Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Generalization bounds in hybrid quantum-classical machine learning models

Tongyan Wu1,*, Amine Bentellis2, Alona Sakhnenko1, and Jeanette Miriam Lorenz3,†

  • *Contact author: tongyan.wu@tum.de
  • †Contact author: jeanette.miriam.lorenz@iks.fraunhofer.de

Phys. Rev. A 113, 022425 – Published 17 February, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/6ckt-hlh8

Abstract

Hybrid quantum-classical models aim to harness the strengths of both quantum computing and classical machine learning, but their practical potential remains poorly understood. In this work, we develop a unified mathematical framework for analyzing generalization in hybrid models, offering insight into how these systems learn from data. We establish a generalization bound of the form Õ(αkN(k32mn+TlogT)) for N training data points, T trainable quantum gates, n-dimensional quantum circuit output, and k bounded linear layers ∥Fi∥F≤α, where i=1,⋯,k and F∈Rm×n interspersed with activation functions. This generalization bound decomposes into quantum and classical contributions, providing a theoretical framework to separate their influence and clarifying their interaction. Alongside the bound, we highlight conceptual limitations of applying classical statistical learning theory in the hybrid setting and suggest promising directions for future theoretical work.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (32)

  1. M. C. Caro, H.-Y. Huang, M. Cerezo, K. Sharma, A. Sornborger, L. Cincio, and P. J. Coles, Generalization in quantum machine learning from few training data, Nat. Commun. 13, 4919 (2022).
  2. A. Abbas, D. Sutter, C. Zoufal, A. Lucchi, A. Figalli, and S. Woerner, The power of quantum neural networks, Nat. Comput. Sci. 1, 403 (2021).
  3. H.-Y. Huang, M. Broughton, M. Mohseni, R. Babbush, S. Boixo, H. Neven, and J. R. McClean, Power of data in quantum machine learning, Nat. Commun. 12, 2631 (2021).
  4. C. Zoufal, A. Lucchi, and S. Woerner, Quantum generative adversarial networks for learning and loading random distributions, npj Quantum Inf. 5, 103 (2019).
  5. M. Kālis, A. Locāns, R. Šikovs, H. Naseri, and A. Ambainis, A hybrid quantum-classical approach for inference on restricted boltzmann machines, Quantum Mach. Intell. 5, 44 (2023).
  6. A. Sakhnenko, C. O'Meara, K. J. B. Ghosh, C. B. Mendl, G. Cortiana, and J. Bernabé-Moreno, Hybrid classical-quantum autoencoder for anomaly detection, Quantum Mach. Intell. 4, 27 (2022).
  7. A. Matic, M. Monnet, J. M. Lorenz, B. Schachtner, and T. Messerer, Quantum-classical convolutional neural networks in radiological image classification, in 2022 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) (IEEE, Broomfield, CO, USA, 2022), pp. 56–66.
  8. K. Gili, M. Hibat-Allah, M. Mauri, C. Ballance, and A. Perdomo-Ortiz, Do quantum circuit born machines generalize? Quantum Sci. Technol. 8, 035021 (2023).
  9. R. Sweke, J.-P. Seifert, D. Hangleiter, and J. Eisert, On the quantum versus classical learnability of discrete distributions, Quantum 5, 417 (2021).
  10. P. L. Bartlett, D. J. Foster, and M. Telgarsky, Spectrally-normalized margin bounds for neural networks, in Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS'17) (Curran Associates, Inc., Long Beach, CA, USA, 2017), pp. 6241–6250.
  11. F. He and D. Tao, Recent advances in deep learning theory, arXiv:2012.10931.
  12. A. Abbas, D. Sutter, A. Figalli, and S. Woerner, Effective dimension of machine learning models, arXiv:2112.04807 .
  13. C. Zhang, S. Bengio, M. Hardt, B. Recht, and O. Vinyals, Understanding deep learning (still) requires rethinking generalization, Commun. ACM 64, 107 (2021).
  14. J. Biamonte, P. Wittek, N. Pancotti, P. Rebentrost, N. Wiebe, and S. Lloyd, Quantum machine learning, Nature (London) 549, 195 (2017).
  15. M. Schuld, I. Sinayskiy, and F. Petruccione, An introduction to quantum machine learning, Contemp. Phys. 56, 172 (2015).
  16. M. Monnet, N. Chaabani, T.-A. Drăgan, B. Schachtner, and J. M. Lorenz, Understanding the effects of data encoding on quantum-classical convolutional neural networks, in 2024 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) (IEEE, Montral, QC, Canada, 2024), pp. 1436–1446.
  17. M. Schuld, R. Sweke, and J. J. Meyer, Effect of data encoding on the expressive power of variational quantum-machine-learning models, Phys. Rev. A 103, 032430 (2021).
  18. S. Lin and J. Zhang, Generalization bounds for convolutional neural networks, arXiv:1910.01487 .
  19. B. Neyshabur, R. Tomioka, and N. Srebro, Norm-based capacity control in neural networks, in Proceedings of The 28th Conference on Learning Theory, Proceedings of Machine Learning Research Vol. 40, edited by P. Grünwald, E. Hazan, and S. Kale (PMLR, Paris, 2015), pp. 1376–1401.
  20. B. Neyshabur, S. Bhojanapalli, and N. Srebro, A PAC-bayesian approach to spectrally-normalized margin bounds for neural networks, in International Conference on Learning Representations (2018).
  21. M. Anthony and P. L. Bartlett, Neural Network Learning: Theoretical Foundations (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 1999).
  22. P. L. Bartlett and S. Mendelson, Rademacher and gaussian complexities: risk bounds and structural results, J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 463 (2003).
  23. M. M. Wolf, Mathematical foundations of supervised learning (2023), https://mediatum.ub.tum.de/node?id=1723378.
  24. R. M. Dudley, Uniform Central Limit Theorems (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1999).
  25. S. Shalev-Shwartz and S. Ben-David, Understanding Machine learning: From Theory to Algorithms (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2014).
  26. E. Gil-Fuster, J. Eisert, and C. Bravo-Prieto, Understanding quantum machine learning also requires rethinking generalization, Nat. Commun. 15, 2277 (2024).
  27. A. Canatar, B. Bordelon, and C. Pehlevan, Spectral bias and task-model alignment explain generalization in kernel regression and infinitely wide neural networks, Nat. Commun. 12, 2914 (2021).
  28. M. Belkin, S. Ma, and S. Mandal, To understand deep learning we need to understand kernel learning, in International Conference on Machine Learning (PMLR, 2018), pp. 541–549.
  29. J. Liu, F. Tacchino, J. R. Glick, L. Jiang, and A. Mezzacapo, Representation learning via quantum neural tangent kernels, PRX Quantum 3, 030323 (2022).
  30. M. Incudini, M. Grossi, A. Mandarino, S. Vallecorsa, A. D. Pierro, and D. Windridge, The quantum path kernel: A generalized neural tangent kernel for deep quantum machine learning, IEEE Trans. Quantum Eng. 4, 1 (2023).
  31. P. Bermejo, P. Braccia, M. S. Rudolph, Z. Holmes, L. Cincio, and M. Cerezo, Quantum convolutional neural networks are (effectively) classically simulable, arXiv:2408.12739.
  32. M. Ledoux and M. Talagrand, Probability in Banach Spaces: Isoperimetry and Processes, Classics in Mathematics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation