Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Quantum mechanical pendulum clock

Matteo Brunelli1,2,*, Mohammad Mehboudi3,*, Nicolas Brunner4, and Patrick P. Potts1

  • *These authors contributed equally to this work.

Phys. Rev. A 113, 052427 – Published 13 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/hb36-7m2r

Abstract

We investigate an optomechanical system as a model of an autonomous mechanical pendulum clock in the quantum regime, whose operation relies only on incoherent (thermal) resources. The escapement of the clock, the mechanism that translates oscillatory motion into ticks, is provided by an emitter in the optical cavity and the operation of the clock relies on the existence of a limit cycle. Since the clock is based on an oscillatory degree of freedom, it can overcome the thermodynamic uncertainty relation and is thus more accurate than clocks that rely only on stochastic transitions. Furthermore, by increasing the amount of emitters in the cavity, the clock approaches the behavior expected for a macroscopic pendulum clock, where fluctuations become irrelevant while the clock dynamics becomes completely irreversible. This allows for investigating the quantum-to-classical transition of pendulum clocks.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (46)

  1. A. C. Barato and U. Seifert, Cost and precision of Brownian clocks, Phys. Rev. X 6, 041053 (2016).
  2. P. Erker, M. T. Mitchison, R. Silva, M. P. Woods, N. Brunner, and M. Huber, Autonomous quantum clocks: Does thermodynamics limit our ability to measure time? Phys. Rev. X 7, 031022 (2017).
  3. G. J. Milburn, The thermodynamics of clocks, Contemp. Phys. 61, 69 (2020).
  4. A. N. Pearson, Y. Guryanova, P. Erker, E. A. Laird, G. A. D. Briggs, M. Huber, and N. Ares, Measuring the thermodynamic cost of timekeeping, Phys. Rev. X 11, 021029 (2021).
  5. E. Schwarzhans, M. P. E. Lock, P. Erker, N. Friis, and M. Huber, Autonomous temporal probability concentration: Clockworks and the second law of thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. X 11, 011046 (2021).
  6. P. Pietzonka, Classical pendulum clocks break the thermodynamic uncertainty relation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 130606 (2022).
  7. F. Meier, E. Schwarzhans, P. Erker, and M. Huber, Fundamental accuracy-resolution trade-off for timekeeping devices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 220201 (2023).
  8. X. He, P. Pakkiam, A. A. Gangat, M. J. Kewming, G. J. Milburn, and A. Fedorov, Effect of measurement backaction on quantum clock precision studied with a superconducting circuit, Phys. Rev. Appl. 20, 034038 (2023).
  9. A. Gopal, M. Esposito, and N. Freitas, Thermodynamic cost of precise timekeeping in an electronic underdamped clock, Phys. Rev. B 109, 085421 (2024).
  10. O. Culhane, M. J. Kewming, A. Silva, J. Goold, and M. T. Mitchison, Powering an autonomous clock with quantum electromechanics, New J. Phys. 26, 023047 (2024).
  11. D. Scheer, J. Völler, and F. Hassler, The superconducting clock-circuit: Improving the coherence of Josephson radiation beyond the thermodynamic uncertainty relation, SciPost Phys. 17, 140 (2024).
  12. K. Prech, G. T. Landi, F. Meier, N. Nurgalieva, P. P. Potts, R. Silva, and M. T. Mitchison, Optimal time estimation and the clock uncertainty relation for stochastic processes, Phys. Rev. X 15, 031068 (2025).
  13. F. Meier, Y. Minoguchi, S. Sundelin, T. J. G. Apollaro, P. Erker, S. Gasparinetti, and M. Huber, Precision is not limited by the second law of thermodynamics, Nat. Phys. 21, 1147 (2025).
  14. V. Wadhia, F. Meier, F. Fedele, R. Silva, N. Nurgalieva, D. L. Craig, D. Jirovec, J. Saez-Mollejo, A. Ballabio, D. Chrastina, G. Isella, M. Huber, M. T. Mitchison, P. Erker, and N. Ares, Entropic costs of extracting classical ticks from a quantum clock, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 200407 (2025).
  15. A. C. Barato and U. Seifert, Thermodynamic uncertainty relation for biomolecular processes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 158101 (2015).
  16. T. R. Gingrich, J. M. Horowitz, N. Perunov, and J. L. England, Dissipation bounds all steady-state current fluctuations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 120601 (2016).
  17. J. M. Horowitz and T. R. Gingrich, Thermodynamic uncertainty relations constrain non-equilibrium fluctuations, Nat. Phys. 16, 15 (2020).
  18. We note that we use the accuracy as defined in Refs. [2, 7], which can be understood as the amount of ticks until the clock is off by one tick on average. A large accuracy is thus desired. This is to be contrasted with atomic clocks, where the accuracy is typically quantified in terms uncertainties which are desired to be small.
  19. M. P. Woods, R. Silva, G. Pütz, S. Stupar, and R. Renner, Quantum clocks are more accurate than classical ones, PRX Quantum 3, 010319 (2022).
  20. A. Pour, T. Dost, and M. P. Woods, Quantum advantages in timekeeping: Dimensional advantage, entropic advantage and how to realise them via Berry phases and ultra-regular spontaneous emission, arXiv:2303.10029.
  21. M. P. Woods and M. Horodecki, Autonomous quantum devices: When are they realizable without additional thermodynamic costs? Phys. Rev. X 13, 011016 (2023).
  22. S. K. Manikandan, Autonomous quantum clocks using athermal resources, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 043013 (2023).
  23. N. Linden, S. Popescu, and P. Skrzypczyk, How small can thermal machines be? The smallest possible refrigerator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 130401 (2010).
  24. D. Gelbwaser-Klimovsky, R. Alicki, and G. Kurizki, Minimal universal quantum heat machine, Phys. Rev. E 87, 012140 (2013).
  25. D. Venturelli, R. Fazio, and V. Giovannetti, Minimal self-contained quantum refrigeration machine based on four quantum dots, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 256801 (2013).
  26. Encyclopedia of Time, edited by S. L. Macey (Routledge, New York, 1994).
  27. M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt, Cavity optomechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 1391 (2014).
  28. H. E. D. Scovil and E. O. Schulz-DuBois, Three-level masers as heat engines, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2, 262 (1959).
  29. W. Niedenzu, M. Huber, and E. Boukobza, Concepts of work in autonomous quantum heat engines, Quantum 3, 195 (2019).
  30. S.-W. Li, M. B. Kim, G. S. Agarwal, and M. O. Scully, Quantum statistics of a single-atom Scovil–Schulz-Dubois heat engine, Phys. Rev. A 96, 063806 (2017).
  31. G. T. Landi, M. J. Kewming, M. T. Mitchison, and P. P. Potts, Current fluctuations in open quantum systems: Bridging the gap between quantum continuous measurements and full counting statistics, PRX Quantum 5, 020201 (2024).
  32. H. M. Wiseman and G. J. Milburn, Quantum Measurement and Control (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009).
  33. D. W. Allan, Statistics of atomic frequency standards, Proc. IEEE 54, 221 (1966).
  34. IEEE standard definitions of physical quantities for fundamental frequency and time metrology—Random instabilities, in IEEE Std. 1139-2022 (Revision of IEEE Std. 1139-2008) (IEEE, 2022), pp. 1–60.
  35. A. Levy and R. Kosloff, The local approach to quantum transport may violate the second law of thermodynamics, Europhys. Lett. 107, 20004 (2014).
  36. P. P. Hofer, M. Perarnau-Llobet, L. D. M. Miranda, G. Haack, R. Silva, J. B. Brask, and N. Brunner, Markovian master equations for quantum thermal machines: Local versus global approach, New J. Phys. 19, 123037 (2017).
  37. P. P. Potts, A. A. S. Kalaee, and A. Wacker, A thermodynamically consistent Markovian master equation beyond the secular approximation, New J. Phys. 23, 123013 (2021).
  38. Y. Zhang, C. Shan, and K. Mølmer, Active frequency measurement on superradiant strontium clock transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 013604 (2022).
  39. H. Yu, Y. Zhang, Q. Wu, C.-X. Shan, and K. Mølmer, Conditional dynamics in heterodyne detection of superradiant lasing with incoherently pumped atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 073601 (2024).
  40. T. Nadolny, C. Bruder, and M. Brunelli, Nonreciprocal synchronization of active quantum spins, Phys. Rev. X 15, 011010 (2025).
  41. R. H. Dicke, Coherence in spontaneous radiation processes, Phys. Rev. 93, 99 (1954).
  42. P. Kirton, M. M. Roses, J. Keeling, and E. G. D. Torre, Introduction to the Dicke model: From equilibrium to nonequilibrium, and vice versa, Adv. Quantum Technol. 2, 1800043 (2019).
  43. M. Mehboudi, Mehboudi/PendulumClocks: PRA_v1.0, Zenodo (2026), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20026922.
  44. J. Monsel, N. Dashti, S. K. Manjeshwar, J. Eriksson, H. Ernbrink, E. Olsson, E. Torneus, W. Wieczorek, and J. Splettstoesser, Optomechanical cooling with coherent and squeezed light: The thermodynamic cost of opening the heat valve, Phys. Rev. A 103, 063519 (2021).
  45. H. Spohn, Entropy production for quantum dynamical semigroups, J. Math. Phys. 19, 1227 (1978).
  46. H. Spohn and J. L. Lebowitz, Irreversible thermodynamics for quantum systems weakly coupled to thermal reservoirs, in Advances in Chemical Physics, edited by S. A. Rice (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1978), pp. 109–142.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation