Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access

Interference in phase space and phase-only reconstruction

André Knoll1,*, Leon Cohen2, and Wolfgang P. Schleich1,2,3

  • 1Institut für Quantenphysik and Center for Integrated Quantum Science and Technology (IQST), Universität Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, D-89069 Ulm, Germany
  • 2Institute for Quantum Science and Engineering (IQSE), Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-4242, USA
  • 3Hagler Institute for Advanced Study, and Department of Physics and Astronomy and Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-4242, USA

  • *Contact author: andre.knoll@uni-ulm.de

Phys. Rev. A 112, 062210 – Published 8 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/3jjy-8f99

Abstract

We demonstrate that the Fourier transform of a function leads to interference effects in phase space which allow the reconstruction of the essential properties of the original function, even when we restrict the inverse Fourier transform to the phase factor rather than the complete Fourier transform. We analyze this phase-only reconstruction, known from signal processing, in quantum mechanics for the elementary example of a superposition of two real-valued Gaussians. We employ the Wigner function as well as techniques of semiclassical quantum mechanics to show that their key features, such as their separation and their width, are indeed encoded in the phase of the Fourier transform. For this example, the amplitude-only reconstruction performing the inverse Fourier transform of the absolute value of the Fourier transform fails.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (34)

  1. A. V. Oppenheim and J. S. Lim, The importance of phase in signals, Proc. IEEE 69, 529 (1981).
  2. Y. Shapiro and M. Porat, Image representation and reconstruction from spectral amplitude or phase, in 1998 IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems. Surfing the Waves of Science and Technology (Cat. No. 98EX196) (IEEE, Piscataway, 1980), Vol. 2, pp. 461–464.
  3. M. Hayes, J. Lim, and A. Oppenheim, Phase-only signal reconstruction, in ICASSP '80. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (IEEE, Piscataway, 1980), Vol. 5, pp. 437–440.
  4. Y. Shechtman, Y. C. Eldar, O. Cohen, H. N. Chapman, J. Miao, and M. Segev, Phase retrieval with application to optical imaging: A contemporary overview, IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 32, 87 (2015).
  5. D. J. Griffiths, Introduction to Quantum Mechanics (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1995).
  6. E. P. Wigner, On the quantum correction for thermodynamic equilibrium, Phys. Rev. 40, 749 (1932).
  7. M. Hillery, R. F. O'Connell, M. O. Scully, and E. P. Wigner, Distribution functions in physics: Fundamentals, Phys. Rep. 106, 121 (1984).
  8. W. P. Schleich, Quantum Optics in Phase Space (Wiley, New York, 2001).
  9. J. P. Dowling, W. P. Schleich, and J. A. Wheeler, Interference in phase space, Ann. Phys. 503, 423 (1991).
  10. R. Gonzalez and R. Woods, Digital Image Processing (Pearson, London, 2017).
  11. Wikimedia Commons, File:RAU 7291.jpg—wikimedia commons, the free media repository (2024), https://commons. wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:RAU_7291.jpg&oldid=968966510.
  12. J. S. Walker, Fast Fourier Transforms (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1996).
  13. W. P. Schleich and M. G. Raymer, Special issue on quantum state preparation and measurement, J. Mod. Opt. 44, 2021 (1997).
  14. D. Leibfried, D. M. Meekhof, B. E. King, C. Monroe, W. M. Itano, and D. J. Wineland, Experimental determination of the motional quantum state of a trapped atom, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4281 (1996).
  15. S. Déléglise, I. Dotsenko, C. Sayrin, J. Bernu, M. Brune, J.-M. Raimond, and S. Haroche, Reconstruction of non-classical cavity field states with snapshots of their decoherence, Nature (London) 455, 510 (2008).
  16. S. Hatanaka and J. Yamasaki, Reconstruction of the Wigner function of electron beams based on coherence measurements, Phys. Rev. A 110, 013702 (2024).
  17. J. Radon, On the determination of functions from their integral values along certain manifolds, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 5, 170 (1986).
  18. Quanten, edited by W. Bothe, J. Franck, P. Jordan, H. Kulenkampff, R. Ladenburg, W. Noddack, W. Pauli, P. Pringsheim, and H. Geiger, Handbuch der Physik Vol. 23, (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1926), p. VIII, 786.
  19. H. Reichenbach, Philosophic Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (University of California, Berkley, 1944).
  20. M. Sabuncu, G. Leuchs, and U. L. Andersen, Experimental continuous-variable cloning of partial quantum information, Phys. Rev. A 78, 052312 (2008).
  21. K. Kobayashi, K. Fujii, and N. Yamamoto, Feedback-driven quantum reservoir computing for time-series analysis, PRX Quantum 5, 040325 (2024).
  22. L. Wang, P. Sun, L.-J. Kong, Y. Sun, and X. Zhang, Quantum next-generation reservoir computing and its quantum optical implementation, Phys. Rev. A 111, 022609 (2025).
  23. Mathematical Methods for Physicists, 7th ed., edited by G. B. Arfken, H.-J. Weber, and F. E. Harris (Academic Press, New York, 2013).
  24. W. Schleich, M. Pernigo, and F. Le Kien, Nonclassical state from two pseudoclassical states, Phys. Rev. A 44, 2172 (1991).
  25. P. Virtanen et al. (SciPy 1.0 Contributors), SciPy 1.0:fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python, Nat. Methods 17, 261 (2019).
  26. P. Theodor, Time-frequency analysis, by L. Cohen, Prentice Hall Signal Processing Series, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1995 - Book review, Control Eng. Pract. 5, 292 (1997).
  27. P. J. Loughlin, J. W. Pitton, and L. E. Atlas, Bilinear time-frequency representations: New insights and properties, IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 41, 750 (1993).
  28. W. J. Williams, Reduced interference time-frequency distributions: Scaled decompositions and interpretations, in Wavelet Transforms and Time-Frequency Signal Analysis, edited by L. Debnath (Birkhäuser, Boston, 2001), pp. 381–417.
  29. J. Jeong and W. J. Williams, Kernel design for reduced interference distributions, IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 40, 402 (1992).
  30. Y. Zhao, L. E. Atlas, and R. J. Marks, The use of cone-shaped kernels for generalized time-frequency representations of nonstationary signals, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 38, 1084 (1990).
  31. R. G. Baraniuk and D. L. Jones, Optimal kernels for time-frequency analysis, in Advanced Signal Processing Algorithms, Architectures, and Implementations, edited by F. T. Luk (SPIE, Bellingham, 1990), Vol. 1348, pp. 181–187.
  32. H. Margenau and R. N. Hill, Correlation between measurements in quantum theory, Prog. Theor. Phys. 26, 722 (1961).
  33. M. H. Hayes, The reconstruction of a multidimensional sequence from the phase or magnitude of its Fourier transform, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 30, 140 (1982).
  34. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation