- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review A

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Probing strong-field QED via angle-discriminated emissions from electrons traversing colliding laser pulses

Christoffer Olofsson and Arkady Gonoskov

PDF

Phys. Rev. A 112, 053502 – Published 3 November, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/hnz2-nmk9

Abstract

Future laser-electron colliders will reach quantum parameters χ well in excess of unity, enabling studies of strong-field QED in extreme regimes. However, statistical inference in such experiments requires mitigating premature radiative losses of electrons to enable high-χ QED events, as well as separating the detectable signal of these events from that of lower-χ particles and photons produced by QED cascades. We propose a collider geometry in which electrons traverse the waist of two or four perpendicularly propagating, tightly focused laser pulses. This configuration suppresses both outlined difficulties by leveraging the short interaction length of the waist, rather than relying on the more technically demanding reduction of pulse duration. Moreover, altering the phase and polarization of each pulse causes the electrons to undergo helical motion where the deflection angle is correlated with the field strength, permitting an angle-based discrimination of the signal from high-χ events. Analysis and simulations show that the case of four circularly polarized pulses uniquely permits achieving helical motion throughout the entire focal region, leading to near-perfect high-χ angle-discrimination and thereby high signal-to-noise ratio. These findings support the consideration of the proposed concept as a viable layout for future experiments at PW laser facilities.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (70)

  1. C. N. Danson, C. Haefner, J. Bromage, T. Butcher, J. C. F. Chanteloup, E. A. Chowdhury, A. Galvanauskas, L. A. Gizzi, J. Hein, D. I. Hillier, N. W. Hopps, Y. Kato, E. A. Khazanov, R. Kodama, G. Korn, R. Li, Y. Li, J. Limpert, J. Ma, C. H. Nam et al., Petawatt and exawatt class lasers worldwide, High Power Laser Sci. Eng. 7, e54 (2019).
  2. C. N. Danson, P. A. Brummitt, R. J. Clarke, J. L. Collier, B. Fell, A. J. Frackiewicz, S. Hancock, S. Hawkes, C. Hernandez-Gomez, P. Holligan, M. H. Hutchinson, A. Kidd, W. J. Lester, I. O. Musgrave, D. Neely, D. R. Neville, P. A. Norreys, D. A. Pepler, C. J. Reason, W. Shaikh et al., Vulcan petawatt – an ultra-high-intensity interaction facility, Nucl. Fusion 44, S239 (2004).
  3. K. Nakamura, H. S. Mao, A. J. Gonsalves, H. Vincenti, D. E. Mittelberger, J. Daniels, A. Magana, C. Toth, and W. P. Leemans, Diagnostics, control and performance parameters for the BELLA high repetition rate petawatt class laser, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 53, 1200121 (2017).
  4. K. Burdonov, A. Fazzini, V. Lelasseux, J. Albrecht, P. Antici, Y. Ayoul, A. Beluze, D. Cavanna, T. Ceccotti, M. Chabanis, A. Chaleil, S. N. Chen, Z. Chen, F. Consoli, M. Cuciuc, X. Davoine, J. P. Delaneau, E. D'Humières, J. L. Dubois, C. Evrard et al., Characterization and performance of the Apollon short-focal-area facility following its commissioning at 1 PW level, Matter Radiat. Extremes 6, 064402 (2021).
  5. Z. Zhang, F. Wu, J. Hu, X. Yang, J. Gui, P. Ji, X. Liu, C. Wang, Y. Liu, X. Lu, Y. Xu, Y. Leng, R. Li, and Z. Xu, The 1 PW/0.1 Hz laser beamline in sulf facility, High Power Laser Sci. Eng. 8, e4 (2020).
  6. S. Gales, K. A. Tanaka, D. L. Balabanski, F. Negoita, D. Stutman, O. Tesileanu, C. A. Ur, D. Ursescu, I. Andrei, S. Ataman, M. O. Cernaianu, L. D'Alessi, I. Dancus, B. Diaconescu, N. Djourelov, D. Filipescu, P. Ghenuche, D. G. Ghita, C. Matei, K. Seto et al., The extreme light infrastructure - nuclear physics (ELi-NP) facility: New horizons in physics with 10 PW ultra-intense lasers and 20 MeV brilliant gamma beams, Rep. Prog. Phys. 81, 094301 (2018).
  7. J. W. Yoon, Y. G. Kim, I. W. Choi, J. H. Sung, H. W. Lee, S. K. Lee, and C. H. Nam, Realization of laser intensity over 1023W/Cm2, Optica 8, 630 (2021).
  8. H. Azechi, K. Mima, Y. Fujimoto, S. Fujioka, H. Homma, M. Isobe, A. Iwamoto, T. Jitsuno, T. Johzaki, R. Kodama, M. Koga, K. Kondo, J. Kawanaka, T. Mito, N. Miyanaga, O. Motojima, M. Murakami, H. Nagatomo, K. Nagai, M. Nakai et al., Plasma physics and laser development for the fast-ignition realization experiment (FIREX) project, Nucl. Fusion 49, 104024 (2009).
  9. J. P. Zou, C. L. Blanc, D. N. Papadopoulos, G. Chériaux, P. Georges, G. Mennerat, F. Druon, L. Lecherbourg, A. Pellegrina, P. Ramirez, F. Giambruno, A. Fréneaux, F. Leconte, D. Badarau, J. M. Boudenne, D. Fournet, T. Valloton, J. L. Paillard, J. L. Veray, M. Pina et al., Design and current progress of the Apollon 10 PW project, High Power Laser Sci. Eng. 3, e2 (2015).
  10. W. Li, Z. Gan, L. Yu, C. Wang, Y. Liu, Z. Guo, L. Xu, M. Xu, Y. Hang, Y. Xu, J. Wang, P. Huang, H. Cao, B. Yao, X. Zhang, L. Chen, Y. Tang, S. Li, X. Liu, S. Li et al., 339 J high-energy Ti:Sapphire chirped-pulse amplifier for 10 PW laser facility, Opt. Lett. 43, 5681 (2018).
  11. C. Hernandez-Gomez, S. P. Blake, O. Chekhlov, R. J. Clarke, A. M. Dunne, M. Galimberti, S. Hancock, R. Heathcote, P. Holligan, A. Lyachev, P. Matousek, I. O. Musgrave, D. Neely, P. A. Norreys, I. Ross, Y. Tang, T. B. Winstone, B. E. Wyborn, and J. Collier, The Vulcan 10 PW Project (IOP, Bristol, England, 2010).
  12. B. Shen, Z. Bu, J. Xu, T. Xu, L. Ji, R. Li, and Z. Xu, Exploring vacuum birefringence based on a 100 PW laser and an x-ray free electron laser beam, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 60, 044002 (2018).
  13. G. Qiu, X. Wu, Q. Ma, and X. Yan, Hybrid proton acceleration with an ultra-intense laser of low contrast, Phys. Plasmas 32, 013105 (2025).
  14. T. Ziegler, I. Göthel, S. Assenbaum, C. Bernert, F. E. Brack, T. E. Cowan, N. P. Dover, L. Gaus, T. Kluge, S. Kraft, F. Kroll, J. Metzkes-Ng, M. Nishiuchi, I. Prencipe, T. Püschel, M. Rehwald, M. Reimold, H. P. Schlenvoigt, M. E. Umlandt, M. Vescovi et al., Laser-driven high-energy proton beams from cascaded acceleration regimes, Nat. Phys. 20, 1211 (2024).
  15. E. D'Humìres, E. Lefebvre, L. Gremillet, and V. Malka, Proton acceleration mechanisms in high-intensity laser interaction with thin foils, Phys. Plasmas 12, 062704 (2005).
  16. M. Borghesi, J. Fuchs, S. V. Bulanov, A. J. Mackinnon, P. K. Patel, and M. Roth, Fast ion generation by high-intensity laser irradiation of solid targets and applications, Fusion Sci. Technol. 49, 412 (2006).
  17. M. Zepf, E. L. Clark, F. N. Beg, R. J. Clarke, A. E. Dangor, A. Gopal, K. Krushelnick, P. A. Norreys, M. Tatarakis, U. Wagner, and M. S. Wei, Proton acceleration from high-intensity laser interactions with thin foil targets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 064801 (2003).
  18. F. Albert and A. G. Thomas, Applications of laser wakefield accelerator-based light sources, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 58, 103001 (2016).
  19. E. N. Nerush, I. Y. Kostyukov, L. Ji, and A. Pukhov, Gamma-ray generation in ultrahigh-intensity laser-foil interactions, Phys. Plasmas 21, 013109 (2014).
  20. R. D. Edwards, M. A. Sinclair, T. J. Goldsack, K. Krushelnick, F. N. Beg, E. L. Clark, A. E. Dangor, Z. Najmudin, M. Tatarakis, B. Walton, M. Zepf, K. W. Ledingham, I. Spencer, P. A. Norreys, R. J. Clarke, R. Kodama, Y. Toyama, and M. Tampo, Characterization of a gamma-ray source based on a laser-plasma accelerator with applications to radiography, Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 2129 (2002).
  21. M. D. Perry, J. A. Sefcik, T. Cowan, S. Hatchett, A. Hunt, M. Moran, D. Pennington, R. Snavely, and S. C. Wilks, Hard x-ray production from high intensity laser solid interactions (invited), Rev. Sci. Instrum. 70, 265 (1999).
  22. M. Marklund, T. G. Blackburn, A. Gonoskov, J. Magnusson, S. S. Bulanov, and A. Ilderton, Towards critical and supercritical electromagnetic fields, High Power Laser Sci. Eng. 11, e19 (2023).
  23. S. V. Bulanov, T. Esirkepov, and T. Tajima, Light intensification towards the Schwinger limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 085001 (2003).
  24. R. Lichters, J. Meyer-ter Vehn, and A. Pukhov, Short-pulse laser harmonics from oscillating plasma surfaces driven at relativistic intensity, Phys. Plasmas 3, 3425 (1996).
  25. C. Baumann, E. Nerush, A. Pukhov, and I. Y. Kostyukov, Probing non-perturbative QED with electron-laser collisions, Sci. Rep. 9, 9407 (2019).
  26. H. Vincenti, Achieving extreme light intensities using optically curved relativistic plasma mirrors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 105001 (2019).
  27. S. Bragin, S. Meuren, C. H. Keitel, and A. Di Piazza, High-energy vacuum birefringence and dichroism in an ultrastrong laser field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 250403 (2017).
  28. I. C. Turcu, B. Shen, D. Neely, G. Sarri, K. A. Tanaka, P. McKenna, S. P. Mangles, T. P. Yu, W. Luo, X. L. Zhu, and Y. Yin, Quantum electrodynamics experiments with colliding petawatt laser pulses, High Power Laser Sci. Eng. 7, e10 (2019).
  29. A. Macleod, J. Edwards, T. Heinzl, B. King, and S. Bulanov, Strong-field vacuum polarization with high energy lasers, New J. Phys. 25, 093002 (2023).
  30. V. Dinu and G. Torgrimsson, Trident process in laser pulses, Phys. Rev. D 101, 056017 (2020).
  31. B. Kettle, D. Hollatz, E. Gerstmayr, G. Samarin, A. Alejo, S. Astbury, C. Baird, S. Bohlen, M. Campbell, C. Colgan et al., A laser–plasma platform for photon–photon physics: The two photon Breit–Wheeler process, New J. Phys. 23, 115006 (2021).
  32. A. I. Titov and B. Kämpfer, Non-linear Breit–Wheeler process with linearly polarized beams, Eur. Phys. J. 74, 218 (2020).
  33. D. L. Burke, R. C. Field, G. Horton-Smith, J. E. Spencer, D. Walz, S. C. Berridge, W. M. Bugg, K. Shmakov, A. W. Weidemann, C. Bula, K. T. Mcdonald, E. J. Prebys, C. Bamber, S. J. Boege, T. Koffas, T. Kotseroglou, A. C. Melissinos, D. D. Meyerhofer, D. A. Reis, and W. Ragg, Positron production in multiphoton light-by-light scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1626 (1997).
  34. C. Bula, K. T. Mcdonald, E. J. Prebys, C. Bamber, S. Boege, T. Kotseroglou, A. C. Melissinos, D. D. Meyerhofer, W. Ragg, D. L. Burke, R. C. Field, G. Horton-Smith, A. C. Odian, J. E. Spencer, D. Walz, S. C. Berridge, W. M. Bugg, K. Shmakov, and A. W. Weidemann, Observation of nonlinear effects in compton scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3116 (1996).
  35. K. Poder, M. Tamburini, G. Sarri, A. Di Piazza, S. Kuschel, C. D. Baird, K. Behm, S. Bohlen, J. M. Cole, D. J. Corvan, M. Duff, E. Gerstmayr, C. H. Keitel, K. Krushelnick, S. P. D. Mangles, P. McKenna, C. D. Murphy, Z. Najmudin, C. P. Ridgers, G. M. Samarin et al., Experimental signatures of the quantum nature of radiation reaction in the field of an ultraintense laser, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031004 (2018).
  36. J. M. Cole, K. T. Behm, E. Gerstmayr, T. G. Blackburn, J. C. Wood, C. D. Baird, M. J. Duff, C. Harvey, A. Ilderton, A. S. Joglekar, K. Krushelnick, S. Kuschel, M. Marklund, P. McKenna, C. D. Murphy, K. Poder, C. P. Ridgers, G. M. Samarin, G. Sarri, D. R. Symes et al., Experimental evidence of radiation reaction in the collision of a high-intensity laser pulse with a laser-wakefield accelerated electron beam, Phys. Rev. X 8, 011020 (2018).
  37. E. Los, E. Gerstmayr, C. Arran, M. J. V. Streeter, C. Colgan, C. C. Cobo, B. Kettle, T. G. Blackburn, N. Bourgeois, L. Calvin et al., Observation of quantum effects on radiation reaction in strong fields, Proc. SPIE PC13534, PC135340A (2025).
  38. M. Mirzaie, C. I. Hojbota, D. Y. Kim, V. B. Pathak, T. G. Pak, C. M. Kim, H. W. Lee, J. W. Yoon, S. K. Lee, Y. J. Rhee, M. Vranic, O. Amaro, K. Y. Kim, J. H. Sung, and C. H. Nam, All-optical nonlinear compton scattering performed with a multi-petawatt laser, Nat. Photon. 18, 1212 (2024).
  39. A. Matheron, P. S. M. Claveria, R. Ariniello, H. Ekerfelt, F. Fiuza, S. Gessner, M. F. Gilljohann, M. Hogan, C. Keitel, A. Knetsch, M. Litos, Y. Mankovska, S. Montefiori, Z. Nie, B. O'Shea, J. Peterson, D. Storey, Y. Wu, X. Xu, V. Zakharova et al., Probing strong-field qed in beam-plasma collisions, Commun. Phys. 6, 141 (2023).
  40. V. Yakimenko, S. Meuren, F. Del Gaudio, C. Baumann, A. Fedotov, F. Fiuza, T. Grismayer, M. J. Hogan, A. Pukhov, L. O. Silva, and G. White, Prospect of studying nonperturbative QED with beam-beam collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 190404 (2019).
  41. T. N. Wistisen, A. Di Piazza, C. F. Nielsen, A. H. Sørensen, and U. I. Uggerhøj, Quantum radiation reaction in aligned crystals beyond the local constant field approximation, Phys. Rev. Res. 1, 033014 (2019).
  42. A. Di Piazza, T. N. Wistisen, M. Tamburini, and U. I. Uggerhøj, Testing strong field QED close to the fully nonperturbative regime using aligned crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 044801 (2020).
  43. J. C. Kimball and N. Cue, Quantum electrodynamics and channeling in crystals, Phys. Rep. 125, 69 (1985).
  44. M. Jirka, O. Klimo, M. Vranic, S. Weber, and G. Korn, QED cascade with 10 PW-class lasers, Sci. Rep. 7, 15302 (2017).
  45. A. Gonoskov, T. G. Blackburn, M. Marklund, and S. S. Bulanov, Charged particle motion and radiation in strong electromagnetic fields, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 045001 (2022).
  46. V. Ritus, Radiative corrections in quantum electrodynamics with intense field and their analytical properties, Ann. Phys. 69, 555 (1972).
  47. N. B. Narozhny, Expansion parameter of perturbation theory in intense-field quantum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 21, 1176 (1980).
  48. C. Olofsson and A. Gonoskov, Prospects for statistical tests of strong-field quantum electrodynamics with high-intensity lasers, High Power Laser Sci. Eng. 11, e67 (2023).
  49. C. Olofsson and A. Gonoskov, Attaining a strong-field QED signal at laser-electron colliders with optimized focusing, Phys. Rev. A 106, 063512 (2022).
  50. A. Gonoskov, A. Bashinov, S. Bastrakov, E. Efimenko, A. Ilderton, A. Kim, M. Marklund, I. Meyerov, A. Muraviev, and A. Sergeev, Ultrabright GeV photon source via controlled electromagnetic cascades in laser-dipole waves, Phys. Rev. X 7, 041003 (2017).
  51. S. S. Bulanov, V. D. Mur, N. B. Narozhny, J. Nees, and V. S. Popov, Multiple colliding electromagnetic pulses: A way to lower the threshold of e+e−-pair production from vacuum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 220404 (2010).
  52. T. Grismayer, M. Vranic, J. L. Martins, R. A. Fonseca, and L. O. Silva, Seeded QED cascades in counterpropagating laser pulses, Phys. Rev. E 95, 023210 (2017).
  53. A. Mercuri-Baron, A. A. Mironov, C. Riconda, A. Grassi, and M. Grech, Growth rate of self-sustained QED cascades induced by intense lasers, Phys. Rev. X 15, 011062 (2025).
  54. E. G. Gelfer, A. A. Mironov, A. M. Fedotov, V. F. Bashmakov, E. N. Nerush, I. Y. Kostyukov, and N. B. Narozhny, Optimized multibeam configuration for observation of QED cascades, Phys. Rev. A 92, 022113 (2015).
  55. E. G. Gelfer, Generation of quantum electrodynamic cascades by colliding laser pulses, Quantum Electron. 46, 310 (2016).
  56. I. Bassett, Limit to concentration by focusing, Optica Acta: Int. J. Opt. 33, 279 (1986).
  57. I. Gonoskov, A. Aiello, S. Heugel, and G. Leuchs, Dipole pulse theory: Maximizing the field amplitude from 4π focused laser pulses, Phys. Rev. A 86, 053836 (2012).
  58. A. Gonoskov, Explicit energy-conserving modification of relativistic pic method, J. Comput. Phys. 502, 112820 (2024).
  59. A. Gonoskov, S. Bastrakov, E. Efimenko, A. Ilderton, M. Marklund, I. Meyerov, A. Muraviev, A. Sergeev, I. Surmin, and E. Wallin, Extended particle-in-cell schemes for physics in ultrastrong laser fields: Review and developments, Phys. Rev. E 92, 023305 (2015).
  60. E. Panova, V. Volokitin, E. Efimenko, J. Ferri, T. Blackburn, M. Marklund, A. Muschet, A. De Andres Gonzalez, P. Fischer, L. Veisz et al., Optimized computation of tight focusing of short pulses using mapping to periodic space, Appl. Sci. 11, 956 (2021).
  61. H. T. Kim, V. B. Pathak, C. I. Hojbota, M. Mirzaie, K. H. Pae, C. M. Kim, J. W. Yoon, J. H. Sung, and S. K. Lee, Multi-GeV laser wakefield electron acceleration with PW lasers, Appl. Sci. 11, 5831 (2021).
  62. M. Yabashi, H. Tanaka, and T. Ishikawa, Overview of the SACLA facility, J. Synchrotron Rad. 22, 477 (2015).
  63. T. Tschentscher, C. Bressler, J. Grünert, A. Madsen, A. P. Mancuso, M. Meyer, A. Scherz, H. Sinn, and U. Zastrau, Photon beam transport and scientific instruments at the European XFEL, Appl. Sci. 7, 592 (2017).
  64. P. Emma, R. Akre, J. Arthur, R. Bionta, C. Bostedt, J. Bozek, A. Brachmann, P. Bucksbaum, R. Coffee, F.-J. Decker et al., First lasing and operation of an ångstrom-wavelength free-electron laser, Nat. Photon. 4, 641 (2010).
  65. J. Dumont, F. Fillion-Gourdeau, C. Lefebvre, D. Gagnon, and S. MacLean, Efficiently parallelized modeling of tightly focused, large bandwidth laser pulses, J. Opt. 19, 025604 (2017).
  66. O. E. Vais, A. G. R. Thomas, A. M. Maksimchuk, K. Krushelnick, and V. Y. Bychenkov, Characterizing extreme laser intensities by ponderomotive acceleration of protons from rarified gas, New J. Phys. 22, 023003 (2020).
  67. J. Powell, S. W. Jolly, S. Vallières, F. Fillion-Gourdeau, S. Payeur, S. Fourmaux, M. Lytova, M. Piché, H. Ibrahim, S. MacLean, and F. Légaré, Relativistic electrons from vacuum laser acceleration using tightly focused radially polarized beams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 155001 (2024).
  68. K. Nakajima, Laser electron acceleration beyond 100 GeV, Eur. Phys. J.: Spec. Top. 223, 999 (2014).
  69. T. Sun, Q. Zhao, K. Xue, Z.-W. Lu, L.-L. Ji, F. Wan, Y. Wang, Y. I. Salamin, and J.-X. Li, Production of polarized particle beams via ultraintense laser pulses, Rev. Mod. Plasma Phys. 6, 38 (2022).
  70. D. Seipt, C. P. Ridgers, D. Del Sorbo, and A. G. Thomas, Polarized QED cascades, New J. Phys. 23, 053025 (2021).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. A 112, 053502– Published 3 November, 2025
  • Received 11 June 2025
  • Revised 14 September 2025
  • Accepted 9 October 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by Bibsam.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation