Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Decoherence and Brownian motion of a polarizable particle near a medium

Clemens Jakubec1,2,*, Christopher Jarzynski3,†, and Kanu Sinha2,4,‡

  • *Contact author: clemens.jakubec@univie.ac.at
  • †Contact author: cjarzyns@umd.edu
  • ‡Contact author: kanu@arizona.edu

Phys. Rev. A 112, 042225 – Published 27 October, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/6m4t-jm4x

Abstract

Optically levitated nanoparticles are ideal experimental testbeds for investigating macroscopic superpositions and microscopic thermodynamics. Integrating such levitated nanoparticles with photonic structures can enable strong coupling between their center-of-mass motion and guided photonic modes, facilitating enhanced control and probing of their motion. When coupling a particle to a photonic structure, such as a waveguide, the effects of fluctuations become prominent at nanoscales. In this work, we analyze the classical and quantized center-of-mass motion of a polarizable particle interacting with the fluctuations of the electromagnetic field in the presence of a medium. We derive a position localization master equation for the particle's quantized center of mass, and examine its classical center-of-mass momentum diffusion, elucidating correspondences between classical and quantum Brownian motion of polarizable particles near media. We study the decoherence rate of the particle in the presence of a planar surface as a function of temperature and distance from the surface, comparing it to common sources of decoherence. Our results are pertinent to experiments aimed at preparing levitated nanospheres in macroscopic quantum states and investigating their Brownian dynamics.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (68)

  1. C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, M. Aspelmeyer, L. Novotny, R. Quidant, and O. Romero-Isart, Levitodynamics: Levitation and control of microscopic objects in vacuum, Science 374, eabg3027 (2021).
  2. L. Neumeier, M. A. Ciampini, O. Romero-Isart, M. Aspelmeyer, and N. Kiesel, Fast quantum interference of a nanoparticle via optical potential control, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2306953121 (2024).
  3. T. Weiss, M. Roda-Llordes, E. Torrontegui, M. Aspelmeyer, and O. Romero-Isart, Large quantum delocalization of a levitated nanoparticle using optimal control: Applications for force sensing and entangling via weak forces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 023601 (2021).
  4. U. Delić, M. Reisenbauer, K. Dare, D. Grass, V. Vuletić, N. Kiesel, and M. Aspelmeyer, Cooling of a levitated nanoparticle to the motional quantum ground state, Science 367, 892 (2020).
  5. L. Magrini, P. Rosenzweig, C. Bach, A. Deutschmann-Olek, S. G. Hofer, S. Hong, N. Kiesel, A. Kugi, and M. Aspelmeyer, Real-time optimal quantum control of mechanical motion at room temperature, Nature (London) 595, 373 (2021).
  6. F. Tebbenjohanns, M. L. Mattana, M. Rossi, M. Frimmer, and L. Novotny, Quantum control of a nanoparticle optically levitated in cryogenic free space, Nature (London) 595, 378 (2021).
  7. J. Piotrowski, D. Windey, J. Vijayan, C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, A. de los Ríos Sommer, N. Meyer, R. Quidant, O. Romero-Isart, R. Reimann, and L. Novotny, Simultaneous ground-state cooling of two mechanical modes of a levitated nanoparticle, Nat. Phys. 19, 1009 (2023).
  8. J. Rieser, M. A. Ciampini, H. Rudolph, N. Kiesel, K. Hornberger, B. A. Stickler, M. Aspelmeyer, and U. Delić, Tunable light-induced dipole-dipole interaction between optically levitated nanoparticles, Science 377, 987 (2022).
  9. M. Reisenbauer, H. Rudolph, L. Egyed, K. Hornberger, A. V. Zasedatelev, M. Abuzarli, B. A. Stickler, and U. Delić, Non-Hermitian dynamics and non-reciprocity of optically coupled nanoparticles, Nat. Phys. 20, 1629 (2024).
  10. V. Liška, T. Zemánková, P. Jákl, M. Šiler, S. H. Simpson, P. Zemánek, and O. Brzobohatý, Pt-like phase transition and limit cycle oscillations in non-reciprocally coupled optomechanical oscillators levitated in vacuum, Nat. Phys. 20, 1622 (2024).
  11. H. Rudolph, U. Delić, K. Hornberger, and B. A. Stickler, Quantum optical binding of nanoscale particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 233603 (2024).
  12. R. Diehl, E. Hebestreit, R. Reimann, F. Tebbenjohanns, M. Frimmer, and L. Novotny, Optical levitation and feedback cooling of a nanoparticle at subwavelength distances from a membrane, Phys. Rev. A 98, 013851 (2018).
  13. L. Magrini, R. A. Norte, R. Riedinger, I. Marinković, D. Grass, U. Delić, S. Gröblacher, S. Hong, and M. Aspelmeyer, Near-field coupling of a levitated nanoparticle to a photonic crystal cavity, Optica 5, 1597 (2018).
  14. M. Tschikin, S. A. Biehs, F. S. S. Rosa, and P. Ben-Abdallah, Radiative cooling of nanoparticles close to a surface, Eur. Phys. J. B 85, 233 (2012).
  15. T. Agrenius, C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, P. Maurer, and O. Romero-Isart, Interaction between an optically levitated nanoparticle and its thermal image: Internal thermometry via displacement sensing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 093601 (2023).
  16. A. A. Geraci, S. B. Papp, and J. Kitching, Short-range force detection using optically cooled levitated microspheres, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 101101 (2010).
  17. P. Schein, P. Kang, D. O'Dell, and D. Erickson, Nanophotonic force microscopy: Characterizing particle–surface interactions using near-field photonics, Nano Lett. 15, 1414 (2015).
  18. E. Hebestreit, M. Frimmer, R. Reimann, and L. Novotny, Sensing static forces with free-falling nanoparticles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 063602 (2018).
  19. H. Rudolph, U. Delić, M. Aspelmeyer, K. Hornberger, and B. A. Stickler, Force-gradient sensing and entanglement via feedback cooling of interacting nanoparticles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 193602 (2022).
  20. E. Joos and H. D. Zeh, The emergence of classical properties through interaction with the environment, Z. Phys. B 59, 223 (1985).
  21. K. Sinha and Y. Subaşı, Quantum Brownian motion of a particle from Casimir-Polder interactions, Phys. Rev. A 101, 032507 (2020).
  22. F. D. Mazzitelli, J. P. Paz, and A. Villanueva, Decoherence and recoherence from vacuum fluctuations near a conducting plate, Phys. Rev. A 68, 062106 (2003).
  23. J.-T. Hsiang and D.-S. Lee, Influence on electron coherence from quantum electromagnetic fields in the presence of conducting plates, Phys. Rev. D 73, 065022 (2006).
  24. R. Fermani, S. Scheel, and P. L. Knight, Spatial decoherence near metallic surfaces, Phys. Rev. A 73, 032902 (2006).
  25. A. Howie, Mechanisms of decoherence in electron microscopy, Ultramicroscopy 111, 761 (2011), special Issue: J. Spence's 65th birthday.
  26. S. Scheel and S. Y. Buhmann, Path decoherence of charged and neutral particles near surfaces, Phys. Rev. A 85, 030101(R) (2012).
  27. L. Martinetz, K. Hornberger, and B. A. Stickler, Surface-induced decoherence and heating of charged particles, PRX Quantum 3, 030327 (2022).
  28. C. I. Velasco, V. Di Giulio, and F. J. García de Abajo, Radiative loss of coherence in free electrons: A long-range quantum phenomenon, Light Sci. Appl. 13, 31 (2024).
  29. P. Sonnentag and F. Hasselbach, Measurement of decoherence of electron waves and visualization of the quantum-classical transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 200402 (2007).
  30. P. J. Beierle, L. Zhang, and H. Batelaan, Experimental test of decoherence theory using electron matter waves, New J. Phys. 20, 113030 (2018).
  31. N. Kerker, R. Röpke, L. M. Steinert, A. Pooch, and A. Stibor, Quantum decoherence by Coulomb interaction, New J. Phys. 22, 063039 (2020).
  32. O. Romero-Isart, Coherent inflation for large quantum superpositions of levitated microspheres, New J. Phys. 19, 123029 (2017).
  33. H. Pino, J. Prat-Camps, K. Sinha, B. P. Venkatesh, and O. Romero-Isart, On-chip quantum interference of a superconducting microsphere, Quantum Sci. Technol. 3, 025001 (2018).
  34. A. Einstein and L. Hopf, Über einen Satz der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung und seine Anwendung in der Strahlungstheorie, Ann. Phys. 338, 1096 (1910).
  35. V. Mkrtchian, V. A. Parsegian, R. Podgornik, and W. M. Saslow, Universal thermal radiation drag on neutral objects, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 220801 (2003).
  36. G. Łach, M. DeKieviet, and U. D. Jentschura, Enhancement of blackbody friction due to the finite lifetime of atomic levels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 043005 (2012).
  37. H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007).
  38. W. H. Zurek, Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 715 (2003).
  39. K. Sinha and P. W. Milonni, Dipoles in blackbody radiation: momentum fluctuations, decoherence, and drag force, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 55, 204002 (2022).
  40. M. A. Schlosshauer, Decoherence: And the Quantum-to-Classical Transition (Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, 2007).
  41. S. Buhmann, Dispersion Forces I: Macroscopic Quantum Electrodynamics and Ground-State Casimir, Casimir–Polder and van der Waals Forces, Springer Tracts in Modern Physics (Springer, Berlin, 2013).
  42. S. Buhmann, Dispersion Forces II: Many-Body Effects, Excited Atoms, Finite Temperature and Quantum Friction, Springer Tracts in Modern Physics (Springer, Berlin, 2013).
  43. J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1999).
  44. H. B. G. Casimir and D. Polder, The influence of retardation on the London-van der Waals forces, Phys. Rev. 73, 360 (1948).
  45. C. Jakubec, P. Solano, U. Delić, and K. Sinha, Fluctuation-induced forces on nanospheres in external fields, Phys. Rev. A 109, 052807 (2024).
  46. J. Dalibard and C. Cohen-Tannoudji, Atomic motion in laser light: Connection between semiclassical and quantum descriptions, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 18, 1661 (1985).
  47. J. J. Halliwell and T. Yu, Alternative derivation of the Hu-Paz-Zhang master equation of quantum Brownian motion, Phys. Rev. D 53, 2012 (1996).
  48. P. Ehrenfest, Bemerkung über die angenäherte Gültigkeit der klassischen Mechanik innerhalb der Quantenmechanik, Z. Phys. 45, 455 (1927).
  49. H. P. Baltes, Comment on blackbody radiation in small cavities, Am. J. Phys. 42, 505 (1974).
  50. P. Milonni, An Introduction to Quantum Optics and Quantum Fluctuations, Oxford Graduate Texts (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2019).
  51. A. Grinin, A. Dana, M. Nguyen, E. Alejandro, and A. A. Geraci, A method for optically trapping nanospheres at micron range from a tilted mirror, arXiv:2504.18389.
  52. I. Pirozhenko, A. Lambrecht, and V. B. Svetovoy, Sample dependence of the Casimir force, New J. Phys. 8, 238 (2006).
  53. E. D. Palik, Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids (Elsevier, London, 1998).
  54. M. Oelschläger, D. Reiche, C. H. Egerland, K. Busch, and F. Intravaia, Electromagnetic viscosity in complex structured environments: From blackbody to quantum friction, Phys. Rev. A 106, 052205 (2022).
  55. V. A. Golyk, M. Krüger, and M. Kardar, Linear response relations in fluctuational electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. B 88, 155117 (2013).
  56. M. Arndt, S. Gerlich, and K. Hornberger, Experimental decoherence in molecule interferometry, in From Quantum to Classical: Essays in Honour of H.-Dieter Zeh, edited by C. Kiefer (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2022), pp. 65–83.
  57. K. Hornberger, S. Uttenthaler, B. Brezger, L. Hackermüller, M. Arndt, and A. Zeilinger, Collisional decoherence observed in matter wave interferometry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 160401 (2003).
  58. S. Gerlich, S. Eibenberger, M. Tomandl, S. Nimmrichter, K. Hornberger, P. J. Fagan, J. Tüxen, M. Mayor, and M. Arndt, Quantum interference of large organic molecules, Nat. Commun. 2, 263 (2011).
  59. L. Hackermüller, K. Hornberger, B. Brezger, A. Zeilinger, and M. Arndt, Decoherence of matter waves by thermal emission of radiation, Nature (London) 427, 711 (2004).
  60. T. W. van de Kamp, R. J. Marshman, S. Bose, and A. Mazumdar, Quantum gravity witness via entanglement of masses: Casimir screening, Phys. Rev. A 102, 062807 (2020).
  61. P. Fragolino, M. Schut, M. Toroš, S. Bose, and A. Mazumdar, Decoherence of a matter-wave interferometer due to dipole-dipole interactions, Phys. Rev. A 109, 033301 (2024).
  62. C. Brand, M. Sclafani, C. Knobloch, Y. Lilach, T. Juffmann, J. Kotakoski, C. Mangler, A. Winter, A. Turchanin, J. Meyer, O. Cheshnovsky, and M. Arndt, An atomically thin matter-wave beamsplitter, Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 845 (2015).
  63. M. Schut, H. Bosma, M. Wu, M. Toroš, S. Bose, and A. Mazumdar, Dephasing due to electromagnetic interactions in spatial qubits, Phys. Rev. A 110, 022412 (2024).
  64. K. Sinha and P. W. Milonni, Scalar QED model for polarizable particles in thermal equilibrium or in hyperbolic motion in vacuum, Physics 6, 356 (2024).
  65. A. Biggs and J. Maldacena, Comparing the decoherence effects due to black holes versus ordinary matter, arXiv:2405.02227.
  66. D. L. Danielson, G. Satishchandran, and R. M. Wald, Black holes decohere quantum superpositions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 31, 2241003 (2022).
  67. S. E. Gralla and H. Wei, Decoherence from horizons: General formulation and rotating black holes, Phys. Rev. D 109, 065031 (2024).
  68. J. Wilson-Gerow, A. Dugad, and Y. Chen, Decoherence by warm horizons, Phys. Rev. D 110, 045002 (2024).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation