Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Three-dimensional cavity-based graphene superconducting quantum circuits in two-circuit joint-readout architectures

Kuei-Lin Chiu1,2,*,†, Avishma J. Lasrado1,2,*, Cheng-Han Lo1,2,*, Yen-Chih Chen1,2, Shi-Bo Shi1,2, Yen-Hsiang Lin3, and Chung-Ting Ke4

  • *These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • †Contact author: klc@mail.nsysu.edu.tw

APS Open Sci. 1, 000101 – Published 24 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/qtsh-l54f

Abstract

We construct a series of graphene-based superconducting quantum circuits and integrate them into three-dimensional (3D) cavities. For a device exhibiting single-qubit behavior, we demonstrate flux-tunable qubit transition, with a relaxation time T1≈48ns measured in one cooldown at a reduced qubit frequency of 3.65GHz, and a separate power-broadening-based lower bound T2*≳17.63ns at the sweet spot in an earlier cooldown at fq≈8.07GHz. By coupling the device to cavities with different resonant frequencies, we access multiple qubit-cavity coupling regimes, enabling the observation of vacuum Rabi splitting and flux-dependent spectral linewidths. In a two-circuit device consisting of a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) and a single junction, power-dependent measurements reveal a two-stage dispersive shift. By flux tuning the cavity frequency at different readout powers, we attribute the first shift to the fixed qubit and the second to the SQUID qubit, indicating successful coupling between the two circuits and a single cavity mode. Our study demonstrates the flexible coupling achievable between two-dimensional (2D)-material-based flux-tunable superconducting circuits and 3D cavities, and paves the way toward constructing multicircuit 3D transmonlike devices from 2D materials.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (41)

  1. J. G. Kroll, W. Uilhoorn, K. L. van der Enden, D. de Jong, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, S. Goswami, M. C. Cassidy, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, Magnetic field compatible circuit quantum electrodynamics with graphene Josephson junctions, Nat. Commun. 9, 4615 (2018).
  2. J. I.-J. Wang, D. Rodan-Legrain, L. Bretheau, D. L. Campbell, B. Kannan, D. Kim, M. Kjaergaard, P. Krantz, G. O. Samach, F. Yan, et al., Coherent control of a hybrid superconducting circuit made with graphene-based van der Waals heterostructures, Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 120 (2019).
  3. L. Casparis, M. R. Connolly, M. Kjaergaard, N. J. Pearson, A. Kringhøj, T. W. Larsen, F. Kuemmeth, T. Wang, C. Thomas, S. Gronin, et al., Superconducting gatemon qubit based on a proximitized two-dimensional electron gas, Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 915 (2018).
  4. A. Hertel, M. Eichinger, L. O. Andersen, D. M. van Zanten, S. Kallatt, P. Scarlino, A. Kringhøj, J. M. Chavez-Garcia, G. C. Gardner, S. Gronin, et al., Gate-tunable transmon using selective-area-grown superconductor-semiconductor hybrid structures on silicon, Phys. Rev. Appl. 18, 034042 (2022).
  5. C.-H. Lo, Y.-H. Chen, A. J. Lasrado, T. Kuo, Y.-Y. Chang, T.-Y. Hsu, Y.-C. Chen, G.-P. Guo, and K.-L. Chiu, Superconducting quantum circuits based on 2D materials, SPIN 13, 2340021 (2023).
  6. T. W. Larsen, K. D. Petersson, F. Kuemmeth, T. S. Jespersen, P. Krogstrup, J. Nygård, and C. M. Marcus, Semiconductor-nanowire-based superconducting qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 127001 (2015).
  7. G. de Lange, B. van Heck, A. Bruno, D. J. van Woerkom, A. Geresdi, S. R. Plissard, E. P. A. M. Bakkers, A. R. Akhmerov, and L. DiCarlo, Realization of microwave quantum circuits using hybrid superconducting-semiconducting nanowire Josephson elements, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 127002 (2015).
  8. J. Huo, Z. Xia, Z. Li, S. Zhang, Y. Wang, D. Pan, Q. Liu, Y. Liu, Z. Wang, Y. Gao, et al., Gatemon qubit based on a thin InAs-Al hybrid nanowire, Chin. Phys. Lett. 40, 047302 (2023).
  9. K.-L. Chiu and Y. Xu, Single-electron transport in graphene-like nanostructures, Phys. Rep. 669, 1 (2017).
  10. F. E. Schmidt, M. D. Jenkins, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and G. A. Steele, A ballistic graphene superconducting microwave circuit, Nat. Commun. 9, 4069 (2018).
  11. X. Liu and M. C. Hersam, 2D materials for quantum information science, Nat. Rev. Mater. 4, 669 (2019).
  12. K. L. Chiu, Single electron transport and possible quantum computing in 2D materials, in 21st Century Nanoscience—A Handbook: Nanophotonics, Nanoelectronics, and Nanoplasmonics, edited by K. D. Sattler (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2020), pp. 13-1–13-48.
  13. I. Siddiqi, Engineering high-coherence superconducting qubits, Nat. Rev. Mater. 6, 875 (2021).
  14. A. Antony, M. V. Gustafsson, G. J. Ribeill, M. Ware, A. Rajendran, L. C. G. Govia, T. A. Ohki, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. Hone, et al., Miniaturizing transmon qubits using van der Waals materials, Nano Lett. 21, 10122 (2021).
  15. J. Î.-J. Wang, M. A. Yamoah, Q. Li, A. H. Karamlou, T. Dinh, B. Kannan, J. Braumüller, D. Kim, A. J. Melville, S. E. Muschinske, et al., Hexagonal boron nitride as a low-loss dielectric for superconducting quantum circuits and qubits, Nat. Mater. 21, 398 (2022).
  16. M. Tanaka, J. Î.-J. Wang, T. H. Dinh, D. Rodan-Legrain, S. Zaman, M. Hays, A. Almanakly, B. Kannan, D. K. Kim, B. M. Niedzielski, et al., Superfluid stiffness of magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene, Nature (London) 638, 99 (2025).
  17. K.-L. Chiu, A. J. Lasrado, C.-H. Lo, C.-T. Ke, V. Mosallanejad, and Y.-H. Lin, Integrating quantum materials into superconducting qubits, Mater. Quantum Technol. 5, 023002 (2025).
  18. F. Luthi, T. Stavenga, O. W. Enzing, A. Bruno, C. Dickel, N. K. Langford, M. A. Rol, T. S. Jespersen, J. Nygård, P. Krogstrup, et al., Evolution of nanowire transmon qubits and their coherence in a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 100502 (2018).
  19. T. W. Larsen, M. E. Gershenson, L. Casparis, A. Kringhøj, N. J. Pearson, R. P. G. McNeil, F. Kuemmeth, P. Krogstrup, K. D. Petersson, and C. M. Marcus, Parity-protected superconductor-semiconductor qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 056801 (2020).
  20. M. Pita-Vidal, A. Bargerbos, C.-K. Yang, D. J. van Woerkom, W. Pfaff, N. Haider, P. Krogstrup, L. P. Kouwenhoven, G. de Lange, and A. Kou, Gate-tunable field-compatible fluxonium, Phys. Rev. Appl. 14, 064038 (2020).
  21. W. M. Strickland, B. H. Elfeky, L. Baker, A. Maiani, J. Lee, I. Levy, J. Issokson, A. Vrajitoarea, and J. Shabani, Gatemonium: A voltage-tunable fluxonium, PRX Quantum 6, 010326 (2025).
  22. J. Balgley, J. Park, X. Chu, E. G. Arnault, M. V. Gustafsson, L. Ranzani, M. Holbrook, Y. He, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, et al., Crystalline superconductor-semiconductor Josephson junctions for compact superconducting qubits, Phys. Rev. Appl. 24, 034016 (2025).
  23. N. Aparicio, S. Messelot, E. Bonet-Orozco, E. Eyraud, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Coraux, and J. Renard, Gate-tunable spectrum and charge dispersion mitigation in a graphene superconducting qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 266001 (2025).
  24. A. D’Elia, F. Chiarello, D. Di Gioacchino, A. Piedjou Komnang, A. Giachero, C. Ligi, G. Maccarrone, F. Mattioli, C. Pira, A. Rettaroli, et al., Coherent oscillations in weakly anharmonic NbSe2 qubit, arXiv:2509.17160.
  25. D. Zoepfl, P. R. Muppalla, C. M. F. Schneider, S. Kasemann, S. Partel, and G. Kirchmair, Characterization of low loss microstrip resonators as a building block for circuit QED in a 3D waveguide, AIP Adv. 7, 085118 (2017).
  26. K.-L. Chiu, Y. Chang, A. J. Lasrado, C.-H. Lo, Y.-H. Chen, T.-Y. Hsu, Y.-C. Chen, Y.-C. Tsai, Samina, Y.-H. Lin, et al., Integration of graphene-based superconducting quantum circuits in a three-dimensional cavity, Phys. Rev. Appl. 23, 034059 (2025).
  27. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/qtsh-l54f for details on device fabrication, the measurement setup and 3D cavity calibration, qubit-cavity detuning analysis for device 1 across cooldowns, coherence time (T1, T2*) measurements and analysis, HFSS/Maxwell simulations of the fixed-qubit coupling strength and capacitance in device 2, and additional power- and flux-dependence data for device 2 across multiple cooldowns, which includes Refs. [28, 29, 30, 31].
  28. D. R. Dean, Y. F. Young, I. Meric, C. Lee, L. Wang, S. Sorgenfrei, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, P. Kim, S. L. Shepard, et al., Boron nitride substrates for high-quality graphene electronics, Nat. Nanotechnol. 5, 722 (2010).
  29. A. S. Mayorov, R. V. Gorbachev, S. V. Morozov, L. Britnell, R. Jalil, L. A. Ponomarenko, P. Blake, K. S. Novoselov, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, et al., Micrometer-scale ballistic transport in encapsulated graphene at room temperature, Nano Lett. 11, 2396 (2011).
  30. S. J. Haigh, A. Gholinia, R. Jalil, S. Romani, L. Britnell, D. C. Elias, K. S. Novoselov, L. A. Ponomarenko, A. K. Geim, and R. Gorbachev, Cross-sectional imaging of individual layers and buried interfaces of graphene-based heterostructures and superlattices, Nat. Mater. 11, 764 (2012).
  31. J. Koch, T. M. Yu, J. Gambetta, A. A. Houck, D. I. Schuster, J. Majer, A. Blais, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box, Phys. Rev. A 76, 042319 (2007).
  32. L. Wang, I. Meric, P. Y. Huang, Q. Gao, Y. Gao, H. Tran, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, L. M. Campos, D. A. Muller, et al., One-dimensional electrical contact to a two-dimensional material, Science 342, 614 (2013).
  33. P. Krantz, M. Kjaergaard, F. Yan, T. P. Orlando, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver, A quantum engineer's guide to superconducting qubits, Appl. Phys. Rev. 6, 021318 (2019).
  34. A. Blais, R.-S. Huang, A. Wallraff, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Cavity quantum electrodynamics for superconducting electrical circuits: An architecture for quantum computation, Phys. Rev. A 69, 062320 (2004).
  35. J. Gambetta, A. Blais, D. I. Schuster, A. Wallraff, L. Frunzio, J. Majer, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Qubit-photon interactions in a cavity: Measurement-induced dephasing and number splitting, Phys. Rev. A 74, 042318 (2006).
  36. M. Boissonneault, J. M. Gambetta, and A. Blais, Nonlinear dispersive regime of cavity QED: The dressed dephasing model, Phys. Rev. A 77, 060305(R) (2008).
  37. D. I. Schuster, A. Wallraff, A. Blais, L. Frunzio, R.-S. Huang, J. Majer, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, ac Stark shift and dephasing of a superconducting qubit strongly coupled to a cavity field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 123602 (2005).
  38. L. S. Bishop, J. M. Chow, J. Koch, A. A. Houck, M. H. Devoret, E. Thuneberg, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Nonlinear response of the vacuum Rabi resonance, Nat. Phys. 5, 105 (2009).
  39. X. Sun, B. Li, E. Zhuo, Z. Lyu, Z. Ji, J. Fan, X. Song, F. Qu, G. Liu, J. Shen, et al., Realization of superconducting transmon qubits based on topological insulator nanowires, Appl. Phys. Lett. 122, 154001 (2023).
  40. G. Ithier, Manipulation, readout and analysis of the decoherence of a superconducting quantum bit, Ph.D. thesis, Université Pierre et Marie Curie—Paris VI, 2005.
  41. S. Filipp, P. Maurer, P. J. Leek, M. Baur, R. Bianchetti, J. M. Fink, M. Göppl, L. Steffen, J. M. Gambetta, A. Blais, et al., Two-qubit state tomography using a joint dispersive readout, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 200402 (2009).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation