Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Sensing decoherence by using edge states

Andrey R. Kolovsky

Phys. Rev. A 113, 042411 – Published 2 April, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/bznq-n86l

Abstract

In the absence of decoherence and disorder the current of noninteracting fermionic particles across a finite lattice connecting two reservoirs (leads) with different chemical potentials is known to be ballistic. It is also known that decoherence suppresses this ballistic current. However, if decoherence is weak, the change in the current can be undetectable. In this work we show that the effect of a weak decoherence can be amplified by orders of magnitude if the lattice has edge states. This allows us to use a lattice with edge states as a sensor for measuring the decoherence rate.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (26)

  1. J. K. Asbóth, L. Oroszlány, and A. Pályi, A Short Course on Topological Insulators: Band-Structure and Edge States in One and Two Dimensions, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 919 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2016).
  2. M. Hafezi, S. Mittal, J. Fan, A. Migdall, and J. M. Taylor, Imaging topological edge states in silicon photonics, Nat. Photon. 7, 1001 (2013).
  3. A. B. Khanikaev and G. Shvets, Two-dimensional topological photonics, Nat. Photon. 11, 763 (2017).
  4. W. P. Su, J. R. Schrieffer, and A. J. Heeger, Solitons in polyacetylene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1698 (1979).
  5. P. Rebentrost, M. Mohseni, I. Kassal, S. Lloyd, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, Environment-assisted quantum transport, New J. Phys. 11, 033003 (2009).
  6. J. Prior, A. W. Chin, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Efficient simulation of strong system-environment interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 050404 (2010).
  7. D. N. Biggerstaff, R. Heilmann, A. A. Zecevik, M. Gräfe, M. A. Broome, A. Fedrizzi, S. Nolte, A. Szameit, A. G. White, and I. Kassal, Enhancing coherent transport in a photonic network using controllable decoherence, Nat. Commun. 7, 11282 (2016).
  8. A. Skalkin, R. Unanyan, and M. Fleischhauer, Dephasing enhanced transport of spin excitations in a two dimensional lossy lattice, arXiv:2502.10854.
  9. L. Esaki and R. Tsu, Superlattice and negative differential conductivity in semiconductors, IBM J. Res. Dev. 14, 61 (1970).
  10. C. Minot, Quantum model of electron transport in superlattice minibands, Phys. Rev. B 70, 161309(R) (2004).
  11. M. Atala, M. Aidelsburger, J. T. Barreiro, D. Abanin, T. Kitagawa, E. Demler, and I. Bloch, Direct measurement of the Zak phase in topological bloch bands, Nat. Phys. 9, 795 (2013).
  12. G. Cáceres-Aravena, D. Guzmán-Silva, I. Salinas, and R. A. Vicencio, Controlled transport based on multiorbital Aharonov-Bohm photonic caging, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 256602 (2022).
  13. J. G. C. Martinez, C. S. Chiu, B. M. Smitham, and A. A. Houck, Flat-band localization and interaction-induced delocalization of photons, Sci. Adv. 9, eadj7195 (2023).
  14. D. Leykam, A. Andreanov, and S. Flach, Artificial flat band systems: From lattice models to experiments, Adv. Phys.: X 3, 1473052 (2018).
  15. A. R. Kolovsky, Open Fermi-Hubbard model: Landauer's versus master equation approaches, Phys. Rev. B 102, 174310 (2020).
  16. A. R. Kolovsky, Deriving Landauer's formula by using the master equation approach, Europhys. Lett. 146, 61001 (2024).
  17. C. A. A. de Carvalho and H. M. Nussenzveig, Time delay, Phys. Rep. 364, 83 (2002).
  18. S. Ajisaka, F. Barra, C. Mejía-Monasterio, and T. Prosen, Nonequlibrium particle and energy currents in quantum chains connected to mesoscopic Fermi reservoirs, Phys. Rev. B 86, 125111 (2012).
  19. T. Zelovich, L. Kronik, and O. Hod, State representation approach for atomistic time-dependent transport calculations in molecular junctions, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 10, 2927 (2014).
  20. D. Gruss, K. A. Velizhanin, and M. Zwolak, Landauer's formula with finite-time relaxation: Kramer's crossover in electronic transport, Sci. Rep. 6, 24514 (2016).
  21. A. Buchleitner and A. R. Kolovsky, Interaction-induced decoherence of atomic Bloch oscillations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 253002 (2003).
  22. M. Žnidarič, Exact solution for a diffusive nonequilibrium steady state of an open quantum chain, J. Stat. Mech. 2010, L05002 (2010).
  23. B. Bertini, F. Heidrich-Meisner, C. Karrasch, T. Prosen, R. Steinigeweg, and M. Žnidarič, Finite-temperature transport in one-dimensional quantum lattice models, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025003 (2021).
  24. Equation (8) is also in agreement with the analytic result of Ref. [25] where the stationary current across the flux rhombic lattice is analyzed within the framework of the Markovian master equation for the boundary driven flux rhombic lattice.
  25. D. N. Maksimov (private communication).
  26. A. R. Kolovsky, Two-terminal transport in biased lattices, Phys. Rev. B 112, 155410 (2025).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation