Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Thermoelastic limit on the focal intensity in Fabry-Pérot cavities

Jeremy J. Axelrod

Lothar Maisenbacher, Ashwin Singh, Isaac M. Pope, Petar N. Petrov*, and Jessie T. Zhang

Holger Müller†

  • *Present address: Institute of Science and Technology Austria, Klosterneuburg, Austria.
  • †Contact author: hm@berkeley.edu

Phys. Rev. A 114, 043507 – Published 6 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/hbqy-z81p

Abstract

Light in the mode of a Fabry-Pérot cavity heats the mirror surfaces via optical absorption, causing thermoelastic deformation of the mirror substrates, which in turn dictates the shape of the mode. We develop an analytical model which predicts that this effect limits the maximum focal intensity of the mode. Using two near-concentric Fabry-Pérot cavities—one with 4.5-fold-higher mirror absorption than the other—we measure the thermoelastic properties of the cavity mirrors and demonstrate that it is possible to achieve at least 70% of this predicted limit (in the high-absorption cavity) and that the predicted limit is 2.9TW/cm2 (in the low-absorption cavity).

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (31)

  1. A. E. Siegman, Lasers (University Science Books, Melville, 1986).
  2. H. Venghaus, Wavelength filters, in Fibre Optic Communication: Key Devices, edited by H. Venghaus and N. Grote (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2017), pp. 417–482.
  3. S. R. Mallinson, Wavelength-selective filters for single-mode fiber WDM systems using Fabry-Perot interferometers, Appl. Opt. 26, 430 (1987).
  4. M. D. Álvarez, Optical Cavities for Optical Atomic Clocks, Atom Interferometry and Gravitational-Wave Detection, Springer Theses (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019).
  5. G. Berden, R. Peeters, and G. Meijer, Cavity ring-down spectroscopy: Experimental schemes and applications, Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 19, 565 (2000).
  6. L. Gianfrani, S.-M. Hu, and W. Ubachs, Advances in cavity-enhanced methods for high precision molecular spectroscopy and test of fundamental physics, Riv. Nuovo Cimento 47, 229 (2024).
  7. A. Reiserer and G. Rempe, Cavity-based quantum networks with single atoms and optical photons, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 1379 (2015).
  8. V. Giovannetti, D. Vitali, P. Tombesi, and A. Ekert, Scalable quantum computation with cavity QED systems, Phys. Rev. A 62, 032306 (2000).
  9. J. Aasi et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration), Characterization of the LIGO detectors during their sixth science run, Class. Quantum Grav. 32, 115012 (2015).
  10. M. Tse et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration), Quantum-enhanced advanced LIGO detectors in the era of gravitational-wave astronomy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 231107 (2019).
  11. A. L. Bullington, B. T. Lantz, M. M. Fejer, and R. L. Byer, Modal frequency degeneracy in thermally loaded optical resonators, Appl. Opt. 47, 2840 (2008).
  12. H. Carstens, N. Lilienfein, S. Holzberger, C. Jocher, T. Eidam, J. Limpert, A. Tünnermann, J. Weitenberg, D. C. Yost, A. Alghamdi, Z. Alahmed, A. Azzeer, A. Apolonski, E. Fill, F. Krausz, and I. Pupeza, Megawatt-scale average-power ultrashort pulses in an enhancement cavity, Opt. Lett. 39, 2595 (2014).
  13. X.-Y. Lu, R. Chiche, K. Dupraz, F. Johora, A. Martens, D. Nutarelli, Y. Peinaud, V. Soskov, A. Stocchi, F. Zomer, C. Michel, L. Pinard, E. Cormier, J. Lhermite, X. Liu, Q.-L. Tian, L.-X. Yan, W.-H. Huang, C.-X. Tang, V. Fedosseev, et al., Stable 500 kW average power of infrared light in a finesse 35 000 enhancement cavity, Appl. Phys. Lett. 124, 251105 (2024).
  14. I. Pupeza, Passive Optical Resonators for Next-Generation Attosecond Metrology, SpringerBriefs in Physics (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2022).
  15. Z. Li, X. Deng, Z. Pan, C. Tang, and A. Chao, Generalized longitudinal strong focusing in a steady-state microbunching storage ring, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 26, 110701 (2023).
  16. M. Alkadi et al., Commissioning of ThomX Compton source subsystems and demonstration of 1010 x-rays/s, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 28, 023401 (2025).
  17. K. E. Deitrick, G. A. Krafft, B. Terzić, and J. R. Delayen, High-brilliance, high-flux compact inverse Compton light source, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 21, 080703 (2018).
  18. A. Martens, K. Cassou, R. Chiche, K. Dupraz, D. Nutarelli, Y. Peinaud, F. Zomer, Y. Dutheil, B. Goddard, M. W. Krasny, T. Lefevre, and F. M. Velotti, Design of the optical system for the gamma factory proof of principle experiment at the CERN Super Proton Synchrotron, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 25, 101601 (2022).
  19. J. J. Axelrod, A laser phase plate for transmission electron microscopy, Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley, 2024.
  20. A. Singh, L. Maisenbacher, Z. Lin, J. J. Axelrod, C. D. Panda, and H. Müller, Dynamics of a buffer-gas-loaded, deep optical trap for molecules, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 033008 (2023).
  21. M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt, Cavity optomechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 1391 (2014).
  22. W. Winkler, K. Danzmann, A. Rüdiger, and R. Schilling, Heating by optical absorption and the performance of interferometric gravitational-wave detectors, Phys. Rev. A 44, 7022 (1991).
  23. H. Carstens, N. Lilienfein, S. Holzberger, C. Jocher, T. Eidam, J. Limpert, A. Tünnermann, A. Apolonski, E. Fill, I. Pupeza, and F. Krausz, Cavity-enhanced 196 kW average-power infrared pulses, in Advanced Solid-State Lasers Congress (OSA, Paris, 2013), p. JTh5A.3.
  24. J. Barber, Contact Mechanics, Solid Mechanics and Its Applications (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2018), Vol. 250.
  25. J. Benedikter, T. Hümmer, M. Mader, B. Schlederer, J. Reichel, T. W. Hänsch, and D. Hunger, Transverse-mode coupling and diffraction loss in tunable Fabry–Pérot microcavities, New J. Phys. 17, 053051 (2015).
  26. ULE Corning Code 7972 Ultra Low Expansion Glass, Datasheet (Corning, Inc., 2016), https://www.corning.com/media/worldwide/csm/documents/7972%20ULE%20Product%20Information%20Jan%202016.pdf.
  27. A. Alexandrovski, M. Fejer, A. Markosian, and R. Route, Photothermal common-path interferometry (PCI): New developments, in Solid State Lasers XVIII: Technology and Devices (SPIE, Bellingham, 2009), Vol. 7193, pp. 79–91.
  28. H. Pfeifer, L. Ratschbacher, J. Gallego, C. Saavedra, A. Faßbender, A. von Haaren, W. Alt, S. Hofferberth, M. Köhl, S. Linden, and D. Meschede, Achievements and perspectives of optical fiber Fabry–Perot cavities, Appl. Phys. B 128, 29 (2022).
  29. N. Jin, C. A. McLemore, D. Mason, J. P. Hendrie, Y. Luo, M. L. Kelleher, P. Kharel, F. Quinlan, S. A. Diddams, and P. T. Rakich, Micro-fabricated mirrors with finesse exceeding one million, Optica 9, 965 (2022).
  30. L. Maisenbacher, A. Singh, I. M. Pope, and H. Müller, Ultrahigh continuous-wave intensities in high-NA optical cavities through suppression of the parametric oscillatory instability, arXiv:2602.23476.
  31. H. Carstens, S. Holzberger, J. Kaster, J. Weitenberg, V. Pervak, A. Apolonski, E. Fill, F. Krausz, and I. Pupeza, Large-mode enhancement cavities, Opt. Express 21, 11606 (2013).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation