J. Math. Phys. 55, 053504 (2014).
  47. A. Fonseca and P. Shanley, Model three-body problem in the molecular mass limit, Ann. Phys. (NY) 117, 268 (1979).
  48. M. A. Efremov, L. Plimak, B. Berg, M. Y. Ivanov, and W. P. Schleich, Efimov states in atom-molecule collisions, Phys. Rev. A 80, 022714 (2009).
  49. D. S. Rosa, T. Frederico, G. Krein, and M. T. Yamashita, Efimov effect in a D-dimensional Born–Oppenheimer approach, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 52, 025101 (2019).
  50. G. Teschl, Mathematical Methods in Quantum Mechanics, Graduate Studies in Mathematics (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2009), Vol. 99.
  51. M. C. Reed and B. Simon, Functional Analysis, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics (Academic Press, New York, 1972), Vol. 1.
  52. G. Basti, D. Ferretti, and A. Teta, A zero-range model for the Efimov effect in the Born–Oppenheimer approximation, Complex Anal. Oper. Theory 20, 110 (2026).
  53. M. C. Reed and B. Simon, Analysis of Operators, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics (Academic Press, New York, 1978), Vol. 4.
  54. M. C. Reed and B. Simon, Scattering Theory, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics (Academic Press, New York, 1979), Vol. 3.
  55. M. Schechter, Operator Methods in Quantum Mechanics (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1981).
  56. G. Basti and A. Teta, Efimov effect for a three-particle system with two identical fermions, Ann. Henri Poincaré 18, 3975 (2017).
  57. D. R. Anderson, M. Onitsuka, and D. O'Regan, Best Ulam constants for damped linear oscillators with variable coefficients, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 543, 128908 (2025).
  58. L. Cădariu, D. Popa, and I. Raşa, Ulam stability of a second linear differential operator with nonconstant coefficients, Symmetry 12, 1451 (2020).
  59. H. Nägerl, T. Kraemer, M. Mark, P. Waldburger, J. G. Danzl, B. Engeser, A. D. Lange, K. Pilch, A. Jaakkola, C. Chin, and R. Grimm, Experimental evidence for Efimov quantum states, AIP Conf. Proc. 869, 269 (2006).
  60. S. Fisher, O. Ogunnaike, and L. Levitov, Three-body bound states of quantum particles: Higher stability through braiding, Phys. Rev. A 109, 043323 (2024).
  61. M. Abramovitz and I. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions: With Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables (Dover, New York, 1965).
  62. T. Prohaska, J. Irrgeher, J. Benefield, J. K. Böhlke, L. A. Chesson, T. B. Coplen, T. Ding, P. J. H. Dunn, M. Gröning, N. E. Holden, H. A. J. Meijer, H. Moossen, A. Possolo, Y. Takahashi, J. Vogl, T. Walczyk, J. Wang, M. E. Wieser, S. Yoneda, X. Zhu, et al., Standard atomic weights of the elements 2021 (IUPAC technical report), Pure Appl. Chem. 94, 573 (2022).
  63. M. Wang, G. Audi, A. Wapstra, F. Kondev, M. MacCormick, X. Xu, and B. Pfeiffer, The Ame2012 atomic mass evaluation, Chin. Phys. C 36, 1603 (2012).
  64. M. Berglund and M. E. Wieser, Isotopic compositions of the elements 2009 (IUPAC technical report), Pure Appl. Chem. 83, 397 (2010).
  65. V. Duchêne and N. Raymond, Spectral asymptotics of a broken δ-interaction, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 47, 155203 (2014).
  66. C. Cacciapuoti, A. Posilicano, and H. Saberbaghi, The Born–Oppenheimer approximation for a 1D 2 + 1 particle system with zero-range interactions, J. Math. Phys. 67, 053503 (2026).
  67. D. Krejčiřík, N. Raymond, J. Royer, and P. Siegl, Reduction of dimension as a consequence of norm-resolvent convergence and applications, Mathematika 64, 406 (2018).
  68. T. M. Dunster, Bessel functions of purely imaginary order, with an application to second-order linear differential equations having a large parameter, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 21, 995 (1990).
  69. R. G. Newton, Analytic properties of radial wave functions, J. Math. Phys. 1, 319 (1960).
  70. D. G. Gaidashev, Chapter 2: The Cauchy-Kovalevskaya theorem (2013), lecture notes, Department of Mathematics, Uppsala University.
  71. J. B. Diaz and J. R. McLaughlin, Sturm comparison theorems for ordinary and partial differential equations, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 75, 335 (1969).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation