Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Optomechanical systems with linear and quadratic position couplings: Dynamics and optimal estimation

Yaqing Xy Wang*

Claudio Sanavio†

Jozsef Zsolt Bernád‡

  • *Contact author: yaq.wang@fz-juelich.de
  • †Contact author: claudio.sanavio@iit.it
  • ‡Contact author: j.bernad@fz-juelich.de

Phys. Rev. A 113, 023504 – Published 3 February, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/5dzx-dhql

Abstract

We study the dynamics of an optomechanical system consisting of a single-mode optical field coupled to a mechanical oscillator, where the nonlinear interaction includes both linear and quadratic terms in the oscillator's position. We present an analytical solution to this quantum-mechanical Hamiltonian problem by employing the formalism of two-phonon coherent states. Quantum estimation theory is applied to the resulting state of the optical field, with a focus on evaluating the quantum Fisher information with respect to the strength of the quadratic coupling. Our estimation scheme employs balanced homodyne photodetection and demonstrates that the corresponding classical Fisher information can reach the quantum Fisher information limit, with the phase of the local coherent oscillator playing a crucial role.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (43)

  1. M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 1391 (2014).
  2. S. Barzanjeh, A. Xuereb, S. Gröblacher, M. Paternostro, C. A. Regal, and E. M. Weig, Nat. Phys. 18, 15 (2022).
  3. S. Qvarfort, A. Serafini, P. F. Barker, and S. Bose, Nat. Commun. 9, 3690 (2018).
  4. R. W. Andrews, A. P. Reed, K. Cicak, J. D. Teufel, and K. W. Lehnert, Nat. Commun. 6, 10021 (2015).
  5. M. Forsch, R. Stockill, A. Wallucks, I. Marinković, C. Gärtner, R. A. Norte, F. van Otten, A. Fiore, K. Srinivasan, and S. Gröblacher, Nat. Phys. 16, 69 (2020).
  6. V. Peano, M. Houde, F. Marquardt, and A. A. Clerk, Phys. Rev. X 6, 041026 (2016).
  7. C. Sanavio, V. Peano, and A. Xuereb, Phys. Rev. B 101, 085108 (2020).
  8. J. Z. Bernád, C. Sanavio, and A. Xuereb, Phys. Rev. A 97, 063821 (2018), a typographical error in Eq. (69) and its related consequences have been corrected in arXiv:1712.09712.
  9. C. Sanavio, J. Z. Bernád, and A. Xuereb, Phys. Rev. A 102, 013508 (2020).
  10. F. Schneiter, S. Qvarfort, A. Serafini, A. Xuereb, D. Braun, D. Rätzel, and D. E. Bruschi, Phys. Rev. A 101, 033834 (2020).
  11. S. Carrasco and M. Orszag, Phys. Rev. A 105, 043508 (2022).
  12. L. Ruppert, A. Rakhubovsky, and R. Filip, Sci. Rep. 12, 16022 (2022).
  13. C. M. Sanavio, J. Z. Bernád, and A. Xuereb, Phys. Rev. A 105, 032423 (2022).
  14. J.-X. Peng, Z.-X. Liu, M. Asjad, and N. Akhtar, Opt. Lett. 49, 2249 (2024).
  15. J.-X. Peng, P. Djorwe, H. T. Cui, N. Akhtar, I. U. Haq, C. Zhao, and D. Li, Phys. Rev. A 111, 012607 (2025).
  16. H. van Trees, Detection, Estimation and Modulation Theory (Wiley, New York, 1968).
  17. S. M. Kay, Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 2009).
  18. C. K. Law, Phys. Rev. A 49, 433 (1994).
  19. C. K. Law, Phys. Rev. A 51, 2537 (1995).
  20. A. A. Gangat, T. M. Stace, and G. J. Milburn, New J. Phys. 13, 043024 (2011).
  21. A. A. Reynoso, G. Usaj, D. L. Chafatinos, F. Mangussi, A. E. Bruchhausen, A. S. Kuznetsov, K. Biermann, P. V. Santos, and A. Fainstein, Phys. Rev. B 105, 195310 (2022).
  22. S. Khorasani, Phys. Rep. 1046, 1 (2024).
  23. K. Sala, T. Doicin, A. D. Armour, and T. Tufarelli, Phys. Rev. A 104, 033508 (2021).
  24. H. P. Yuen, Phys. Rev. A 13, 2226 (1976).
  25. C. W. Helstrom, J. Stat. Phys. 1, 231 (1969).
  26. M. G. A. Paris, Int. J. Quantum Inform. 07, 125 (2009).
  27. J. Z. Bernád, H. Frydrych, and G. Alber, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 46, 235501 (2013).
  28. R. J. Glauber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 84 (1963).
  29. E. C. G. Sudarshan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 277 (1963).
  30. H. Yuen and J. Shapiro, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 24, 657 (1978).
  31. J. Shapiro, H. Yuen, and A. Mata, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 25, 179 (1979).
  32. L. Mandel and E. Wolf, Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995).
  33. C. K. D. Law and J. Z. Bernád, Phys. Rev. A 111, 042218 (2025).
  34. M. Tsang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 230401 (2012).
  35. A. Holevo, J. Multivar. Anal. 3, 337 (1973).
  36. J. Liu, J. Chen, X.-X. Jing, and X. Wang, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 49, 275302 (2016).
  37. T. Tyc and B. C. Sanders, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 37, 7341 (2004).
  38. J. D. Thompson, B. M. Zwickl, A. M. Jayich, F. Marquardt, S. M. Girvin, and J. G. E. Harris, Nature (London) 452, 72 (2008).
  39. H. K. Cheung and C. K. Law, Phys. Rev. A 84, 023812 (2011).
  40. M. Karuza, M. Galassi, C. Biancofiore, C. Molinelli, R. Natali, P. Tombesi, G. Di Giuseppe, and D. Vitali, J. Opt. (Bristol, U. K.) 15, 025704 (2013).
  41. J. C. Sankey, C. Yang, B. M. Zwickl, A. M. Jayich, and J. G. E. Harris, Nat. Phys. 6, 707 (2010).
  42. C. Genes, A. Mari, P. Tombesi, and D. Vitali, Phys. Rev. A 78, 032316 (2008).
  43. Y. X. Wang (2025), https://github.com/Xyeeee/MPSOM.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation