Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Interpreting quantum-reference-frame transformations through a simple example

Esteban Castro-Ruiz1, Thomas D. Galley1,2,3,*, and Leon Loveridge4

  • *Contact author: thomas.galley@universite-paris-saclay.fr

Phys. Rev. A 114, 032201 – Published 2 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/czr8-dv1l

Abstract

Quantum reference frame transformations have been proposed to provide a means by which to translate descriptions of quantum systems relative to each other. At present, there are several differing frameworks for describing quantum reference frames, with concomitantly different transformation rules. Here we investigate a simple example of three qubit systems with Z2 symmetry in order to analyze physical and conceptual distinctions between three contemporary approaches to quantum reference frames—dubbed perspective-neutral, extra particle, and operational. By constructing two three-qubit states that are indistinguishable by observables relative to one frame but are distinguishable by observables relative to another, we show that each of the three approaches provides a distinct transformation rule, which may be understood to reflect differing attitudes towards the global state and the information that can be accessed by each frame. This helps us to shed light on the physical meaning of each approach and the contexts in which they may be most naturally applied.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (64)

  1. G. C. Wick, A. S. Wightman, and E. P. Wigner, The intrinsic parity of elementary particles, Phys. Rev. 88, 101 (1952).
  2. Y. Aharonov and L. Susskind, Charge superselection rule, Phys. Rev. 155, 1428 (1967).
  3. G.-C. Wick, A. S. Wightman, and E. P Wigner, Superselection rule for charge, Phys. Rev. D 1, 3267 (1970).
  4. S. D. Bartlett, T. Rudolph, and R. W. Spekkens, Reference frames, superselection rules, and quantum information, Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 555 (2007).
  5. D. Poulin, Toy model for a relational formulation of quantum theory, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 45, 1189 (2006).
  6. C. Rovelli, What is observable in classical and quantum gravity? Class. Quantum Grav. 8, 297 (1991).
  7. C. Rovelli, Quantum reference systems, Class. Quantum Grav. 8, 317 (1991).
  8. R. M. Angelo, N. Brunner, S. Popescu, A. J Short, and P. Skrzypczyk, Physics within a quantum reference frame, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 44, 145304 (2011).
  9. P. Hayden, S. Nezami, S. Popescu, and G. Salton, Error correction of quantum reference frame information, PRX Quantum 2, 010326 (2021).
  10. M. P. Woods and Á. M. Alhambra, Continuous groups of transversal gates for quantum error correcting codes from finite clock reference frames, Quantum 4, 245 (2020).
  11. S. Carrozza, A. Chatwin-Davies, P. A. Höhn, and F. M. Mele, A correspondence between quantum error correcting codes and quantum reference frames, arXiv:2412.15317.
  12. V. I. Arnold, Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics, Graduate Texts in Mathematics (Springer Science & Business Media, New York, 2013), Vol. 60.
  13. W. Rindler, Essential Relativity: Special, General, and Cosmological, Theoretical and Mathematical Physics (Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012).
  14. Y. Aharonov and T. Kaufherr, Quantum frames of reference, Phys. Rev. D 30, 368 (1984).
  15. M. Toller, Quantum reference frames and quantum transformations, Nuovo Cim. B 112, 1013 (1997).
  16. S. Mazzucchi, On the observables describing a quantum reference frame, J. Math. Phys. 42, 2477 (2001).
  17. P. Merriam, Physical laws must be invariant over quantum systems, Phys. Essays 19, 75 (2006).
  18. R. M. Angelo and A. D. Ribeiro, Kinematics and dynamics in noninertial quantum frames of reference, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 45, 465306 (2012).
  19. S. T. Pereira and R. M. Angelo, Galilei covariance and Einstein's equivalence principle in quantum reference frames, Phys. Rev. A 91, 022107 (2015).
  20. A. Vanrietvelde, P. A. Höhn, F. Giacomini, and E. Castro-Ruiz, A change of perspective: Switching quantum reference frames via a perspective-neutral framework, Quantum 4, 225 (2020).
  21. A.-C. de la Hamette and T. D. Galley, Quantum reference frames for general symmetry groups, Quantum 4, 367 (2020).
  22. M. Krumm, P. A. Höhn, and M. P. Müller, Quantum reference frame transformations as symmetries and the paradox of the third particle, Quantum 5, 530 (2021).
  23. P. A. Höhn, A. R. H. Smith, and M. P. E. Lock, Trinity of relational quantum dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 104, 066001 (2021).
  24. P. A. Höhn, M. Krumm, and M. P. Müller, Internal quantum reference frames for finite Abelian groups, J. Math. Phys. 63, (2022).
  25. E. Castro-Ruiz, F. Giacomini, A. Belenchia, and C. Brukner, Quantum clocks and the temporal localisability of events in the presence of gravitating quantum systems, Nat. Commun. 11, (2020).
  26. J. Głowacki, Operational quantum frames: An operational approach to quantum reference frames, arXiv:2304.07021.
  27. E. Castro-Ruiz and O. Oreshkov, Relative subsystems and quantum reference frame transformations, Commun. Phys. 8, 187 (2025).
  28. T. Carette, J. Glowacki, and L. Loveridge, Operational quantum reference frame transformations, Quantum 9, 1680 (2025).
  29. P. A Höhn, Switching internal times and a new perspective on the ‘wave function of the universe', Universe, 5, 116 (2019).
  30. A. Vanrietvelde, P. A Höhn, and F. Giacomini, Switching quantum reference frames in the n-body problem and the absence of global relational perspectives, Quantum 7, 1088 (2023).
  31. P. A Höhn and A. Vanrietvelde, How to switch between relational quantum clocks, New J. Phys. 22, 123048 (2020).
  32. P. A Höhn, A. R. H. Smith, and M. P. E. Lock, Equivalence of approaches to relational quantum dynamics in relativistic settings, Front. Phys. 9, 587083 (2021).
  33. F. Giacomini, E. Castro-Ruiz, and Č. Brukner, Relativistic quantum reference frames: The operational meaning of spin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 090404 (2019).
  34. C. J. Fewster, D. W. Janssen, L. D. Loveridge, K. Rejzner, and J. Waldron, Quantum reference frames, measurement schemes and the type of local algebras in quantum field theory, Commun. Math. Phys. 406, 19 (2025).
  35. L. F Streiter, F. Giacomini, and Č. Brukner, Relativistic Bell test within quantum reference frames, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 230403 (2021).
  36. A. Ballesteros, F. Giacomini, and G. Gubitosi, The group structure of dynamical transformations between quantum reference frames, Quantum 5, 470 (2021).
  37. F. Giacomini, Spacetime quantum reference frames and superpositions of proper times, Quantum 5, 508 (2021).
  38. M. Mikusch, L. C. Barbado, and Č. Brukner, Transformation of spin in quantum reference frames, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 043138 (2021).
  39. L. Apadula, E. Castro-Ruiz, and Č. Brukner, Quantum reference frames for Lorentz symmetry, Quantum 8, 1440 (2024).
  40. C. Cepollaro, A. Akil, P. Cieśliński, A.-C. de la Hamette, and Č. Brukner, Sum of entanglement and subsystem coherence is invariant under quantum reference frame transformations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 010201 (2025).
  41. F. Giacomini, E. Castro-Ruiz, and Č. Brukner, Quantum mechanics and the covariance of physical laws in quantum reference frames, Nat. Commun. 10, 494 (2019).
  42. L. Hardy, Implementation of the quantum equivalence principle, in Progress and Visions in Quantum Theory in View of Gravity: Bridging Foundations of Physics and Mathematics, edited by F. Finster, D. Giulini, J. Kleiner, and J. Tolksdorf (Birkhäuser, Cham, 2020), pp. 189–220.
  43. F. Giacomini and C. Brukner, Quantum superposition of spacetimes obeys Einstein's equivalence principle, AVS Quantum Sci. 4, 015601 (2022).
  44. A.-C. de la Hamette, V. Kabel, E. Castro-Ruiz, and Č. Brukner, Quantum reference frames for an indefinite metric, Commun. Phys. 6, 231 (2023).
  45. V. Kabel, A.-C. de la Hamette, L. Apadula, C. Cepollaro, H. Gomes, J. Butterfield, and Č. Brukner, Identification is pointless: Quantum reference frames, localisation of events, and the quantum hole argument, Commun. Phys. 8, 185 (2025).
  46. A.-C. de la Hamette, V. Kabel, and Č. Brukner, What an event is not: Unravelling the identity of events in quantum theory and gravity, arXiv:2404.00159.
  47. S. A. Ahmad, T. D. Galley, P. A. Höhn, M. P. E. Lock, and A. R. H. Smith, Quantum relativity of subsystems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 170401 (2022).
  48. A.-C. de la Hamette, T. D. Galley, P. A. Höhn, L. Loveridge, and M. P. Mueller, Perspective-neutral approach to quantum frame covariance for general symmetry groups, arXiv:2110.13824 [quant-ph].
  49. P. A. Höhn, I. Kotecha, and F. M. Mele, Quantum frame relativity of subsystems, correlations and thermodynamics, arXiv:2308.09131 [quant-ph].
  50. S. Carrozza, S. Eccles, and P. A. Höhn, Edge modes as dynamical frames: Charges from post-selection in generally covariant theories, SciPost Phys. 17, 048 (2024).
  51. V. Kabel, Č. Brukner, and W. Wieland, Quantum reference frames at the boundary of spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 108, 106022 (2023).
  52. G. Araujo-Regado, P. A. Höhn, and F. Sartini, Relational entanglement entropies and quantum reference frames in gauge theories, arXiv:2506.23459.
  53. C. J. Fewster, D. W. Janssen, and K. Rejzner, Semi-local observables, edge modes and quantum reference frames in quantum electromagnetism: An algebraic approach, arXiv:2508.20939.
  54. T. Miyadera, L. Loveridge, and P. Busch, Approximating relational observables by absolute quantities: A quantum accuracy-size trade-off, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 49, 185301 (2016).
  55. L. Loveridge, P. Busch, and T. Miyadera, Relativity of quantum states and observables, Europhys. Lett. 117, 40004 (2017).
  56. L. Loveridge, T. Miyadera, and P. Busch, Symmetry, reference frames, and relational quantities in quantum mechanics, Found. Phys. 48, 135 (2018).
  57. J. Głowacki, L. Loveridge, and J. Waldron, Quantum reference frames on finite homogeneous spaces, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 63, 137 (2024).
  58. J. Głowacki, Quantum reference frames on homogeneous spaces, arXiv:2409.07231.
  59. M. J. Riera and L. Loveridge, Uncertainty relations relative to phase-space quantum reference frames, Phys. Rev. A 111, L060201 (2025).
  60. A.-C. de la Hamette, V. Kabel, and Č. Brukner, Accessibility of global properties from internal quantum reference frame perspectives, arXiv:2510.09100 [quant-ph].
  61. G. Doat and A. Vanrietvelde, What can we do in a symmetry-constrained perspective? The importance of the total charge's status in quantum reference frame frameworks, Quantum 10, 2126 (2025).
  62. J. De Vuyst, P. A. Höhn, and A. Tsobanjan, On the relation between perspective-neutral, algebraic, and effective quantum reference frames, Quantum 10, 2196 (2026).
  63. G. Araujo-Regado, P. A. Höhn, and F. Sartini, Relational entanglement entropies and quantum reference frames in gauge theories, arXiv:2506.23459 [hep-th].
  64. L. Loveridge, Quantum measurements in the presence of symmetry, Ph.D. thesis, University of York, 2012.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation